A multi-center analysis of individuals with a 47,XXY/46,XX karyotype.

INTRODUCTION: Klinefelter syndrome (KS), a sex chromosome aneuploidy, is associated with a 47,XXY chromosomal complement and is diagnosed in ∼1:600 live male births. Individuals with a 46,XX cell line in addition to 47,XXY are less common with a limited number of published case reports. METHODOLOGY: To better understand the implications of a 47,XXY/46,XX karyotype, we conducted a retrospective, multi-center analysis of the cytogenetic findings and associated clinical records of 34 patients diagnosed with this SCA across 14 institutions. RESULTS: Presence of the XX cell line ranged from 5-98% in patient specimens. Phenotypes also exhibited significant heterogeneity with some reporting a single reason for referral and others presenting with a constellation of symptoms, including ambiguous genitalia and ovotestes. Ovotestes were present in 12% of individuals in this cohort, who had a significantly higher percentage of XX cells. Notably, two patients were assigned female sex at birth DISCUSSION: These findings highlight the variability of the clinical phenotypes associated with this SCA as well as the challenges of clinical management for this population. Karyotype or FISH analysis, which offer single-cell resolution, rather than chromosomal microarray or molecular testing, is the ideal test strategy in these instances as mosaicism can occur at low levels.

Pediatric spinal ependymoma with chromothripsis of chromosome 6: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Ependymomas are the third most common central nervous system tumor in the pediatric population; however, spinal ependymomas in children are rare. Ependymomas affecting the spinal cord most frequently occur in adults of 20-40 years of age. The current World Health Organization classification system for ependymomas is now composed of ten different entities based on histopathology, location, and molecular studies, with evidence that the new classification system more accurately predicts clinical outcomes. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 16-year-old Caucasian female patient with a history of type 2 neurofibromatosis with multiple schwannomas, meningioma, and spinal ependymoma. Chromosome analysis of the harvested spinal ependymoma tumor sample revealed a 46,XX,-6,+7,-22,+mar[16]/46,XX[4] karyotype. Subsequent OncoScan microarray analysis of the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor sample confirmed + 7, -22 and clarified that the marker chromosome represents chromothripsis of the entire chromosome 6 with more than 100 breakpoints. Fluorescent in situ hybridization and microarray analysis showed no evidence of MYCN amplification. The final integrated pathology diagnosis was spinal ependymoma (central nervous system World Health Organization grade 2 with no MYCN amplification. CONCLUSION: This case adds to the existing literature of pediatric patients with spinal ependymomas and expands the cytogenetic findings that may be seen in patients with this tumor type. This case also highlights the value of cytogenetics and microarray analysis in solid tumors to provide a more accurate molecular diagnosis.

The challenges and opportunities of offering and integrating training in clinical molecular genetics and clinical cytogenetics: A survey of LGG Fellowship Program Directors.

Purpose: The specialty of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics (LGG) was created in 2017 in an effort to reflect the increasing convergence in technologies and approaches between clinical molecular genetics and clinical cytogenetics. However, there has not yet been any formal evaluation of the merging of these disciplines and the challenges faced by Program Directors (PDs) tasked with ensuring the successful training of laboratory geneticists under the new model. Methods: An electronic multi-question Qualtrics survey was created and was sent to the PD for each of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited LGG fellowship programs at the time. The data were collected, and the responses were aggregated for each question. Results: All of the responding PDs had started training at least 1 LGG fellow. PDs noted challenges with funding, staff shortages, molecular/cytogenetics content integration, limited total training time, increased remote work, increased sendout testing, and a lack of prior cytogenetics knowledge among incoming fellows. Conclusion: This survey attempted to assess the challenges that LGG PDs have been facing in offering and integrating clinical molecular genetics and clinical cytogenetics fellowship training. Common challenges between programs were noted, and a set of 6 concluding comments are provided to facilitate future discussion.