Molecular profiling of colorectal cancer in a genetically admixed Hispanic population.

BACKGORUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the leading causes of cancer-related deaths among Hispanics living in the United States (USH). Understanding the most common carcinogenic molecular pathways that affect Hispanics with CRC is crucial to guide research efforts in developing new therapeutic modalities incorporating genomically diverse populations. Tumor profiling techniques help identify actionable alternatives to recommend treatment and improve survival in cancer patients. METHODS: We conducted a secondary data analysis to evaluate the mutational profile of 218 CRC tumors in Hispanics living in Puerto Rico (PRH) who underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing from 2015 to 2020. We compared the prevalence of CRC tumor somatic mutations in PRHs with the mutational profiles reported for CRC from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Pan-Cancer Clinical Data, the AACR Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE)-Non-Hispanic, and GENIE-Hispanic datasets. RESULTS: Among the top mutated genes in CRC tumors in PRHs were APC, TP53, and KRAS, which had significantly higher mutational frequencies in PRH compared to the examined datasets, including GENIE-Hispanics. The most frequent gene amplifications for PRH were CDX2, CDKN1B, and HNRNPA2B1. Targetable biomarkers for CRC, such as microsatellite instability-high (MSI), wild-type KRAS, wild-type NRAS, V600E BRAF, and ERBB2 gene amplifications were found in 2.0%, 43.8%, 97.8%, 3.9%, and 2.3%, respectively, of PRH patients. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to report the mutational profile of CRC tumors in PRHs and make comparisons to other non-Hispanic and USH populations.

Prevalence of Complementary/Alternative Medicine use in Cancer Patients in a Tertiary Hospital in Puerto Rico.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a study in a tertiary hospital to investigate complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) prevalence in a Puerto Rican population. The study also evaluated demographic and clinical factors in order to correlate them with CAM use. METHODS: Spanish speaking residents with a known diagnosis of cancer being followed in the outpatient facilities at Auxilio Mutuo Cancer Center were invited to participate in the study. Patients who read and signed a consent form were given a questionnaire inquiring, among various things, on their use of any CAM treatment, education level, gender, place of residence and whether they had consulted their oncologist. The questionnaire also asked about their expectations for use of CAM. RESULTS: 215 patients were approached to participate out of which 200 signed the consent and accepted to participate. A total of 95 of 200 patients (47.5%) mentioned that they utilized at least one CAM treatment. Six factors were then analyzed for their correlation with CAM usage and three yielded statistically significant results at p<.05: age group, education level, and area of residence. After multivariate analysis all of these three factors behaved as independent variables. Gender, tumor type and stage were not significantly associated with use of CAM. CONCLUSION: Our data show that CAM use is significantly more common in those with higher education, younger age, and those living in non-metropolitan areas. Vitamin C and soursop (Graviola or guanábana) proved to be the two most common CAM treatments, respectively.

A New Salvage Regimen for Aggressive Lymphomas Based on Gemcitabine, Rituximab, and Oxaliplatin Followed by Lenalidomide (GROC-Rev).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of lenalidomide in patients with aggressive lymphoma who experienced less than complete response (CR) or as maintenance therapy after CR after gemcitabine, rituximab, and oxaliplatin salvage chemotherapy (GROC-Rev regimen). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma received up to 6 GROC-Rev courses: rituximab (375 mg/m2 provided intravenously) on day 1, oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2 provided intravenously; 2 hours), gemcitabine (provided 1250 mg/m2 intravenously; 30 minutes) on day 2, and pegfilgrastim (6 mg provided subcutaneously) on day 3. Patients switched to lenalidomide if they did not experience at least partial response (PR) after their second GROC-Rev course, or if they experienced less than a CR after 6 courses. RESULTS: In 33 patients, overall response was 61% (CR = 39%). Of 17 patients with PR who continued to 6 courses, 10 (59%) experienced CR and 7 PR as maximum response; of these 7, 1 died before receiving lenalidomide, 1 experienced CR while receiving lenalidomide (17%), and 2 experienced a further PR (33%). Of 16 with disease that failed to respond to GROC-Rev after their second course, 2 died before lenalidomide could be administered, and 2 experienced CR (14%) and 1 PR (7%) after lenalidomide. Overall survival and progression-free survival were 47% and 33% at 2 years. Grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and/or anemia (n = 5), neutropenic infection (n = 3), urinary tract infection (n = 3), pneumonia (n = 2), cellulitis (n = 2), and seizure (n = 1). Eight went on to receive transplants. CONCLUSION: GROC-Rev is an effective and well-tolerated salvage regimen consisting of chemotherapy followed by lenalidomide maintenance in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Simultaneous administration of these agents is worth exploring in future studies.

Results of Upfront Therapy for Marginal Zone Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Marginal zone lymphomas (MZLs) are indolent disorders composed of 3 subtypes: extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (MALT), splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL), and nodal marginal zone lymphoma (NMZL). Early-stage MALT is treated with radiotherapy or antibiotics, and advanced MALT and NMZL are managed with either watch and wait or chemotherapy. SMZLs are treated with splenectomy or rituximab. However, because these approaches have failed to cure patients with SMZL and NMZL, we have systematically used upfront chemotherapy for them, as well as for advanced MALT. We report the outcomes of this approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 44 patients with MZL were identified from our database and divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (22 with early-stage MALT) patients received either radiotherapy (n = 17) or antibiotics with or without surgery (n = 5). Group 2 included 9 patients with advanced MALT, 9 with SMZL, and 4 with NMZL. Group 2 was treated with FND-R (fludarabine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3, mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 on day 1, dexamethasone 20 mg on days 1 to 5, and rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1; n = 14) or CHOP-R (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 on day 1, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1, vincristine 2 mg intravenous push on day 1, prednisone 100 mg/m2 orally on days 1 to 5, rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1; n = 8), followed by maintenance rituximab for 70%. RESULTS: All patients achieved complete remission, and only 2 patients in group 1 had developed a relapse at 70 and 75 months. Both relapses were stage I MALT that had initially been treated with radiotherapy. Both were salvaged with FND-R and remained free of disease at 27 and 39 months after the relapse. At 10 years, the failure-free survival for the 44 patients was 80% and the overall survival was 100%. None of the patients in group 2 developed a relapse. The long-term toxicities have been acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The excellent responses using upfront chemotherapy for MZL suggests that this disorder is curable. Our results should be confirmed in a prospective trial.

Indolent Lymphomas That Present With Clinically Aggressive Features: A Subset of Low-Grade Lymphomas With a Behavior Inconsistent With the Histologic Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: The expected presentation for low-grade lymphomas consists of disseminated lymphadenopathy with no constitutional symptomsk, and with bone marrow involvement, normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), low proliferative rate as determined by Ki-67, and positron emission tomography (PET) scan with low standardized uptake values (SUVs) < 14. However, it is not unusual for some cases to present with 1 or more clinically aggressive features. Because the clinical behavior of such patients has not been investigated, there are no data regarding their expected outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For these cases, we use the term "clinically discordant indolent histology" (CDIH), which we define as any follicular grade 1-2, grade 3-A, or small lymphocytic lymphoma that meets at least 1 or more of the following conditions at the time of diagnosis: constitutional symptoms, LDH elevation, PET SUV > 14, unusual areas of involvement for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (bone, pleura, central nervous system, soft tissue, lung), Ki-67 > 30%, necrotic areas seen on computed tomography scan, or discrete space-occupying lesions in the liver or spleen. We have reviewed our NHL database with the objective of identifying such cases so we could compare them with those with the expected presentation of indolent NHLs. RESULTS: Patients with CDIH have a less favorable overall survival and failure-free survival, and a higher rate of transformation to a higher-grade histology. CONCLUSIONS: CDIH functionally behaves as aggressive NHL despite the fact that under the microscope the lymphomas resemble typical indolent NHLs. These cases seem to fare better when treated with a regimen containing doxorubicin-rituximab.