Early Conversion to Prednisolone/Everolimus as an Alternative Weaning Regimen Associates With Beneficial Renal Transplant Histology and Function: The Randomized-Controlled MECANO Trial.

In renal transplantation, use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) is associated with nephrotoxicity and immunosuppression with malignancies and infections. This trial aimed to minimize CNI exposure and total immunosuppression while maintaining efficacy. We performed a randomized controlled, open-label multicenter trial with early cyclosporine A (CsA) elimination. Patients started with basiliximab, prednisolone (P), mycophenolate sodium (MPS), and CsA. At 6 months, immunosuppression was tapered to P/CsA, P/MPS, or P/everolimus (EVL). Primary outcomes were renal fibrosis and inflammation. Secondary outcomes were estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and incidence of rejection at 24 months. The P/MPS arm was prematurely halted. The trial continued with P/CsA (N = 89) and P/EVL (N = 96). Interstitial fibrosis and inflammation were significantly decreased and the eGFR was significantly higher in the P/EVL arm. Cumulative rejection rates were 13% (P/EVL) and 19% (P/CsA), (p = 0.08). A post hoc analysis of HLA and donor-specific antibodies at 1 year after transplantation revealed no differences. An individualized immunosuppressive strategy of early CNI elimination to dual therapy with everolimus was associated with decreased allograft fibrosis, preserved allograft function, and good efficacy, but also with more serious adverse events and discontinuation. This can be a valuable alternative regimen in patients suffering from CNI toxicity.

Glycemic Stability Through Islet-After-Kidney Transplantation Using an Alemtuzumab-Based Induction Regimen and Long-Term Triple-Maintenance Immunosuppression.

Pancreatic islet transplantation is performed in a select group of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Immunosuppressive regimens play an important role in long-term islet function. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of islet transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes and a previous kidney transplantation using an alemtuzumab-based induction regimen and triple maintenance immunosuppression. Patients with type 1 diabetes, who had received a kidney transplant previously, were treated with alemtuzumab as induction therapy for their first islet transplantation and basiliximab induction therapy for subsequent islet transplantations. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of triple immunosuppression (tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone). Thirteen patients (age 50.9 ± 9.2 years, duration of diabetes 35 ± 9 years) received a total of 22 islet transplantations. One- and 2-year insulin independence was 62% and 42%, respectively; graft function was 100% and 92%, respectively. HbA1c dropped from 57.2 ± 13.1 (7.4 ± 1.2%) to 44.5 ± 11.8 mmol/molHb (6.2 ± 0.9%) (p = 0.003) after 2 years. Six of 13 patients suffered from severe hypoglycemia before islet transplantation. After transplantation, severe hypoglycemia was restricted to the only patient who lost graft function. Creatinine clearance was unchanged. Islet-after-kidney transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes using an alemtuzumab-based induction regimen leads to considerable islet allograft function and improvement in glycemic control.

Effect of Vagus Nerve Integrity on Short and Long-Term Efficacy of Antireflux Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Vagus nerve injury is a feared complication of antireflux surgery (ARS) that may negatively affect reflux control. The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate short-term and long-term impact of vagus nerve injury, evaluated by pancreatic polypeptide response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia (PP-IH), on the outcome of ARS. METHODS: In the period from 1990 until 2000, 125 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) underwent ARS at a single center. Before and 6 months after surgery, vagus nerve integrity testing (PP-IH), 24-h pH-monitoring, gastric emptying, and reflux-associated symptoms were evaluated. In 2014, 14-25 years after surgery, 110 patients were contacted again for evaluation of long-term symptomatic outcome using two validated questionnaires (Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and GERD-Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL)). RESULTS: Short-term follow-up: vagus nerve injury (PP peak ≤47 pmol/l) was observed in 23 patients (18%) 6 months after fundoplication. In both groups, a comparable decrease in reflux parameters and symptoms was observed at 6-month follow-up. Postoperative gastric emptying was significantly delayed in the vagus nerve injury group compared with the vagus nerve intact group. Long-term follow-up: patients with vagus nerve injury showed significantly less effective reflux control and a higher re-operation rate. CONCLUSIONS: Vagus nerve injury occurs in up to 20% of patients after ARS. Reflux control 6 months after surgery was not affected by vagus nerve injury. However, long-term follow-up showed a negative effect on reflux symptom control and re-operation rate in patients with vagus nerve injury.

The Eurotransplant donor risk index in liver transplantation: ET-DRI.

Recently we validated the donor risk index (DRI) as conducted by Feng et al. for the Eurotransplant region. Although this scoring system is a valid tool for scoring donor liver quality, for allocation purposes a scoring system tailored for the Eurotransplant region may be more appropriate. Objective of our study was to investigate various donor and transplant risk factors and design a risk model for the Eurotransplant region. This study is a database analysis of all 5939 liver transplantations from deceased donors into adult recipients from the 1st of January 2003 until the 31st of December 2007 in Eurotransplant. Data were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models. From 5723 patients follow-up data were available with a mean of 2.5 years. After multivariate analysis the DRI (p < 0.0001), latest lab GGT (p = 0.005) and rescue allocation (p = 0.007) remained significant. These factors were used to create the Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index (ET-DRI). Concordance-index calculation shows this ET-DRI to have high predictive value for outcome after liver transplantation. Therefore, we advise the use of this ET-DRI for risk indication and possibly for allocation purposes within the Eurotrans-plant region.

Donor brain death predisposes human kidney grafts to a proinflammatory reaction after transplantation.

Donor brain death has profound effects on post-transplantation graft function and survival. We hypothesized that changes initiated in the donor influence the graft's response to ischemia and reperfusion. In this study, human brain dead donor kidney grafts were compared to living and cardiac dead donor kidney grafts. Pretransplant biopsies of brain dead donor kidneys contained notably more infiltrating T lymphocytes and macrophages. To assess whether the different donor conditions result in a different response to reperfusion, local cytokine release from the reperfused kidney was studied by measurement of paired arterial and renal venous blood samples. Reperfusion of kidneys from brain dead donors was associated with the instantaneous release of inflammatory cytokines, such as G-CSF, IL-6, IL-9, IL-16 and MCP-1. In contrast, kidneys from living and cardiac dead donors showed a more modest cytokine response with release of IL-6 and small amounts of MCP-1. In conclusion, this study shows that donor brain death initiates an inflammatory state of the graft with T lymphocyte and macrophage infiltration and massive inflammatory cytokine release upon reperfusion. These observations suggest that brain dead donors require a novel approach for donor pretreatment aimed at preventing this inflammatory response to increase graft survival.

Similar liver transplantation survival with selected cardiac death donors and brain death donors.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) with controlled graft donation after cardiac death (DCD) is usually inferior to that with graft donation after brain death (DBD). This study compared outcomes from OLT with DBD versus controlled DCD donors with predefined restrictive acceptance criteria. METHODS: All adult recipients in the Netherlands in 2001-2006 with full-size OLT from DCD (n = 55) and DBD (n = 471) donors were included. Kaplan-Meier, log rank and Cox regression analyses were used. RESULTS: One- and 3-year patient survival rates were similar for DCD (85 and 80 per cent) and DBD (86.3 and 80.8 per cent) transplants (P = 0.763), as were graft survival rates (74 and 68 per cent versus 80.4 and 74.5 per cent; P = 0.212). The 3-year cumulative percentage of surviving grafts developing non-anastomotic biliary strictures was 31 per cent after DCD and 9.7 per cent after DBD transplantation (P < 0.001). The retransplantation rate was similar overall (P = 0.081), but that for biliary stricture was higher in the DCD group (P < 0.001). Risk factors for 1-year graft loss after DBD OLT were transplant centre, recipient warm ischaemia time and donor with severe head trauma. After DCD OLT they were transplant centre, donor warm ischaemia time and cold ischaemia time. DCD graft was a risk factor for non-anastomotic biliary stricture. CONCLUSION: OLT using controlled DCD grafts and restrictive criteria can result in patient and graft survival rates similar to those of DBD OLT, despite a higher risk of biliary stricture.

Accumulation of autoreactive effector T cells and allo-specific regulatory T cells in the pancreas allograft of a type 1 diabetic recipient.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation is an established treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes and end-stage renal failure, even though restored beta cell function may become affected by recurrent islet autoimmunity or graft rejection. We characterised infiltrating lymphocytes isolated from a pancreatic graft with normal endocrine function in a kidney-pancreas recipient with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: The pancreas graft was removed due to recurrent graft pancreatitis of unknown cause. Pancreas-infiltrating lymphocytes and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated and characterised phenotypically and functionally. RESULTS: Compared with PBMC, pancreas-infiltrating lymphocytes exhibited a distinct activation/memory phenotype and T cell receptor profile that were indicative of selective infiltration of the pancreas. Islet autoreactive CD8(+) T cells could be detected in the pancreas and were increased in frequency compared with PBMC. Additionally, an augmentation of CD8(+) CD28(-) regulatory T cells was observed in the pancreas; these induced expression of the inhibitory receptor immunoglobulin-like transcript-3 on antigen-presenting cells in a donor HLA class I-specific manner. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: These data demonstrate the simultaneous presence of regulatory and effector T cells in the pancreas allograft of a recipient with type 1 diabetes. They also indicate that circulating islet autoreactive T cells may reflect immunological processes in pancreatic tissue, even though their frequency in the periphery may lead to underestimation of their presence in the pancreas. Additional specificities were also present in the pancreas that were undetectable in the circulation.

Liver transplantation in a patient with encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis.

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a poorly understood condition in which excess fibrosis results in an encasement of the small bowel, which can clinically result in obstruction. The condition is thought to be related to the persistent expression of transforming growth factor beta on mesothelial cells causing proliferation of subserosal fibroblasts, massive production of extracellular matrix and loss of mesothelial cells. We report a patient with liver cirrhosis in whom the diagnosis of EPS was made. During laparotomy for liver transplantation the complete peritoneum was found to be thickened, consisting of white sheets; liver transplantation was deferred. Histological examination showed peritoneal sclerosing fibrosis. Immunosuppressive medication was started and a difficult but successful liver transplantation followed. If EPS is diagnosed during laparotomy for organ transplantation, adjusted immunosuppression is preferred as calcineurin inhibitors such as cyclosporin and tacrolimus may accelerate EPS while prednisone and some other drugs may stop progression.

Individualized population pharmacokinetic model with limited sampling for cyclosporine monitoring after liver transplantation in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: We recently developed and validated limited sampling models (LSMs) for cyclosporine monitoring after orthotopic liver transplantation based on individualized population pharmacokinetic models with Bayesian modelling. Aim To evaluate LSM in practice, and to seek optimal balance between benefit and discomfort. METHODS: In 30 stable patients, more than 6 months after orthotopic liver transplantation, previously switched from trough- to 2 h post-dose (C2)-monitoring, we switched to 3-monthly LSM 0,1,2,3 h-monitoring. During 18 months we evaluated dose, creatinine clearance, calculated area under the curve, intra-patient pharmacokinetic variability and ability to assess systemic exposure by several previously validated LSMs. RESULTS: Within patients, there was variability of cyclosporine-area under the curve with the same dose (CV of 15%). Compared to C2-monitoring, there was no significant difference in dose (P = 0.237), creatinine clearance (P = 0.071) and number of rejections. Some models showed excellent correlation and precision with LSM 0,1,2,3 h comparing area under the curves (0,2 h: r(2) = 0.88; 0,1,3 h: r(2) = 0.91; 0,2,3 h: r(2) = 0.92, all P < 0.001) with no difference in advised dose. CONCLUSIONS: The limited sampling model, with only trough- and 2-h sampling, yields excellent accuracy and assesses systemic exposure much better than C2 with less bias and greater precision. Considering the calculated intra-patient variability, more precision is redundant, so LSM 0,2 h seems the optimal way of cyclosporine-monitoring.

Risk factors of acute hepatic failure during antituberculosis treatment: two cases and literature review.

Hepatotoxicity is a well-known side effect of antituberculosis treatment (ATT). If not recognised in time, drug-induced hepatitis can develop, which may rapidly progress to acute liver failure. We describe two patients with acute hepatic failure caused by ATT, whose pretreatment liver function had been normal. Both patients successfully underwent liver transplantation. Possible risk factors predisposing towards ATT-induced hepatic failure were evaluated, and at least four risk factors were present in these patients. Although available guidelines do not advocate routine monitoring of liver function during ATT unless baseline values are elevated or in the case of pre-existent liver disease, this is nevertheless common practice. Liver function should always be measured in patients who develop symptoms during ATT, and rising liver function parameters should prompt immediate action to prevent the occurrence of liver failure. This report underscores that regular monitoring of liver function parameters and adherence to guidelines is especially important in patients with risk factors for ATT-induced liver disease. An evaluation of chronic viral hepatitis in risk groups before starting ATT could be worthwhile.

Organ Donation After Euthanasia in the Netherlands: A Case Report.

In 2014, there was still a shortage of available organs for transplantation, and 1044 patients were waiting for an organ in the Netherlands. Maximizing the pool of organ donors is part of the solution. In 2001, the Dutch Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide Act was adopted, legalizing euthanasia under strict conditions. In 2010, 3136 reports were made of euthanasia and assisted suicide; in 2014, 5306 reports were made. Among them were patients with a desire to donate their organs after their deaths. Although a potential source of donor organs, only a few cases of organ donation after active euthanasia have been described. Since 2012, 16 combinations of these procedures have been performed in the Netherlands. The literature mentions 16 Belgian cases between 2005 and 2013. This limited number can be the result of lack of knowledge about this subject among healthcare professionals or because of practical, ethical, and/or legal considerations. Performing this combination has possible advantages, both in number as well as in transplantation outcomes. By describing a recent case in our center, we will try to outline the state of the art in the Netherlands and disseminate knowledge about the possibilities and limitations of organ donation after active euthanasia.

Easy-to-use, accurate and flexible individualized Bayesian limited sampling method without fixed time points for ciclosporin monitoring after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: New methods to estimate the systemic exposure to ciclosporin such as the level 2 h after dosing and limited sampling formulas may lead to improved clinical outcome after orthotopic liver transplantation. However, most strategies are characterized by rigid sampling times. AIM: To develop and validate a flexible individualized population-pharmacokinetic model for ciclosporin monitoring in orthotopic liver transplantation. METHODS: A total of 62 curves obtained from 31 patients at least 0.5 year after orthotopic liver transplantation were divided into two equal groups. From 31 curves, relatively simple limited sampling formulas were derived using multiple regression analysis, while using pharmacokinetic software a two-compartment population-pharmacokinetic model was derived from these same data. We then tested the ability to estimate the AUC by the limited sampling formulas and a different approach using several limited sampling strategies on the other 31 curves. The new approach consists of individualizing the mean a priori population-pharmacokinetic parameters of the two-compartment population-pharmacokinetic model by means of maximum a posteriori Bayesian fitting with individual data leading to an individualized population-pharmacokinetic limited sampling model. From the individualized pharmacokinetic parameters, AUC(0-12h) was calculated for each combination of measured blood concentrations. The calculated AUC(0-12h) both from the limited-sampling formulas and the limited-sampling model were compared with the gold standard AUC(0-12h) (trapezoidal rule) by Pearson's correlation coefficient and prediction precision and bias were calculated. RESULTS: The AUC(0-12h) value calculated by individualizing the population-pharmacokinetic model using several combinations of measured blood concentrations: 0 + 2 h (r(2) = 0.94), 0 + 1 + 2 h (r(2) = 0.94), 0 + 1 + 3 h (r(2) = 0.92), 0 + 2 + 3 h (r(2) = 0.92) and 0 + 1 + 2 + 3 h (r(2) = 0.96) had excellent correlation with AUC(0-12h), better than limited sampling formulas with less than three sampling time points. Even trough level with limited sampling method (r(2) = 0.86) correlated better than the level after 2 h of dosing (r(2) = 0.75) or trough level (r(2) = 0.64) as single values without limited sampling method. Moreover, the individualized population-pharmacokinetic model had a low prediction bias and excellent precision. CONCLUSION: Multiple rigid sampling time points limit the use of limited sampling formulas. The major advantage of the Bayesian estimation approach presented here, is that blood sampling time points are not fixed, as long as sampling time is known. The predictive performance of this new approach is superior to trough level and that after 2 h of dosing and at least as good as limited sampling formulas. It is of clear advantage in busy out-patient clinics.

Oral efficacy of the macrolide immunosuppressant SDZ RAD and of cyclosporine microemulsion in cynomolgus monkey kidney allotransplantation.

BACKGROUND: 40-O-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-rapamycin (SDZ RAD) is a novel, potent, macrolide immunosuppressant. Its efficacy in rodent transplantation models provided the rationale for us to evaluate the compound in a more relevant, large animal transplantation model. METHODS: Life-supporting kidney allotransplantation was performed in cynomolgus monkeys: rejection was inferred from a rise in serum creatinine or urea and was subsequently confirmed by histopathology. This model was validated with the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine (i.e., Neoral). Two studies with a microemulsion formulation of SDZ RAD were performed. First, in a dose-finding study, the SDZ RAD dose was reduced in a stepwise fashion until rejection occurred, either with SDZ RAD as monotherapy, or in combination with a fixed, suboptimal dose of cyclosporine. Second, an efficacy study was performed in which two fixed SDZ RAD doses (0.75 and 1.50 mg/kg/ day) were evaluated in monotherapy and compared with the same doses of rapamycin (sirolimus). All immunosuppressants were administered once daily by gastric gavage. RESULTS: Untreated control animals rejected their grafts between 4 and 8 days after transplantation. Cyclosporine (initially at 150 mg/kg/day, reduced to 100 mg/kg/day 2 weeks after transplantation) yielded long-term (>100 days) rejection-free allograft survival in four of five animals. A 10 mg/kg/day dose of cyclosporine led to rejection between 10 and 27 days after transplantation and was considered suboptimal. In the dose-finding study with SDZ RAD monotherapy, rejection occurred in most of the cases (four of six animals) when a dose level of 0.63 mg/kg/day had been reached. Combined with suboptimal cyclosporine, this threshold SDZ RAD dose was about 2-fold lower. In the efficacy study, median graft survival with histologically proven rejection was 32 days (range 8-91 days, n=6) for 0.75 mg(kg/day SDZ RAD and 59 days (range 28-85 days, n=6) for 1.50 mg/kg/day SDZ RAD. For sirolimus, median graft survival was 43 days (range 5-103 days, n=7) for the 0.75 mg/kg/day dose and 56 days (range 8-103 days, n=8) for the 1.50 mg/kg/day dose. There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between SDZ RAD and sirolimus. CONCLUSION: SDZ RAD, in the absence of any other immunosuppressant and at doses that do not show any overt toxicity, considerably prolongs rejection-free survival of cynomolgus monkeys after life-supporting kidney allotransplantation.

The effect of aprotinin on renal function in orthotopic liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In the European Multicenter Study on the Use of Aprotinin in Liver Transplantation (EMSALT), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective study, we demonstrated that aprotinin significantly reduces intraoperative blood loss during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Aprotinin is metabolized in the kidney and potentially nephrotoxic at high concentrations. Renal insufficiency is a common and serious complication after OLT. It is unknown whether aprotinin increases the risk of renal failure after OLT. METHODS: We analyzed intraoperative urine output, need for postoperative dialysis, perioperative serum creatinine levels, and creatinine clearance in 93 patients enrolled in EMSALT, receiving a high dose of aprotinin, a regular dose, or placebo. RESULTS: Peak increase in serum creatinine exceeding 0.5 mg/dl during one of the postoperative days occurred in 11 (35%) patients in the placebo group, in 11 (34%) patients in the high-dose group, but only in 1 (3%) patient in the regular-dose group (P=0.007). Furthermore, a perioperative decrease in creatinine clearance was seen in the placebo group (-23.9+/-10.1 ml/min) but not in both high-dose (-1.6+/-13.3 ml/min) and regular-dose (9.7+/-10.3 ml/min) groups (P<0.02 comparing regular-dose and placebo group). CONCLUSIONS: Despite its potential nephrotoxicity, the use of aprotinin for reducing blood loss during OLT does not lead to a higher incidence of postoperative renal insufficiency. In combination with the observed reduction in blood loss, these findings support the prophylactic use of regular-dose aprotinin during OLT.

Insulin secretion and sensitivity after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation estimated by continuous infusion of glucose with model assessment.

BACKGROUND: Monitoring of insulin secretion and sensitivity after pancreas transplantation remains a practical problem. METHODS: We introduced the simple structural model, continuous infusion of glucose with model assessment (CIGMA), to obtain insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity estimations after 35 successful simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations. Eighteen non-diabetic kidney transplant recipients were used as control group. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were equal between the two groups except for higher fasting insulin levels in the pancreas transplant group. After the 1-hr CIGMA glucose load, the pancreas transplant group reached a mean +/- SD blood glucose of 8.2+/-1.7 mmol/L compared with 7.3+/-1.0 mmol/L in the control group (P = 0.05). Concurrent stimulated insulin and C-peptide levels were 48+/-28 mU/L and 2.3+/-0.9 nmol/L in the pancreas transplant group compared with 36+/-21 mU/L and 2.9+/-1.1 nmol/L in the control group (P = 0.1 and P = 0.03, respectively). Both the CIGMA estimation for secretion as well as the CIGMA estimation for sensitivity were lower in pancreas transplant group (P = 0.003 and P = 0.01, respectively). Mean +/- SE coefficients of variation for the model estimations were 15+/-4% for secretion and 17+/-6% for sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that CIGMA can be used clinically to evaluate carbohydrate metabolism in pancreas-kidney transplant recipients. These patients have a reduction in insulin secretory capacity and evidence of more insulin resistance than non-diabetic kidney transplant recipients.

Interstitial rejection, vascular rejection, and diffuse thrombosis of renal allografts. Predisposing factors, histology, immunohistochemistry, and relation to outcome.

Histological and immunohistochemical analyses were made of biopsy specimens from 50 consecutive patients who experienced putative graft rejection. The mean age of the patients was 44.5 years (range, 17-69 years) and 26 were men. There were 67 evaluable allograft specimens, which were grouped according to the histological diagnosis: group 1, acute tubulointerstitial rejection (n = 42); group 2, acute vascular rejection (n = 18); and group 3, diffuse thrombosis (n = 7). Over a follow-up period of 21-57 months, the mean number of rejection episodes was 1.7, 2.8, and 3.3 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Allograft loss occurred in 7 out of 30, 10 out of 16, and 4 out of 4 patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The following histological parameters differed significantly (P < 0.05) among the groups: interstitial edema, congestion of peritubular capillaries, glomerular thrombosis, and glomerular ischemia (group 3 > group 2 > group 1). Interstitial bleeding was seen more often in group 2 and 3 tissues than in group 1 specimens (P < 0.01). Immunohistochemical analyses showed that vascular rejection was associated with WT14 staining for monocytes and macrophages around the tubuli and with interstitial deposition of complement factor 3. With regard to serology, positive anti-endothelial cell antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity was associated with vascular rejection and thrombosis of the graft in all patients tested, and with graft loss in 75%. Pre-existent positive anti-IgG immunofluorescence on peritubular capillaries in pretransplant biopsy specimens incubated with patient serum was found in only 3 of the 50 patients, but was associated with graft loss in 2 of the 3. Cytomegalovirus infection was associated with a higher percentage of graft loss. There were significant intergroup differences in panel reactive antibodies before transplantation (P < 0.001), with higher titers in groups 2 and 3. The findings in relation to interstitial rejection are compatible with cellular rejection, while the data on vascular rejection support a humorally mediated pathogenesis.

Complete withdrawal of immunosuppression in kidney allograft recipients: a prospective study in rhesus monkeys.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported the successful withdrawal of immunosuppression in kidney-allografted rhesus monkeys. Recipients had received pretransplant blood transfusions and cyclosporine (CsA) immunosuppression for 6 to 12 months. One animal is still alive at more than 15 years after transplantation. Our hypothesis was that the sharing of a single DR antigen between blood donor and recipient, and the sharing of the same DR antigen with the kidney donor, may be beneficial to allograft survival. We now report on the results from a prospective study. METHODS: The animals received three pretransplant blood transfusions from a single donor sharing one DR antigen with the recipient. Subsequently, a life-supporting kidney from a donor sharing the same DR antigen was transplanted. CsA was given for at least 6 months after transplantation. RESULTS: Two animals rejected their graft at 5-8 weeks after cessation of CsA treatment. One animal is still alive at 700 days after transplantation. This animal showed MLR nonreactivity to its kidney donor, similar to the animal at more than 15 years after transplantation. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that withdrawal of immunosuppression may be a realistic option in kidney graft patients under careful immunological monitoring of donor-specific immunity.

Prevention of renal allograft rejection in primates by blocking the B7/CD28 pathway.

BACKGROUND: There is accumulating evidence that blockade of the costimulatory pathways offers a valid approach for immune suppression after solid organ transplantation. In this study, the efficacy of anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in combination with cyclosporine (CsA) to prevent renal allograft rejection was tested in non-human primates. METHODS: Rhesus monkeys were transplanted with a partly major histocompatibility complex-matched kidney on day 0. Anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 mAbs were administered intravenously daily for 14 days starting at day - 1. CsA was given intramuscularly for 35 days starting just after transplantation. The kidney function was monitored by determining serum creatinine levels. RESULTS: The combination of anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 mAbs completely abrogated the mixed lymphocyte reaction. Untreated rhesus monkeys rejected the kidney allograft in 5-7 days. Treatment with anti-CD80 plus anti-CD86 mAbs resulted in a significantly prolonged graft survival of 28+ 7 days (P=0.025). There were no clinical signs of side effects or rejection during treatment. Kidney graft rejection started after the antibody therapy was stopped. The anti-mouse antibody response was delayed from day 10 to 30 after the first injection. No difference in graft survival was observed between animals treated with CsA alone or in combination with anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 mAbs. However, treatment with anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 mAbs reduced development of vascular rejection. CONCLUSIONS: In combination, anti-CD80 and antiCD86 mAbs abrogate T-cell proliferation in vitro, delay the anti-mouse antibody response in vivo, and prevent graft rejection and development of graft vascular disease in a preclinical vascularized transplant model in non-human primates.