RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To continue education during the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented a Virtual Education Platform (VEP) and Virtual Visiting Professorship (VVP) in March 2020 into our plastic surgery residency curriculum. This study investigated resident and guest speaker perceptions of the VEP since the start of the pandemic. METHODS: The VEP consists of weekly VVP lectures and usual conferences held over Zoom. In May 2020, residents and speakers completed surveys that assessed the perceptions of the VEP using a 5-point Likert scale and open-ended responses. In August 2021, residents also completed follow-up surveys. RESULTS: A total of 19 (100%) residents and 10 (100%) speakers responded to the 2020 surveys and 15 (88.2%) residents responded to the 2021 follow-up survey. Speakers represented nine academic institutions, one international. 74% of residents responded that they learned a lot or a great deal from the VVP. In 2021, 100% of residents agreed that virtual conferences should remain a core component in PRS residency education, even after social distancing requirements subside. The VVP lectures were mentioned as the most helpful lectures in both years. Easy accessibility without travel time was the most mentioned advantage of the VEP in both years, with significantly more residents citing this benefit in 2021 (p = 0.0076). The most reported disadvantage for residents was the lack of social interaction and community in both years, with significantly more residents in 2021 citing this as a disadvantage (p = 0.0307). Residents' attitudes also shifted such that significantly more residents liked and were satisfied with the VVP lectures from 2020 to 2021 (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Over a year into the COVID-19 pandemic, resident perceptions of a virtual education platform and virtual visiting professorship were very positive. The quick development, implementation, and high efficacy of these educational experiences underscore that learning is possible in alternative forms in unprecedented times.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Instituciones Académicas , EscolaridadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) commonly affects surgical patients, particularly trauma patients. However, baseline knowledge of IPV is poor among surgeons and screening is variable. We designed a project to educate surgical residents on IPV and standardize screening in all trauma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Quality improvement frameworks and the Modified Provider Survey were used to examine residents' attitudes and behaviors regarding IPV at a level one trauma center. An educational curriculum was designed with a trainee-led, multidisciplinary team to address knowledge gaps, barriers, and relevant reporting laws, and provide framing language that normalized screening. RESULTS: Fifty-seven surgical residents (64% response rate) spanning post-graduate years 1-7 completed surveys. All respondents believed IPV was relevant to their patients, yet only 4% correctly identified the prevalence of IPV. Only 15% felt comfortable screening for IPV and 75% felt they had received inadequate training. The most common barriers to screening were insufficient knowledge of community resources and what to do if patients screened positive. Most residents grossly underestimated the incidence of IPV and 19% believe healthcare providers have a limited role in being able to help IPV victims. There were no significant differences in responses between male and female residents or among residents from different postgraduate levels. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical residents believe IPV is relevant, but few feel they have adequate training. Residents vastly underestimated the societal prevalence of IPV and the majority never screened patients for IPV. A residency-wide curriculum can address common misperceptions and perceived barriers.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Violencia de Pareja , Curriculum , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Implant-based breast reconstruction remains the most often used method following mastectomy, but data are lacking regarding differences in complications and long-term patient-reported outcomes for two-stage subpectoral versus prepectoral reconstruction. This study sought to better understand the risks and impact of these reconstructive approaches on overall satisfaction. METHODS: Patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy and two-stage implant-based reconstruction from 2014 to 2019 were identified from the electronic medical records and contacted via email to complete the BREAST-Q survey. Overall satisfaction was measured by the question, "How happy are you with the outcome of your breast reconstruction?" using a six-point Likert scale. Patients were grouped into subpectoral or prepectoral cohorts. Complications were evaluated retrospectively. Only patients who were at least 6 months from their final reconstruction were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Of the 582 patients contacted, 206 (35%) responded. The subpectoral ( n = 114) and prepectoral ( n = 38) groups did not differ significantly by demographic or treatment characteristics. BREAST-Q scores were also comparable. Complication rates were similar, but prepectoral patients had a significantly higher rate of capsular contracture (16% versus 4%, P < 0.05). Bivariate ordered logistic regression identified prepectoral implant placement, having any postoperative complication, and capsular contracture as predictors of less overall happiness. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' study suggests that prepectoral patients may have slightly higher complication rates but are as satisfied as subpectoral patients after at least a year of follow-up. Further studies should investigate risk factors for capsular contracture, how the risk changes over time, and how the risk affects patient satisfaction.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Contractura , Mamoplastia , Humanos , Femenino , Mastectomía/efectos adversos , Mastectomía/métodos , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantación de Mama/métodos , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pezones/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Mamoplastia/métodos , Contractura/etiologíaRESUMEN
A mycotic aneurysm of the distal radial artery following access for cardiac catheterisation is a rare complication that has not been described in the literature. We present the case of an 84-year-old man who developed bacteraemia and cellulitis over his left first dorsal webspace 2 days after undergoing cardiac catheterisation through the distal radial artery at the anatomic snuffbox. Ultrasound scanning and CT imaging were concerning for a possible pseudoaneurysm at that location. Once we confirmed that the patient had adequate flow through his hand with angiography and an Allen's test, we explored his left hand and found a mycotic aneurysm of the distal radial artery with surrounding frank purulence. We resected the aneurysm and ligated the artery. Pathology confirmed that this was a mycotic aneurysm. The patient quickly recovered from his infection after this definitive treatment.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Falso , Aneurisma Infectado , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma Falso/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Falso/etiología , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Infectado/etiología , Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Mano , Humanos , Masculino , Arteria Radial/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Radial/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although some geriatric trauma patients may be at low risk of complications, poor outcomes are pronounced if complications do occur. Prevention in this group decreases the risk of excess morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We performed a case-control study of trauma patients 65 years or older treated from January 2015 to August 2016 at a Level I trauma center with a Trauma Quality Improvement Program-predicted probability of complication of less than 20%. Cases had one of the following complications: unplanned admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), unplanned intubation, pneumonia, or unplanned return to the operating room. Two age-matched controls were randomly selected for each case. We collected information on comorbidities, home medications, and early medical care and calculated odds ratios using multivariable conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients experienced unplanned admission to ICU (n = 51), unplanned intubation (n = 14), pneumonia (n = 21), and unplanned return to the operating room (n = 8). The 188 controls were more frequently intubated and had higher median ISS but were otherwise similar to cases. The adjusted odds of complication were higher for patients on a home ß-blocker (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-4.0) and home anticoagulation (aOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-4.1). Patients with diabetes (aOR 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7) and dementia (aOR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0-4.3) also had higher odds of complication. The adjusted odds of complication for patients receiving geriatrics consultation was 0.4 (95% CI, 0.2-1.0; p = 0.05). Pain service consultation and indwelling pain catheter placement may be protective, but CIs included 1. There was no association between opiates, benzodiazepines, fluid administration, or blood products in the first 24 hours and odds of complication. CONCLUSIONS: Geriatrics consultation was associated with lower odds of unplanned admission to the ICU, unplanned intubation, pneumonia, and unplanned return to the operating room in low-risk older adult trauma patients. Pathways that support expanding comanagement strategies with geriatricians are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care management, Level IV.
Asunto(s)
Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugíaAsunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional/prevención & control , Cirugía General/educación , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Cirujanos/psicología , Adulto , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Masculino , Cultura Organizacional , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , San FranciscoRESUMEN
Acute and chronic pain conditions are often debilitating, inflicting severe physiological, emotional and economic costs and affect a large percentage of the global population. However, the development of therapeutic analgesic agents based primarily on targeted drug development has been largely ineffective. An alternative approach to analgesic development would be to develop low cost, high throughput, untargeted animal based behavioral screens that model complex nociceptive behaviors in which to screen for analgesic compounds. Here we describe the development of a behavioral based assay in zebrafish larvae that is effective in identifying small molecule compounds with analgesic properties. In a place aversion assay, which likely utilizes supraspinal neuronal circuitry, individually arrayed zebrafish larvae show temperature-dependent aversion to increasing and decreasing temperatures deviating from rearing temperature. Modeling thermal hyperalgesia, the addition of the noxious inflammatory compound and TRPA1 agonist allyl isothiocyanate sensitized heat aversion and reversed cool aversion leading larvae to avoid rearing temperature in favor of otherwise acutely aversive cooler temperatures. We show that small molecules with known analgesic properties are able to inhibit acute and/or sensitized temperature aversion.