Cryopreservation, semen use and the likelihood of fatherhood in male Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: an EORTC-GELA Lymphoma Group cohort study.

STUDY QUESTION: How does the successful cryopreservation of semen affect the odds of post-treatment fatherhood among Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors? SUMMARY ANSWER: Among 334 survivors who wanted to have children, the availability of cryopreserved semen doubled the odds of post-treatment fatherhood. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Cryopreservation of semen is the easiest, safest and most accessible way to safeguard fertility in male patients facing cancer treatment. Little is known about what proportion of patients achieve successful semen cryopreservation. To our knowledge, neither the factors which influence the occurrence of semen cryopreservation nor the rates of fatherhood after semen has been cryopreserved have been analysed before. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a cohort study with nested case-control analyses of consecutive Hodgkin survivors treated between 1974 and 2004 in multi-centre randomized controlled trials. A written questionnaire was developed and sent to 1849 male survivors. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Nine hundred and two survivors provided analysable answers. The median age at treatment was 31 years. The median follow-up after cryopreservation was 13 years (range 5-36). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Three hundred and sixty-three out of 902 men (40%) cryopreserved semen before the start of potentially gonadotoxic treatment. The likelihood of semen cryopreservation was influenced by age, treatment period, disease stage, treatment modality and education level. Seventy eight of 363 men (21%) used their cryopreserved semen. Men treated between 1994 and 2004 had significantly lower odds of cryopreserved semen use compared with those treated earlier, whereas alkylating or second-line (chemo)therapy significantly increased the odds of use; no other influencing factors were identified. We found an adjusted odds ratio of 2.03 (95% confidence interval 1.11-3.73, P = 0.02) for post-treatment fatherhood if semen cryopreservation was performed. Forty-eight out of 258 men (19%) who had children after HL treatment became a father using cryopreserved semen. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Data came from questionnaires and so this study potentially suffers from response bias. We could not perform an analysis with correction for duration of follow-up or provide an actuarial use rate due to lack of dates of semen utilization. We do not have detailed information on either the techniques used in cryopreserved semen utilization or the number of cycles needed. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Lance Armstrong Foundation, Dutch Cancer Foundation, René Vogels Stichting, no competing interests.

Treatment-specific risk of subsequent malignant neoplasms in five-year survivors of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of rituximab significantly improved the prognosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), emphasizing the importance of evaluating the long-term consequences of exposure to radiotherapy, alkylating agents and anthracycline-containing (immuno)chemotherapy among DLBCL survivors. METHODS: Long-term risk of subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs) was examined in a multicenter cohort comprising 2373 5-year DLBCL survivors treated at ages 15-61 years in 1989-2012. Observed SMN numbers were compared with expected cancer incidence to estimate standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and absolute excess risks (AERs/10 000 person-years). Treatment-specific risks were assessed using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 13.8 years, 321 survivors developed one or more SMNs (SIR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.8, AER 51.8). SIRs remained increased for at least 20 years after first-line treatment (SIR ≥20-year follow-up 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.2, AER 81.8) and were highest among patients ≤40 years at first DLBCL treatment (SIR 2.7, 95% CI 2.0-3.5). Lung (SIR 2.0, 95% CI 1.5-2.7, AER 13.4) and gastrointestinal cancers (SIR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.0, AER 11.8) accounted for the largest excess risks. Treatment with >4500 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide/>300 mg/m2 doxorubicin versus ≤2250 mg/m2/≤150 mg/m2, respectively, was associated with increased solid SMN risk (hazard ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.2). Survivors who received rituximab had a lower risk of subdiaphragmatic solid SMNs (hazard ratio 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-1.0) compared with survivors who did not receive rituximab. CONCLUSION: Five-year DLBCL survivors have an increased risk of SMNs. Risks were higher for survivors ≤40 years at first treatment and survivors treated with >4500 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide/>300 mg/m2 doxorubicin, and may be lower for survivors treated in the rituximab era, emphasizing the need for studies with longer follow-up for rituximab-treated patients.

[Saliva and intensity modulated radiotherapy]. / Speeksel en intensiteitsgemoduleerde radiotherapie.

A dry mouth (xerostomia) is a serious side effect for head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. The degree of xerostomia is dependent on the dosage in the parotid glands. New, advanced radiation techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, can reduce the dosage in the parotid glands, resulting in a significant improvement in the functioning of these glands by comparison with conventional radiation techniques.

Quantitative dose-volume response analysis of changes in parotid gland function after radiotherapy in the head-and-neck region.

PURPOSE: To study the radiation tolerance of the parotid glands as a function of dose and volume irradiated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred eight patients treated with primary or postoperative radiotherapy for various malignancies in the head-and-neck region were prospectively evaluated. Stimulated parotid flow rate was measured before radiotherapy and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after radiotherapy. Parotid gland dose-volume histograms were derived from CT-based treatment planning. The normal tissue complication probability model proposed by Lyman was fit to the data. A complication was defined as stimulated parotid flow rate <25% of the preradiotherapy flow rate. RESULTS: The mean stimulated preradiotherapy flow rate of 174 parotid glands was 0.34 mL/min. The mean flow rate reduced to 0.12 mL/min 6 weeks postradiotherapy, but recovered to a mean flow rate of 0.20 mL/min at 1 year after radiotherapy. Reduction in postradiotherapy flow rate correlated significantly with mean parotid dose. No threshold dose was found. Increasing the irradiated volume of parotid glands from 0%-40% to 90-100% in patients with a mean parotid dose of 35-45 Gy resulted in a decrease in flow ratio from, respectively, approximately 100% to less than 10% 6 weeks after radiation. The flow ratio of the 90%-100% group partially recovered to 15% at 6 months and to 30% at 1 year after radiotherapy. The normal tissue complication probability model parameter TD(50) (the dose to the whole organ leading to a complication probability of 50%) was found to be 31, 35, and 39 Gy at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postradiotherapy, respectively. The volume dependency parameter n was around 1, which means that the mean parotid dose correlates best with the observed complications. There was no steep dose-response curve (m = 0.45 at 1 year postradiotherapy). CONCLUSIONS: This study on dose/volume/parotid gland function relationships revealed a linear correlation between postradiotherapy flow ratio and parotid gland dose and a strong volume dependency. No threshold dose was found. Recovery of parotid gland function was shown at 6 months and 1 year after radiotherapy. In radiation planning, attempts should be made to achieve a mean parotid gland dose at least below 39 Gy (leading to a complication probability of 50%).

Preservation of the rat parotid gland function after radiation by prophylactic pilocarpine treatment: radiation dose dependency and compensatory mechanisms.

PURPOSE: To study the ability of a prophylactic pilocarpine administration to preserve the rat parotid gland function after unilateral irradiation with graded doses of X-rays. METHODS: The right parotid gland of male albino Wistar rats was irradiated with single doses of X-rays (10-30 Gy, at 1.5 Gy min(-1)). Pilocarpine (4 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally, 1 hour prior to irradiation. Saliva samples of both left and right parotid gland were collected by means of miniaturized Lashley cups 4 days before and 3, 7, 10, and 30 days after irradiation. The parotid salivary flow rate (microl/min) was used as a parameter for the assessment of parotid gland function. RESULTS: Our data confirm that a single prophylactic treatment of pilocarpine can attenuate radiation-induced loss of gland function. Surprisingly, the effect of pilocarpine was not restricted to the irradiated gland only. Pilocarpine also enhanced the flow rate in the contralateral, nonirradiated gland. The latter effect was found for all doses above 10 Gy and became apparent around 7 days after the radiation treatment. The effectiveness of pilocarpine to attenuate function loss in the irradiated gland decreased with increasing dose and was lost after single doses of 30 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide direct evidence that increasing the compensatory potential of the nondamaged gland, at least in part, underlies the "radioprotective effect" of pilocarpine in case of unilateral radiation. The ability of pilocarpine to ameliorate the early radiation-induced impairment of the parotid gland function in the irradiated gland may therefore be dependent on the remaining number of functional cells, and thus on the volume of the gland that lies within the radiation portal.

CT-based parotid gland location: implications for preservation of parotid function.

PURPOSE: The position of the parotid gland in relation to surrounding structures was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients with head and neck tumours were prospectively evaluated. Parotid position was determined using beam's eye views of CT images projected on simulator films. Distances between the different borders of the parotid gland and surrounding bony marks were quantitatively assessed. RESULTS: The parotid gland volume ranged from 12.9 to 46.4 cm(3). The distance between the cranial border of the parotid gland and the tuberculum anterior of the atlas ranged between 0.7 and 4.8 cm. The position of the parotid gland was unaffected by the angle of the mandible. CONCLUSIONS: The size and position of the parotid gland varies largely among patients. As the extent of radiation-induced salivary dysfunction depends on the volume of the gland tissue exposed, CT-based simulation of radiation fields is necessary.

The influence of clinical factors on human stimulated parotid flow rate in cancer and other patients.

Reduced salivary secretion can produce a wide variety of complaints, having a negative impact on the daily life of a patient. Multiple causes of salivary hypofunction are described, however, there are no consistent data about the influence of clinical parameters on parotid gland function. We studied a group of patients with head and neck malignancies before treatment with radiotherapy. We used Lashley cups to collect stimulated parotid saliva simultaneously from both parotid glands. Sizes of the parotid gland, gender, age, tobacco and alcohol consumption, and tumour characteristics were related to the function of the parotid gland. A considerable variability in parotid output was found with a range of 0.03-1.66 ml/min (mean 0.34 ml/min). None of the variables were correlated with parotid flow. These results are important, especially when evaluating effects of radiation on parotid gland function.

Chromatin structure and cellular radiosensitivity: a comparison of two human tumour cell lines.

The role of variation in susceptibility to DNA damage induction was studied as a determinant for cellular radiosensitivity. Comparison of the radiosensitive HX142 and radioresistant RT112 cell lines previously revealed higher susceptibility to X-ray-induced DNA damage in the sensitive cell line using non-denaturing elution, but not when using alkaline unwinding. The present data also show that no difference in the amount of initial damage is seen when pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) or comet analysis are used for DNA damage assessment. However, using the halo assay or a modified version of PFGE in which the higher DNA architecture remained partially intact, the radiosensitive cells showed steeper dose-response curves for initial DNA damage than the radioresistant cells. Analysis of the protein composition, of DNA-nucleoid structures revealed substantial differences when isolated from HX142 or RT112 cells. From our data, it is concluded that HX142 and RT112 differ in their structural organization of chromatin. As no differences in the kinetics of DNA damage rejoining were found, it is hypothesized that the same amount of lesions have a different impact in the two cell lines in that the 'presentation' of DNA damage alters the ratio of repairable to non-repairable DNA damage.

Radiation induced DNA damage and damage repair in three human tumour cell lines.

Three human tumour cell lines (HX142, RT112 and MGH-U1) with different radiosensitivities were tested for differences in the rate and/or extent of DNA unwinding in alkali as well as for differences in the induction of DNA double strand breaks by means of the pulsed field gel electrophoresis, after X-irradiation. Unlike that which has been found using the non-denaturing filter elution technique (NDE, McMillan et al., 1990), no differences in initial DNA damage (the extent of alkaline unwinding and the induction of double strand breaks) were found for the three cell lines. These data suggest that rather than a different number of DNA lesions per Da per Gy between these cell lines, structural differences in chromatin structure (related to radiosensitivity) might impair the detectability of lesions in some assays like the NDE. The nature of such structure differences remains unclear. However, the differences did not affect alkaline unwinding profiles, as all three cell lines showed identical rates of DNA unwinding after exposure to X-rays. Furthermore, the three cell lines did not show significant differences in the kinetics of DNA strand break rejoining nor in the amounts of damage remaining after 24 h repair. The results obtained in this study, together with other findings, suggest that the three cell lines may differ in their 'presentation' of DNA damage.