RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bipolar Disorder (BD) imposes considerable economic and social burdens on the community. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the economic burden of bipolar disorder in patients referred to single-specialty psychiatric hospitals at the secondary and tertiary care level in 2022. METHODS: This partial economic evaluation was conducted as a cross-sectional study in the south of Iran in 2022, and 916 patients were selected through the census method. The prevalence-based and bottom-up approaches were used to collect cost information and calculate the costs, respectively. The data on Direct Medical Costs (DMC), Direct Non-Medical Costs (DNMC), and Indirect costs (IC) were obtained using the information from the patients' medical records and bills as well as the self-reports by the patients or their companions. The human capital approach was also used to calculate IC. FINDINGS: The results showed that in 2022, the annual cost of bipolar disorder was $4,227 per patient. The largest share of the costs was that of DMC (77.66%), with hoteling and ordinary beds accounting for the highest expenses (55.40%). The shares of DNMC and IC were 6.37% and 15.97%, respectively, and the economic burden of the disease in the country was estimated at $2,799,787,266 as well. CONCLUSION: In general, the costs of bipolar disorder treatment could impose a heavy economic burden on the community, the health system, the insurance system, and the patients themselves. Considering the high costs of hoteling and ordinary beds, it is suggested that hospitalization of BD patients be reduced by managing treatment solutions along with prevention methods to reduce the economic burden of this disease. Furthermore, in order to reduce the costs, proper and fair distribution of psychiatrists and psychiatric beds as well as expansion of home care services and use of the Internet and virtual technologies to follow up the treatment of these patients are recommended.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world, with about one million cases diagnosed annually. Various treatment methods can be used to treat colorectal cancer, including chemotherapy with different drug regimens. Considering the need to opt for more effective and less expensive drugs in the treatment of this disease, the present study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of FOLFOX6+Bevacizumab with FOLFOX6+Cetuximab in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer referred to medical centers in Shiraz, Iran, in 2021. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a decision tree, the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the 2 drug regimens were compared in all studied patients through the census method. Having a societal perspective, this study considered direct medical costs, direct non-medical costs, and indirect costs. The effectiveness indicators included the rate of major response to the drug combination used and the Quality-adjusted Life Year (QALY). The data were analyzed using Treeage 2011 and Excel 2016 software. In order to ensure the robustness of the results, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed as well. RESULTS: The results showed that the expected costs, the effectiveness (major response rate), and the QALYs of the FOLFOX6+Bevacizumab drug regimen were $16746.13(USD), .49, and .19, respectively, and those of the FOLFOX6+Cetuximab regimen were, respectively, $15191.05 (USD), .68, and .22. Therefore, FOLFOX6+Cetuximab compared to FOLFOX6+Bevacizumab was less costly and more effective and had a greater QALY, thus being considered as the dominant option. Also, the results of the sensitivity analyses showed that there was a bit of uncertainty. CONCLUSION: Considering that the FOLFOX6+Cetuximab regimen was more cost-effective, it is suggested to be prioritized in preparing clinical guidelines for Iranian colorectal cancer patients. In addition, increasing the basic and supplementary insurance coverage for this drug combination as well as the use of remote technology to guide patients by oncologists can be solutions to reduce direct and indirect costs of the patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Humanos , Bevacizumab/efectos adversos , Irán , Cetuximab/efectos adversos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is one of the main causes of death from cancer around the world, imposing a significant economic burden on the families and healthcare system. The present study aimed at determining the economic burden of breast cancer in the patients referred to the medical centers in Fars province in southern Iran in 2021. METHODS: This cross-sectional study is a partial economic evaluation and a cost-of-illness study with a bottom-up and prevalence-based approach, conducted in Fars province in southern Iran in 2021 from the societal perspective. A total of 230 patients were randomly included in the study, and a researcher-made data collection form was used to collect the required data. The data on direct medical costs were collected using the information on patients' medical and financial records. On the other hand, the data on direct non-medical and indirect costs were obtained using self-reports by the patients or their companions. The Excel 2016 software was used to analyze the collected data. RESULTS: The results showed that the annual cost of each breast cancer patient in the studied sample was 11,979.09 USD in 2021. Direct medical costs accounted for the largest share of costs (70.69%, among which the cost of radiotherapy was the highest one. The economic burden of the disease in the country was estimated at 193,090,952 USD. CONCLUSIONS: In general, due to the high prevalence of breast cancer and the chronicity of this disease, its medical costs can impose a heavy economic burden on society, the health system, the insurance system, and patients. Thus, in order to reduce the costs, the following suggestions can be offered: the use of advanced radiotherapy techniques, increasing the insurance coverage of required services, establishing low-cost accommodation centers near medical centers for the patients and their companions, providing specialized medical services for the patients in towns, using the Internet and virtual space to follow up the treatment of the patients, and carrying out free screening programs and tests for faster diagnosis of the infected patients and susceptible or exposed people.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in the world, and is associated with significant economic costs for patients and communities. Therefore, the information on the costs of the disease and the identification of its underlying factors will provide insights into designing effective interventions and reducing the costs. Thus, the present study aimed to identify the factors affecting the economic burden of breast cancer from all medical centers providing diagnostic and treatment services in southern Iran. METHODS: A list of factors affecting the economic burden of breast cancer was obtained based on the effective factors searched in the databases, including PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, SID, and Magiran, and the opinions of BC cancer specialists. Then, the data on 460 breast cancer patients was collected from March 2020 to March 2022. The relationship between the factors affecting Breast Cancer costs was analyzed using SPSS 13.0 software by the use of multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: The results of the multiple regression analysis showed that stages (P-value < 0.001), being an extreme user (p = 0.025), type of treatment center (P-value < 0.001), income (P-value < 0.001), chemotherapy side effects (P-value < 0.001), and distance to the nearest health center (P-value < 0.001) were important factors affecting the costs of breast cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results, encouraging people to undergo annual screenings, increasing insurance coverage, assuring the patients about the desirability and adequacy of the provided medical services, deploying specialists in chemotherapy centers (especially nutritionists) to recommend special diets, and establishing cancer diagnostic and treatment centers in high-population cities could help reduce the costs of breast cancer patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Irán/epidemiología , Costo de Enfermedad , Estrés Financiero , RentaRESUMEN
Background: The new coronavirus has been spreading since the beginning of 2020, and many efforts have been made to develop vaccines to help patients recover. It is now clear that the world needs a rapid solution to curb the spread of COVID-19 worldwide with non-clinical approaches such as artificial intelligence techniques. These approaches can be effective in reducing the burden on the health care system to provide the best possible way to diagnose the COVID-19 epidemic. This study was conducted to use Machine Learning (ML) algorithms for the early detection of COVID-19 in patients. Methods: This retrospective study used data from hospitals affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in Iran. This dataset was collected in the period March to October 2020 andcontained 10055 cases with 63 features. We selected and compared six algorithms: C4.5, support vector machine (SVM), Naive Bayes, logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest, and K-Nearest Neighbor algorithm using Rapid Miner software. The performance of algorithms was measured using evaluation metrics, such as precision, recall, accuracy, and f-measure. Results: The results of the study show that among the various used classification methods in the diagnosis of coronavirus, SVM (93.41% accuracy) and C4.5 (91.87% accuracy) achieved the highest performance. According to the C4.5 decision tree, "contact with a person who has COVID-19" was considered the most important diagnostic criterion based on the Gini index. Conclusion: We found that ML approaches enable a reasonable level of accuracy in the diagnosis of COVID-19.
RESUMEN
Among cancers, colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the world and the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Some studies have shown that the incidence of colorectal cancer is increasing in Iran and in Fars province. The present study aimed to determine the economic burden of colorectal cancer in patients referred to the referral centers affiliated to Iran, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in 2019 from the patients' perspective. This is a partial economic evaluation and a cost-of-illness study conducted cross-sectionally in 2019. All the patients with colorectal cancer who had been referred to the referral centers affiliated to Iran, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, and had medical records were studied through the census method (N = 96). A researcher-made data collection form was used to collect the cost data. The prevalence-based and bottom-up approaches were also used in this study. The human capital approach was applied to calculate indirect costs. The mean annual cost per patient with colorectal cancer in the present study was $10930.98 purchasing power parity (PPP) (equivalent to 5745.29 USD), the main part of which was the medical direct costs (74.86%). Also, among the medical direct costs per patient, the highest were those of surgeries (41.7%). In addition, the mean annual cost per patient with colorectal cancer in the country was $ 116917762 PPP (equivalent to 61451621.84 USD) in 2019. Regarding the considerable economic burden of colorectal cancer and in order to reduce the costs, these suggestions can be made: increasing the number of specialized beds through the cooperation of health donors, establishing free or low-cost accommodation centers for patients and their companions near the medical centers, using the Internet and cyberspace technologies to follow up the treatment of patients, and increasing insurance coverage and government drug subsidies on drug purchase.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/economía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Costo de Enfermedad , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Irán , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) has placed special emphasis on protecting households from health care expenditures. Many households face catastrophic health expenditures (CHEs) from a combination of economic poverty and financing the treatment of medical conditions. The present study aimed to measure the percentage of households facing catastrophic CHEs and the factors associated with the occurrence of CHEs in Shiraz, Iran in 2018. METHODS: The present cross-sectional study was performed on 740 randomly selected households from different districts of Shiraz, Iran in 2018 using a multi-stage sampling method. Data were collected using the Persian version of the "WHO Global Health Survey" questionnaire. CHEs were defined as health expenditures exceeding 40% of households' capacity to pay. Households living below the poverty line before paying for health services were excluded from the study. The associations between the households' characteristics and facing CHEs were determined using the Chi-Square test as well as multiple logistic regression modeling in SPSS 23.0 at the significance level of 5%. RESULTS: The results showed that 16.48% of studied households had faced CHEs. The higher odds of facing CHEs were observed in the households living in rented houses (OR = 3.14, P-value < 0.001), households with disabled members (OR = 27.98, P-value < 0.001), households with children under 5 years old (OR = 2.718, P-value = 0.02), and those without supplementary health insurance coverage (OR = 1.87, P-value = 0.01). CONCLUSION: CHEs may be reduced by increasing the use of supplementary health insurance coverage by individuals and households, increasing the support of the Social Security and the State Welfare Organizations for households with disabled members, developing programs such as the Integrated Child Care Programs, and setting home rental policies and housing policies for tenants.
RESUMEN
Inadequate attention has been given to the provision of mental health (MH) services especially in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study was aimed to identify key barriers to provide and utilize MH services in LMICs. A comprehensive search on7 important online databases was conducted for key barriers to the provision and utilization MH services in LMICs from Jan 2000 to Nov 2019. Five-step Arksey and O'Malley guideline was used for scope study. The extracted data were synthesized using a qualitative content analysis and thematic network. Three main themes identified as barriers to the provision of MH services in LMICs, namely resource and administrative barriers, information and knowledge barriers, as well as policy and legislation barriers. Also attitudinal barriers, structural barriers, knowledge barriers, and treatment-related barriers were four main themes emerged regarding the challenges of utilization of MH services. Equitable access to MH services in LMICs is influenced by many barriers in both provision and utilization sides. In order to alleviate these problems, health systems could adopt some strategies including integration of MH into the general health policy, improvement of public MH awareness, developing anti-stigma programs, reallocation of health resources toward high-priority MH needs, developing community-based insurance, as well as integration of MH services into all levels of health-care systems. The success of intervention strategies depends on the weight of these barriers in different socio-economic contexts.
Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Servicios de Salud Mental , Política de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Estigma SocialRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In order to the significance of lessons learned from the natural disasters for health care systems particularly in developing and under-developed countries, the main purpose of this study was to identify challenges and limitations in light of the earthquake experience in Kermanshah Province. METHODS: The present study was conducted in 2019 as a qualitative research using content analysis method. In this regard, 19 key informants were selected using snowball sampling. To enhance the accuracy of the study, the four validation criteria for qualitative studies in data coding developed by Guba and Lincoln including credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability were used. Data was analyzed applying Graneheim and Lundman (2004) approach for analyzing the qualitative content of an interview text. RESULTS: Analysis of the data led to the identification of 2 main themes, 5 sub- themes and 17 main categories. The first main theme was health system oriented challenges containing challenges of medication supply and preparation, structural challenges, challenges in crisis-scene management and challenges of service delivery and the second main theme was non-health system oriented challenges including social and psychosocial challenges. CONCLUSION: According to the results, along with health system oriented challenges with the inter-sectoral or intra-sectoral nature, the non-health system oriented challenges the same as social, cultural and psychological factors can be considered as the major challenges of Iran's healthcare system in the face of crises. This complicated context can shed the light to policy makers that not only attention to the medicine and medical equipment supply chain, manpower preparation and service delivery system can be considered as an emergency, but also careful attention to the structural challenges and crisis-scene management should be planned and considered as a priority. Besides, the policy makers and the local managers should try to plan and act in a contingent situation according to the social and cultural characteristics of the region and the psychological condition and the mental needs of the people.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Terremotos , Incidentes con Víctimas en Masa , Planificación en Desastres , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Irán , Investigación Cualitativa , Sistemas de Socorro/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Hospital accreditation has been adopted internationally as a way and solution for healthcare quality improvement in hospitals. The purpose of this study was to review and knowledge mapping of bibliographic data about "Hospital Accreditation" and assess the current quantitative trends. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Scientometric methods and knowledge visualization using the coword analysis techniques conducted in three steps based on the data related to the field of hospital accreditation from 1975 to 2018 obtained from the MEDLINE database. Bibliographic data for titles, abstracts and keywords articles were saved in CSV format and MEDLINE templates by applying filters. Data extracted were exported into an Excel spreadsheet and were preprocessed. The authors applied the text mining and visualization using VOSviewer software. FINDINGS: Hospital accreditation studies have been increased rapidly over the past 30 years. 6,661 documents in the field of hospital accreditation had been published from 1975 to 2018. Hospitals or organizations active in the field of hospital accreditation were in the United States, Italy and Canada. The 10 most productive authors identified in the area of hospital accreditation with a higher influence were identified. "The United States", "accreditation", "Joint commission on accreditation" and "quality assurance, healthcare" had, respectively, the highest frequency. The cluster analysis identified and categorized them into four major clusters. Hospital accreditation field had a close relationship with the quality improvement, patient safety, risk and standards. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Hospital accreditation had focused on the scopes of implementation of accreditation programs, adherence to JCI standards, and focus on safety and quality improvement. Future studies are recommended to be conducted on design interventions and paying attention to all dimensions of hospital accreditation.
Asunto(s)
Acreditación , Bibliometría , Visualización de Datos , Hospitales , MEDLINE , Análisis por Conglomerados , HumanosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Today, cancers have become a major cause of mortality in developed and developing countries. Among various cancers, gastric cancer imposes a huge economic burden on patients, their families, and on the health-care system. This study aimed to determine the economic burden of gastric cancer in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad province of Iran in 2016. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional cost of illness study conducted in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad province of Iran in 2016, using a prevalence-based approach. All patients were studied using the census method (N = 110). The required data on direct medical, direct nonmedical, and indirect costs were collected using a data collection form from the patients' medical records, tariffs of diagnostic, and therapeutic services approved by the Ministry of Health and Medical Education in 2016. RESULTS: The total cost and burden of gastric cancer in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad province of Iran in 2016 were $US436 237, among which the majority were direct medical costs (59%). The highest costs among direct medical costs, direct nonmedical costs, and indirect costs were, respectively, related to the costs of medications used by the patients (35%), transportation (31%), and absence of patients' families from work and daily activities caused by patient care (56%). CONCLUSION: Our study has revealed for the first time high costs of gastric cancer in Iran. To decrease the total costs and burden, the following suggestions can be made: increasing insurance coverage and government subsidies for purchasing necessary medications, providing the required specialized care and services related to cancer diseases such as gastric cancer in other provincial cities rather than just in capital cities, and so on.
Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Gástricas/economía , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Irán/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fair financial contribution in healthcare financing is one of the main goals and challengeable subjects in the evaluation of world health system functions. This study aimed to investigate the equity in healthcare financing in Shiraz, Iran in 2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross- sectional survey conducted on the Shiraz, Iran households. A sample of 740 households (2357 persons) was selected from 11 municipal districts using the multi-stage sampling method (stratified sampling method proportional to size, cluster sampling and systematic random sampling methods). The required data were collected using the Persian format of "World Health Survey" questionnaire. The collected data were analyzed using Stata14.0 and Excel 2007. The Gini coefficient and concentration and Kakwani indices were calculated for health insurance premiums (basic and complementary), inpatient and outpatient services costs, out of pocket payments and, totally, health expenses. RESULTS: The Gini coefficient was obtained based on the studied population incomes equal to 0.297. Also, the results revealed that the concentration index and Kakwani index were, respectively, 0.171 and - 0.125 for basic health insurance premiums, 0.259 and - 0.038 for health insurance complementary premiums, 0.198 and - 0.099 for total health insurance premiums, 0.126 and - 0.170 for outpatient services costs, 0.236 and - 0.061 for inpatient services costs, 0.174 and - 0.123 for out of pocket payments (including the sum of costs related to the inpatient and outpatient services) and 0.185 and - 0.112 for the health expenses (including the sum of out of pocket payments and health insurance premiums). CONCLUSION: The results showed that the healthcare financing in Shiraz, Iran was regressive and there was vertical inequity and, accordingly, it is essential to making more efforts in order to implement universal insurance coverage, redistribute incomes in the health sector to support low-income people, strengthening the health insurance schemes, etc.
Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud/ética , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Financiación de la Atención de la Salud/ética , Cobertura del Seguro/ética , Seguro de Salud/ética , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/ética , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Irán , MasculinoRESUMEN
Hospital employees' turnover is one of the problems with which both public and private organizations have been faced for many years. Employees' turnover can cause many organization's investments in employees to be wasted and the stability and continuity of the organizational activities to be undermined. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of social support and mediating factors on the turnover intention of administrative and financial employees working in the teaching hospitals affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran, using structural equation modeling in 2017. This was an applied, cross-sectional, and descriptive-analytic study conducted on the administrative and financial employees working in the teaching hospitals affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in 2017. The results showed that the proposed model remarkably explained "turnover intention," and the overall validity of the model was confirmed. Accordingly, 15 of 21 study hypotheses were supported. Moreover, the results showed that social support had an indirect significant association with the hospital employees' turnover intention and could decrease it through increasing the employees' organizational commitment, psychological empowerment, and core self-evaluation and reducing their job stress and job burnout (P < .05). To reduce the hospital employees' turnover intention in hospitals, employ suitable and qualified individuals for the positions, provide training courses such as stress management, improve better interactions and mutual cooperation among managers and employees, provide job security and job enrichment, and create a comfortable and relaxed working environment.
Asunto(s)
Intención , Reorganización del Personal , Personal de Hospital/psicología , Apoyo Social , Adulto , Agotamiento Profesional/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Administración Financiera , Administración Hospitalaria , Humanos , Irán , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Masculino , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to determine accreditation effects on Iranian military hospital health service quality through nurses' viewpoints. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The paper is a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. Sampling drew from a hospital nurse census ( n=160). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze participant demographics and nurses' views. Linear regression analysis determined the independent variables' overall effect on the accreditation quality results dimension (dependent variable). FINDINGS: From the nurses' viewpoints, accreditation effects on services quality mean score was 3.60±0.61. Linear regression analysis showed that leadership and quality management were identified as the most important accreditation quality predictors. The R2 value (0.698) showed that nearly 70 percent of the dependent variable changes were affected by the independent variables. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: This study gives hospital managers a deeper insight into accreditation and its effects on military hospital service quality. Military hospitals benefit from military organization such as hierarchy and command chain, so managers should employ these characteristics to adopt appropriate policies to promote human resource management as a competitive advantage. Furthermore, results will guide public and private hospital managers on how to manage organizational variables that benefit from accreditation. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Accreditation was introduced as a hospital quality improvement program. However, implementing accreditation programs should be cost-effective. Hospital managers and employees should feel that accreditation can improve service quality. Nurses had positive viewpoints about accreditation and its effects on military hospital service quality.
Asunto(s)
Acreditación , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Hospitales Militares , Humanos , Irán , Liderazgo , Masculino , Seguridad , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Accreditation helps to ensure safe and high-quality services in hospitals. Different occupational groups have various hospital accreditation experiences. The purpose of this paper is to investigate nurses' accreditation experience and its effects on Iranian teaching hospital service quality. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This was a qualitative study involving a phenomenological approach to studying nurses' hospital accreditation experience and understanding the effects on Iranian teaching hospital service quality. Data were collected using two focus groups in which nurses were selected using purposive sampling. Transcripts were analyzed using content analysis. FINDINGS: Nurses' experiences showed that hospital administrators and nurses had greater role in implementing accreditation than other occupational groups. Accreditation improved patient-centeredness, patient safety, logistics and managerial processes and decision making. However, a weak incentive system, extra documentation and work stress were negative experiences. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Nurse experience, as the most important care team member, reveals accreditation's strengths and weaknesses and its effects on service quality. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The author used a phenomenology approach to measure accreditation effects on service quality - a valuable tool for understanding a phenomenon among those that experience hospital accreditation processes.
Asunto(s)
Acreditación , Hospitales de Enseñanza/organización & administración , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Grupos Focales , Irán , Estudios de Casos Organizacionales , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
Purpose Strategic planning is the best tool for managers seeking an informed presence and participation in the market without surrendering to changes. Strategic planning enables managers to achieve their organizational goals and objectives. Hospital goals, such as improving service quality and increasing patient satisfaction cannot be achieved if agreed strategies are not implemented. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the factors affecting strategic plan implementation in one teaching hospital using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). Design/methodology/approach The authors used a descriptive study involving experts and senior managers; 16 were selected as the study sample using a purposive sampling method. Data were collected using a questionnaire designed and prepared based on previous studies. Data were analyzed using ISM. Findings Five main factors affected strategic plan implementation. Although all five variables and factors are top level, "senior manager awareness and participation in the strategic planning process" and "creating and maintaining team participation in the strategic planning process" had maximum drive power. "Organizational structure effects on the strategic planning process" and "Organizational culture effects on the strategic planning process" had maximum dependence power. Practical implications Identifying factors affecting strategic plan implementation is a basis for healthcare quality improvement by analyzing the relationship among factors and overcoming the barriers. Originality/value The authors used ISM to analyze the relationship between factors affecting strategic plan implementation.
Asunto(s)
Cultura Organizacional , Objetivos Organizacionales , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Hospitales de Enseñanza/organización & administración , Humanos , Liderazgo , Compromiso LaboralRESUMEN
This study was undertaken to investigate nurses' perceptions of and attitudes toward the effects of hospital accreditation on their service quality in an eye hospital in Tehran in 2016. This was a cross-sectional and descriptive-analytic study conducted in the second half of 2016. Data of 200 nurses who were selected using a census method were studied. For collecting the required data, a standard questionnaire was used. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 through descriptive statistics, as well as AMOS 18.0 software through the measurement and structural models of structural equation modeling method. The results showed that the independent variables of nurses' participation and the benefits of accreditation had predicted 63% of the variations in the dependent variable of "quality." Also, the results of structural equation modeling showed that the benefits of accreditation (regression weight = 0.22) had a significant effect on quality outcomes (P = .02). Moreover, the participation of nurses (regression weight = 0.61) had an important effect on quality outcomes (P < .001). Finally, the benefits of accreditation had a significant association with the nurses' participation (regression weight = 0.50) (P < .001). According to the results of the present study, the hospital accreditation program had positive effects on the quality of care from the studied nurses' perspective.
Asunto(s)
Acreditación/normas , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Modelos Estadísticos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Irán , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Service quality is the most important factor in the success of health care organizations; because of their vital and important services, even very small errors can be followed by great and irreparable harm and damage. This study aimed to assess the quality of services provided in the teaching hospitals affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in 2015. This is an applied, cross-sectional, and descriptive-analytical study conducted in 2015 in the teaching hospitals affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. A sample of 290 inpatients with at least 2 days of admission to hospital was selected using stratified sampling proportional to size and simple random sampling methods. The results showed that there were significant negative gaps in all dimensions (P > .001), and the highest and lowest means and SD of negative gaps were related to empathy (-1.35 ± 1.4) and assurance (-0.52 ± 0.95). Moreover, the results showed that there was a significant negative correlation between the patients' age and the total mean of the patients' expectations. According to the results, the studied hospitals had not been able to meet the expectations of their patients in any of the service quality dimensions. Therefore, to improve the service quality dimensions, the authors recommend holding training courses on how to interact with patients and meet their needs, providing adequate and proper information about the diseases and their treatment for the patients, having adequate medical staff, and so on.
Asunto(s)
Hospitales de Enseñanza/normas , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Estudios Transversales , Empatía , Femenino , Humanos , Irán , Masculino , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Childbirth is a great moment in a woman's life and is inevitably influenced by emotional, social, and psychological stress. This study aimed to assess the anxiety and pain level of nulliparous women giving birth using physiological methods (without doula support) during labor and those women supported by a doula at Towhid Hospital of Jam, Bushehr, Iran in 2015. In this interventional study, 150 women were randomly assigned to either an intervention (with doula support) or a control group (with no doula support). The intrapartum, postpartum, and hidden anxiety levels were measured using Spielberger standard questionnaire used for assessing anxiety. The labor pain rate was evaluated using McGill questionnaire. Results showed that the average rate of obvious anxiety during labor was 57.76 ± 9.57 in physiological delivery (without doula) and 48.04 ± 9.61 in doula-supported delivery. The difference between mean scores of obvious anxiety during labor was significant. The mean anxiety of the control group (who did not receive doula support) was higher (P = .000). Also, the difference between the mean labor pain scores of the 2 groups was statistically significant. The results of the study showed that doula's presence has positive significant effects on labor pain and anxiety reduction; also, doula-supported mothers reported considerably lower pain and anxiety compared with those experiencing physiological delivery (without doula). Thus, the increased use of doula in hospitals all over the country is recommended.