Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Acta Oncol ; 52(1): 147-52, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22686472

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Re-irradiation using high-precision radiation techniques has been established within the clinical routine for patients with recurrent gliomas. In the present work, we developed a practical prognostic score to predict survival outcome after re-irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) was applied in 233 patients. Primary histology included glioblastoma (n = 89; 38%), WHO Grade III gliomas (n = 52; 22%) and low-grade glioma (n = 92; 40%). FSRT was applied with a median dose of 36 Gy in 2 Gy single fractions. We evaluated survival after re-irradiation as well as progression-free survival after re-irradiation; prognostic factors analyzed included age, tumor volume at re-irradiation, histology, time between initial radiotherapy and re-irradiation, age and Karnofsky Performance Score. RESULTS: Median survival after FSRT was 8 months for glioblastoma, 20 months for anaplastic gliomas, and 24 months for recurrent low-grade patients. The strongest prognostic factors significantly impacting survival after re-irradiation were histology (p < 0.0001) and age (< 50 vs. ≥ 50, p < 0.0001) at diagnosis and the time between initial radiotherapy and re-irradiation ≤ 12 vs. > 12 months (p < 0.0001). We generated a four-class prognostic score to distinguish patients with excellent (0 points), good (1 point), moderate (2 points) and poor (3-4 points) survival after re-irradiation. The difference in outcome was highly significant (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: We generated a practical prognostic score index based on three clinically relevant factors to predict the benefit of patients from re-irradiation. This score index can be helpful in patient counseling, and for the design of further clinical trials. However, individual treatment decisions may include other patient-related factors not directly influencing outcome.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Glioblastoma/radioterapia , Glioma/radioterapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Niño , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Femenino , Glioblastoma/mortalidad , Glioblastoma/patología , Glioma/mortalidad , Glioma/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Retratamiento , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 71(4): 999-1005, 2008 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18258384

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate toxicity and outcomes in patients with primary glioblastoma (GB) treated with postoperative radiochemotherapy (RCHT) with temozolomide (TMZ) comparing two dose regimens. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 160 patients with histologically confirmed GB were treated with postoperative RCHT with TMZ. Of the patients, 66 were female and 94 were male, with a median age of 60 years. After the primary diagnosis, a biopsy had been performed in 42 patients; a subtotal and total resection was conducted in 66 and 52 patients. Postoperative radiotherapy was applied with a median dose of 60 Gy with a median fractionation of 5 x 2Gy/week. Concomitant TMZ was prescribed at 50 mg/m(2) in 123 patients (Group A) and at 75 mg/m(2) in 37 patients (Group B). Patients were followed in 3-months intervals, with a median follow-up of 13 months. RESULTS: Overall survival (OS) rates in Group A vs. Group B were 67% and 79% at 1 year and 43% vs. 49% at 2 years, respectively (p = 0.69). Progression-free survival was 49% vs. 54% at 1 year and 22% vs. 29% at 2 years (p = 0.31). Hematologic toxicity was not statistically significant over the 6-week RCHT period except for a significant decrease in platelets during Week 6 (p = 0.01) in Group B. CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival seems to be comparable in both groups, although longer follow-up and a larger group of patients are needed to corroborate these results. Lower dosing of TMZ also is associated with a more beneficial toxicity profile.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Dacarbazina/análogos & derivados , Glioblastoma/mortalidad , Glioblastoma/terapia , Radioterapia/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administración & dosificación , Terapia Combinada/estadística & datos numéricos , Dacarbazina/administración & dosificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Temozolomida , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA