The role of six biomarkers in diagnosis of hemophilic arthropathy: review of the literature.

The aim of our narrative review of the literature is to identify the role of six important biomarkers: synovial fluid thrombomodulin, fibroblast-like synoviocytes, synovial tissue growth factor , vascular endothelial growth factor in synovium and peripheral blood, urinary C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen, and synovial fluid tumor necrosis factor alpha. These urinary, serum and synovial biomarkers illustrated should be evaluated in patients with hemophilic arthropathy for early diagnosis of hemophilic arthropathy, because they have important implications in the development of arthrofibrosis, altered inflammatory response and bleeding. Moreover, better knowledge of their biological activity is important to identify possible new biological treatment options.

Total elbow arthroplasty in haemophilia.

INTRODUCTION: Advanced haemophilic arthropathy of the elbow can be a devastating manifestation of severe haemophilia with significant implications for activities of daily living. AIM: To summarize the currently available data on total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) for haemophilic arthropathy of the elbow, to draw comparisons to TEA for other indications, and to outline some considerations regarding TEA in this unique population. METHODS: A narrative review of the literature has been performed. RESULTS: The scant data regarding outcomes of TEA for haemophilic arthropathy are limited to small case series and case reports. A review of the available literature shows that, while pain relief and patient satisfaction are promising, variable outcomes with significant complications and infection rates may discourage routine use of TEA for haemophilic arthropathy of the elbow. CONCLUSION: While patients with severe haemophilic arthropathy of the elbow are likely to make gains in terms of pain control and range of motion following TEA, there are insufficient data to routinely recommend its use. Complication and infection rates are concerning, and the lack of survival analysis data makes it difficult to quantify the benefit to the patient in light of the risks and resources involved in the procedure.

Recommendations on multidisciplinary management of elective surgery in people with haemophilia.

Planning and undertaking elective surgery in people with haemophilia (PWH) is most effective with the involvement of a specialist and experienced multidisciplinary team (MDT) at a haemophilia treatment centre. However, despite extensive best practice guidelines for surgery in PWH, there may exist a gap between guidelines and practical application. For this consensus review, an expert multidisciplinary panel comprising surgeons, haematologists, nurses, physiotherapists and a dental expert was assembled to develop practical approaches to implement the principles of multidisciplinary management of elective surgery for PWH. Careful preoperative planning is paramount for successful elective surgery, including dental examinations, physical assessment and prehabilitation, laboratory testing and the development of haemostasis and pain management plans. A coordinator may be appointed from the MDT to ensure that critical tasks are performed and milestones met to enable surgery to proceed. At all stages, the patient and their parent/caregiver, where appropriate, should be consulted to ensure that their expectations and functional goals are realistic and can be achieved. The planning phase should ensure that surgery proceeds without incident, but the surgical team should be ready to handle unanticipated events. Similarly, the broader MDT must be made aware of events in surgery that may require postoperative plans to be changed. Postoperative rehabilitation should begin soon after surgery, with attention paid to management of haemostasis and pain. Surgery in patients with inhibitors requires even more careful preparation and should only be undertaken by an MDT experienced in this area, at a specialized haemophilia treatment centre with a comprehensive care model.

Hindfoot fusion in haemophilic arthropathy: 6-year mean follow-up of 41 procedures performed in 28 adult patients.

INTRODUCTION: Haemophilic arthropathy of the ankle is rare disorder caused by recurrent haemarthorses beginning in early adulthood. AIM: Our aim was to evaluate the fusion rate of various techniques of hindfoot fusion using internal fixation for the treatment of haemophilic arthropathy of the hindfoot. METHODS: We have evaluated the fusion rate of various techniques of hindfoot (tibiotalar and subtalar joints) fusion for the treatment of haemophilic arthropathy of the hindfoot. Twenty-eight patients underwent a total of 41 procedures. Thirty-four ankle (tibiotalar) fusions were performed, seven were done arthroscopically, six using a minimal access approach and 21 with an open approach. There were two isolated subtalar fusions, three combined tibiotalar and subtalar fusions, one of which included a talonavicular fusion at the second operation. There was one peritalar ankle fusion (tibiotalar, subtalar and talonavicular). The mean age at operation was 40.3 years (SD, 12.3; range, 18.7-65.7 years). The mean time to last follow-up was 77 months (SD, 50.4; range, 7-190). RESULTS: The overall non-union rate was 9.7%. All non-unions occurred in tibiotalar fusions (there were no non-unions in cases of subtalar or talonavicular fusion). A single deep infection (2.4%) occurred in an arthroscopically fused ankle. The revision rate was 4.8% (2 cases) and was carried out for non-unions. Both revisions were successful. CONCLUSION: Hindfoot arthrodesis in patients with haemophilic ankle arthropathy provides a high fusion rate with few complications. Arthroscopic tibiotalar fusion did not result in shorter hospital stays. Revision surgery for the haemophilic hindfoot is successful, and fusion of the entire hindfoot can be achieved without complications.

Safety of radiation exposure after radiosynovectomy in paediatric patients with haemophilia.

Many paediatric patients with haemophilia who might benefit from radiosynovectomy (RS) for the control of synovitis do not undergo the procedure as there is controversy in the literature regarding the safety of radiation exposure after two cases of acute lymphocytic leukaemia in children with haemophilia treated with (32) P RS were reported. The purpose of this review was to analyse the safety of RS in paediatric patients with haemophilia and provide a risk-benefit assessment, which practitioners could apply to their patients. Children undergoing knee RS receive a radiation dose of approximately 0.74 mSv (90 megabecquerels-MBq) and elbow and ankle RSs a dose of approximately 0.32 mSv (30-40 MBq). The radiation dose from natural sources is approximately 2 mSv and the recommended limit for patients (apart from natural sources) is 1 mSv per year. The lifetime cancer risk increases about 0.5% per 100 mSv per year. Considering the risks and benefits of RS, the authors recommend that clinicians consider this procedure in children with inhibitors or in patients without inhibitors when bleeding is recurrent and persistent despite aggressive factor replacement.

Bone health in persons with haemophilia.

INTRODUCTION: As the population of patients with haemophilia (PWH) ages, healthcare providers are required to direct greater attention to age-related co-morbidities. Low bone mineral density (BMD) is one such co-morbidity where the incidence not only increases with age, but also occurs with greater frequency in PWH. AIM: To review risk factors for low BMD, and strategies to promote bone health and identify patients who would benefit from screening for osteoporosis and subsequent treatment. METHODS: A narrative review of the literature was performed in MEDLINE with keywords haemophilia, bone density, osteoporosis and fracture. Reference lists of retrieved articles were also reviewed. RESULTS: Low BMD occurs more commonly in PWH than the general population and is most likely the result of a combination of risk factors.  Steps to promote bone health include preventing haemarthrosis, encouraging regular exercise, adequate vitamin D and calcium intake, and avoiding tobacco and excessive alcohol intake. Adults 50 years of age and older with haemophilia and those younger than 50 years with a fragility fracture or increased fracture risk based on FRAX (The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool), regardless of haemophilia severity, should be screened for low BMD using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Once osteoporosis is diagnosed based on DXA, fracture risk should guide treatment. Currently, treatment is similar to those without haemophilia and most commonly includes bisphosphonates. CONCLUSION: Haemophilia care providers should promote adequate bone formation during childhood and reduce bone loss during adulthood as well as identify patients with low BMD that would benefit from therapy.

The current role of orthoses in treating haemophilic arthropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Haemophilic arthropathy (HA) is an inevitable consequence of repeated haemarthroses in people with haemophilia, and principally affects their ankles, knees and elbows. It is advisable that haematological treatment be complemented with rehabilitation therapy and surgery. Orthoses are devices that are used within the framework of rehabilitation, in order to change the functional or structural characteristics of the neuromusculoskeletal system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This article reviews the design, the materials and characteristics of orthoses and the indications for the various orthoses used in HA. Ankle, knee, elbow orthoses, insoles, footwear modifications and orthopedic shoes are discussed. RESULTS: Orthoses can control or prevent joint movement, stabilise a specific joint or relieve the load or stress on it. These devices must be prescribed by a physician within the framework of rehabilitation. Recommendations for the proper selection and use of orthoses are highly complex. DISCUSSION: To maximise the benefits of this mode of therapy, a profound understanding of anatomy and biomechanics is crucial, as is an understanding of the devices available for the various joints that may be affected by HA (ankles-feet, knees, elbows). CONCLUSIONS: Orthotic devices can reduce pain and improve quality of life of people with HA, delaying surgery in many cases.

Orthopaedic co-morbidities in the elderly haemophilia population: a review.

Due to improvements in the treatment and medical care of haemophilia, the life expectancy of individuals with haemophilia has approached that of the general population. To review the main co-morbidities of the musculoskeletal system in elderly persons with haemophilia, we have performed a review of the literature on the musculoskeletal problems of elderly haemophiliacs. Chronic arthropathy is the main co-morbidity in the ageing person with haemophilia. Age-related orthopaedic co-morbidities include degenerative joint changes, osteoporosis, muscle atrophy or sarcopenia, muscle weakness and disturbance of gait and balance. Increased pain, muscle weakness and atrophy along with an increased risk of falling are key features of advanced haemophilic arthropathy and ageing. An ageing haemophilia population in which arthropathy continues to be the primary co-morbidity is a current challenge for those responsible for their care. Exercise programmes undertaken two to three times per week for at least 12 weeks seem most effective in reducing the impact of age-related changes on the musculoskeletal system. Establishing effective exercise programmes and strategies to identify individuals who would benefit from early surgical intervention together with presurgical physiotherapy prehabilitation is a priority for future research.

Consensus recommendations for the use of FEIBA(®) in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors undergoing elective orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic surgery.

A growing number of publications have described the efficacy and safety of FEIBA as a first-line haemostatic agent for surgical procedures in haemophilia A patients with high-responding FVIII inhibitors. The aim of this study was to provide practical guidance on patient management and selection and also to communicate a standardized approach to the dosing and monitoring of FEIBA during and after surgery. A consensus group was convened with the aims of (i) providing an overview of the efficacy and safety of FEIBA in surgery; (ii) sharing best practice; (iii) developing recommendations based on the outcome of (i) and (ii). To date there have been 17 publications reporting on the use of FEIBA in over 210 major and minor orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic surgical procedures. Haemostatic outcome was rated as 'excellent' or 'good' in 78-100% of major cases. The reporting of thromboembolic complications or anamnestic response to FEIBA was very rare. Key to the success of FEIBA as haemostatic cover in surgery is to utilize the preplanning phase to prepare the patient both for surgery and also for rehabilitation. Haemostatic control with FEIBA should be continued for an adequate period postoperatively to support wound healing and to cover what can in some patients be an extended period of physiotherapy. Published data have demonstrated that FEIBA can provide adequate, well tolerated, peri and postoperative haemostatic cover for a variety of major and minor surgical procedures in patients with haemophilia A. The consensus recommendations provide a standardized approach to the dosing and monitoring of FEIBA.

The treatment of patellar tendinopathy.

BACKGROUND: Patellar tendinopathy (PT) presents a challenge to orthopaedic surgeons. The purpose of this review is to revise strategies for treatment of PT MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PubMed (MEDLINE) search of the years 2002-2012 was performed using "patellar tendinopathy" and "treatment" as keywords. The twenty-two articles addressing the treatment of PT with a higher level of evidence were selected. RESULTS: Conservative treatment includes therapeutic exercises (eccentric training), extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), and different injection treatments (platelet-rich plasma, sclerosing polidocanol, steroids, aprotinin, autologous skin-derived tendon-like cells, and bone marrow mononuclear cells). Surgical treatment may be indicated in motivated patients if carefully followed conservative treatment is unsuccessful after more than 3-6 months. Open surgical treatment includes longitudinal splitting of the tendon, excision of abnormal tissue (tendonectomy), resection and drilling of the inferior pole of the patella, closure of the paratenon. Postoperative inmobilisation and aggressive postoperative rehabilitation are also paramount. Arthroscopic techniques include shaving of the dorsal side of the proximal tendon, removal of the hypertrophic synovitis around the inferior patellar pole with a bipolar cautery system, and arthroscopic tendon debridement with excision of the distal pole of the patella. CONCLUSION: Physical training, and particularly eccentric training, appears to be the treatment of choice. The literature does not clarify which surgical technique is more effective in recalcitrant cases. Therefore, both open surgical techniques and arthroscopic techniques can be used.

Aspects of current management: orthopaedic surgery in haemophilia.

If continuous prophylaxis is not feasible due to expense or lack of venous access, we must aggressively treat major haemarthroses (including arthrocentesis) to prevent progression to synovitis, recurrent joint bleeds, and ultimately end-stage osteoarthritis (haemophilic arthropathy). For the treatment of chronic haemophilic synovitis, radiosynovectomy should always be indicated as the first procedure. If, after three procedures with 6-month interval, radiosynovectomy fails, an arthroscopic synovectomy must be indicated. Between the second and fourth decades, many haemophilic patients develop joint destruction (arthropathy). At this stage possible treatments include alignment osteotomy, arthroscopic joint debridement, arthrodesis (joint fusion) and total joint arthroplasty. For the hip press-fit uncemented components (hemispherical acetabulum, flanged femoral stem, metal-to-polyethylene) are recommended whilst for the knee a posterior-stabilized (PS) cemented design is advised. Muscular problems must not be underestimated in haemophilia due to their risk of developing compartment syndromes (which will require surgical decompression) and pseudotumours (which will require surgical removal or percutaneous treatment). Regarding patients with inhibitors, the advent of APCCs and rFVIIa has made major orthopaedic surgery possible, leading to an improved quality of life for haemophilia patients. Concerning local fibrin seal, it is not always necessary to achieve haemostasis in all surgical procedures performed in persons with haemophilia. However, it could be a good adjunct therapy, mainly when a surgical field potentially will bleed more than expected (i.e. patients with inhibitors), and also in some orthopaedic procedures (mainly the surgical removal of pseudotumours).

Surgical wound healing in bleeding disorders.

Animal experiments have shown that a number of bleeding disorders may affect wound healing (WH), including haemophilia B, deficiency of factor XIII and abnormalities of fibrinogen. Therefore, normal healing requires adequate haemostatic function for the appropriate time frame (up to 4 weeks in the clean and uncontaminated wound). Many factors may affect WH, including impaired haemostasis, diabetes, poor nutrition, insufficient oxygenation, infection, smoking, alcoholism, old age, stress and obesity. The gold standard for the correct care of surgical wounds in patients with bleeding disorders includes wound dressing and comprehensive standard care (haemostasis, nutritional support, treatment of co-morbidities, offloading, reperfusion therapy and compression). Although complications of surgical wounds healing in patients with bleeding disorders are uncommon, a low level of the deficient factor for an insufficient period of time could cause WH complications such as haematomas, infection, and skin necrosis and dehiscence. Clinical experience and animal experiments appear to indicate that, to get a satisfactory healing of surgical wounds and avoid potential complications of WH, a good level of haemostasis is necessary for 2-3 weeks after surgery. However, many treaters would regard this recommendation at odds with (i.e. more aggressive than) current standards. Unfortunately no additional clinical evidence for this recommendation can be provided.

The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of the musculo-skeletal problems of haemophilia.

Recurrent haemarthrosis is the final cause of haemophilic arthrosic disease in haemophilia patients. Therefore, it is essential to diagnose it early, both clinically and by imaging. In addition, haemophilia patients experience chronic synovitis, joint degeneration, muscle haematoma and pseudotumours. The objective of this article is to highlight the value of ultrasounds in the diagnosis and control of the evolution of musculo-skeletal problems in haemophilia patients. To this end, we have performed a literature search in the PubMed, Web of Science(®) (WOS) and SciVerse bases, using the following keywords: hemophilia or haemophilia and ultrasonography (US), ultrasound, echography and sonography. The search was limited to studies published in English between the years 1991 and 2011, finding a total of 221 references. After reviewing the title or abstract for evidence of the use of US for the diagnosis of musculo-skeletal lesions in haemophilia, we selected 24 of these references. We added data collected from our experience to the most important data found in the references. Our main conclusion is that US is highly valuable for the diagnosis of musculo-skeletal diseases in haemophilia. It is a fast, effective, safe, available, comparative, real-time technique that can help us confirm the clinical examination. It is particularly important in acute haemarthrosis, as it can be used to objectively identify the presence of blood in the joints, measure its size, pinpoint its location, assess its evolution and confirm its complete disappearance.

Cartilage restoration in haemophilia: advanced therapies.

Current treatment of joint cartilage lesions is based either on conventional techniques (bone marrow stimulation, osteochondral autograft or allograft transplantation) or on newly developed techniques (chondrocyte implantation and those based on cell therapy that use bioreactors, growth factors, mesenchymal stem cells [MSCs] and genetically modified cells). The aim of this article is to review the therapeutic strategies above mentioned and to determine whether the chondral damage seen in haemophilia could benefit from any of them. The different conventional techniques have shown similar results whereas autologous chondrocyte implantation, which is in common use at the present time, has not been shown to produce any conclusive results or to lead to the formation of hyaline cartilage. MSCs hold promise for the repair of joint cartilage given their differentiation capacity and the therapeutic effect. The use of bioreactors and growth factors, which stimulate cartilage formation, may optimize such strategies in the context of reimplantation of chondrocytes, differentiated MSCs and cartilage progenitor cells. The aim of cell therapy is restoration of function through the repair of damaged tissue or the stimulation of growth factor synthesis. Implantation of autologous chondrocytes or MSCs was up to now able to address only highly localized chondral lesions. Adequate control of the differentiation process as well as the use of growth factors and appropriate bioreactors could transform cell-based therapies into a more efficient and longer term treatment even for patients with haemophilia. Nevertheless, raising false expectations in these patients should be avoided. There are a number of approaches to cartilage restoration in haemophilic arthropathy, which are currently being explored for other joint related degenerative disorders. If it can be proven to be effective for the disorders in which clinical trials are ongoing and costs could be limited, it might be an useful palliative approach to haemophilic arthropathy. However, we still have a long way to go for use in haemophilic arthropathy.

Management of bleeding disorders in adults.

Development of FVIII inhibitors is currently the most severe and challenging complication of haemophilia A treatment and represents a very large economic burden for a chronic disease. As a result, clinical research is making major efforts to optimize the therapeutic approaches for this condition. In this section we will review some important aspects of the management of haemophilia in adults, including an overview of bleeding in women with von Willebrand disease, an analysis of FVIII consumption in patients with severe haemophilia A, an update of the ongoing RES.I.ST study, long-term prophylaxis and experience from the Pro.Will study, current evidence relating to economic aspects of the treatment of haemophilic patients with inhibitors (based on the PROFIT study), and an overview of musculoskeletal complications in adults with severe bleeding disorders.

What patient, joint and isotope characteristics influence the response to radiosynovectomy in patients with haemophilia?

The literature describes radiosynovectomy (RS) as a good non-surgical option for reducing synovial membrane size and thus the number of haemarthrosis episodes. However, there are still many aspects concerning the beneficial effects of RS that have not been quantified. A total of 156 radiosynovectomies (RS) were performed in 104 joints corresponding to 78 haemophiliacs (yttrium-90, rhenium-186). The mean patient age was 18 years. In another study involving the same group of patients, the parameters that improved most after RS were pain and haemarthrosis, followed by the World Federation of Hemophilia clinical score, muscle strength and range of movement (ROM). Following RS, improvement was seen to be independent of patient age, haemophilia type and grade, previous haematological treatment, the presence or absence of circulating inhibitor, synovial membrane size, the type of joint (elbow, knee and ankle), previous physical activity or lack of activity, the prior presence or absence of radiographic signs of joint degeneration (arthropathy) or the isotope used. RS is effective in treating haemophilic synovitis and may require 1-3 injections (RS-1, RS-2 and RS-3) spaced 6 months apart. Following RS-1, the knee had a 3.4- and 3.2-fold greater risk of not improving in terms of pain, compared with the elbow and ankle, respectively. Regarding ROM, lesser improvement was recorded after RS-1 in cases of severe haemophilia and the ankle. In other words, severe haemophilia implies a 2.1-fold greater risk of no improvement in ROM compared with mild and moderate haemophilia. In addition, the ankle presented a 6-fold greater risk of not improving in terms of ROM compared with the elbow and knee. RS affords effective treatment of chronic haemophilic synovitis. RS is effective in all patient groups, independently of the presence of circulating inhibitor antibody, the type of joint involved, the degree of synovial membrane hypertrophy and the presence of radiographic findings of joint degeneration (arthropathy).

Joint protection in haemophilia.

Haemarthroses (intra-articular haemorrhages) are a frequent finding typically observed in patients with haemophilia. Diagnosis and treatment of these bleeding episodes must be delivered as early as possible. Additionally, treatment should ideally be administered intensively (enhanced on-demand treatment) until the resolution of symptoms. Joint aspiration plays an important role in acute and profuse haemarthroses as the presence of blood in the joint leads to chondrocyte apoptosis and chronic synovitis, which will eventually result in joint degeneration (haemophilic arthropathy). Ultrasonography (US) is an appropriate diagnostic technique to assess the evolution of acute haemarthrosis in haemophilia, although magnetic resonance imaging remains the gold standard as far as imaging techniques are concerned. Some patients experience subclinical haemarthroses, which eventually tend to result in some degree of arthropathy, especially in the ankles. Nowadays, the most effective way of protecting these patients is primary prophylaxis, which in practice changes severe haemophilia into moderate haemophilia, preventing or at least minimizing the occurrence of haemarthrosis. If primary prophylaxis is, for whatever reason not an option, secondary prophylaxis and enhanced on demand treatment should be considered. Two alternatives are available for inhibitor patients: (i) control of haemostasis using by-passing agents (rFVIIa or aPCCs) either as enhanced on demand treatment or secondary prophylaxis, as appropriate, following the same basic principles used for non-inhibitor patients and (ii) immune tolerance induction (ITI) to eradicate the inhibitor.

Surgery in haemophilia patients with inhibitors, with special emphasis on orthopaedics: Madrid experience.

We report on a series of 92 surgical procedures (90 patients). It includes 35 orthopaedic procedures (33 patients) and 57 non-orthopaedic procedures (57 patients). The orthopaedic procedures include 27 radiosynovectomies (minor surgery) and eight major orthopaedic procedures. The non-orthopaedic procedures include 52 minor interventions and five major procedures. The average age of patients was 34 years (range: 8-56), and the average follow-up time was 3 years (range: 1-6). Of the 92 surgical procedures, 42 were performed with activated prothrombin complex concentrates [factor eight inhibitor bypassing agent (FEIBA)] and 47 with recombinant-activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa; NovoSeven, Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark). Regarding FEIBA treatment in minor surgery, the initial dose was 100 IU kg(-1). After 6 h, we continued with 50 IU kg(-1) every 12 h for at least 4 days (radiosynovectomies). In minor non-orthopaedic procedures, the dose was continued until day 14. In patients who underwent surgery with the haemostatic control achieved by means of rFVIIa, the initial dose of rFVIIa in minor procedures (both orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic) was 90-120 microg kg(-1). In postoperative days 1-5, the dose was 2-4 x 90-120 microg kg(-1) q3-6 h for 24 h. In major procedures (both orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic), the dose was 120 microg kg(-1) pre-operatively, 120 microg kg(-1) q 3 h day 2/day 3-5, and then 90-120 microg kg(-1) q 6 h until day 14. There were 87 good results, four fair results and one poor result. Our study has shown that haemophilic patients with inhibitors requiring surgery can undergo orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic procedures with a high expectation of success. In other words, surgery (orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic) is now possible in haemophilia patients with inhibitors, leading to an improved quality of life for these patients.