Potential Hydrodynamic Cytoplasmic Transfer between Mammalian Cells: Cell-Projection Pumping.

We earlier reported cytoplasmic fluorescence exchange between cultured human fibroblasts (Fibs) and malignant cells (MCs). Others report similar transfer via either tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) or shed membrane vesicles, and this changes the phenotype of recipient cells. Our time-lapse microscopy showed most exchange was from Fibs into MCs, with less in the reverse direction. Although TNTs were seen, we were surprised transfer was not via TNTs but was instead via fine and often branching cell projections that defied direct visual resolution because of their size and rapid movement. Their structure was revealed nonetheless by their organellar cargo and the grooves they formed indenting MCs, which was consistent with holotomography. Discrete, rapid, and highly localized transfer events evidenced against a role for shed vesicles. Transfer coincided with rapid retraction of the cell projections, suggesting a hydrodynamic mechanism. Increased hydrodynamic pressure in retracting cell projections normally returns cytoplasm to the cell body. We hypothesize "cell-projection pumping" (CPP), in which cytoplasm in retracting cell projections partially equilibrates into adjacent recipient cells via microfusions that form temporary intercellular cytoplasmic continuities. We tested plausibility for CPP by combined mathematical modeling, comparison of predictions from the model with experimental results, and then computer simulations based on experimental data. The mathematical model predicted preferential CPP into cells with lower cell stiffness, expected from equilibration of pressure toward least resistance. Predictions from the model were satisfied when Fibs were cocultured with MCs and fluorescence exchange was related to cell stiffness by atomic force microscopy. When transfer into 5000 simulated recipient MCs or Fibs was studied in computer simulations, inputting experimental cell stiffness and donor cell fluorescence values generated transfers to simulated recipient cells similar to those seen by experiment. We propose CPP as a potentially novel mechanism in mammalian intercellular cytoplasmic transfer and communication.

Membrane and cytoplasmic marker exchange between malignant neoplastic cells and fibroblasts via intermittent contact: increased tumour cell diversity independent of genetic change.

We previously demonstrated that human osteosarcoma cells (SAOS-2) induce contact-dependent apoptosis in endothelium, and expected similar apoptosis in human gingival fibroblasts (h-GF) using SAOS-2 alkaline phosphatase (AP) to identify cells. However, h-GF apoptosis did not occur, despite reduction in AP-negative h-GF number (p < 0.01) and enhancement of this by h-GF TNFα pretreatment (p < 0.01). We suggest that TNFα-enhanced transfer of membrane AP from SAOS-2 to h-GF would explain these data. This idea was investigated using fluorescence prelabelled cells and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Co-cultures of membrane-labelled h-GF (marker-DiO) and SAOS-2 (marker-DiD) generated dual-labelled cells, primarily at the expense of single labelled h-GF (p < 0.001), suggesting predominant membrane transfer from SAOS-2 to h-GF. However, opposite directional transfer predominated when membrane labels were reversed; SAOS-2 further expressed green fluorescent protein (GFP) in cytoplasm and nuclei, and h-GF additionally bore nuclear label (Syto59) (p < 0.001). Cytoplasmic exchange was investigated using h-GF prelabelled with cytoplasmic DDAO-SE and nuclear Syto59, co-cultured with SAOS-2 expressing GFP in cytoplasm and nuclei, and predominant cytoplasmic marker transferred from h-GF to SAOS-2 (p < 0.05). Pretreating h-GF with TNFα increased exchange of membrane markers (p < 0.04) but did not affect either cell surface area profile or circularity. Dual-labelled cells had a morphological phenotype differing from SAOS-2 and h-GF (p < 0.001). Time-lapse microscopy revealed extensive migration of SAOS-2 and cell process contact with h-GF, with the appearance of SAOS-2 indulging in 'cellular sipping' from h-GF. Similar exchange of membrane was seen between h-GF and with other cell lines (melanoma MeIRMu, NM39, WMM175, MM200-B12; osteosarcoma U20S; ovarian carcinoma cells PE01, PE04 and COLO316), while cytoplasmic sharing was also seen in all cell lines other than U20S. We suggest that in some neoplasms, cellular sipping may contribute to phenotypic change and the generation of diverse tumour cell populations independent of genetic change, raising the possibility of a role in tumour progression.