Shifts in predator behaviour following climate induced disturbance on coral reefs.

Coral reefs are increasingly ecologically destabilized across the globe due to climate change. Behavioural plasticity in corallivore behaviour and short-term trophic ecology in response to bleaching events may influence the extent and severity of coral bleaching and subsequent recovery potential, yet our understanding of these interactions in situ remains unclear. Here, we investigated interactions between corallivory and coral bleaching during a severe high thermal event (10.3-degree heating weeks) in Belize. We found that parrotfish changed their grazing behaviour in response to bleaching by selectively avoiding bleached Orbicella spp. colonies regardless of bleaching severity or coral size. For bleached corals, we hypothesize that this short-term respite from corallivory may temporarily buffer coral energy budgets by not redirecting energetic resources to wound healing, and may therefore enable compensatory nutrient acquisition. However, colonies that had previously been heavily grazed were also more susceptible to bleaching, which is likely to increase mortality risk. Thus, short-term respite from corallivory during bleaching may not be sufficient to functionally rescue corals during prolonged bleaching. Such pairwise interactions and behavioural shifts in response to disturbance may appear small scale and short term, but have the potential to fundamentally alter ecological outcomes, especially in already-degraded ecosystems that are vulnerable and sensitive to change.

Negligible Greenhouse Gas Release from Sediments in Oyster Habitats.

After centuries of decline, oyster populations are now on the rise in coastal systems globally following aquaculture development and restoration efforts. Oysters regulate the biogeochemistry of coastal systems in part by promoting sediment nutrient recycling and removing excess nitrogen via denitrification. Less clear is how oysters alter sediment greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes-an important consideration as oyster populations grow. Here, we show that sediments in oyster habitats produce carbon dioxide (CO2), with highest rates in spring (2396.91 ± 381.98 µmol CO2 m-2 h-1) following deposition of seasonal diatom blooms and in summer (2795.20 ± 307.55 µmol CO2 m-2 h-1) when temperatures are high. Sediments in oyster habitats also consistently released methane to the water column (725.94 ± 150.34 nmol CH4 m-2 h-1) with no seasonal pattern. Generally, oyster habitat sediments were a sink for nitrous oxide (N2O; -36.11 ± 7.24 nmol N2O m-2 h-1), only occasionally releasing N2O in spring. N2O release corresponded to high organic matter and dissolved nitrogen availability, suggesting denitrification as the production pathway. Despite potential CO2 production increases under aquaculture in some locations, we conclude that in temperate regions oysters have an overall negligible impact on sediment GHG cycling.

Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Oyster Aquaculture.

Production of animal protein is associated with high greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Globally, oyster aquaculture is increasing as a way to meet growing demands for protein, yet its associated GHG-emissions are largely unknown. We quantified oyster aquaculture GHG-emissions from the three main constituents of GHG-release associated with terrestrial livestock production: fermentation in the animal gut, manure management, and fodder production. We found that oysters release no methane (CH4) and only negligible amounts of nitrous oxide (0.00012 ± 0.00004 µmol N2O gDW-1 hr-1) and carbon dioxide (3.556 ± 0.471 µmol CO2 gDW-1 hr-1). Further, sediment fluxes of N2O and CH4 were unchanged in the presence of oyster aquaculture, regardless of the length of time it had been in place. Sediment CO2 release was slightly stimulated between 4 and 6 years of aquaculture presence and then returned to baseline levels but was not significantly different between aquaculture and a control site when all ages of culture were pooled. There is no GHG-release from oyster fodder production. Considering the main drivers of GHG-release in terrestrial livestock systems, oyster aquaculture has less than 0.5% of the GHG-cost of beef, small ruminants, pork, and poultry in terms of CO2-equivalents per kg protein, suggesting that shellfish aquaculture may provide a a low GHG alternative for future animal protein production compared to land based sources. We estimate that if 10% of the protein from beef consumption in the United States was replaced with protein from oysters, the GHG savings would be equivalent to 10.8 million fewer cars on the road.

Oyster aquaculture enhances sediment microbial diversity- Insights from a multi-omics study.

The global aquaculture industry has grown substantially, with consequences for coastal ecology and biogeochemistry. Oyster aquaculture can alter the availability of resources for microbes that live in sediments as oysters move large quantities of organic material to the sediments via filter feeding, possibly leading to changes in the structure and function of sediment microbial communities. Here, we use a chronosequence approach to investigate the impacts of oyster farming on sediment microbial communities over 7 years of aquaculture activity in a temperate coastal system. We detected shifts in bacterial composition (16S rRNA amplicon sequencing), changes in gene expression (meta-transcriptomics), and variations in sediment elemental concentrations (sediment geochemistry) across different durations of oyster farming. Our results indicate that both the structure and function of bacterial communities vary between control (no oysters) and farm sites, with an overall increase in diversity and a shift towards anoxic tolerance in farm sites. However, little to no variation was observed in either structure or function with respect to farming duration suggesting these sediment microbial communities are resilient to change. We also did not find any significant impact of farming on heavy metal accumulation in the sediments. The minimal influence of long-term oyster farming on sediment bacterial function and biogeochemical processes as observed here can bear important consequences for establishing best practices for sustainable farming in these areas. Importance: Sediment microbial communities drive a range of important ecosystem processes such as nutrient recycling and filtration. Oysters are well-known ecological engineers, and their presence is increasing as aquaculture expands in coastal waters globally. Determining how oyster aquaculture impacts sediment microbial processes is key to understanding current and future estuarine biogeochemical processes. Here, we use a multi-omics approach to study the effect of different durations of oyster farming on the structure and function of bacteria and elemental accumulation in the farm sediments. Our results indicate an increase in the diversity of bacterial communities in the farm sites with no such increases observed for elemental concentrations. Further, these effects persist across multiple years of farming with an increase of anoxic tolerant bacteria at farm sites. The multi-omics approach used in this study can serve as a valuable tool to facilitate understanding of the environmental impacts of oyster aquaculture.

Evaluating connections between nitrogen cycling and the macrofauna in native oyster beds in a New England estuary.

Recent efforts to quantify biogeochemical and ecological processes in oyster habitats have focused on provision of habitat and regulation of the nitrogen cycle. However, it is unclear how these two processes may interact. In this study, seasonal patterns of habitat use and nitrogen removal from natural oyster beds were quantified for comparison with nearby bare sediment in Green Hill Pond, a temperate coastal lagoon in Rhode Island USA. Relationships were tested between benthic macrofaunal abundance and nitrogen removal via denitrification and burial in sediments. Nitrogen removal by oyster bio-assimilation was quantified and compared with nearby oyster aquaculture. Despite limited differences in habitat use by macrofauna, there were fewer non-oyster benthic organisms (e.g., filter-feeders, detritivores) where oysters were present, possibly due to competition for resources. Additionally, low rugosity of the native oyster beds provided little refuge value for prey. There was a shift from net N removal via denitrification in bare sediments to nitrogen fixation beneath oysters, though this change was not statistically significant (t(96) = 1.201; p = 0.233). Sediments contained low concentrations of N, however sediments beneath oysters contained almost twice as much N (0.07%) as bare sediments (0.04%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in tissue N content between wild oysters and those raised in aquaculture nearby, though caged oysters had more tissue per shell mass and length, and therefore removed more N on a shell length basis. These oyster beds lacked the complex structure of 3-dimensional oyster reefs which may have diminished their ability to provide habitat for refugia, foraging sites for macrofauna, and conditions known to stimulate denitrification.