Hydrogen leak test is minimally invasive and highly specific for assessment of the integrity of the luminal closure after natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery procedures (with video).

BACKGROUND: Leak-resistant closure of transluminal access is a major challenge facing natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a hydrogen (H(2))-based leak test for assessment of transluminal-access closure integrity after NOTES procedures. SETTING: Nine acute porcine experiments. DESIGN AND INTERVENTION: After gastric-wall puncture and balloon dilation, peritoneoscopy was performed, followed by transmural closure of the gastric opening. The animals were randomly assigned to complete or incomplete closure groups. The H(2) leak test was performed by using 1000 mL of 4% H(2) gas mixture and the Hydrogen Leak Detector H2000+. The animals were then euthanized for a methylene blue (MB) test of gastric closure integrity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Intraperitoneal H(2) concentration after gastric insufflation with H(2). RESULTS: The H(2) leak test was quick and easy. Intraperitoneal H(2) concentrations in parts per million in both groups were similar at baseline (mean +/- SD, 0.18 +/- 0.29 parts per million [ppm] vs 0.22 +/- 0.35 ppm, P = .97) and after balloon dilation (414.8 +/- 198.5 ppm vs 601.3 +/- 116.1 ppm, P > .99). Postclosure intraperitoneal H(2) concentrations dropped to 0.01 +/- 0.77 ppm in the complete-closure group, similar (P = .81) to matched-pairs preopening levels and significantly lower than in the incomplete-closure group (162.0 +/- 83.0 ppm, P < .02). On necropsy, the MB test was negative in all 5 animals of the complete-closure group and positive in all 4 animals of the incomplete-closure group. A cutoff of 25 ppm in intraperitoneal H(2) concentration after closure gave 100% sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for MB leakage. LIMITATIONS: Nonsurvival animal experiments. CONCLUSIONS: The H(2) leak test is highly accurate for detection of leakage after NOTES procedures and could become a substitute for currently used MB leak tests.

Air and fluid leak tests after NOTES procedures: a pilot study in a live porcine model (with videos).

BACKGROUND: Transluminal access site closure remains a major challenge in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to develop in vivo leak tests for evaluation of the integrity of transgastric access closure. SETTINGS: Survival experiments on 12 50-kg pigs. DESIGN AND INTERVENTIONS: After a standardized transgastric approach to the peritoneal cavity and peritoneoscopy, the gastric wall incision was closed with T-bars (Wilson-Cook Medical, Winston-Salem, NC) deployed on both sides of the incision and then cinched together. Gastrotomy closure was assessed with air and fluid leak tests. The animals were observed for 1 week and then underwent endoscopic evaluation and necropsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: (1) Leak-proof closure of the gastric wall incision. (2) Gastric incision healing 1 week after the procedure. RESULTS: The mean intraperitoneal pressure increased 10.7 +/- 3.7 mm Hg during gastric insufflation when the air leak test was performed before closure compared with 0.9 +/- 0.8 mm Hg after transmural closure of the transgastric access site with T-bars (P < .001). Fluid leak tests demonstrated no leakage of liquid contrast from the stomach into the peritoneal cavity after closure. Necropsy in 1 week confirmed completeness of the gastric closure in all animals with full-thickness healing and no spillage of the gastric contents into the peritoneal cavity. LIMITATIONS: Leak tests were only evaluated on an animal model. CONCLUSIONS: Fluid and air leak tests are simple techniques to evaluate in vivo the adequacy of the transluminal access site closure after NOTES procedures. Leak-proof gastric closure resulted in adequate tissue approximation and full-thickness healing of the gastric wall incision.