Usefulness of the Hybrid RFR-FFR Approach: Results of a Prospective and Multicenter Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement between RFR and FFR-The RECOPA (REsting Full-Cycle Ratio Comparation versus Fractional Flow Reserve (A Prospective Validation)) Study.

BACKGROUND: The resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) is a novel resting index which in contrast to the gold standard (fractional flow reserve (FFR)) does not require maximum hyperemia induction. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the agreement between RFR and FFR with the currently recommended thresholds and to design a hybrid RFR-FFR ischemia detection strategy, allowing a reduction of coronary vasodilator use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients subjected to invasive physiological study in 9 Spanish centers were prospectively recruited between April 2019 and March 2020. Sensitivity and specificity studies were made to assess diagnostic accuracy between the recommended levels of RFR ≤0.89 and FFR ≤0.80 (primary objective) and to determine the RFR "grey zone" in order to define a hybrid strategy with FFR affording 95% global agreement compared with FFR alone (secondary objective). RESULTS: A total of 380 lesions were evaluated in 311 patients. Significant correlation was observed (R 2 = 0.81; P < 0.001) between the two techniques, with 79% agreement between RFR ≤ 0.89 and FFR ≤ 0.80 (positive predictive value, 68%, and negative predictive value, 80%). The hybrid RFR-FFR strategy, administering only adenosine in the "grey zone" (RFR: 0.86 to 0.92), exhibited an agreement of over 95% with FFR, with high predictive values (positive predictive value, 91%, and negative predictive value, 92%), reducing the need for vasodilators by 58%. CONCLUSIONS: Dichotomous agreement between RFR and FFR with the recommended thresholds is significant but limited. The adoption of a hybrid RFR-FFR strategy affords very high agreement, with minimization of vasodilator use.

[Infective endocarditis in two Spanish university hospitals in different geographical locations with and without a cardiac surgery department]. / Endocarditis infecciosa en 2 hospitales universitarios españoles que difieren en su localización y en la presencia de servicio quirúrgico.

OBJECTIVES: To assess possible differences in clinical presentation, microbiology, morbidity and mortality of infective endocarditis between two Spanish hospitals, one on the mainland that has cardiac surgery and one in the Canary Islands without this service. METHOD: A total of 229patients consecutively diagnosed of endocarditis between 2005 and 2012, including pediatric population, were studied in the Reina Sofía Hospital (Córdoba, n=119) and Nuestra Señora de Candelaria Hospital (Tenerife, n=110). We compared the clinical, microbiological and echocardiographic data and analyzed mortality differences by binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: There were no differences in underlying heart disease, proportion of surgery, or the microbiological profile. The proportion of infections attributable to catheter was higher in the Canary Islands hospital (13.6% vs 3.4%). Mortality was also higher (31.8% vs 18.5%, P=.020), although this difference was no longer significant in the multivariate analysis (OR=1.85; 95%CI, 0.70-4.87; P=.213). Age (OR=1.04/year; 95%CI, 1.01-1.07; P=.006), cardiac complications (OR=5.05; 95%CI, 1.78-14.34; P=.002), persistent sepsis (OR=4.89; 95%CI, 2.09-11.46; P<.001), and emergent surgery (OR=4.43, 95%CI, 1.75-11.19; P=.002) were independent predictors of death. Time to surgery, length of stay in the hospital without a surgical service (20 [13-30.5] vs 13 [6-25] days; P=.019) was not associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in the presentation of endocarditis between two distant hospitals in Spain. The different hospital mortality can not be directly related to the presence of a surgery service.

Adjusting RFR by Predictors of Disagreement, "The Adjusted RFR": An Alternative Methodology to Improve the Diagnostic Capacity of Coronary Indices. / Ajustando a RFR por Preditores de Discordância, "A RFR Ajustada": Uma Metodologia Alternativa para Melhorar a Capacidade Diagnóstica dos Índices Coronarianos.

BACKGROUND: Cutoff thresholds for the "resting full-cycle ratio" (RFR) oscillate in different series, suggesting that population characteristics may influence them. Likewise, predictors of discordance between the RFR and fractional flow reserve (FFR) have been documented. The RECOPA Study showed that diagnostic capacity is reduced in the RFR "grey zone", requiring the performance of FFR to rule out or confirm ischemia. OBJECTIVES: To determine predictors of discordance, integrate the information they provide in a clinical-physiological index, the "Adjusted RFR", and compare its agreement with the FFR. METHODS: Using data from the RECOPA Study, predictors of discordance with respect to FFR were determined in the RFR "grey zone" (0.86 to 0.92) to construct an index ("Adjusted RFR") that would weigh RFR together with predictors of discordance and evaluate its agreement with FFR. RESULTS: A total of 156 lesions were evaluated in 141 patients. Predictors of discordance were: chronic kidney disease, previous ischemic heart disease, lesions not involving the anterior descending artery, and acute coronary syndrome. Though limited, the "Adjusted RFR" improved the diagnostic capacity compared to the RFR in the "grey zone" (AUC-RFR = 0.651 versus AUC-"Adjusted RFR" = 0.749), also showing an improvement in all diagnostic indices when optimal cutoff thresholds were established (sensitivity: 59% to 68%; specificity: 62% to 75%; diagnostic accuracy: 60% to 71%; positive likelihood ratio: 1.51 to 2.34; negative likelihood ratio: 0.64 to 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Adjusting the RFR by integrating the information provided by predictors of discordance to obtain the "Adjusted RFR" improved the diagnostic capacity in our population. Further studies are required to evaluate whether clinical-physiological indices improve the diagnostic capacity of RFR or other coronary indices.

FUNDAMENTO: Os limiares de corte para a "relação do ciclo completo de repouso" (RFR) oscilam em diferentes séries, sugerindo que as características da população podem influenciá-los. Da mesma forma, foram documentados preditores de discordância entre a RFR e a reserva de fluxo fracionado (FFR). O Estudo RECOPA, mostrou que a capacidade diagnóstica está reduzida na "zona cinzenta" da RFR, tornando necessária a realização de FFR para descartar ou confirmar isquemia. OBJETIVOS: Determinar os preditores de discordância, integrar as informações que eles fornecem em um índice clínico-fisiológico: a "RFR Ajustada", e comparar sua concordância com o FFR. MÉTODOS: Usando dados do Estudo RECOPA, os preditores de discordância em relação à FFR foram determinados na "zona cinzenta" da RFR (0,86 a 0,92) para construir um índice ("RFR Ajustada") que pesaria a RFR juntamente com os preditores de discordância e avaliar sua concordância com a FFR. RESULTADOS: Foram avaliadas 156 lesões em 141 pacientes. Os preditores de discordância foram: doença renal crônica, cardiopatia isquêmica prévia, lesões não envolvendo a artéria descendente anterior esquerda e síndrome coronariana aguda. Embora limitada, a "RFR Ajustada" melhorou a capacidade diagnóstica em comparação com a RFR na "zona cinzenta" (AUC-RFR = 0,651 versus AUC-"RFR Ajustada" = 0,749), mostrando também uma melhora em todos os índices diagnósticos quando foram estabelecidos limiares de corte otimizados (sensibilidade: 59% a 68%; especificidade: 62% a 75%; acurácia diagnóstica: 60% a 71%; razão de verossimilhança positiva: 1,51 a 2,34; razão de verossimilhança negativa: 0,64 a 0,37). CONCLUSÕES: Ajustar a RFR integrando as informações fornecidas pelos preditores de discordância para obter a "RFR Ajustada" melhorou a capacidade diagnóstica em nossa população. Mais estudos são necessários para avaliar se os índices clínico-fisiológicos melhoram a capacidade diagnóstica da RFR ou de outros índices coronarianos.

Benefit of primary percutaneous coronary interventions in the elderly with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (P-PCI) has demonstrated its efficacy in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, patients with STEMI ≥75 years receive less P-PCI than younger patients despite their higher in-hospital morbimortality. The objective of this analysis was to determine the effectiveness of P-PCI in patients with STEMI ≥75 years. METHODS: We included 979 patients with STEMI ≥75 years, from the ATención HOspitalaria del Síndrome coronario study, a registry of 8142 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome admitted at 31 Spanish hospitals in 2014-2016. We calculated a propensity score (PS) for the indication of P-PCI. Patients that received or not P-PCI were matched by PS. Using logistic regression, we compared the effectiveness of performing P-PCI versus non-performance for the composite primary event, which included death, reinfarction, acute pulmonary oedema or cardiogenic shock during hospitalisation. RESULTS: Of the included patients, 81.5 % received P-PCI. The matching provided two groups of 169 patients with and without P-PCI. Compared with its non-performance, P-PCI presented a composite event OR adjusted by PS of 0.55 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Receiving a P-PCI was significantly associated with a reduced risk of major intrahospital complications in patients with STEMI aged 75 years or older.

[Acute coronary syndrome and cocaine]. / Síndrome coronario agudo y cocaína.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cocaine is directly related to the occurrence of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We analyzed the differential characteristics of consumers who suffer an ACS in our environment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 914 patients with ACS who entered consecutively to our hospital. RESULTS: Thirty four patients were consumers (3.7%, CI95%: 2.7-5.2), with an average age of 40.1+/-9.1 years, significantly lower than non-consumers (63.6+/-12.15 years, P<.001). The prevalence increased progressively in younger groups. Most were men (82.4%), with higher consumption of tobacco (88.2% vs. 34.2%, P<.001) and other illegal drugs (35.3% vs 0.9%, P<.001). By contrast, they had less frequently hypertension (26.5 vs. 60.5%, P<.001) or diabetes (11.7 vs. 39.8%, P<.001). There was single vessel disease in 44.1%, and a coronary angiography without significant lesions in 20.6% cases. CONCLUSIONS: The typical patient with ACS who consumes cocaine is usually a young man, who often takes other drugs and with a lower prevalence of classic risk factors. These data have to be taken into account when considering preventive and therapeutic manoeuvres.

Hospital Mortality in 415 798 AMI Patients: 4 Years Earlier in the Canary Islands Than in the Rest of Spain.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The Canary Islands has the highest mortality from diabetes in Spain. The aim of this study was to determine possible differences in mortality due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during hospital admission between this autonomous community and the rest of Spain, as well as the factors associated with this mortality and the population fraction attributable to diabetes. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of hospital admissions for AMI in Spain from 2007 to 2014, registered in the Minimum Basic Data Set. RESULTS: A total of 415 798 AMI were identified. Canary Island patients (16 317) were younger than those living in the rest of Spain (63.93 ± 13.56 vs 68.25 ± 13.94; P < .001) and death occurred 4 years earlier in the archipelago (74.03 ± 11.85 vs 78.38 ± 11.10; P < .001). This autonomous community had the highest prevalence of smoking (44% in men and 23% in women); throughout Spain, AMI occurred 13 years earlier in smokers than in nonsmokers. Patients in the Canary Islands had the highest mortality rates whether they had diabetes (8.7%) or not (7.6%), and they also showed the highest fraction of AMI mortality attributable to diabetes (9.4; 95%CI, 4.8-13.6). After adjustment for type of AMI, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, smoking, cocaine use, renal failure, sex and age, the Canary Islands showed the highest risk of mortality vs the rest of Spain (OR = 1.25; 95%CI, 1.17-1.33; P < .001) and it was one of the autonomous communities showing no significant improvement in the risk of mortality due to AMI during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality due to AMI during hospital admission is higher in the Canary Islands than in the rest of Spain.

[Diagnostic usefulness of N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide in patients admitted to a cardiology service]. / Utilidad diagnóstica del fragmento N-terminal del propéptido natriurético cerebral en los pacientes ingresados en un servicio de cardiología.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a new tool for the diagnosis of patients with evidence of heart failure (HF). The diagnosis of HF is improbable in patients with a level of NT-proBNP<300 pg/ml. Our objective is to determine the validity of the cut-off points proposed by literature (inclusion/exclusion) regarding the age for NT-proBNP in patients admitted to our service. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We gathered consecutively the data of 76 patients admitted to our service with the diagnosis of HF (n=37) and with other diseases (n=39), taking a sample of plasma to determine NT-proBNP. We studied the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of this test, as well as the relation between the levels of that marker and the clinical and echocardiographic variables. RESULTS: The ventricular diameter was larger and the ejection fraction was lower in patients with HF. Sensitivity for the diagnosis of exclusion reached a value of 97% and the negative predictive value was 94%. CONCLUSIONS: The cut-off point proposed for exclusion (300 pg/ml) shows high sensitivity and negative predictive value in the diagnosis of HF in patients admitted to our service.

Infective endocarditis in patients with oncological diseases. / Endocarditis infecciosa en pacientes con enfermedades oncológicas.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer patients may constitute a special risk group for the development of infective endocarditis (IE) because they are often subjected to invasive procedures. The aim of this study is to determine the differential clinical profile and prognosis of patients with IE and cancer. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on all patients consecutively diagnosed with IE in a single centre between 2005 and 2015. A comparative analysis was performed between patients with cancer and those free of disease, as well as a long-term follow-up. RESULTS: There were 208 IE cases, of which 32 had a cancer diagnosis. There were no significant differences in age (67.5 [59.2-74] vs. 64 [51-74] years). The Charlson comorbidity index was same whether cancer was diagnosed or not (4 [2.2-5] vs. 3.9 [2-5]). IE in cancer patients was mainly associated with health care (59.5% vs 24.4%, P<.001). Staphylococcus aureus was the main causative agent (35%), and the tricuspid location was three times more common (18.8% vs. 6.2%). Surgery was not performed in 18.7% of patients, despite having an indication, compared with 7.4% of patients without cancer. In-hospital mortality for cancer patients was 45.5%, and the probability of survival at one year was 40%. CONCLUSIONS: IE in patients with cancer is predominantly caused by staphylococci, and has high early mortality. Although it is often related to health care, patients are limited from the therapeutic point of view.

[Impact of rotational coronary angiography in the amount of iodinated contrast and the exposure to ionising radiations in patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis]. / Impacto de la angiografía coronaria rotacional en la cantidad total de contraste administrado y la exposición a las radiaciones ionizantes en pacientes en los que se realizan procedimientos coronarios invasivos: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis.

BACKGROUND: Invasive coronary procedures involve the administration of iodinated contrast and the exposure to ionising radiations, increasing morbidity and mortality. The rotational coronary angiography (RCA) allows acquiring multiple projections with a unique injection of iodinated contrast. To date, there are no meta-analyses specifically comparing RCA and conventional coronary angiography (CCA) in patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures, whether diagnostic or diagnostic and therapeutic. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the impact of RCA on the amount of iodinated contrast and the exposure to ionising radiations during invasive coronary procedures. METHODS: A search in PubMed and Ovid databases was conducted to identify studies, including diagnostic and diagnostic and therapeutic studies, comparing RCA and CCA. The manuscripts were evaluated on quality and biases, and were included if they analysed any of the following endpoints: volume of contrast and exposure to ionising radiations measured as dose-area product, and Kerma-air or fluoroscopy time. RESULTS: Sixteen studies, with a total of 2,327 patients, were included in the final analysis (1,146 patients underwent RCA and 1,181 patients underwent CCA), with significant differences being detected in volume of contrast (standard difference in means [95% confidence interval] -1.887 [-2.472 to -1.302]; P<.001), dose-area product (-0.726 [-1.034 to -0.418]; P<.001), Kerma-air (-0.842 [-1.104 to -0.581]; P<.001), and fluoroscopy time (0.263 [-0.496 to -0.030]; P=.027). CONCLUSIONS: RCA reduces the volume of contrast and the exposure to radiation, evaluated as dose-area product, Kerma-air, and fluoroscopy time, in patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures.

Prospective evaluation of the development of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing rotational coronary angiography vs. conventional coronary angiography: CINERAMA study. / Evaluación prospectiva del desarrollo de nefropatía inducida por contraste en pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo tratados con angiografía coronaria rotacional vs. angiografía coronaria convencional: Estudio CINERAMA.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Rotational coronary angiography (RCA) requires less contrast to be administered and can prevent the onset of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) during invasive coronary procedures. The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of RCA on CIN (increase in serum creatinine ≥0.5mg/dl or ≥25%) after an acute coronary syndrome. METHODS: From April to September 2016, patients suffering acute coronary syndromes who underwent diagnostic coronary angiography, with the possibility of ad hoc coronary angioplasty, were prospectively enrolled. At the operator's discretion, patients underwent RCA or conventional coronary angiography (CCA). CIN (primary endpoint), as well as analytical, angiographic and clinical endpoints, were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of the 235 patients enrolled, 116 patients received RCA and 119 patients received CCA. The RCA group was composed of older patients (64.0±11.8 years vs. 59.7±12.1 years; p=0.006), a higher proportion of women (44.8 vs. 17.6%; p<0.001), patients with a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (76±25 vs. 86±27ml/min/1.73 m2; p=0.001), and patients who underwent fewer coronary angioplasties (p<0.001) compared with the CCA group. Furthermore, the RCA group, received less contrast (113±92 vs. 169±103ml; p<0.001), including in diagnostic procedures (54±24 vs. 85±56ml; p<0.001) and diagnostic-therapeutic procedures (174±64 vs. 205±98ml; p=0.049) compared with the CCA group. The RCA group presented less CIN (4.3 vs. 22.7%; p<0.001) compared to the CCA group, and this finding was maintained in the regression analysis (Adjusted relative risk: 0.868; 95% CI: 0.794-0.949; p=0.002). There were no differences in clinical endpoints between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: RCA was associated with lower administration of contrast during invasive coronary procedures in acute coronary syndrome patients, resulting in lower incidence of CIN, in comparison with CCA.

Ajustando a RFR por Preditores de Discordância, "A RFR Ajustada": Uma Metodologia Alternativa para Melhorar a Capacidade Diagnóstica dos Índices Coronarianos / Adjusting RFR by Predictors of Disagreement, "The Adjusted RFR": An Alternative Methodology to Improve the Diagnostic Capacity of Coronary Indices

Resumo Fundamento Os limiares de corte para a "relação do ciclo completo de repouso" (RFR) oscilam em diferentes séries, sugerindo que as características da população podem influenciá-los. Da mesma forma, foram documentados preditores de discordância entre a RFR e a reserva de fluxo fracionado (FFR). O Estudo RECOPA, mostrou que a capacidade diagnóstica está reduzida na "zona cinzenta" da RFR, tornando necessária a realização de FFR para descartar ou confirmar isquemia. Objetivos Determinar os preditores de discordância, integrar as informações que eles fornecem em um índice clínico-fisiológico: a "RFR Ajustada", e comparar sua concordância com o FFR. Métodos Usando dados do Estudo RECOPA, os preditores de discordância em relação à FFR foram determinados na "zona cinzenta" da RFR (0,86 a 0,92) para construir um índice ("RFR Ajustada") que pesaria a RFR juntamente com os preditores de discordância e avaliar sua concordância com a FFR. Resultados Foram avaliadas 156 lesões em 141 pacientes. Os preditores de discordância foram: doença renal crônica, cardiopatia isquêmica prévia, lesões não envolvendo a artéria descendente anterior esquerda e síndrome coronariana aguda. Embora limitada, a "RFR Ajustada" melhorou a capacidade diagnóstica em comparação com a RFR na "zona cinzenta" (AUC-RFR = 0,651 versus AUC-"RFR Ajustada" = 0,749), mostrando também uma melhora em todos os índices diagnósticos quando foram estabelecidos limiares de corte otimizados (sensibilidade: 59% a 68%; especificidade: 62% a 75%; acurácia diagnóstica: 60% a 71%; razão de verossimilhança positiva: 1,51 a 2,34; razão de verossimilhança negativa: 0,64 a 0,37). Conclusões Ajustar a RFR integrando as informações fornecidas pelos preditores de discordância para obter a "RFR Ajustada" melhorou a capacidade diagnóstica em nossa população. Mais estudos são necessários para avaliar se os índices clínico-fisiológicos melhoram a capacidade diagnóstica da RFR ou de outros índices coronarianos.

Abstract Background Cutoff thresholds for the "resting full-cycle ratio" (RFR) oscillate in different series, suggesting that population characteristics may influence them. Likewise, predictors of discordance between the RFR and fractional flow reserve (FFR) have been documented. The RECOPA Study showed that diagnostic capacity is reduced in the RFR "grey zone", requiring the performance of FFR to rule out or confirm ischemia. Objectives To determine predictors of discordance, integrate the information they provide in a clinical-physiological index, the "Adjusted RFR", and compare its agreement with the FFR. Methods Using data from the RECOPA Study, predictors of discordance with respect to FFR were determined in the RFR "grey zone" (0.86 to 0.92) to construct an index ("Adjusted RFR") that would weigh RFR together with predictors of discordance and evaluate its agreement with FFR. Results A total of 156 lesions were evaluated in 141 patients. Predictors of discordance were: chronic kidney disease, previous ischemic heart disease, lesions not involving the anterior descending artery, and acute coronary syndrome. Though limited, the "Adjusted RFR" improved the diagnostic capacity compared to the RFR in the "grey zone" (AUC-RFR = 0.651 versus AUC-"Adjusted RFR" = 0.749), also showing an improvement in all diagnostic indices when optimal cutoff thresholds were established (sensitivity: 59% to 68%; specificity: 62% to 75%; diagnostic accuracy: 60% to 71%; positive likelihood ratio: 1.51 to 2.34; negative likelihood ratio: 0.64 to 0.37). Conclusions Adjusting the RFR by integrating the information provided by predictors of discordance to obtain the "Adjusted RFR" improved the diagnostic capacity in our population. Further studies are required to evaluate whether clinical-physiological indices improve the diagnostic capacity of RFR or other coronary indices.

Incidence, Mortality and Positive Predictive Value of Type 1 Cardiorenal Syndrome in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the risk of cardiovascular mortality associated with cardiorenal syndrome subtype 1 (CRS1) in patients who were hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was greater than the expected risk based on the sum of its components, to estimate the predictive value of CRS1, and to determine whether the severity of CRS1 worsens the prognosis. METHODS: Follow-up study of 1912 incident cases of ACS for 1 year after discharge. Cox regression models were estimated with time to event (in-hospital death, and readmission or death during the first year after discharge) as the dependent variable. RESULTS: The incidence of CRS1 was 9.2/1000 person-days of hospitalization (95% CI = 8.1-10.5), but these patients accounted for 56.6% (95% CI = 47.4-65.) of all mortality. The positive predictive value of CRS1 was 29.6% (95% CI = 23.9-36.0) for in-hospital death, and 51.4% (95% CI = 44.8-58.0) for readmission or death after discharge. The risk of in-hospital death from CRS1 (RR = 18.3; 95% CI = 6.3-53.2) was greater than the sum of risks associated with either acute heart failure (RR = 7.6; 95% CI = 1.8-31.8) or acute kidney injury (RR = 2.8; 95% CI = 0.9-8.8). The risk of events associated with CRS1 also increased with syndrome severity, reaching a RR of 10.6 (95% CI = 6.2-18.1) for in-hospital death at the highest severity level. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of CRS1 on in-hospital mortality is greater than the sum of the effects associated with each of its components, and it increases with the severity of the syndrome. CRS1 accounted for more than half of all mortality, and its positive predictive value approached 30% in-hospital and 50% after discharge.

[Clinical outcome and reversibility of systolic dysfunction in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy due to hypertension and chronic heart failure]. / Evolución clínica y reversibilidad de la disfunción sistólica en pacientes con miocardiopatía dilatada hipertensiva e insuficiencia cardíaca crónica.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: There is little information on the clinical and functional course of patients with heart failure secondary to dilated cardiomyopathy due to hypertension. The objectives of our study were to assess the clinical and functional course of these patients, and to identify possible predictors of prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We evaluated a series of 49 patients with this condition diagnosed in our hospital from 1994 to 2003. Mean age was 63(11) years, and 40% were women. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 30.1(4.8)%. Follow-up was 45(23) months (median, 41 months). RESULTS: Four-year survival was 0.84, the 4-year rate of hospitalization due to heart failure was 0.12, and likelihood of readmission-free survival was 0.80 at 4 years. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 30.1(4.8)% to 57.6(13.5)% (P< .001). An unfavorable clinical and functional outcome at 4 years (death, readmission for heart failure or persistence of dilated cardiomyopathy) was recorded in only in 40% of the patients. Multivariate analysis with the Cox model showed appropriate control of blood pressure to be the only independent predictor of a favorable clinical outcome (absence of death or readmission for heart failure) (hazard ratio = 4.58; 95% CI, 1.32-9.83; P=.032). CONCLUSIONS: The course of patients with severe dilated cardiomyopathy due to hypertension was favorable in 60% of cases. Adequate control of blood pressure was the only independent predictor of a favorable clinical outcome.

Absence of left circumflex with superdominant right coronary artery.

Congenital anomalies of coronary arteries are a group of diseases that are infrequently found. Their prevalence has been reported from 0.6% to 1.3%. Most clinical manifestations are benign and asymptomatic. Congenital absence of the left circumflex artery is a very rare congenital anomaly of the coronary circulation, and only a few cases have been reported in the literature. We report a case of a 51-year-old man who underwent a cardiac catheterisation. Coronary angiography showed a left anterior descending coronary artery with no circumflex and a dominant right coronary artery.

Mortalidad hospitalaria de 415.798 pacientes con IAM: 4 años antes en Canarias que en el conjunto de España / Hospital mortality in 415 798 AMI patients: 4 years earlier in the Canary Islands than in the rest of Spain

Introducción y objetivos: Canarias tiene la mortalidad por diabetes más elevada de España. El objetivo es averiguar si existen diferencias con las restantes comunidades autónomas en la mortalidad hospitalaria por infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM), en los factores asociados con esta mortalidad y la fracción poblacional atribuible a la diabetes. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo de los ingresos hospitalarios por IAM en España desde 2007 hasta 2014, registrados en el Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos. Resultados: Se identificaron 415.798 IAM. Los pacientes canarios (16.317) eran más jóvenes que los del resto de España (63,93 +/- 13,56 frente a 68,25 +/- 13,94 años; p < 0,001); también el fallecimiento ocurrió 4 años antes en el archipiélago (a los 74,03 +/- 11,85 frente a los 78,38 +/- 11,10 años; p < 0,001). En esta comunidad alcanzó su prevalencia máxima el tabaquismo (el 44% de los varones y el 23% de las mujeres), que se asoció con un adelanto de 13 años en la edad al IAM. Las islas Canarias tuvieron la mayor mortalidad de pacientes tanto con diabetes (8,7%) como sin ella (7,6%), y también la mayor fracción poblacional de muerte por IAM atribuible a la diabetes (9,4; IC95%, 4,8-13,6). Tras ajustar por tipo de IAM, diabetes, dislipemia, hipertensión, tabaquismo, consumo de cocaína, insuficiencia renal, sexo y edad, Canarias presentó el mayor riesgo de mortalidad respecto a España (OR = 1,25; IC95%, 1,17-1,33; p < 0,001). Fue, además, una de las comunidades autónomas que no mejoró significativamente su riesgo demortalidad por IAM durante el periodo estudiado

Introduction and objectives: The Canary Islands has the highest mortality from diabetes in Spain. The aim of this study was to determine possible differences in mortality due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during hospital admission between this autonomous community and the rest of Spain, as well as the factors associated with this mortality and the population fraction attributable to diabetes. Methods: Cross-sectional study of hospital admissions for AMI in Spain from 2007 to 2014, registered in the Minimum Basic Data Set. Results: A total of 415 798 AMI were identified. Canary Island patients (16 317) were younger than those living in the rest of Spain (63.93 +/- 13.56 vs 68.25 +/- 13.94; P < .001) and death occurred 4 years earlier in the archipelago (74.03 +/- 11.85 vs 78.38 +/- 11.10; P < .001). This autonomous community had the highest prevalence of smoking (44% in men and 23% in women); throughout Spain, AMI occurred 13 years earlier in smokers than in nonsmokers. Patients in the Canary Islands had the highest mortality rates whether they had diabetes (8.7%) or not (7.6%), and they also showed the highest fraction of AMI mortality attributable to diabetes (9.4; 95% CI, 4.8-13.6). After adjustment for type of AMI, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, smoking, cocaine use, renal failure, sex and age, the Canary Islands showed the highest risk of mortality vs the rest of Spain (OR = 1.25; 95%CI, 1.17-1.33; P < .001) and it was one of the autonomous communities showing no significant improvement in the risk of mortality due to AMI during the study period. Conclusions: Mortality due to AMI during hospital admission is higher in the Canary Islands than in the rest of Spain