The Effect of Social Deprivation on Patient Satisfaction in Otolaryngology Clinics.

OBJECTIVES: Multiple factors have been associated with lower satisfaction scores. We hypothesize that patients with a more deprived socioeconomic status will have different patient satisfaction scores than patients of higher socioeconomic status. METHODS: We reviewed Press Ganey satisfaction scores for new, outpatient visits between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018. Due to the high ceiling effects of the survey, "satisfaction" was defined as achieving a perfect score of 100. We determined social deprivation using the 2015 Area Deprivation Index (ADI) which serves as a proxy for socioeconomic status derived from zip codes. Patient satisfaction was defined as a binary variable. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors correlated with patient satisfaction. RESULTS: There were 3239 unique new patients with completed surveys. Univariate analysis demonstrated decreased odds of achieving satisfaction for both the Total Score and Provider Sub-Score for each decile increase in ADI (OR 0.94; CI = 0.908-0.981; P = .003 and OR 0.94; CI = 0.91-0.98; P = .002 respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed the odds for reporting satisfaction for each decile increase in ADI were 0.96 for Total Score (CI = 0.921-0.998; P = .038) and 0.96 for Provider Sub-Score (CI = 0.92-0.993; P = .019). Patients in the most deprived quartile, compared to the least deprived, were significantly less likely to be satisfied with their care for both Total Score (OR 0.70; CI = 0.564-0.865; P = .001) and Provider Sub-Score (OR 0.69; CI = 0.558-0.852; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Increased social deprivation was an independent predictor of lower patient satisfaction in otolaryngology outpatients using the Press Ganey survey. This non-modifiable outcome should be taken into consideration when evaluating patient satisfaction scores and offers further support to the need of addressing and improving healthcare discrepancies in the field of otolaryngology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Evaluating Factors That Influence Patient Satisfaction in Otolaryngology Clinics.

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors that influence patient satisfaction during outpatient visits in various settings of otolaryngology clinics in an academic medical center. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Academic medical center. METHODS: We reviewed Press Ganey patient satisfaction survey responses for new, outpatient visits between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018. Self-reported race was identified using electronic medical records. Multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify continuous and categorical variables associated with patient satisfaction. RESULTS: There were 3998 unique new patient visits with completed surveys. Multivariate analysis revealed that responses for patients <18 years old are less likely to be satisfied with their care compared to patients ≥18 years old (OR 0.66; P < .001). For each 10-minute increase in wait time, patients were 43.4% less likely report satisfaction (P < .001). African American patients were also less likely to report satisfaction (OR 0.22; P = .043) while Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders were over 3 times more likely to be satisfied (OR 3.6; P = .013). Additionally, Medicare patients and those who were seen at community satellite clinics compared to the main University Hospital had increased odds of achieving satisfactory care (OR 1.3; P = .005 and OR 1.3; P = .002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Wait time, clinic location, patient race, insurance provider, and age were all shown to significantly influence patient-reported satisfaction. Understanding how these variables influence patient satisfaction will hopefully lead to processes that improve patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Optimization of Subglottic View During Flexible Laryngoscopy With Patient Positioning.

OBJECTIVE: Determine the ideal head position to optimize visualization of the subglottis using flexible laryngoscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Outpatient multidisciplinary airway clinic at a tertiary care center. METHODS: Patients presenting to a multidisciplinary airway clinic undergoing nasoendoscopic airway examination were enrolled. Three head positions were utilized to examine the subglottis during laryngoscopy: "sniffing," chin tuck, and stooping positions. In-office reviewers and blinded clinician participants evaluated views of the airway based on Cormack-Lehane (CL) scale, airway grade (AG), and visual analog scale (VAS). Demographic data were obtained. Statistical analysis compared head positions and demographic data using Student's t test, analysis of variance, and Tukey's post hoc analysis. RESULTS: One hundred patients participated. No statistical differences existed among in-clinic or blinded reviewers for the CL score in any head position (p = .35, .5, respectively). For both AG and VAS, flexed and stooping positions were rated higher than the sniffing positions by both in-clinic and blinded reviewers (p < .01 for all analyses), but there was no statistical difference between these two positions (p = .28, .18, respectively). There was an inverse correlation between age and scores for AG and VAS in the flexed position for both sets of reviewers (p = .02, <.01 respectively), and a higher body mass index was significantly associated with the need to perform tracheoscopy for full airway evaluation (p < .01). CONCLUSION: Both flexion and stoop postures can be implemented by an experienced endoscopist in awake, transnasal flexible laryngoscopy to enhance visualization of the subglottic airway.

Evaluation of factors impacting patient satisfaction in a pediatric otolaryngology clinic.

OBJECTIVES: With an emphasis on patient-centered care and provider transparency, patient satisfaction measures have become a key indicator of healthcare quality. Using the Press Ganey Outpatient Medical Practice Survey (PGOMPS), we sought to determine key factors that impact patient satisfaction. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of new pediatric (<18 years old) outpatient otolaryngology visits between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018 at a children's hospital clinic and satellite clinics. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis were used to determine factors correlated with patient satisfaction for both the PGOMPS Total Score and Provider Sub-Score. RESULTS: A total of 1,050 patient or parent responses were included. The mean patient age was 5.6 ± 5.0 years with 54.7% identified as male. Univariate analysis demonstrated that for each 10-min increase in Total Wait Time, the odds of being satisfied were significantly decreased on both the Total Score (odds ratio [OR] 0.5; P < 0.001) and Provider Sub-Score (OR 0.8; P < 0.001). Furthermore, for each additional 5-year increase in patient age, patients were significantly more likely to report satisfaction on Total Score (OR 1.21; P = 0.011). Multivariate analysis revealed that the odds of achieving satisfaction for each decile increase in Total Wait Time were 0.5 for Total Score (P < 0.001) and 0.8 for Provider Sub-Score (P < 0.001), independent of patient age, sex, insurance category, socioeconomic disadvantage level, and patient community type. CONCLUSIONS: Wait time is a significant factor impacting patients' likelihood of being satisfied with their overall care in a pediatric otolaryngology clinic setting.