Depolarization after resonance energy transfer (DARET): a sensitive fluorescence-based assay for botulinum neurotoxin protease activity.

The DARET (depolarization after resonance energy transfer) assay is a coupled Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-fluorescence polarization assay for botulinum neurotoxin type A or E (BoNT/A or BoNT/E) proteolytic activity that relies on a fully recombinant substrate. The substrate consists of blue fluorescent protein (BFP) and green fluorescent protein (GFP) flanking SNAP-25 (synaptosome-associated protein of 25 kDa) residues 134-206. In this assay, the substrate is excited with polarized light at 387 nm, which primarily excites the BFP, whereas emission from the GFP is monitored at 509 nm. Energy transfer from the BFP to the GFP in the intact substrate results in a substantial depolarization of the GFP emission. The energy transfer is eliminated when the fluorescent domains separate on cleavage by the endopeptidase, and emission from the directly excited GFP product fragment is then highly polarized, resulting in an overall increase in polarization. This increase in polarization can be monitored to assay the proteolytic activity of BoNT/A and BoNT/E in real time. It allows determination of the turnover rate of the substrate and the kinetic constants (V(max) and k(cat)) based on the concentration of cleaved substrate determined directly from the measurements using the additivity properties of polarization. The assay is amenable to high-throughput applications.

Botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A and B preparations have different safety margins in preclinical models of muscle weakening efficacy and systemic safety.

This preclinical study compared the muscle weakening efficacy, duration, and safety margin of the recently approved botulinum toxin type B (BTX-B; Myobloc/Neurobloc) to botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A; BOTOX((R))). Mice received a single hind limb intramuscular injection of BTX-B (1-150U/kg) or BTX-A (1-120U/kg). An observer who was masked to treatment assessed the magnitude and duration of muscle weakening efficacy on a 0-4 scale using the digit abduction scoring assay. Safety margins were determined as the ratio of the IM median lethal dose to the IM dose that produced half-maximal muscle weakness in the DAS. BTX-A produced muscle weakness at lower doses than BTX-B (IM ED(50): 6.2+/-0.6 vs. 20.8+/-1.4U/kg, respectively) (p<0.0001). BTX-A at 29U/kg and BTX-B at 67U/kg produced comparable peak DAS scores of approximately 4 indicating maximal muscle weakness. At these doses, the duration of BTX-A was longer, with a return to baseline by day 36 compared to a return to baseline by day 14 with BTX-B. The mean dose that was lethal in 50% of mice was lower for BTX-A than BTX-B (81.4+/-3.5 vs. 104.6+/-1.9U/kg, respectively) (p<0.001) and the safety margin was higher (13.9+/-1.7 vs. 5.4+/-0.3, respectively (p<0.001). These results indicate that the BTX-A:BTX-B dose ratio for muscle weakening efficacy is different from the ratio for systemic effects following IM injections and suggest that no single dose ratio is adequate to compare these preparations. The in vivo differences found are consistent with the different clinical profiles reported for these two products.