Ureteral injuries in colorectal surgery and the impact of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches.

BACKGROUND: Ureteral injury is a feared complication in colorectal surgery that has been increasing over the past decade. Some have attributed this to an increased adoption of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), but the literature is hardly conclusive. In this study we aim to further assess the overall trend of ureteral injuries in colorectal surgery, and investigate propensity adjusted contributions from open and MIS to include robotic-assisted surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of colorectal surgeries from 2006 to 2016 using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predisposing and protective factors. Demographics, hospital factors, and case-mix differences for open and MIS were accounted for via propensity analysis. The NIS coding structure changed in 2015, which could introduce a potential source of incongruity in complication rates over time. As a result, all statistical analyses included only the first nine years of data, or were conducted before and after the change for comparison. RESULTS: Of 514,162 colorectal surgeries identified there were 1598 ureteral injuries (0.31%). Ureteral injuries were found to be increasing through 2015 (2.3/1000 vs 3.3/1000; p < 0.001) and through the coding transition to 2016 (4.8/1000; p < 0.001). This trend was entirely accounted for by injuries made during open surgery, with decreasing injury rates for MIS over time. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) for ureteral injury with all MIS vs. open cases was 0.81 (95% CI 0.70-0.93, p = 0.003) and for robotic-assisted surgery alone versus open cases was 0.50 (95% CI 0.33-0.77, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence rate of ureteral injuries during open colorectal surgery is increasing over time, but have been stable or decreasing for MIS cases. These findings hold even after using propensity score analysis. More research is needed to further delineate the impact of MIS and robotic-assisted surgery on ureteral injuries.

Necrotizing soft tissue infection following a peripheral bypass.

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI), formerly referred to as necrotizing fasciitis, is a rare but serious postoperative complication. NSTI following arterial bypass is seen only once in the literature (for a coronary artery bypass) and is not mentioned following peripheral bypass. Although surgical site infections have been studied extensively, there are limited published data on postoperative NSTI and no data for NSTI following peripheral arterial bypass. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we present the first, to our knowledge, reported instance of an NSTI following a lower extremity peripheral bypass. Despite the continued function of the bypass, the patient became rapidly systemically ill with a focus at the surgical site. Because of prompt surgical debridement, the patient survived this severe infection, though did require an above the knee amputation to control the rapid spread of the disease. The patient, a native of American Samoa, was infected with organisms infrequently associated with NSTI, Morganella morganii and Aeromonas hydrophila. This article discusses the diagnosis and treatment of this rare postoperative complication, along with a brief review of the microbiology of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: NSTI is a rare but lethal postoperative complication. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of an NSTI following an arterial peripheral bypass. This patient survived because of prompt and aggressive intervention.

Balancing Expectations: Navigating Medically Necessary Torso Procedures with Cosmetic Components in the Military Healthcare System.

Background: Surgeons performing federal insurance-financed procedures involving medically necessary and cosmetic components must navigate patient expectations to avoid postoperative disappointment. This challenge is amplified in military healthcare, where different surgical specialties concurrently address the same diagnosis, while the Department of Defense policy on cosmetic fees and TRICARE's definition of excluded services adds further complexity. With the increasing prevalence of elevated body mass index, focus is directed toward diagnoses involving the torso, specifically gynecomastia in male individuals, and diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles (DRAM) in female individuals. Methods: The study involves a team of experienced board-certified surgeons conducting a narrative review of surgical procedures addressing gynecomastia and DRAM. Relevant literature from 2000 to 2023 is reviewed, focusing on patient satisfaction regarding outcome of medically necessary and cosmetic aspects. Results: For gynecomastia, distinguishing between true and pseudogynecomastia is critical. A protocol is presented based on the Simon classification, offering evidence-based guidelines for surgical interventions. Similarly, for DRAM, a minimally invasive approach balances deployment readiness and surgical recovery. The presence of a symptomatic panniculus, however, requires more invasive intervention. The downstream ramification of limited Current Procedural Terminology codes for these interventions is discussed. Conclusions: In medically necessary procedures funded through federal health plans such as TRICARE, the primary goal is functional improvement, not the final torso contour. Clear communication and preoperative counseling are crucial to managing patient expectations. Providers in military healthcare must navigate the complex landscape of patient expectations, policy guidelines, and duty readiness while maintaining the standard of care.

Optimal Time to Surgery for Small Bowel Obstruction: A Risk Adjusted Analysis Utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: The management of a small bowel obstruction (SBO) remains a challenge for general surgeons. The majority of SBOs can be treated conservatively; however, when surgery is required, the timing of operative intervention remains uncertain. Utilizing a large national database, we sought to evaluate the optimal timeframe for surgery following hospital admission with a diagnosis of SBO. METHODS: This was a retrospective review utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2006-2015). Outcomes following surgery for SBO were identified using ICD-9-CM coding. Two comorbidity indices were utilized to determine severity of illness. Patients were stratified into four groups based on time in days from admission to surgery. Propensity score models were created to predict the number of days until surgery following admission. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine risk adjusted postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 92 807 cases of non-elective surgery for SBO. The overall mortality rate was 4.7%. Surgery on days 3-5 was associated with the lowest rate of mortality. A longer preoperative length of stay (LOS) (3-5 days) was associated with a significantly greater number of wound (OR = 1.24) and procedural (OR = 1.17) complications compared to day 0. However, delayed surgical intervention (≥6 days) was associated with decreased cardiac (OR = .69) and pulmonary complications (OR = .58). DISCUSSION: After adjustment, a preoperative LOS of 3-5 days was associated with a decreased risk of mortality. In addition, increasing preoperative LOS was associated with decreased cardiopulmonary complications. However, an increased risk of procedural and wound complications during this time period suggest surgery may be more technically challenging.

Review of a Role 2 in Afghanistan: Understanding the Data on Medical and Surgical Volumes in a Deployed Setting.

INTRODUCTION: The U.S. forward military surgical assets have deployed throughout the Iraq and Afghanistan theaters of operations to maintain surgical support for injured service members in compliance with the "golden hour" as specified in the Gates Memorandum. The support of evacuation times of less than 60 minutes to a surgical capability has resulted in smaller surgical teams being deployed to an increased number of locations. Over the last 5 years, the combat trauma patient encounters have decreased. Although some Role 2 medical treatment facilities (MTFs) maintain a medical mission, most of them are set up to provide trauma care. The largest and busiest Role 2 MTF is located near Kabul and serves the NATO population. The aims of this review are to examine the epidemiological data of the largest Role 2 MTF in theater, to examine damage control surgical capability optimization in a facility with a largely medical mission, and to analyze what this may mean in the context of surgical skill atrophy. METHODS: As part of a performance improvement project, a retrospective review of prospectively collected data at the Hamid Karzai NATO Role 2 MTF was conducted. Four years of clinical and epidemiological data were reviewed. Independent source verification of the records was conducted by validating records via comparison to the ancillary services' records. When available, data on other MTFs in Afghanistan were used for comparison. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze demographics, evacuations, surgeries, and admissions. RESULTS: Over the studied period, 0.7% of patients were seen for battle injuries. The average number of patients seen was 636 per month with 184 per month in 2016 and a steady increase to 805 per month in 2019. The operative volume was a mean of 2.8 surgeries per month with a median of 2 surgeries per month (orthopedic and general surgery combined). Other Role 2 facilities were on average seeing even fewer operative patients, although there were some treating more operative patients. From available data, no other Role 2 MTFs were treating close to as many total patients (all types combined). The two Role 3 facilities evaluated saw significantly more operative patients at an average of 53 surgeries per month. CONCLUSION: The ratio of operative cases per surgeon is substantially higher at these Role 3 facilities, when compared to Role 2 facilities, although still significantly lower than would be expected at an U.S. Level 1 trauma center. This is consistent with other larger epidemiological studies on forward MTF workload. The vast majority of patient care is related to treatment of disease and preventative medicine. Only 0.7% of the large volume of patient visits evaluated were for battle injuries. There is a scarcity of both surgical and trauma patients, with a more pronounced reduction at Role 2 compared to Role 3 facilities. This is especially evident here with a facility that has such a large patient population but low trauma or surgical patient volume. Sustaining trauma and surgical skills for both surgeons and trauma teams with a paucity of trauma patients is a significant concern.

Safe surgery in the elderly: A review of outcomes following robotic proctectomy from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample in a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: As our nation's population ages, operating on older and sicker patients occurs more frequently. Robotic operations have been thought to bridge the gap between a laparoscopic and an open approach, especially in more complex cases like proctectomy. METHODS: Our objective was to evaluate the use and outcomes of robotic proctectomy compared to open and laparoscopic approaches for rectal cancer in the elderly. A retrospective cross-sectional cohort study utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS; 2006-2013) was performed. All cases were restricted to age 70 years old or greater. RESULTS: We identified 6740 admissions for rectal cancer including: 5879 open, 666 laparoscopic, and 195 robotic procedures. The median age was 77 years old. The incidence of a robotic proctectomy increased by 39%, while the open approach declined by 6% over the time period studied. Median (interquartile range) length of stay was shorter for robotic procedures at 4.3 (3-7) days, compared to laparoscopic 5.8 (4-8) and open at 6.7 (5-10) days (p < 0.01), while median total hospital charges were greater in the robotic group compared to laparoscopic and open cases ($64,743 vs. $55,813 vs. $50,355, respectively, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the risk of total complications between the different approaches following multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Robotic proctectomy was associated with a shorter LOS, and this may act as a surrogate marker for an overall improvement in adverse events. These results demonstrate that a robotic approach is a safe and feasible option, and should not be discounted solely based on age or comorbidities.

Retrospective Review of Pediatric Blunt Renal Trauma: A Single Institution's Five Year Experience.

Children are at higher risk of renal injury from blunt trauma than adults due to a variety of anatomic factors such as decreased perirenal fat, weaker abdominal muscles, and a less ossified thoracic cage. Non-operative management is gaining in popularity for even major injuries, although there are no universally accepted guidelines. We present a retrospective review of pediatric major blunt renal injuries (grade 3 or higher) at a children's hospital in Hawai'i over a 5-year period. Medical records were examined between January 2009 and September 2014 from Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu, Hawai'i. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of renal trauma, or the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma with hematuria. Exclusion criteria were grade I or II renal injury or death due to an additional traumatic injury. Mechanism of injury, clinical characteristics on admission, blood product requirements, surgical interventions performed, and hospital length of stay were retrospectively analyzed. Eleven total patient records were examined, nine of which fit inclusion criteria. Uniquely, 33% of patients sustained their renal injury while surfing. No patients required laparotomy or nephrectomy, though 22% of patients received a blood transfusion and 44% of patients underwent ureteral stent placement. Non-operative management of major renal injuries in children is feasible and allows for preservation of renal tissue. A novel mechanism of surfing as a cause of major renal trauma is seen in the state of Hawai'i.

An unusual presentation of a rare disease: posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome following abdominal sepsis.

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is an unusual disease of unknown incidence and cause. There are a wide range of associated, predisposing medical causes to include pregnancy, renal failure, immunosuppressive medication administration and hypertension. The diagnosis is made following the radiographic identification of characteristic vasogenic edema in the setting of neurologic impairment. A significant portion of patients will have long-term, if not permanent, sequelae of the disease. We present a patient who developed PRES following a hemicolectomy that was complicated by an anastomotic leak. She went on to a complete recovery following surgical treatment of the leak and supportive care.