[Emergence of the patient-actor in patient safety in France. A narrative review in social sciences and public health]. / L'émergence du patient-acteur dans la sécurité des soins en France : une revue narrative de la littérature entre sciences sociales et santé publique.

INTRODUCTION: For the last forty years, patients have been encouraged to take part in their care and to participate in improving the quality and safety of care. This phenomenon requires reflection on the conditions of emergence of this new role and its public health implications, particularly in the field of patient safety. METHODS: A narrative review of the international literature was conducted by searching Medline, Cairn and Persée databases. RESULTS: The database query identified 2,206 documents, 106 of which were included in the analysis. The emergence of the patient-actor is linked to sanitary crises and promoted by patient associations in the field of patient safety such as le Lien. This movement induces a transformation of the patient's role beyond the theme of patient safety: it revolutionizes the patient's contribution to the health system. CONCLUSION: This narrative review of the literature highlights the way in which health crises have encouraged the emergence of a new actor: the patient-actor, accompanied by new semantics concerning the power of the patient. The patient occupies a specific place in the field of safety of care. In collaboration with healthcare professionals, the patient must constitute a resource to improve patient safety. The various contributions of patients are described and an analysis of the acceptability of patient participation is proposed.

[The emergence of patient safety issues in France]. / L'émergence de la question de la sécurité des patients en France.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to elucidate the conditions of emergence of patient safety issues in the public debate and the limits to implementation of patient safety in the current health system. METHOD: A narrative review of the international literature was conducted by searching PubMed, Cairn and Persée databases. RESULTS: The database search retrieved 2,206 documents, 48 of which were included in the study. The theme of patient safety has spread worldwide, but emerged late in France. The delayed emergence of patient safety in France is essentially related to the euphemistic approach to the problem of patient safety, the difficulty of adopting systematic reasoning, the lack of human resources management levers and the ambiguous position of patients in relation to patient safety.

[Benchmarks for interdisciplinary health and social sciences research: contributions of a research seminar]. / Jalons pour une recherche interdisciplinaire en santé et en sciences humaines et sociales: apports d'un séminaire de recherche.

This article proposes a reflection on an interdisciplinary seminar, initiated by philosophy and sociology researchers and public health professionals. The objective of this seminar was to explore the mechanisms involved in setting up and conducting interdisciplinary research, by investigating the practical modalities of articulating health and human and social sciences research in order to more clearly understand the conditions, tensions and contributions of collaborative research. These questions were discussed on the basis of detailed analysis of four recent or current research projects. Case studies identified four typical epistemological or methodological issues faced by researchers in the fields of health and human and social sciences: institutional conditions and their effects on research; deconstruction of the object; the researcher's commitment in his/her field; the articulation of research methods. Three prerequisites for interdisciplinary research in social and human sciences and in health were identified: mutual questioning of research positions and fields of study; awareness of the tensions related to institutional positions and disciplinary affiliation; joint elaboration and exchanges between various types of knowledge to ensure an interdisciplinary approach throughout all of the research process.

Feelings of Trust and of Safety Are Related Facets of the Patient's Experience in Surgery: A Descriptive Qualitative Study in 80 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Few studies to date have explored the question of the safety of a hospital stay from the patient's point of view. The aim of this study was to describe patients' own perspectives on the safety of the surgical care they received. A qualitative study was conducted based on interviews. METHODS: Semidirected interviews were conducted by a sociologist with adult patients admitted for hospitalization in 2 orthopedic and in 2 digestive surgery wards in 4 hospitals. RESULTS: Eighty interviews were transcribed and analyzed. The patients surveyed averaged 61.7 years old (SD, 16.0 y). Forty-eight percent were men (n = 38). The issue of the safety of care, as defined by professionals, is little apprehended by patients. In their view, sense of safety was related to the trust in the surgeon, which is a requisite condition for a sense of security and is based on interactions with the surgeon and on their communication style. Sense of safety was also related to the preoperative consultation, in which the procedure is explained and illustrated and to a postoperative encounter with a person who participated in the operation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' sense of safety is linked to the amount of trust they have in their surgeons. New strategies to improve language practices and surgeon-patient interaction should be developed, along with organizational improvement guaranteeing that participants of the surgery debrief with the patient.The study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02820545).