[Immunotherapy: also in elderly patients ?] / Immunothérapie: aussi chez le patient âgé ?

The emergence of immunotherapy has generated great enthusiasm in oncology improving the prognosis of pathologies such as melanoma, lung cancer, kidney cancer, bladder and head and neck cancers. This enthusiasm concerns also older patients in view of the good tolerance of immunotherapy in young people. However, advanced age is linked to changes in the immune system, called immunosenescence, which could have a negative impact on the efficacy and toxicity of immunotherapy treatment. Knowledge in terms of efficacy and tolerance is limited for geriatric patients, few being included in clinical studies. This article summarizes the experience of immunotherapy in large clinical trials. It appears that the immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective and well tolerated in the elderly.

L'émergence de l'immunothérapie a engendré un grand enthousiasme en oncologie en améliorant le pronostic de pathologies telles que le mélanome et les cancers pulmonaires, rénaux, vésicaux et de la sphère ORL. Cet enthousiasme concerne aussi les patients âgés au vu de la bonne tolérance de l'immunothérapie chez les jeunes. Cependant, l'âge avancé est lié à des modifications du système immunitaire, appelées immunosénescence, qui pourraient avoir un impact négatif sur l'efficacité et la toxicité du traitement par immunothérapie. Les connaissances en termes d'efficacité et de tolérance restent limitées pour les patients gériatriques, inclus en petit nombre dans les études cliniques. Cet article résume l'expérience de l'immunothérapie dans les grands essais cliniques. Il apparaît que les inhibiteurs de points de contrôle immunitaire soient efficaces et bien tolérés chez le sujet âgé.

Daratumumab during Myeloma Induction Therapy Is Associated with Impaired Stem Cell Mobilization and Prolonged Post-Transplant Hematologic Recovery.

Daratumumab is being increasingly integrated into first-line multiple myeloma (MM) induction regimens, leading to improved response depth and longer progression-free survival. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is commonly performed as a consolidation strategy following first-line induction in fit MM patients. We investigated a cohort of 155 MM patients who received ASCT after first-line induction with or without daratumumab (RVd, n = 110; D-RVd, n = 45), analyzing differences in stem cell mobilization, apheresis, and engraftment. In the D-RVd group, fewer patients successfully completed mobilization at the planned apheresis date (44% vs. 71%, p = 0.0029), and more patients required the use of rescue plerixafor (38% vs. 28%, p = 0.3052). The median count of peripheral CD34+ cells at apheresis was lower (41.37 vs. 52.19 × 106/L, p = 0.0233), and the total number of collected CD34+ cells was inferior (8.27 vs. 10.22 × 106/kg BW, p = 0.0139). The time to recovery of neutrophils and platelets was prolonged (12 vs. 11 days, p = 0.0164; and 16 vs. 14 days, p = 0.0002, respectively), and a higher frequency of erythrocyte transfusions (74% vs. 51%, p = 0.0103) and a higher number of platelet concentrates/patients were required (4 vs. 2; p = 0.001). The use of daratumumab during MM induction might negatively impact stem cell mobilization and engraftment in the context of ASCT.

LAG-3 Expression Predicts Outcome in Stage II Colon Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: LAG-3 is an inhibitory immune checkpoint molecule that suppresses T cell activation and inflammatory cytokine secretion. T cell density in the tumor microenvironment of colon cancer plays an important role in the host's immunosurveillance. We therefore hypothesized that LAG-3 expression on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) predicts outcome in patients with stage II colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Immunohistochemical staining for LAG-3 was performed on tissue microarrays (TMAs) of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from 142 stage II colon cancer patients. LAG-3 expression was assessed in TILs within both the tumor front and tumor center and scored as either positive or negative. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: In patients diagnosed with stage II colon cancer, the presence of LAG-3 expression on TILs was significantly associated with better 5-year DFS (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.80, p = 0.009). The effect on DFS was mainly due to LAG-3-positive TILs in the tumor front (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.82, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Assessment of LAG-3 might help to predict outcomes in patients with stage II colon cancer and potentially identify those patients who might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, LAG-3 may serve as a prognostic biomarker in stage II colon cancer.