RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Conventional serologic typing of red blood cell systems other than ABO and RhD can be inaccurate and difficult to interpret in patients who have recently undergone blood transfusion. While molecular-based assays are not used routinely, the usefulness of genotyping was investigated in order to determine patients who may benefit from this procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood samples were taken from 101 patients with haemato-oncological, chronic renal, or gastroenterological diseases and from 50 donor controls; the samples were tested for Fya and Fyb by applying serologic and genetic methods. All patients had received 3 or more units of RBCs during the last 3 months. An average of 6.1 RBC units were transfused per patient. The average length of time from transfusion until blood sampling was 24.4 days. The haemagglutination test was applied for serological analysis, and the restriction length polymorphism assay was used for genotyping. RESULTS: In total, 33 (32.7%) patients showed positive reactions with anti-Fya or anti-Fyb while being negative genetically. False-positive Fya results were found in 23 samples, and false-positive Fyb in 10 specimens. During the last 3 months, significantly more RBC units were transfused to patients with discrepant results than to those with accurate phenotyping/genotyping results: median of 5 (mean ± SE: 6.85±0.69) versus median of 4 (mean: 5.71±0.51), respectively (p=0.025). The median length of time after the last transfusion was 25 days (mean: 28.72±2.23 days) in the group with accurate phenotyping/genotyping results versus a median of 14 days (mean: 15.52±1.95 days) in the group with discrepant results (p=0.001). Phenotypes and genotypes coincided in all donor samples. CONCLUSION: Genotyping assays for the Duffy system should be considered if the patient underwent blood transfusion less than 3 or 4 weeks before the sample collection. If the time frame from RBC transfusion exceeds 6 weeks, Duffy phenotyping can provide accurate results.
RESUMEN
The morbidity and mortality of BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasia (MPN) patients is highly dependent on thrombosis that may be affected by antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLA) and lupus anticoagulant. Our aim was to evaluate the association of the aPLA together with platelet receptor glycoprotein (GP) Ia/IIa c.807C>T CT/TT genotypes and thrombotic complications in patients with MPNs. The study included 108 patients with BCR-ABL-negative MPN with data of previous thrombosis. Two different screening and one confirmatory test for the lupus anticoagulant were performed. Thrombotic complications were present in 59 (54.6%) subjects. aPLA were more frequently found in MPN patients with thrombosis vs no thrombosis (25.4 and 6.1%; p = 0.007). MPN patients with arterial thrombosis were more frequently positive for aPLA vs no arterial thrombosis (38.8 and 11.9%; p = 0.001). aPLA were more frequently found in patients with cerebrovascular events vs other arterial thrombotic complications or no thrombosis, respectively (39.3, 6.1, and 12.9%; p < 0.001). MPN patients with thrombosis were more frequently positive with aPLA and had platelet receptor GP Ia/IIa c.807C>T CT/TT genotypes compared to MPN patients without thrombosis (18.6 and 2.0%; p = 0.006). aPLA alone or with coexistence with platelet receptor GP Ia/IIa c.807C>T CT/TT polymorphism could be associated with thrombotic complications in patients with MPN.