Management of distal biceps tendon ruptures: a survey of fellowship-trained subspecialist elbow surgeons.

BACKGROUND: There are several approaches to the management of distal biceps tendon ruptures, with no consensus on what constitutes best practice. METHODS: An online survey queried the perceptions and management of distal biceps tendon ruptures amongst fellowship-trained subspecialty elbow surgeons, which primarily comprised of members of the Shoulder and Elbow Society of Australia, the national subspecialist interest group of the Australian Orthopaedic Association and the Mayo Clinic Elbow Club (Rochester, MN, USA). RESULTS: One hundred surgeons responded. The median (IQR) experience as orthopedic surgeons amongst respondents was 17 (10-23) years; 78% of respondents saw >10 cases of distal biceps tendon ruptures annually; 95% of respondents would recommend surgery for symptomatic radiologically-confirmed partial tears, the most common indications being pain (83%), weakness (60%), and tear size (48%). Forty-three percent of respondents would have grafts available for tears older than 6 weeks. The one-incision approach (70%) was preferred over two incisions (30%); 78% of one-incision users believed that their repair location was anatomic, compared to 100% of two-incision users. One-incision users were more likely to have encountered lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (78% vs. 46%) and superficial radial nerve palsies (28% vs. 11%). Two-incision users were more likely to have encountered posterior interosseus nerve palsy (21% vs. 15%), heterotopic ossification (54% vs. 42%), and synostosis (14% vs. 0%). Re-ruptures were the most common cause of reoperation. The more conservative a respondent's postoperative immobilization was, the less likely they were to have ever encountered re-rupture (14% amongst cast users, 29% amongst splint/brace users, 49% amongst sling users, 100% amongst non-immobilizers). Thirty percent of respondents who placed elbow strength restrictions for 6 months postoperatively encountered re-rupture, compared to 40% amongst those who restricted for 6-12 weeks postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The operation rate for repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures amongst subspecialist elbow surgeons is high, as seen in our cohort. However, there is a large variation in the approach toward its management. One incision (anterior) was preferred over two incisions (anterior and posterior). Complications from repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures can be expected even amongst subspecialists, and are associated with surgical approach. The responses imply that more conservative postoperative rehabilitation may be associated with a lower risk of re-rupture.

Sonographic evaluation of anterior inferior iliac spine morphology demonstrates excellent accuracy when compared to false profile view.

PURPOSE: To compare ultrasound examination to false profile radiographs in identification and classification of AIIS morphology. The study hypothesis stated that sonographic imaging of the AIIS correlates well to AIIS morphology seen on false profile radiographs. METHODS: Fifty-three hips in 30 consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. A single, fellowship trained, orthopedic surgeon performed an ultrasound on all of the patients to evaluate the AIIS morphology. The patients underwent standing false profile radiographs. The US and radiographic images were independently reviewed and classified according to Hetsroni classification of AIIS morphology by two senior, fellowship trained, orthopedic surgeons. Agreement between the two raters was calculated for each imaging modality (inter-rater agreement) as well as the agreement between the rating in each modality by the same rater ("inter-method" agreement). RESULTS:  The agreement between the raters (inter-rater agreement) for morphologic evaluation of the AIIS by means of FP view was 88.8% (p < 0.001) and that by means of US was 81.5%(p < 0.001). The overall accuracy of the US compared to the FP view was 92.3% (48/52) for both rater 1 and 2. CONCLUSION:  This study showed near-perfect agreement in analyzing the morphology of the AIIS in a group of patients with hip pathology. Office sonographic evaluation of the AIIS is reliable and, therefore, may be routinely utilized in the clinic setting avoiding unnecessary radiation exposure to the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Self-reduction techniques taught via smartphone are effective for anterior shoulder dislocation: prospective randomized study.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the effectiveness of three methods for self-assisted shoulder reduction demonstrated using a smartphone video link. BACKGROUND: Anterior shoulder dislocation is very common among young adults. Patients often seek medical assistance in the emergency department to reduce their shoulder. Many techniques for shoulder reduction had been described, some of which do not require professional assistance and can be performed by patients themselves. METHODS: Patients admitted with anterior shoulder dislocation were randomized to either the Stimson, Milch or the Boss-Holtzach-Matter technique. Each patient was given a link to watch a short instructional video on his smartphone and instructed to attempt self-reduction. Success of the reduction, pain level, patient satisfaction and complications were recorded. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 58 patients (mean age was 31.6 (18-66, median = 27), 82% males, 88% right hand dominant). Success rate using Boss-Holtzach-Matter (10 of 19, 53%) and self-assisted Milch (11 of 20, 55%) were significantly higher than with the self-assisted Stimson method (3 of 19, 16%), p < 0.05. Pain levels improved from 8.4 (2-10) to 3.1 (0-10) following the reduction. Patient subjective satisfaction from the reduction attempt was 6.7 (0-10). No complications were observed. CONCLUSION:  Both the Self-assisted Milch and the Boss-Holtzach-Matter techniques are ideal for reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation without medical assistance. Both methods can be successfully performed without assistance or previous education and taught using an instructional video. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Sequelae of underdiagnosed foot compartment syndrome after calcaneal fractures.

The calcaneus is the most frequently fractured tarsal bone. Compartment syndrome (CS) complicates fractures and other injuries and is most commonly described in association with the lower leg. The long-term sequelae of CS of the foot can include toe clawing, permanent loss of function, persistent pain, muscle atrophy, contracture, painful warts, weakness, and sensory disturbances. The incidence and clinical significance of untreated CS after calcaneal fractures were questioned. All compliant patients treated by us for a calcaneus fracture underwent a physical examination and medical interview: 47 (49 fractures) were included in the final cohort (36 males, 11 females, mean age 49 ± 14.5 years, mean follow-up 23 ± 16 months). Missed CS sequelae were diagnosed by the presence of claw toes and plantar sensory deficits. The functional outcome and pain at rest and during activity were scored. Five patients (10%) had missed CS, and their functional score was significantly lower than for those without CS (52 ± 21.5 versus 77.4 ± 22 for no CS, p < .05). All missed CS cases were diagnosed in patients with a Sanders type 3 or 4 fracture. Intra-articular fracture was a significant factor associated with developing CS sequelae (p = .045). Untreated CS can cause muscle and nerve injury and contribute to a poor functional outcome. Because CS is more likely to develop after highly comminuted intra-articular fractures, these patients warrant close monitoring for CS development. Early detection and treatment might result in fewer late disabling sequelae of this injury.

Biomechanical and morphological comparison of two interposition graft rotator cuff repair techniques.

BACKGROUND: Interposition graft rotator cuff repair is one option for the treatment of massive, otherwise irreparable rotator cuff tears. It is undetermined how different suturing techniques influence morphology at the patch-tendon interface in interposition rotator cuff repairs, particularly with respect to increased cross-sectional area at the repair site post-exposure to cyclic loading, which may influence healing. We aimed to analyze how the morphology of the grafts used in polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) interposition rotator cuff repairs differed according to whether the graft was secured using the multiple mattress technique or the weave technique respectively. METHODS: Twelve PTFE interposition rotator cuff repairs (two groups, n = 6) were cyclically loaded. The thickness, width, cross-sectional area at the individual patches and at the repair site, and patch elongation were compared between repairs using the 'multiple mattress' technique and repairs that used the 'weave' technique. RESULTS: At all loads, repair site cross-sectional area and thickness was greater in the weave group than in the multiple mattress group (P<0.05), despite repair site width being greater in the multiple mattress group (P<0.05). No significant differences in elongation were found between the multiple mattress and weave groups. CONCLUSION: Greater repair site cross-sectional area under cyclic loading was observed in polytetrafluoroethylene interposition rotator repairs that used the weave technique than in those that used the multiple mattress technique. Increased repair site cross-sectional area in the weave group occurred due to increased thickness and decreased width relative to the multiple mattress group. No differences in cross-sectional area were found between groups at the individual patches.

Biomechanical Comparison of Synthetic Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) vs Human Dermal Allograft (HDA), 2 vs 3 Glenoid Anchors, and Suture vs Minitape in Superior Capsule Reconstruction.

Background: Superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) is an option for the treatment of massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears. However, which materials yield the strongest constructs remains undetermined. Purposes: We sought to investigate whether SCR with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or human dermal allograft (HDA), 2 or 3 glenoid anchors, and suture or minitape resulted in better failure load properties at the patch-glenoid interface. Methods: We conducted a biomechanical study in 30 glenoid-sided SCR repairs in Sawbones models divided into 5 groups. Each was pulled to failure to assess mode of failure, peak load (N), stiffness (N/mm), yield load (N), peak energy (N m), and ultimate energy (N m). The 5 groups were as follows: group 1-PTFE, 2 anchors, and suture; group 2-PTFE, 2 anchors, and minitape; group 3-HDA, 2 anchors, and suture; group 4-HDA, 2 anchors, and minitape; group 5-PTFE, 3 anchors, and minitape. Results: Repairs failed by button-holing of suture/minitape. Group 5 had greater peak load, stiffness, yield load, and peak energy (384 ± 62 N; 24 ± 3 N/mm; 343 ± 42 N; 4 ± 2 N m) than group 3 (226 ± 67 N; 16 ± 4 N/mm; 194 ± 74 N; 2 ± 1 N m) or group 4 (274 ± 62 N; 17 ± 4 N/mm; 244 ± 50 N; 2 ± 1 N m) and greater ultimate energy (8 ± 3 N m) than all other groups. Conclusions: This biomechanical study of SCR repairs in Sawbones models found that yield load was greater in PTFE than HDA, 3 anchors were better than 2, and minitape was no better than suture.

Predictors of Return to Work Following Primary Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: An Analysis of 1502 Cases.

BACKGROUND: It is undetermined which factors predict return to work after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. PURPOSE: To identify which factors predicted return to work at any level and return to preinjury levels of work 6 months after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Multiple logistic regression analysis of prospectively collected descriptive, preinjury, preoperative, and intraoperative data from 1502 consecutive primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs, performed by a single surgeon, was performed to identify independent predictors of return to work at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Six months after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, 76% of patients had returned to work, and 40% had returned to preinjury levels of work. Return to work at 6 months was likely if patients were still working after their injuries but before surgery (Wald statistic [W] = 55, P < .0001), were stronger in internal rotation preoperatively (W = 8, P = .004), had full-thickness tears (W = 9, P = .002), and were female (W = 5, P = .030). Patients who continued working postinjury but presurgery were 1.6 times more likely to return to work at any level at 6 months compared to patients who were not working (P < .0001). Patients who had a less strenuous preinjury level of work (W = 173, P < .0001), worked at a mild to moderate level post injury but presurgery, had greater preoperative behind-the-back lift-off strength (W = 8, P = .004), and had less preoperative passive external rotation range of motion (W = 5, P = .034) were more likely to return to preinjury levels of work at 6 months postoperatively. Specifically, patients who worked at a mild to moderate level postinjury but presurgery were 2.5 times more likely to return to work than patients who were not working, or who were working strenuously postinjury but presurgery (p < 0.0001). Patients who nominated their preinjury level of work as "light" were 11 times more likely to return to preinjury levels of work at 6 months compared to those who nominated it as "strenuous" (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Six months after rotator cuff repair, patients who continued to work after injury but presurgery were the most likely to return to work at any level, and patients who had less strenuous preinjury levels of work were the most likely to return to their preinjury levels of work. Greater preoperative subscapularis strength independently predicted return to work at any level and to preinjury levels.

Factors influencing clinical outcomes in superior capsular reconstruction: A scoping review.

Background: It is undetermined how effective superior capsule/capsular reconstruction (SCR) is, and which factors influence clinical outcomes. Questions/purposes: (1) To identify which factors influence outcomes in SCR, (2) to evaluate the effect of graft integrity on clinical outcomes, and (3) to compare SCR to other procedures for irreparable rotator cuff tears. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for clinical SCR studies. Data on specific factors that influenced outcomes, that compared outcomes between intact/torn graft groups, or compared SCR to alternative treatments for irreparable tears were extracted by two investigators. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes between intact vs torn SCR grafts. Results: 394 articles were identified. 100 full-text articles were screened. 13 studies were included for scoping review. Eight studies were meta-analyzed. Better clinical scores were found in younger patients, with intact/repairable subscapularis, without acetabulization/arthritis, who played sports. In patients with irreparable tears without arthritis, SCR produced similar clinical scores at 2 years as shoulder arthroplasty and partial infraspinatus repair, and greater improvements in ASES and Constant scores than latissimus dorsi tendon transfer. Intact grafts produced better VAS (mean difference [MD] = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [-1.45-0.50], P < 0.0001, I 2 = 67%, n [patients] = 261), ASES (MD = 8.29, [2.89-13.70], P = 0.003, I 2 = 74%, n = 281), external rotation (MD = 4.49, [0.36-8.61], P = 0.03, I 2 = 0%, n = 240), and acromiohumeral distance (MD = 2.45, [0.96-3.94], P = 0.001, I 2 = 92%, n = 260) than torn grafts. Conclusions: Patients who underwent SCR for irreparable rotator cuff tears were more likely to have better clinical outcomes if they were younger, had intact/repairable subscapularis, without acetabulization/arthritis, played sports and had intact grafts.

Reliability of a Novel Preoperative Protocol for Determining Graft Sizes for Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using Plain Film Radiography.

BACKGROUND: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears involves anchoring a graft between the superior glenoid and the greater tuberosity of the humerus. Optimizing the graft size is important. We aimed (1) to evaluate the reliability of plain film radiography in determining graft size for SCR and (2) to create a database to help predict future graft sizes. METHODS: An inter- and intra-rater reliability trial was conducted on 10 and 6 subjects with healthy shoulders, respectively, using plain film radiography to measure the distance between the superior glenoid and the supraspinatus footprint. The subjects were positioned upright with an abduction pillow modified to hold the shoulder at 30° abduction and 45° external rotation, afterwhich a true antero-posterior shoulder radiograph was captured. Thirty subjects were recruited for the database and grouped using the aforementioned protocol. RESULTS: The inter-rater and intra-rater trial agreement was excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.94 (95% CI) and 0.76 (95% CI), respectively. Three medio-lateral patch sizes, of 33 mm, 38 mm, and 47 mm, were proposed based on the protocol in 30 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Plain film radiography demonstrated excellent reliability in measuring the distance between the superior glenoid and the supraspinatus footprint. Three ordinal patch sizes are proposed.

Revision Rotator Cuff Repair With Versus Without an Arthroscopically Inserted Onlay Bioinductive Implant in Workers' Compensation Patients.

Background: The addition of onlay biological grafts to augment difficult rotator cuff repairs has shown encouraging results in a case series. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of an onlay bioinductive implant would improve repair integrity, shear wave elastographic appearance of the repaired tendon and patch, and patient-rated and/or surgeon-measured shoulder function when used in workers' compensation patients undergoing revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. We hypothesized that the addition of the bioinductive implant would enhance repair integrity and clinical outcomes compared with standard repair. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A post hoc matched-cohort study was conducted on prospectively recruited workers' compensation patients who received a bioinductive implant for revision rotator cuff repair (n = 19). The control group was selected from consecutive workers' compensation revision rotator cuff repair patients before the introduction of bioinductive implants. Then, they were matched for age and tear size (n = 32). Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare the primary outcome of repair integrity between groups. The secondary outcomes were to evaluate the elastographic appearance of the tendon and patch in the bioinductive implant group and to compare patient-rated and surgeon-measured shoulder function between groups preoperatively and at 1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Results: No major complications associated with the bioinductive implants were identified. Six months after the revision rotator cuff repair, the retear rate in the bioinductive implant group was 16% (3/19), compared with 19% (6/32) in the age- and tear size-matched control group (P = .458). At the final follow-up, the retear rate in the bioinductive implant group was 47% (9/19) at a mean of 14 months compared with 38% (12/32) at a mean of 29 months in the control group (P = .489). The shear wave elastographic stiffness of repaired tendons augmented with the bioinductive implant remained unchanged at 6 m/s from 1 week to 6 months postoperatively, which is lower than the stiffness of 10 m/s in healthy tendons. There were no significant differences in patient-rated or surgeon-measured outcomes between groups 6 months postoperatively. Conclusion: There were no differences in repair integrity or clinical outcomes between workers' compensation patients who underwent revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with an onlay bioinductive implant compared to those who underwent standard revision rotator cuff repair.