Antimicrobial Susceptibility Among Gram-Negative Isolates in Pediatric Patients in Latin America, Africa-Middle East, and Asia From 2016-2020 Compared to 2011-2015: Results From the ATLAS Surveillance Study.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) data in the pediatric population are limited, particularly in developing countries. This study assessed the AMR profile and key resistance phenotypes and genotypes for Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) isolates collected as part of the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program from pediatric patients in Latin America, Africa-Middle East, and Asia in 2016-2020 versus 2011-2015. METHODS: Minimum inhibitory concentrations by broth microdilution methodology were interpreted per the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints were used for interpreting colistin activity. ß-lactamase genes were screened by polymerase chain reaction and sequencing. RESULTS: For Acinetobacter baumannii, low susceptibility (<60.0%) was observed for all antimicrobials, except colistin (≥92.9%), across regions and year periods. Ceftazidime-avibactam, amikacin, colistin, and meropenem were mostly active (78.6%-100.0%) against Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. For Pseudomonas aeruginosa, susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam, amikacin, and colistin was ≥85.9%. Among resistance phenotypes, carbapenem-resistant (CR, ≥44.8%) and difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR, ≥37.1%) rates were the highest in A. baumannii. A consistent increase in CR and DTR K. pneumoniae was noted across regions over time. Extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBL)-producing K. pneumoniae (32.6%-55.6%) were more frequent than ESBL-producing E. coli (25.3%-37.1%). CTX-M was the dominant ESBL among Enterobacterales. NDM-positive Enterobacterales species and VIM-positive P. aeruginosa were identified across regions. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified high susceptibility to few agents for key GNB in pediatric patients. Continued surveillance of resistance phenotypes and genotypes at regional levels may help to guide appropriate treatment decisions.

Comparison of Lateral Flow Immunochromatography and Phenotypic Assays to PCR for the Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria, a Multicenter Experience in Mexico.

The identification of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa is important for treating and controlling hospital infections. The recommended methods for their identification require a long waiting time, technical training, and expertise. Lateral flow immunoassays such as NG-Test CARBA 5® overcome these needs. We analyzed 84 clinical isolates of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa from four different hospitals in a two-year period. Antimicrobial resistance patterns were confirmed with the broth dilution method. Evaluation of KPC, VIM, NDM, IMP, and OXA-48-like enzymes was performed and compared to NG-Test CARBA 5 and phenotypic assays. Enterobacterales represented 69% of isolates and P. aeruginosa represented 31%. Carbapenemase-producing strains were 51 (88%) of Enterobacterales and 23 (88.4%) of P. aeruginosa; 20 (34%) and 23 (88%) were Class B ß-lactamases, respectively. The NG-Test CARBA 5® assay for Enterobacterales showed high sensitivity (98%), specificity (100%), and PPV (100%); however, it did not for P. aeruginosa. The Kappa concordance coefficient was 0.92 for Enterobacterales and 0.52 for P. aeruginosa. NG-Test CARBA 5® is a fast and easy-to-use assay. In Enterobacterales, we found excellent agreement in our comparison with molecular tests. Despite the low agreement in P. aeruginosa, we suggest that this test could be used as a complementary tool.

Outpatient surveillance programme for health workers with COVID 19 in Mexico: an observational study of ambulatory treatment and early hospitalization.

Introduction: International guidelines recommend hospital care for patients with severe Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), but fragile health care systems struggle to cope with high number of admissions, placing patients at risk of receiving substandard care. We describe an outpatient ambulatory surveillance and treatment strategy (OPAT) for health care workers (HCWs) with severe COVID-19 during low hospital bed availability periods in Mexico City. Methods: In this observational, descriptive, retrospective study, we included HCWs with severe disease for whom there were no hospital beds available at the time of evaluation. We provided daily assessments by infectious disease specialists, daily ambulatory steroid, oral thromboprophylaxis and domiciliary low-dose oxygen. We recorded the number of patients who recovered, were hospitalized or died on follow-up. Results: From 18 March 2020 to 16 July 2021, 1739 HCWs attended our service. A total of 540 were diagnosed with COVID-19. Seventy-four had severe COVID-19 and needed hospitalization. Immediate hospitalization was not possible in 56 patients who were sent to the OPAT and included in our study. Twenty-four patients subsequently required hospitalization and 32 recovered as outpatients. Conclusions: We describe a feasible and safe outpatient management strategy for HCWs with severe COVID-19 in a low-resource setting.

Outpatient ertapenem therapy in an ESBL-high-prevalence area: an efficacy, safety, and cost study.

INTRODUCTION: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy is a safe, effective, and convenient way of administering antimicrobials for a wide variety of infections. So far there are no reports on the efficacy of outpatient antimicrobial therapy in Mexico. Our objective was to determine the outcomes, safety, and cost of outpatient ertapenem therapy (OET) in our hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A case series of 99 patients that received intravenous OET was conducted. The primary outcomes were clinical cure, relapse, and recurrence of infection. RESULTS: Of the 99 patients who received OET the most common diagnosis was urinary tract infection in 56%. Extended-spectrum-ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae caused 67% of infections in our population. Ninety-seven percent of the patients were cured at the completion of OET. One patient presented relapse 12 days after the end of OET; two patients presented recurrence, one with skin and soft tissue infection and one with pyelonephritis at days 35 and 34, respectively, after the end of OET. Three patients were readmitted after OET, one with an episode of phlebitis, one with recurrence, and one with relapse. A case of non-Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea was observed. The intravascular line complications observed during OET were phlebitis in two patients. CONCLUSION: In our hospital, the OET was found to be effective, safe, and cost-saving when compared to inpatient care.