RESUMEN
Dexamethasone is a life-saving treatment for severe COVID-19, yet its mechanism of action is unknown, and many patients deteriorate or die despite timely treatment initiation. Here, we identify dexamethasone treatment-induced cellular and molecular changes associated with improved survival in COVID-19 patients. We observed a reversal of transcriptional hallmark signatures in monocytes associated with severe COVID-19 and the induction of a monocyte substate characterized by the expression of glucocorticoid-response genes. These molecular responses to dexamethasone were detected in circulating and pulmonary monocytes, and they were directly linked to survival. Monocyte single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq)-derived signatures were enriched in whole blood transcriptomes of patients with fatal outcome in two independent cohorts, highlighting the potential for identifying non-responders refractory to dexamethasone. Our findings link the effects of dexamethasone to specific immunomodulation and reversal of monocyte dysregulation, and they highlight the potential of single-cell omics for monitoring in vivo target engagement of immunomodulatory drugs and for patient stratification for precision medicine approaches.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Dexametasona , Monocitos , SARS-CoV-2 , Análisis de la Célula Individual , Humanos , Dexametasona/farmacología , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Monocitos/metabolismo , Monocitos/efectos de los fármacos , SARS-CoV-2/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Femenino , Transcriptoma , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/farmacología , Pulmón/patología , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an inflammatory multisystemic disease caused by environmental exposures and/or genetic factors. Inherited alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is one of the best recognized genetic factors increasing the risk for an early onset COPD with emphysema. The aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of the associations between comorbidities and specific biomarkers in COPD patients with and without AATD to enable future investigations aimed, for example, at identifying risk factors or improving care. METHODS: We focused on cardiovascular comorbidities, blood high sensitivity troponin (hs-troponin) and lipid profiles in COPD patients with and without AATD. We used clinical data from six German University Medical Centres of the MIRACUM (Medical Informatics Initiative in Research and Medicine) consortium. The codes for the international classification of diseases (ICD) were used for COPD as a main diagnosis and for comorbidities and blood laboratory data were obtained. Data analyses were based on the DataSHIELD framework. RESULTS: Out of 112,852 visits complete information was available for 43,057 COPD patients. According to our findings, 746 patients with AATD (1.73%) showed significantly lower total blood cholesterol levels and less cardiovascular comorbidities than non-AATD COPD patients. Moreover, after adjusting for the confounder factors, such as age, gender, and nicotine abuse, we confirmed that hs-troponin is a suitable predictor of overall mortality in COPD patients. The comorbidities associated with AATD in the current study differ from other studies, which may reflect geographic and population-based differences as well as the heterogeneous characteristics of AATD. CONCLUSION: The concept of MIRACUM is suitable for the analysis of a large healthcare database. This study provided evidence that COPD patients with AATD have a lower cardiovascular risk and revealed that hs-troponin is a predictor for hospital mortality in individuals with COPD.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Deficiencia de alfa 1-Antitripsina , Humanos , Deficiencia de alfa 1-Antitripsina/diagnóstico , Deficiencia de alfa 1-Antitripsina/epidemiología , Deficiencia de alfa 1-Antitripsina/genética , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/genética , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , TroponinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiac symptoms due to postacute inflammatory cardiac involvement affect a broad segment of previously well people with only mild acute COVID-19 illness and without overt structural heart disease. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging can identify the underlying subclinical disease process, which is associated with chronic cardiac symptoms. Specific therapy directed at reducing postacute cardiac inflammatory involvement prior to development of myocardial injury and impairment is missing. TRIAL DESIGN: Prospective multicentre randomised placebo-controlled study of myocardial protection therapy (combined immunosuppressive/antiremodelling) of low-dose prednisolone and losartan. Consecutive symptomatic individuals with a prior COVID-19 infection, no preexisting significant comorbidities or structural heart disease, undergo standardised assessments with questionnaires, CMR imaging and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Eligible participants fulfilling the criteria of subclinical Post-COVID inflammatory involvement on baseline CMR examination are randomised to treatment with either verum or placebo for a total of 16 weeks (W16). Participants and investigators remain blinded to the group allocation throughout the study duration. The primary efficacy endpoint is the absolute change of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to baseline at W16, measured by CMR, between the verum treatment and placebo group by absolute difference, using unpaired t-test confirmatively at the 5% significance level. Secondary endpoints include assessment of changes of symptoms, CMR parameters, and CPET after W16, and frequency of major adverse cardiac events after 1 year. Safety data will be analysed for frequency, severity and types of adverse events (AEs) for all treatment groups. The proportion of AEs related to the contrast agent gadobutrol will also be analysed. A calculated sample size is a total of 280 participants (accounting for 8% drop-out), randomised in 1:1 fashion to 140 in the verum and 140 placebo group. CONCLUSION: Myoflame-19 study will examine the efficacy of a myocardial protection therapy in symptomatic participants with post-COVID inflammatory cardiac involvement determined by CMR. The aim of the intervention is to reduce the symptoms and inflammatory myocardial injury, to improve exercise tolerance and preclude the development of cardiac impairment. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER: NCT05619653.
RESUMEN
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) inflicts severe illness and courses of infections not only in neonates, infants, and young children, but also causes significant morbidity and mortality in older adults and in people with immunosuppression, hemato-oncologic disease, chronic lung disease, or cardiovascular disease. In June and August 2023, effective vaccines against RSV were approved for the first time by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the EU. The respective pivotal studies showed a very high efficacy of the vaccine in preventing severe RSV-associated respiratory infections. At this point, use of the respective vaccines is restricted to persons aged 60 years or older, according to the registration studies. We therefore recommend use of the vaccination in persons aged 60 years or older. In addition, we recommend use of the vaccination in adults of any age with severe pulmonary or cardiovascular pre-existing conditions, as well as in adults with significant immune compromise, after individual consultation with the treating physician. Cost coverage can be applied for individually with the responsible health insurance company.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano , Anciano , Humanos , Pulmón , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/efectos adversos , Vacunación , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study assessed the frequency, clinical significance, and risk factors for Herpes simplex virus (HSV) reactivation in immunocompetent patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: The study included adult CAP-patients who were enrolled in the CAPNETZ study between 2007 and 2017 and had a residual sputum sample available for analysis. In addition to routine diagnostics, sputum and blood samples were tested for HSV-1/2 using PCR. Demographics, comorbidities, and CRB-65 score were compared between HSV-positive and negative patients using Fisher exact or Mann Whitney test. Logistic regression analyses investigated the influence of HSV reactivation on a modified hospital recovery scale (HRS) until day 7, divided into 3 categories (no oxygen therapy, oxygen therapy, ICU admission or death). RESULTS: Among 245 patients, HSV-1 and HSV-2 were detected in 30 patients (12.2%, 95%CI 8.7-16.9) and 0 patients, respectively. All HSV-positive patients were hospitalized, had a CRB-65 severity score of 0-2 and survived the first 28 day. In the HSV-positive group, patients had a non-significantly higher median age (70.5 versus 66 years) and a higher rate of oncological comorbidities (16.7% versus 8.8%) compared to the HSV-negative group. Distribution of co-pathogens and outcome parameters did not significantly differ between both groups. In a multivariate logistic regression model, age (AOR 1.029, p = 0.012) and CRB-65 score (AOR 1.709, p = 0.048), but not HSV-1 as single or co-pathogen were independently associated with higher HRS. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that HSV-1 reactivation is common in CAP but might not be associated with specific risk factors or a complicated disease course.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to identify the pathogen spectrum of community acquired pneumonia in people living with HIV (PLWH), and to compare it with a matched HIV negative group in order to reassess therapeutic strategies for PLWH. METHODS: Seventy-three (n = 73) PLWH (median CD4 3-6 months before CAP: 515/µl; SD 309) with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) were matched with 218 HIV-negative CAP controls in a prospective study design. Pathogen identifications used blood culture, samples from the upper and lower respiratory tract (culture and multiplex PCR) and urinary pneumococcal and legionella antigen test. RESULTS: Although the vaccination rate among PLWH with CAP was significantly higher (pneumococcal vaccination: 27.4 vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001; influenza vaccination: 34.2 vs. 17.4%, p = 0.009), pneumococci were found most frequently as pathogen among both PLWH (n = 19/21.3%) and controls (n = 34/17.2%; p = 0.410), followed by Haemophilus influenzae (PLWH, n = 12/13.5%, vs. controls, n = 25 / 12.6%; p = 0.850). Staphylococcus aureus was found equally in 20.2 and 19.2% in PLWH and controls, but infection or colonization could not be distinguished. Mortality during 6-month follow-up was significantly higher for PLWH (5/73, or 6.8%) versus controls (3/218, or 1.4%), however with lower case numbers than previously reported. Typical HIV-associated pathogens such as Pneumocystis jirovecii were found only exceptionally. CONCLUSIONS: Our study underscores the persistent clinical burden of CAP for PLWH. From pathogen perspective, empirical antibiotic treatment for CAP in PLWH on antiretroviral therapy should cover pneumococci and Haemophilus influenzae and may be adopted from valid common recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Infecciones por VIH , Infecciones por Haemophilus , Neumonía Bacteriana , Humanos , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Haemophilus/tratamiento farmacológico , Haemophilus influenzae , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and non-COVID-19 community-acquired pneumonia (NC-CAP) often result in hospitalization with considerable risks of mortality, ICU treatment, and long-term morbidity. A comparative analysis of clinical outcomes in COVID-19 CAP (C-CAP) and NC-CAP may improve clinical management. METHODS: Using prospectively collected CAPNETZ study data (January 2017 to June 2021, 35 study centers), we conducted a comprehensive analysis of clinical outcomes including in-hospital death, ICU treatment, length of hospital stay (LOHS), 180-day survival, and post-discharge re-hospitalization rate. Logistic regression models were used to examine group differences between C-CAP and NC-CAP patients and associations with patient demography, recruitment period, comorbidity, and treatment. RESULTS: Among 1368 patients (C-CAP: n = 344; NC-CAP: n = 1024), C-CAP showed elevated adjusted probabilities for in-hospital death (aOR 4.48 [95% CI 2.38-8.53]) and ICU treatment (aOR 8.08 [95% CI 5.31-12.52]) compared to NC-CAP. C-CAP patients were at increased risk of LOHS over seven days (aOR 1.88 [95% CI 1.47-2.42]). Although ICU patients had similar in-hospital mortality risk, C-CAP was associated with length of ICU stay over seven days (aOR 3.59 [95% CI 1.65-8.38]). Recruitment period influenced outcomes in C-CAP but not in NC-CAP. During follow-up, C-CAP was linked to a reduced risk of re-hospitalization and mortality post-discharge (aOR 0.43 [95% CI 0.27-0.70]). CONCLUSION: Distinct clinical trajectories of C-CAP and NC-CAP underscore the need for adapted management to avoid acute and long-term morbidity and mortality amid the evolving landscape of CAP pathogens.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This executive summary of a German national guideline aims to provide the most relevant evidence-based recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. METHODS: The guideline made use of a systematic assessment and decision process using evidence to decision framework (GRADE). Recommendations were consented by an interdisciplinary panel. Evidence analysis and interpretation was supported by the German innovation fund providing extensive literature searches and (meta-) analyses by an independent methodologist. For this executive summary, selected key recommendations are presented including the quality of evidence and rationale for the level of recommendation. RESULTS: The original guideline contains 26 recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with nosocomial pneumonia, thirteen of which are based on systematic review and/or meta-analysis, while the other 13 represent consensus expert opinion. For this key summary, we present 11 most relevant for everyday clinical practice key recommendations with evidence overview and rationale, of which two are expert consensus and 9 evidence-based (4 strong, 5 weak and 2 open recommendations). For the management of nosocomial pneumonia patients should be divided in those with and without risk factors for multidrug-resistant pathogens and/or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bacterial multiplex-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) should not be used routinely. Bronchoscopic diagnosis is not considered superior to´non-bronchoscopic sampling in terms of main outcomes. Only patients with septic shock and the presence of an additional risk factor for multidrug-resistant pathogens (MDRP) should receive empiric combination therapy. In clinically stabilized patients, antibiotic therapy should be de-escalated and focused. In critically ill patients, prolonged application of suitable beta-lactam antibiotics should be preferred. Therapy duration is suggested for 7-8 days. Procalcitonin (PCT) based algorithm might be used to shorten the duration of antibiotic treatment. Patients on the intensive care unit (ICU) are at risk for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). Diagnostics for Aspergillus should be performed with an antigen test from bronchial lavage fluid. CONCLUSION: The current guideline focuses on German epidemiology and standards of care. It should be a guide for the current treatment and management of nosocomial pneumonia in Germany.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The objective examination of the Post-COVID syndrome (PCS) remains difficult due to heterogeneous definitions and clinical phenotypes. The aim of the study was to verify the functionality and correlates of a recently developed PCS score. METHODS: The PCS score was applied to the prospective, multi-center cross-sectoral cohort (in- and outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection) of the "National Pandemic Cohort Network (NAPKON, Germany)". Symptom assessment and patient-reported outcome measure questionnaires were analyzed at 3 and 12 months (3/12MFU) after diagnosis. Scores indicative of PCS severity were compared and correlated to demographic and clinical characteristics as well as quality of life (QoL, EQ-5D-5L). RESULTS: Six hundred three patients (mean 54.0 years, 60.6% male, 82.0% hospitalized) were included. Among those, 35.7% (215) had no and 64.3% (388) had mild, moderate, or severe PCS. PCS severity groups differed considering sex and pre-existing respiratory diseases. 3MFU PCS worsened with clinical severity of acute infection (p = .011), and number of comorbidities (p = .004). PCS severity was associated with poor QoL at the 3MFU and 12MFU (p < .001). CONCLUSION: The PCS score correlated with patients' QoL and demonstrated to be instructive for clinical characterization and stratification across health care settings. Further studies should critically address the high prevalence, clinical relevance, and the role of comorbidities. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The cohort is registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov under NCT04768998.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Calidad de Vida , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Masculino , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alemania/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Estudios de Cohortes , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Evaluación de SíntomasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of mediastinal pathologies. Its greatest limitation has been the low diagnostic yield in lymphoproliferative disorders as well as insufficient samples for molecular testing. Transesophageal examinations using an EBUS scope have helped increase the diagnostic yield by allowing for additional biopsies of paraesophageal and intra-abdominal lesions. Similarly, the novel approach of transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy has further increased the yield by providing larger and better-preserved biopsies. Both complimentary techniques have shown great individual feasibility and safety. However, the feasibility of transesophageal cryobiopsies in the evaluation of mediastinal pathologies remains a subject of debate. AIM: The aim of the study was to investigate the safety and feasibility of transesophageal EBUS-guided mediastinal cryobiopsies performed at our center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 30 patients who underwent mediastinal cryobiopsy through the esophagus at our institution between October 2023 and March 2024. Data on patient demographics, diagnostic yield, and complications were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 43 years, with a gender distribution of 60% male and 40% female. The primary indications included suspicion of lymphoproliferative disorders, suspected sarcoidosis, and malignancies with paraesophageal lesions. The overall diagnostic yield was 93%. No major complications were noted in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: Transesophageal mediastinal cryobiopsy appears to be a promising complimentary technique for mediastinal evaluation with a relatively high diagnostic yield and favorable safety profile. However, further studies with larger cohorts are warranted to validate the findings at our institution.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The global epidemiology of asthma among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presents striking geographic differences, defining prevalence zones of high and low co-occurrence of asthma and COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare asthma prevalence among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in major global hubs across the world by applying common inclusion criteria and definitions. METHODS: We built a network of 6 academic hospitals in Stanford (Stanford University)/the United States; Frankfurt (Goethe University), Giessen (Justus Liebig University), and Marburg (Philipps University)/Germany; and Moscow (Clinical Hospital 52 in collaboration with Sechenov University)/Russia. We collected clinical and laboratory data for patients hospitalized due to COVID-19. RESULTS: Asthmatic individuals were overrepresented among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Stanford and underrepresented in Moscow and Germany as compared with their prevalence among adults in the local community. Asthma prevalence was similar among patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit and patients hospitalized in other than an intensive care unit, which implied that the risk for development of severe COVID-19 was not higher among asthmatic patients. The numbers of males and comorbidities were higher among patients with COVID-19 in the Stanford cohort, and the most frequent comorbidities among these patients with asthma were other chronic inflammatory airway disorders such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. CONCLUSION: The observed disparity in COVID-19-associated risk among asthmatic patients across countries and continents is connected to the varying prevalence of underlying comorbidities, particularly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Asunto(s)
Asma , COVID-19 , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , SARS-CoV-2 , Comorbilidad , Hospitalización , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad CrónicaRESUMEN
Liver cirrhosis is the end stage of all chronic liver diseases and contributes significantly to overall mortality of 2% globally. The age-standardized mortality from liver cirrhosis in Europe is between 10 and 20% and can be explained by not only the development of liver cancer but also the acute deterioration in the patient's overall condition. The development of complications including accumulation of fluid in the abdomen (ascites), bleeding in the gastrointestinal tract (variceal bleeding), bacterial infections, or a decrease in brain function (hepatic encephalopathy) define an acute decompensation that requires therapy and often leads to acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) by different precipitating events. However, due to its complexity and organ-spanning nature, the pathogenesis of ACLF is poorly understood, and the common underlying mechanisms leading to the development of organ dysfunction or failure in ACLF are still elusive. Apart from general intensive care interventions, there are no specific therapy options for ACLF. Liver transplantation is often not possible in these patients due to contraindications and a lack of prioritization. In this review, we describe the framework of the ACLF-I project consortium funded by the Hessian Ministry of Higher Education, Research and the Arts (HMWK) based on existing findings and will provide answers to these open questions.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Hepática Crónica Agudizada , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas , Humanos , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/complicaciones , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/complicaciones , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/terapia , Insuficiencia Hepática Crónica Agudizada/terapia , Insuficiencia Hepática Crónica Agudizada/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In ACLF patients, an adequate risk stratification is essential, especially for liver transplant allocation, since ACLF is associated with high short-term mortality. The CLIF-C ACLF score is the best prognostic model to predict outcome in ACLF patients. While lung failure is generally regarded as signum malum in ICU care, this study aims to evaluate and quantify the role of pulmonary impairment on outcome in ACLF patients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 498 patients with liver cirrhosis and admission to IMC/ICU were included. ACLF was defined according to EASL-CLIF criteria. Pulmonary impairment was classified into three groups: unimpaired ventilation, need for mechanical ventilation and defined pulmonary failure. These factors were analysed in different cohorts, including a propensity score-matched ACLF cohort. RESULTS: Mechanical ventilation and pulmonary failure were identified as independent risk factors for increased short-term mortality. In matched ACLF patients, the presence of pulmonary failure showed the highest 28-day mortality (83.7%), whereas mortality rates in ACLF with mechanical ventilation (67.3%) and ACLF without pulmonary impairment (38.8%) were considerably lower (p < .001). Especially in patients with pulmonary impairment, the CLIF-C ACLF score showed poor predictive accuracy. Adjusting the CLIF-C ACLF score for the grade of pulmonary impairment improved the prediction significantly. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights that not only pulmonary failure but also mechanical ventilation is associated with worse prognosis in ACLF patients. The grade of pulmonary impairment should be considered in the risk assessment in ACLF patients. The new score may be useful in the selection of patients for liver transplantation.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Hepática Crónica Agudizada , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedad Crítica , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Pronóstico , PulmónRESUMEN
RATIONALE: The ratio of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte (MLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) are biomarkers that have shown potential for predicting mortality in several diseases. For patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), the prognostic capabilities of these biomarkers are unknown. OBJECTIVE: Investigate whether NLR, MLR or PLR were associated with 90-day mortality in CAP. Further, investigate whether the prediction rule CURB-65 could be improved by adding these biomarkers. METHODS: A derivation-validation study using a Danish multicentre retrospective cohort as the derivation cohort (N = 831) and a European multicentre prospective cohort as the validation cohort (N = 2463). Associations between biomarkers and mortality were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models with adjustments for sex, CURB-65 and comorbidities. A cut-off value for biomarkers was determined using Youden's J Statistics. The performance of CURB-65 with added biomarkers was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristics. RESULTS: In both cohorts increasing NLR and PLR were associated with 90-day mortality. In the derivation cohort, the hazard ratios for NLR and PLR were 1.016 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.001-1.032, P = 0.038) and 1.001 (95% CI 1.000-1.001, P = 0.035), respectively. Adding these biomarkers to CURB-65 did not improve its performance. CONCLUSIONS: NLR and PLR were associated with 90-day mortality in CAP, but did not improve CURB-65.
Asunto(s)
Neutrófilos , Neumonía , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Linfocitos , Pronóstico , Biomarcadores , Neumonía/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved outcomes for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) versus chemotherapy in clinical trials. In Germany, ICIs have been used clinically since 2015 for patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) aberrations. As part of I-O Optimise, a multinational research program utilizing real-world data on thoracic malignancies, we describe real-world treatment patterns and survival following reimbursement of ICIs for advanced NSCLC in Germany. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC without known EGFR/ALK aberrations who received a first line of therapy at Frankfurt University Hospital between January 2012 and December 2018, with follow-up to December 2019 or death, whichever occurred first. Using electronic medical records, treatment patterns and survival outcomes were described by histology (squamous cell [SQ]; non-squamous cell [NSQ]/other) and time period (pre- and post-ICI approval). RESULTS: Among eligible patients who started first-line treatment, 136 (pre-ICI) and 126 (post-ICI) had NSQ/other histology, and 32 (pre-ICI) and 38 (post-ICI) had SQ histology. Use of an ICI in the NSQ/other cohort increased from 5.9% (all second- or third-line) in the pre-ICI period to 57.1% (22.2% in first-line, including 13.5% as monotherapy and 8.7% combined with chemotherapy) in the post-ICI period. This was paralleled by a significant (P < 0.0001) prolongation of median (95% CI) OS from 9.4 (7.1-11.1) to 14.8 (12.7-20.5) months between the pre-ICI and post-ICI periods. A similar increase in the uptake of ICI was observed for the SQ cohort (from 3.1% pre-ICI [fourth-line] to 52.6% post-ICI [28.9% as first-line, including 15.8% as monotherapy and 13.2% combined with chemotherapy]); however, analysis of survival outcomes was limited by small group sizes. CONCLUSION: These real-world data complement clinical trial evidence on the effectiveness of ICIs in patients with advanced NSCLC and NSQ/other histology in Germany.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Receptores ErbB , HospitalesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Since the beginning of the pandemic in spring 2020, inpatient healthcare has been under enormous burden, which is reflected especially in overworked staff, imprecise bed planning and/or data transfer. According to the recommendation of the Science Council, university clinics should play a controlling role in regional healthcare and act in conjunction with surrounding hospitals and practices. METHODS: In September 2021, 31 representatives from 18 university hospitals were invited to a hybrid Delphi study with a total of 4 survey rounds to discuss criteria for effective inpatient care in a pandemic situation, which were extracted from previous expert interviews. Criteria that were classified as very important/relevant by≥75% of the participants in the first round of the survey (consensus definition) were then further summarized in 4 different small groups. In a third Delphi round, all participants came together again to discuss the results of the small group discussions. Subsequently, these were prioritized as Optional ("can"), Desirable ("should") or Necessary ("must") recommendations. RESULTS: Of the invited clinical experts, 21 (67.7%) participated in at least one Delphi round. In an online survey (1st Delphi round), 233 criteria were agreed upon and reduced to 84 criteria for future pandemic management in four thematic small group discussions (2nd Delphi round) and divided into the small groups as follows: "Crisis Management and Crisis Plans" (n=20), "Human Resources Management and Internal Communication" (n=16), "Regional Integration and External Communication" (n=24) and "Capacity Management and Case & Care" (n=24). In the following group discussion (3rd Delphi round), the criteria were further modified and agreed upon by the experts, so that in the end result, there were 23 essential requirements and recommendations for effective inpatient care in a pandemic situation. CONCLUSION: The results draw attention to key demands of clinical representatives, for example, comprehensive digitization, standardization of processes and better (supra) regional networking in order to be able to guarantee needs-based care even under pandemic conditions. The present consensus recommendations can serve as guidelines for future pandemic management in the inpatient care sector.
Asunto(s)
Pacientes Internos , Pandemias , Humanos , Técnica Delphi , Alemania/epidemiología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Despite improvements in medical science and public health, mortality of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has barely changed throughout the last 15 years. The current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has once again highlighted the central importance of acute respiratory infections to human health. The "network of excellence on Community Acquired Pneumonia" (CAPNETZ) hosts the most comprehensive CAP database worldwide including more than 12,000 patients. CAPNETZ connects physicians, microbiologists, virologists, epidemiologists, and computer scientists throughout Europe. Our aim was to summarize the current situation in CAP research and identify the most pressing unmet needs in CAP research. METHODS: To identify areas of future CAP research, CAPNETZ followed a multiple-step procedure. First, research members of CAPNETZ were individually asked to identify unmet needs. Second, the top 100 experts in the field of CAP research were asked for their insights about the unmet needs in CAP (Delphi approach). Third, internal and external experts discussed unmet needs in CAP at a scientific retreat. RESULTS: Eleven topics for future CAP research were identified: detection of causative pathogens, next generation sequencing for antimicrobial treatment guidance, imaging diagnostics, biomarkers, risk stratification, antiviral and antibiotic treatment, adjunctive therapy, vaccines and prevention, systemic and local immune response, comorbidities, and long-term cardio-vascular complications. CONCLUSION: Pneumonia is a complex disease where the interplay between pathogens, immune system and comorbidities not only impose an immediate risk of mortality but also affect the patients' risk of developing comorbidities as well as mortality for up to a decade after pneumonia has resolved. Our review of unmet needs in CAP research has shown that there are still major shortcomings in our knowledge of CAP.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Neumonía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/terapia , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Humanos , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Neumonía/epidemiología , Neumonía/terapia , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
There are few data on mortality after discharge with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Therefore, we evaluated risk factors for 30-day post-discharge mortality after CAP. We included all patients of the prospective multi-national CAPNETZ study between 2002 and 2018 with (1) hospitalized CAP, (2) survival until discharge, and (3) complete follow-up data. The study endpoint was death within 30 days after discharge. We evaluated risk factors including demographics, comorbidities, admission CAP severity, and laboratory values and treatment-related factors in uni- and multivariable analyses. A total of 126 (1.6%) of 7882 included patients died until day 30 after discharge, corresponding to 26% of all 476 deaths. After multivariable analysis, we identified 10 independent risk factors: higher age, lower BMI, presence of diabetes mellitus, chronic renal or chronic neurological disease (other than cerebrovascular diseases), low body temperature or higher thrombocytes on admission, extended length of hospitalization, oxygen therapy during hospitalization, and post-obstructive pneumonia. By addition these factors, we calculated a risk score with an AUC of 0.831 (95%CI 0.822-0.839, p < 0.001) for prediction of post-discharge mortality. Early post-discharge deaths account for » of all CAP-associated deaths and are associated with patient- and CAP-severity-related risk factors. Additional studies are necessary to replicate our findings in independent cohorts. Study registration: NCT02139163.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Neumonía , Cuidados Posteriores , Hospitalización , Humanos , Alta del Paciente , Neumonía/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Mobile (m) Health technology is well-suited for Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) in a patient's habitual environment. In recent years there have been fast-paced developments in mHealth-enabled pediatric RPM, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, necessitating evidence synthesis. To this end, we conducted a scoping review of clinical trials that had utilized mHealth-enabled RPM of pediatric asthma. MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched from September 1, 2016 through August 31, 2021. Our scoping review identified 25 publications that utilized synchronous and asynchronous mHealth-enabled RPM in pediatric asthma, either involving mobile applications or via individual devices. The last three years has seen the development of evidence-based, multidisciplinary, and participatory mHealth interventions. The quality of the studies has been improving, such that 40% of included study reports were randomized controlled trials. In conclusion, there exists high-quality evidence on mHealth-enabled RPM in pediatric asthma, warranting future systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses of the benefits of such RPM.
Asunto(s)
Asma , COVID-19 , Aplicaciones Móviles , Telemedicina , Niño , Humanos , Pandemias , Asma/terapiaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Management of patients with lung disease caused by non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM-LD) in Germany is currently characterized by delayed diagnosis, frequently poor prognosis and high follow-up costs. Mainly due to an increased number of hospitalizations, the SHI-relevant direct costs ( 9,093.20 patient/year) are higher compared to typical underlying diseases (e.g. asthma: 706.00 patient/year). This less than optimal NTM care is mainly caused by lack of awareness of the disease at primary care and out-patient specialist care level, largely absent structured referral structures and limited communication between specialists out of hospital with specialized NTM clinics. Lack of incentives to support these communication pathways is part of the problem. Sufficient, appropriate and economically sustainable care is hampered by poor adherence to treatment recommendations. METHODS: For the development of the NTM care concept, relevant professional societies and patient organizations were interviewed about the care situation. Thereafter, 20 NTM-LD patients, 5 residential pulmonologists and 8 experts were interviewed in an explorative qualitative interview to determine the current patient pathway. Based on the findings, the NTM care concept was developed in an advisory board by the authors. RESULTS: Regional management centers should concentrate specific expertise and ensure quality of care through routine consultation and involvement in diagnosis, decision-making on treatment necessity, initiation of therapy, follow-up examinations, and determination of the therapy success, as well as adequate follow-up of patients. The referring pulmonologist should continue to provide case-specific therapy support close to the patient's home in preferred shared-care concept. The establishment of clear referral structures and case identification criteria will help residential physicians to include patients at risk in the NTM-care system early. Patients and pulmonologists without specific expertise need to be made aware of the care pathway and severity of NTM-LD. CONCLUSION: The increased morbidity and mortality of NTM-LD patients must be addressed with patient-oriented, interdisciplinary and trans-sectoral care concept. An NTM care system with clear treatment procedures and referral structures is proposed for a nationwide pilot project.