Implementation and outcomes of a pharmacist-led collaborative drug therapy management program for oncology symptom management.

INTRODUCTION: Nausea, vomiting, constipation, and diarrhea are common cancer and cancer therapy adverse effects. Pharmacists are uniquely positioned to optimize patient symptom control and minimize excess use of hospital resources, such as emergency department visits. METHODS: Michigan Medicine oncology clinical pharmacists have been independently providing patient symptom management through a collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM) program which established guidelines for management of gastrointestinal toxicities (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and/or constipation) secondary to a patient's cancer diagnosis or treatment of the cancer. Patients were referred to the pharmacist by the treating oncologist or hematologist. RESULTS: From June 2019 to May 2020, there were a total of 62 patient referrals. Ten of the 62 referrals did not meet the CDTM inclusion criteria, resulting in 52 patients who were managed by the pharmacists. The total number of individual pharmacist visits was 136, with a median of 2.2 (range, 0-11) visits per patient referred. A total of 169 categorized pharmacist interventions were captured. Most interventions (100/169, 59.2%) were related to nausea/vomiting. Diarrhea-related and constipation-related interventions accounted for 10 (5.9%) and 13 (7.7%) of the total interventions, respectively. Most patients (36/52, 69.2%) had a reduction in the severity of their referral diagnosis symptom(s) based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grading. CONCLUSION: The Michigan Medicine Pharmacist CDTM program allowed pharmacists to independently manage gastrointestinal toxicities of patients with cancer and improved patient symptom severity. The CDTM program has the opportunity to improve quality of care.

Role of caplacizumab in the treatment of acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura is a rare blood disorder with a high early mortality rate, if untreated. Standard of care plasma exchange and glucocorticoids have dramatically improved survival. However, additional advancements are necessary to further decrease mortality. Caplacizumab-yhdp (Cablivi®) is the first Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment indicated for adult patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, in combination with plasma exchange and immunosuppressive therapy. However, there are considerable risks associated with the use of caplacizumab and they must be weighed against the benefits of the medication.

Multicenter evaluation of the addition of eltrombopag to immunosuppressive therapy for adults with severe aplastic anemia.

Eltrombopag has been shown to improve response rates when added to standard therapy in adults with severe aplastic anemia in controlled trial settings. However, outcomes in real-world populations have mostly been examined in small retrospective studies. This robust, multicenter, retrospective cohort study across six academic health systems compared outcomes in patients who received immunosuppressive therapy with or without eltrombopag. The study included 82 patients who received front-line therapy from January 2014 to August 2021. Overall response rates at 6 months did not differ significantly for patients receiving eltrombopag versus immunosuppressive therapy alone (58% v. 65%, p = 0.56). However, complete response rates at 6 and 12 months were over two times higher in the eltrombopag arm (29% v. 12%, p = 0.06 and 48% v. 18%, p = 0.005). Rates of hepatotoxicity were similar across both arms. Eltrombopag addition did not impact overall survival (median not reached in either arm at 2 years, p = 0.86) or disease-free survival (median not reached v. 13.3 months at 2 years, p = 0.20). Eltrombopag may not produce as large of a benefit in real-world settings compared to controlled trial settings but may offer patients deeper responses with similar rates of toxicity to immunosuppressive therapy alone.

Multicenter comparison of first salvage chemotherapy versus novel therapy regimens in adult relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) represent a heterogeneous population and therefore there is no standard of care first salvage regimen. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis to compare chemotherapy (e.g. HyperCVAD, MOAD, Larson/CALGB-9511, etc.) to novel agents (blinatumomab or inotuzumab) in first salvage. The primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was not significantly different among treatment arms, with a median OS of 10.6 months with chemotherapy and 10.1 months with novel therapy (p = .799). Similarly, there was no difference in the CR/CRi rate, with a CR/CRi in 18 patients (41.9%) versus 16 patients (47.1%) treated with salvage chemotherapy and novel therapy, respectively (p = .817). Age significantly impacted the probability of achieving CR/CRi with novel therapy versus chemotherapy. This analysis suggests the use of chemotherapy in first salvage still represents an appropriate treatment option, particularly for young fit patients, as the median OS was roughly 10 months regardless of whether patients received novel therapy or chemotherapy in first salvage. For the reported outcomes, 100% of patients in the novel therapy arm received a novel therapy (per design), whereas only 60.5% of patients in the chemotherapy arm required a novel therapy. Thus, 40% of patients did not require a novel therapy for similar OS. This analysis demonstrates that first-line chemotherapy can achieve similar results to novel therapies, especially now that novel therapies are available for subsequent relapses. However, this study has several limitations including younger age, increased CNS involvement, and higher blast percentage in the chemotherapy arm and potential confounders, including selection of treatment sequence as 43 patients (55.8%) ultimately received both chemotherapy and novel therapy. Therefore, a larger, prospective, randomized study with adequate chemotherapy comparators and availability of novel agents upon relapse is warranted to confirm these results.

Propensity-score Matched Comparison of Salvage Chemotherapy Regimens in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) confers a poor prognosis, and there is no single standard of care first-line salvage regimen. FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) is a common salvage regimen with a favorable toxicity and efficacy profile in poor-risk AML. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis of first relapse/primary refractory patients with AML that received salvage chemotherapy from January 2009 to July 2019. We propensity-score matched patients 1:1 (based on age at diagnosis, cytogenetic risk group, Charlson comorbidity index, de novo vs. secondary AML, and whether or not they received an allogeneic stem cell transplant in first complete remission) into 2 groups, FLAG (Group 1) or non-FLAG (Group 2) as first-line salvage regimen, with 66 patients in each group. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (complete response and complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery). RESULTS: The median patient age was 59 years (range, 19-80 years). Patients treated with FLAG had a higher overall response rate (complete response/complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery) (71.2% vs. 50.0%; odds ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-5.08; P = .013), longer event-free survival (8.9 vs. 2.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.86; P = .005), and longer overall survival (14.2 vs. 5.9 months; HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.93; P = .019). Patients who received FLAG had a shorter median duration of neutropenia (22 vs. 34 days; HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.29-0.64; P < .001). CONCLUSION: This analysis supports the FLAG regimen as an effective and well-tolerated salvage therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory AML.

Hybrid chemotherapy regimen (FLAG-IDA-vincristine-prednisone) for acute leukemia with mixed-phenotype blasts.

BACKGROUND: Acute leukemia with mixed-phenotype blasts is associated with poor outcomes. There are no standard treatment regimens. Due to disease heterogeneity, controversy exists over whether an AML-based, ALL-based, or a combined (hybrid) AML/ALL-based regimen is most appropriate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective case series review of patients with acute leukemia with mixed phenotype blasts as described by the European Group for Immunological Characterization of Leukemia (EGIL) or the 2008 WHO classification. Patients were treated from November 2014 and December 2019 with the combination chemotherapy regimen FLAG-idarubicin-vincristine-prednisone with or without rituximab. Outcomes included induction response, time to transplant, time to relapse, overall survival, time to neutrophil or platelet recovery, infection, and duration of hospitalization. RESULTS: The median age was 68 years (range 21-77). Six patients (87.5 %) had unfavorable/complex cytogenetics. All patients achieved a complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi). Estimated 1-year overall survival was 85.7 %. There were no deaths during induction, with a 22 day median duration of hospitalization for induction. CONCLUSION: The combination of FLAG, idarubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (FLAG-VIPR) demonstrated favorable induction responses in a disease state with historically poor outcomes and should be studied in a prospective clinical trial.

Impact of prophylactic intrathecal chemotherapy on CNS relapse rates in AML patients presenting with hyperleukocytosis.

Central nervous system (CNS) relapse in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) confers a poor prognosis. Despite the identification of risk factors for CNS relapse (e.g. hyperleukocytosis), there is no standard practice for CNS relapse risk reduction with intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy in patients. We compared outcomes of 50 patients who did not receive IT chemotherapy with 18 patients who did receive IT chemotherapy with a hyperleukocytosis at diagnosis (defined as white blood cell count ≥100,000 cells/mcL). There were three occurrences of CNS relapse, all within patients who did not receive prophylaxis. There was no difference in the incidence of CNS relapse between the patient cohorts (p = .560). These results highlight the low incidence of CNS relapse in our patient population that received and survived induction chemotherapy despite selecting for a high risk cohort. Furthermore, there is a need for a CNS relapse registry to standardize treatment approaches in this high-risk patient population.

Contemporary treatment options for a classical disease: Advanced Hodgkin lymphoma.

Advanced classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is a rare lymphoid disease characterized by the presence of Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells. Each year, cHL accounts for 0.5% of all new cancer diagnoses and about 80% are diagnosed with advanced stage disease. Given the significant improvement in cure rates, the focus of treatment has shifted towards minimization of acute and long-term toxicities. PET-adapted strategies have largely been adopted as standard of care in the United States in an attempt to balance toxicities with adequate lymphoma control. However, the appropriate upfront chemotherapy regimen (ABVD versus eBEACOPP) remains controversial.