Activity and safety of crizotinib in patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma with rearrangement of TFE3: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) phase II trial 90101 'CREATE'.

Background: Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is an orphan malignancy associated with a rearrangement of transcription factor E3 (TFE3), leading to abnormal MET gene expression. We prospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of the MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib in patients with advanced or metastatic ASPS. Patients and methods: Eligible patients with reference pathology-confirmed ASPS received oral crizotinib 250 mg bd. By assessing the presence or absence of a TFE3 rearrangement, patients were attributed to MET+ and MET- sub-cohorts. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR) according to local investigator. Secondary end points included duration of response, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), progression-free rate, overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: Among 53 consenting patients, all had a centrally confirmed ASPS and 48 were treated. A total of 45 were eligible, treated and assessable. Among 40 MET+ patients, 1 achieved a confirmed partial response (PR) that lasted 215 days and 35 had stable disease (SD) as best response (ORR: 2.5%, 95% CI 0.6% to 80.6%). Further efficacy end points in MET+ cases were DCR: 90.0% (95% CI 76.3% to 97.2%), 1-year PFS rate: 37.5% (95% CI 22.9% to 52.1%) and 1-year OS rate: 97.4% (95% CI 82.8% to 99.6%). Among 4 MET- patients, 1 achieved a PR that lasted 801 days and 3 had SD (ORR: 25.0%, 95% CI 0.6% to 80.6%) for a DCR of 100% (95% CI 39.8% to 100.0%). The 1-year PFS rate in MET- cases was 50% (95% CI 5.8% to 84.5%) and the 1-year OS rate was 75% (95% CI 12.8% to 96.1%). One patient with unknown MET status due to technical failure achieved SD but stopped treatment due to progression after 17 cycles. The most common crizotinib-related adverse events were nausea [34/48 (70.8%)], vomiting [22/48 (45.8%)], blurred vision [22/48 (45.8%)], diarrhoea (20/48 (41.7%)] and fatigue [19/48 (39.6%)]. Conclusion: According to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) efficacy criteria for soft tissue sarcoma, our study demonstrated that crizotinib has activity in TFE3 rearranged ASPS MET+ patients. Clinical trial number: EORTC 90101, NCT01524926.

A phase II study of a human anti-PDGFRα monoclonal antibody (olaratumab, IMC-3G3) in previously treated patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Background: This study evaluated tumor response to olaratumab (an anti-PDGFRα monoclonal antibody) in previously treated patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with or without PDGFRα mutations (cohorts 1 and 2, respectively). Patients and methods: Patients received olaratumab 20 mg/kg intravenously every 14 days until disease progression, death, or intolerable toxicity occurred. Outcome measures were 12-week tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Of 30 patients enrolled, 21 patients received ≥1 dose of olaratumab. In the evaluable population (cohort 1, n = 6; cohort 2, n = 14), no complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was observed. Stable disease (SD) was observed in 3 patients (50.0%) in cohort 1 and 2 patients (14.3%) in cohort 2. Progressive disease (PD) was observed in 3 patients (50.0%) in cohort 1 and 12 patients (85.7%) in cohort 2. The 12-week clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD) (90% CI) was 50.0% (15.3-84.7%) in cohort 1 and 14.3% (2.6-38.5%) in cohort 2. SD lasted beyond 12 weeks in 5 patients (cohort 1, n = 3; cohort 2, n = 2). Median PFS (90% CI) was 32.1 (5.0-35.9) weeks in cohort 1 and 6.1 (5.7-6.3) weeks in cohort 2. Median OS was not reached in cohort 1 and was 24.9 (14.4-49.1) weeks in cohort 2. All patients in cohort 1 and 9 (64.3%) in cohort 2 experienced an olaratumab-related adverse event (AE), most commonly fatigue (38.1%), nausea (19.0%), and peripheral edema (14.3%). Two grade ≥3 olaratumab-related events were reported (cohort 1, syncope; cohort 2, hypertension). Conclusions: Olaratumab had an acceptable AE profile in patients with GIST. While there was no apparent effect on PFS in patients without PDGFRα mutations, patients with PDGFRα-mutant GIST (all with D842V mutations) treated with olaratumab had longer disease control compared with historical data for this genotype. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01316263.

Activity and safety of crizotinib in patients with advanced clear-cell sarcoma with MET alterations: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase II trial 90101 'CREATE'.

BACKGROUND: Clear-cell sarcoma (CCSA) is an orphan malignancy, characterized by a specific t(12;22) translocation, leading to rearrangement of the EWSR1 gene and overexpression of MET. We prospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib in patients with advanced or metastatic CCSA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with CCSA received oral crizotinib 250 mg twice daily. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR), secondary end points included duration of response, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), progression-free rate (PFR), overall survival (OS), OS rate and safety. The study design focused on MET+ disease with documented rearrangement of the EWSR1 gene by fluorescence in situ hybridization. RESULTS: Among 43 consenting patients with the local diagnosis of CCSA, 36 had centrally confirmed CCSA, 28 of whom were eligible, treated and assessable. Twenty-six out of the 28 patients had MET+ disease, of whom one achieved a confirmed partial response and 17 had stable disease (SD) (ORR 3.8%, 95% confidence interval: 0.1-19.6). Further efficacy end points in MET+ CCSA were DCR: 69.2% (48.2% to 85.7%), median PFS: 131 days (49-235), median OS: 277 days (232-442). The 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-month PFR was 53.8% (34.6-73.0), 26.9% (9.8-43.9), 7.7% (1.3-21.7) and 7.7% (1.3-21.7), respectively. Among two assessable MET- patients, one had stable disease and one had progression. The most common treatment-related adverse events were nausea [18/34 (52.9%)], fatigue [17/34 (50.0%)], vomiting [12/34 (35.3%)], diarrhoea [11/34 (32.4%)], constipation [9/34 (26.5%)] and blurred vision [7/34 (20.6%)]. CONCLUSIONS: The PFS with crizotinib in MET+ CCSA is similar to results achieved first-line in non-selected metastatic soft tissue sarcomas with single-agent doxorubicin. The PFS is similar to results achieved with pazopanib in previously treated sarcoma patients. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: EORTC 90101, EudraCT number 2011-001988-52, NCT01524926.

[Soft tissue sarcomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors]. / Weichteilsarkome und gastrointestinale Stromatumoren.

Soft tissue sarcomas are rare tumors that represent a major challenge due to varying clinical presentations and often interdisciplinary treatment concepts. Gold standard for the treatment of localized resectable soft tissue sarcomas is complete surgical removal. In metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, systemic therapy is the treatment of choice. The most active drugs are anthracyclines and ifosfamide. Combination chemotherapy has improved both response rate and progression-free survival at the cost of increased toxicity. Imatinib at a dose of 400 mg/day is the gold standard for patients with advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). In patients with a mutation in KIT exon 9, 800 mg/day is the recommended dose. In imatinib refractory or intolerant patients, sunitinib is recommended. Regorafenib has been approved for third-line therapy.

Prognostic relevance of the mitotic count and the amount of viable tumour after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary, localised, high-grade soft tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: We sought to examine whether mitotic count (MC) and the amount of viable tumour (VT) following neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (SC) for primary, localised, high-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS) correlate with prognosis. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 57 patients who underwent SC involving a combination of an anthracycline and an alkylating agent, followed by surgical resection between 2001 and 2011. RESULTS: The amount of VT after chemotherapy was significantly associated with disease-specific survival (DSS) and event-free survival (EFS). Patients with <10% VT had a DSS of 94% at 5 years, compared with 61% for patients with ⩾10% VT (P=0.033); EFS was 75%, compared with 48% (P=0.030). Patients with an MC of ⩾20/10 high power fields (HPF) after chemotherapy had a significantly lower DSS (33% vs 84% at 5 years, P<0.001) and EFS (40% vs 63% at 5 years, P=0.019) than patients with an MC of <20/10 HPF. CONCLUSIONS: The MC and the amount of VT after neoadjuvant therapy for primary, localised, high-grade STS appear to correlate with prognosis. If these results are validated prospectively, then they could provide a rational for the design of neoadjuvant treatment modification/escalation studies, analogue to the EURAMOS-1 trial for bone sarcomas.

Docetaxel plus oxaliplatin with or without fluorouracil or capecitabine in metastatic or locally recurrent gastric cancer: a randomized phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel/cisplatin/infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; DCF) is a standard chemotherapy regimen for patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). This phase II study evaluated docetaxel/oxaliplatin (TE), docetaxel/oxaliplatin/5-FU (TEF), and docetaxel/oxaliplatin/capecitabine (TEX) in patients with advanced GC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic or locally recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma (including carcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction) were randomly assigned (1 : 1 : 1) to TE, TEF, or TEX. Each regimen was tested at two doses before full evaluation at optimized dose levels. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS), tumour response, and safety were also assessed. A therapeutic index (median PFS relative to the incidence of febrile neutropenia) was calculated for each regimen and compared with DCF (historical data). RESULTS: Overall, 248 patients were randomly assigned to receive optimized dose treatment. Median PFS was longer with TEF (7.66 [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.97-9.40] months) versus TE (4.50 [3.68-5.32] months) and TEX (5.55 [4.30-6.37] months). Median OS was 14.59 (95% CI: 11.70-21.78) months for TEF versus 8.97 (7.79-10.87) months for TE and 11.30 (8.08-14.03) months for TEX. The rate of tumour response (complete or partial) was 46.6% (95% CI 35.9-57.5) for TEF versus 23.1% (14.3-34.0) for TE and 25.6% (16.6-36.4) for TEX. The frequency and type of adverse events (AEs) were similar across the three arms. Common grade 3/4 AEs were fatigue (21%), sensory neuropathy (14%), and diarrhoea (13%). Febrile neutropenia was reported in 2% (TEF), 14% (TE), and 9% (TEX) of patients. The therapeutic index was improved with TEF versus TEX, TE, or DCF. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that TEF is worthy of evaluation as an arm in a phase III trial or as a backbone regimen for new targeted agents in advanced GC. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: Identifier Trial registration number: NCT00382720.

Phase I study of panobinostat and imatinib in patients with treatment-refractory metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

BACKGROUND: Panobinostat, a pan-deacetylase inhibitor, overcomes imatinib resistance in preclinical models of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). Here we determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of panobinostat in combination with imatinib (IM) for treatment of patients with refractory GIST. METHODS: Following a 7-day run-in phase of IM (400 mg per day), escalating doses of panobinostat were added following a '3 plus 3' design. Twelve heavily pretreated GIST patients were enrolled in two dose levels. RESULTS: Most common adverse events were thrombocytopenia, anaemia, fatigue, creatinine elevation, nausea, emesis and diarrhoea. Twenty micrograms of panobinostat and 400 mg IM were declared the MTD. Pharmacologically active concentrations of panobinostat and IM were achieved as evidenced by histone H3 acetylation in blood mononuclear cells in vivo and inhibition of the IM-resistant KIT (D816) mutation in vitro. In FDG-PET-CT scans after IM run-in and following 3 weeks panobinostat treatment, 1 out of 11 evaluable patients showed a metabolic partial response, 7 patients were metabolically stable and 3 patients progressed. Longest treatment duration was 17 weeks (median 6). CONCLUSION: Panobinostat and IM can be administered at doses achieving target inhibition in vivo. Further clinical exploration of patients with treatment-refractory GIST is warranted. Correlative studies in this trial may help to optimise dosing schedules in GIST.

Differentiation of myxoid liposarcoma by magnetic resonance imaging: a histopathologic correlation.

BACKGROUND: Myxoid liposarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of soft tissue tumors in which prognosis is dependent on differentiation. PURPOSE: To identify magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria to distinguish low-grade from high-grade myxoid liposarcomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MR images of 30 histologically proven myxoid liposarcomas were retrospectively reviewed. Tumors were evaluated according to size, localization, tumor border, and structure as well as tumor composition. These imaging criteria were correlated with histopathological findings. RESULTS: Nineteen myxoid liposarcomas were histologically classified as low-grade myxoid liposarcomas, whereas 11 were considered high-grade myxoid liposarcomas. Mean tumor volume of low-grade myxoid liposarcomas (710.1 ± 960.1 ccm) was significantly smaller as compared to high-grade myxoid liposarcomas (2737.0 ± 3423.7 ccm; P = 0.04). In addition to necrotic areas, three tumor components - fatty, myxoid, as well as contrast-enhancing non-fatty, non-myxoid - could be identified. The mean fraction of fatty tumor areas in low-grade myxoid liposarcomas was 10 ± 11% as compared to 6 ± 4% for high-grade myxoid liposarcomas (P = 0.66). Myxoid components accounted for 88 ± 16% in low-grade myxoid liposarcomas, but only for 45 ± 25% in high-grade myxoid liposarcomas (P < 0.0001). The non-fatty, non-myxoid tumor fraction was significantly higher in high-grade myxoid liposarcomas (50 ± 25%) as compared to low-grade myxoid liposarcomas (2 ± 9%; P < 0.0001). A proportion of > 5% of this tumor fraction was found to be a precise unique predictor for high-grade myxoid liposarcomas with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 95%. CONCLUSION: Tumor components with contrast-enhancing non-fatty, non-myxoid imaging features were predominantly found in high-grade myxoid liposarcomas, which may histologically resemble round cell clusters.

Osteosarcoma of the mobile spine.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this analysis were to investigate features and outcome of high-grade osteosarcomas of the mobile spine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since 1977, 20 Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group patients had a diagnosis of high-grade osteosarcomas of the mobile spine and were included in this retrospective analysis of patient-, tumor- and treatment-related variables and outcome. RESULTS: The median age was 29 years (range 5-58). Most frequent tumor sites were thoracic and lumbar spine. All but three patients had nonmetastatic disease at diagnosis. Treatment included surgery and chemotherapy for all patients, 13 were also irradiated. Eight patients failed to achieve a macroscopically complete surgical remission (five local, one primary metastases, two both), six died, two are alive, both with radiotherapy. Of 12 patients with complete remission at all sites, three had a recurrence (two local, one metastases) and died. The median follow-up of the 11 survivors was 8.7 years (range 3.1-22.3), 5-year overall and event-free survival rates were 60% and 43%. Age <40 years, nonmetastatic disease at diagnosis and complete remission predicted for better overall survival (OS, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Osteosarcomas of the mobile spine are rare. With complete resection (and potentially radiotherapy) and chemotherapy, prognosis may be comparable with that of appendicular osteosarcomas.

The treatment of uterine sarcomas.

Uterine sarcomas are rare and comprise only 3% of all uterine cancers. Within the group of adult soft tissue sarcomas, they account for ∼7% of new cases. They consist of several distinct histological subtypes like leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal tumors, undifferentiated sarcomas, pure heterologous sarcomas, and mixed epithelial and mesenchymal tumors. Standard treatment in localized disease is abdominal hysterectomy. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and lymphadenectomy have no proven value in leiomyosarcomas and high-grade undifferentiated sarcomas. However, in endometrial stromal tumors, given the hormonal reponsiveness of most tumors, salpingo-oophorectomy is generally recommended. Carcinosarcomas are treated according to current recommendations for epithelial uterine cancers. In leiomyosarcomas, postoperative radiation does not improve both relapse-free and overall survival. adjuvant chemotherapy seems to improve survival in the context of uncontrolled phase II trials. However, it is currently not considered standard of care in the absence of data from randomized trials. In contrast, adjuvant chemotherapy does improve overall survival in carcinosarcomas and is therefore considered standard of care. Systemic therapy for advanced uterine leiomyosarcomas, undifferentiated uterine sarcomas, and heterologous sarcomas is generally following the recommendations for adult soft tissue sarcomas. Endometrial stromal sarcomas are usually hormonal receptor positive, which allows endocrine therapy in most cases.

Hypertension as a potential biomarker of efficacy in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated with sunitinib.

BACKGROUND: Reliable biomarkers of sunitinib response in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) are lacking. Hypertension (HTN), an on-target class effect of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling-pathway inhibitors, has been shown to correlate with clinical outcome in advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis examined correlations between sunitinib-associated HTN and antitumor efficacy (N = 319) and safety (N = 1565) across three advanced GIST studies. Blood pressure (BP) was measured on days 1 and 28 of each treatment cycle at a minimum. Time-to-event endpoints were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods, and patient subgroups with and without HTN (maximum systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg) were compared using Cox proportional hazards models. Landmark analyses evaluated associations between early HTN and efficacy endpoints. Adverse events (AEs) were compared between groups. RESULTS: Sunitinib-associated HTN correlated with improved objective response rates, time to tumor progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Almost all benefits remained significant in multivariate and landmark analyses. Overall incidences of HTN-related AEs were low and similar between groups; incidences of cardiovascular AEs were somewhat higher in patients with HTN. CONCLUSION: Sunitinib-associated HTN appeared to correlate with improved clinical outcomes in GIST, while incidences of HTN-associated AEs were generally low and manageable.

Phase III study of nilotinib versus best supportive care with or without a TKI in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors resistant to or intolerant of imatinib and sunitinib.

BACKGROUND: This phase III open-label trial investigated the efficacy of nilotinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors following prior imatinib and sunitinib failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized 2:1 to nilotinib 400 mg b.i.d. or best supportive care (BSC; BSC without tyrosine kinase inhibitor, BSC+imatinib, or BSC+sunitinib). Primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival (PFS) based on blinded central radiology review (CRR). Patients progressing on BSC could cross over to nilotinib. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-eight patients enrolled. Median PFS was similar between arms (nilotinib 109 days, BSC 111 days; P=0.56). Local investigator-based intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed a significantly longer median PFS with nilotinib (119 versus 70 days; P=0.0007). A trend in longer median overall survival (OS) was noted with nilotinib (332 versus 280 days; P=0.29). Post hoc subset analyses in patients with progression and only one prior regimen each of imatinib and sunitinib revealed a significant difference in median OS of >4 months in favor of nilotinib (405 versus 280 days; P=0.02). Nilotinib was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: In the ITT analysis, no significant difference in PFS was observed between treatment arms based on CRR. In the post hoc subset analyses, nilotinib provided significantly longer median OS.

Adjuvant therapy in primary GIST: state-of-the-art.

BACKGROUND: The management of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) has evolved with the introduction of adjuvant therapy. Recently reported results of the SSG XVIII/AIO trial by the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group (SSG) and the German Working Group on Medical Oncology (AIO) represent a significant change in the evidence for adjuvant therapy duration. The objectives of this European Expert Panel meeting were to describe the optimal management and best practice for the systemic adjuvant treatment of patients with primary GISTs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A panel of medical oncology experts from European sarcoma research groups were invited to a 1-day workshop. Several questions and discussion points were selected by the organising committee prior to the conference. The experts reviewed the current literature of all clinical trials available on adjuvant therapy for primary GISTs, considered the quality evidence and formulated recommendations for each discussion point. RESULTS: Clinical issues were identified and provisional clinical opinions were formulated for adjuvant treatment patient selection, imatinib dose, duration and patient recall, mutational analysis and follow-up of primary GIST patients. Adjuvant imatinib 400 mg/day for 3 years duration is a standard treatment in all patients with significant risk of recurrence following resection of primary GISTs. Patient selection for adjuvant therapy should be based on any of the three commonly used patient risk stratification schemes. R1 surgery (versus R0) alone is not an indication for adjuvant imatinib in low-risk GIST. Recall and imatinib restart could be proposed in patients who discontinued 1-year adjuvant imatinib within the previous 3 months and may be considered on a case-by-case basis in patients who discontinued within the previous year. Mutational analysis is recommended in all cases of GISTs using centralised laboratories with good quality control. Treatment is not recommended in an imatinib-insensitive D842V-mutated GIST. During adjuvant treatment, patients are recommended to be clinically assessed at 1- to 3-month intervals. Upon discontinuation, computed tomography scan (CT) scans are recommended every 3 to 4 months for 2 years when the risk of relapse is highest, followed by every 6 months until year 5 and annually until year 10 after treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Key points in systemic adjuvant treatment and clinical management of primary GISTs as well as open questions were identified during this European Expert Panel meeting on GIST management.

Chemotherapy treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. The SArcoma treatment and Burden of Illness in North America and Europe (SABINE) study.

BACKGROUND: To describe chemotherapy treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (mSTS) patients with favorable response to chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multicenter (25) multi-country (9) retrospective chart review of mSTS patients with favorable response to chemotherapy, defined as stable disease or better following four cycles. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirteen patients (58% female; mean age 54.7 years) received a mean of 2.7 lines of chemotherapy and 5.2 cycles per line. The most common first-line regimens were doxorubicin (34%) and anthracycline plus ifosfamide (30%). Favorable response was achieved by 83% to first-line and 42% and 38% in second- and third-line chemotherapy. The most common reason for chemotherapy discontinuation in lines with a favorable response was reaching a predefined number of cycles in first line (64% of 213) and disease progression in second or later lines (41% of 138). The mean time off chemotherapy was 38.0 weeks after first line, falling to 2.7-6.4 weeks in second or later lines. Median overall and progression-free survival were 23.5 (95% confidence interval 20.5-28.1) and 8.3 (7.4-9.9) months from first favorable response to chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: mSTS patients achieving favorable response to chemotherapy have poor outcomes. Additional treatment options are needed.

Perioperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and capecitabine (DCX) in gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a phase II study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO){dagger}.

BACKGROUND: This prospective multicentre phase II trial assessed the feasibility and efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and capecitabine (DCX) in patients with gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients with curatively resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach, the gastro-oesophageal junction or the lower third of the oesophagus were enrolled. Patients received docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) (day 1), followed by oral capecitabine 1875 mg/m(2) divided into two doses (days 1-14) every 3 weeks. There were three cycles preoperatively and three cycles postoperatively. The primary end point was the R0 resection rate. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were recruited and assessed for feasibility and efficacy. 94.1% of patients received all three planned cycles preoperatively, and 52.9% received three cycles postoperatively. The R0 resection rate was 90.2%. 13.7% of patients showed complete pathological remission (pCR). Toxicity was acceptably tolerable. Without prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration, neutropenic fever developed in 21.5% of patients preoperatively (grade 3 or 4) and in 11.1% of patients postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: DCX is a safe and feasible perioperative regimen in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma with a high percentage of cycles delivered pre- and postoperatively, compared with standard practice. The high efficacy in terms of R0 resection rate and pCR is very promising.