Effect of raloxifene on serum triglycerides in women with a history of hypertriglyceridemia while on oral estrogen therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Raloxifene hydrochloride is a selective estrogen receptor modulator that to date has not been shown to cause hypertriglyceridemia in normal, diabetic, or hypertriglyceridemic women. This study was designed to assess the effect of raloxifene on serum triglycerides in postmenopausal women who have a history of increased hypertriglyceridemia with oral estrogen therapy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a single-center, uncontrolled, open-label study investigating the effects of 8 weeks of raloxifene (60 mg/day) therapy on plasma lipids. The study subjects were 12 postmenopausal women, ages 49-73 years, with a documented history of oral estrogen-induced hypertriglyceridemia (serum triglycerides > or =3.39 mmol/l [> or =300 mg/dl]). RESULTS: At week 2 of the study, three (25%) of the subjects withdrew from the trial because they developed marked hypertriglyceridemia (>or =11.3 mmol/l [> or =1,000 mg/dl]) during raloxifene therapy. These three women had higher baseline triglyceride and glucose levels, were not being treated with lipid-lowering agents, and were more likely to have diabetes than the other study subjects. The remaining nine patients (75%) completed the 8-week trial and experienced a nonsignificant increase in mean triglyceride levels from baseline to end point. Raloxifene treatment also resulted in a significant 16% decrease in hepatic lipase activity and a 26% increase in HDL(2) levels (P = 0.013 and 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a previous history of hypertriglyceridemia on oral estrogen therapy should have serum triglyceride levels monitored closely after beginning raloxifene therapy and may even require fibrate therapy before beginning raloxifene.

Effect of raloxifene on quality of life: a prospective study using the Utian Quality of Life (UQOL) Scale.

OBJECTIVE: The Utian Quality of Life Scale (UQOL) is a new questionnaire used to quantify patient perception of quality of life in postmenopausal women. The current study is the first to use the UQOL in ascertaining treatment effects on quality of life in postmenopausal women. DESIGN: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of healthy postmenopausal women. Participants were randomized to raloxifene 60 mg/day or placebo. Participants completed the UQOL at baseline, at 3 months, and at the 6-month study endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 74 women (mean age, 55.6 years) were randomized. In the overall population, there were no significant changes from baseline to 6 months within or between treatment groups in any of the domains or total score, although raloxifene was associated with positive changes from baseline in the occupational (P = 0.093) and health (P = 0.055) domains. In women who completed the study, raloxifene was associated with a significant improvement from baseline in the occupational (P = 0.041) and health (P = 0.025) domains and in the total score (P = 0.044), whereas placebo had no effect. There were no statistically significant differences between raloxifene and placebo in any of the domains or total score. CONCLUSION: Although there were no treatment group differences, raloxifene was associated with an improvement from baseline in the occupational and health domains and in the overall score of the UQOL. Larger studies are needed using the UQOL as a primary endpoint to determine whether the positive effects of raloxifene on quality of life observed in this trial are real or a chance finding.

Transition from estrogen-progestin to raloxifene in postmenopausal women: effect on vasomotor symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: To compare vasomotor symptoms after transition from estrogen-progestin therapy to raloxifene 60 mg/d with and without a placebo washout. METHODS: Postmenopausal women currently taking continuous combined estrogen-progestin therapy (conjugated equine estrogen, 0.625 mg/medroxyprogesterone acetate, 2.5 or 5 mg) daily for 5 or more months were enrolled. Women were randomized to 1 of 4 blinded regimens: 1) 12 weeks estrogen-progestin; 2) 12 weeks placebo; 3) 4 weeks placebo, then 8 weeks raloxifene; or 4) 12 weeks raloxifene. For the final 36 weeks, all subjects received raloxifene. Vasomotor symptoms were assessed by patient diaries. RESULTS: A total of 266 women (mean age 57.5) were enrolled. Mean hot flush frequency at baseline was approximately 1 per week in the entire population, with 16% of women reporting hot flushes. Mean frequency and severity of hot flushes during the first 12 weeks of the study were statistically greater in the 3 groups transitioned off estrogen-progestin (range of hot flushes per week: 4 weeks, 11-12; 8 weeks, 18-24; 12 weeks, 13-16), as compared with those continuing estrogen-progestin, with no difference between these 3 groups (P> or =.1). Approximately 50-70% of these women reported hot flushes, generally rated as mild to moderate by participants, after estrogen-progestin discontinuation. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of women discontinuing estrogen-progestin experience hot flushes. Raloxifene does not appear to increase the frequency or severity of vasomotor symptoms in women discontinuing estrogen-progestin more than that observed with placebo treatment after estrogen-progestin discontinuation. Transition from estrogen-progestin to raloxifene with no washout period therefore may be acceptable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I

Duloxetine: meta-analyses of suicidal behaviors and ideation in clinical trials for major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty regarding relationships of antidepressant treatment and suicidality encouraged systematic review of data on suicidal behaviors and ideation from Phase II and III clinical trials of duloxetine for major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: We evaluated all completed duloxetine trials in MDD with data lock by February 2, 2004. We compared incidence of suicide-related events with duloxetine versus placebo in controlled trials, using Mantel-Haenszel incidence difference (MHID) and exposure time-adjusted rate difference (MHRD) methods, and analyzed changes in Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) Item-3 (suicidality) scores. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the incidence of suicide-related events with duloxetine versus placebo in 12 placebo-controlled trials (duloxetine, 1812; placebo, 1184 [corrected] patients). The MHID for suicide-related behaviors was -0.03% (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.48 to 0.42) and MHRD -0.002 (95% CI, -0.02 to 0.02). Changes in HAMD Item-3 suicidality scores showed more improvement with duloxetine (MHID, 9.56%; 95% CI, 4.50 to 14.6; P < 0.001) and less worsening of suicidal ideation with duloxetine (MHID, -4.25%; 95% CI, -6.55 to -1.95; P < 0.001). Other Item-3 findings showed no consistent pattern; a slightly higher proportion of duloxetine-treated patients with a change from 0 (absent) to 3 was balanced against a higher proportion of placebo-treated patients changing from 0 to 2. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of an increased risk of suicidal behaviors or ideation during treatment with duloxetine compared with placebo in MDD patients. HAMD Item-3 suicidality scores had more improvement and less worsening of suicidal ideation with duloxetine than placebo.