Pediatric multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis in Germany - diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of an "orphan disease".

Delay in diagnosing multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-pTB) in children prolongs time to effective treatment. Data on risk factors for pediatric MDR from low-incidence countries are scarce. Retrospective nationwide case-control study to analyze MDR-pTB cases in Germany between 2010 and 2020 in comparison to a drug-susceptible (DS)-pTB group. We included 52 MDR cases (24 tuberculosis (TB), 28 TB infection (TBI); mean age 7.3 years) and 56 DS cases (31 TB, 26 TBI; mean age 7.9 years). Groups were similar for sex, household size, and migration background. Compared to the DS group, more children with MDR were born in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) (22% MDR-pTB vs. 13% DS-pTB, n.s.) and had more MDR index cases (94% MDR-pTB, 5% DS-pTB, p < 0.001). The interval between first healthcare contact and initiation of effective therapy was significantly longer in MDR-pTB (47 days) than in DS-pTB (11 days, p < 0.001), correlating with disease progression. Treatment for MDR-pTB was successful in 74%, but 22% experienced long-term adverse effects (e.g., hepatopathy, hearing loss). CONCLUSIONS: Close contact to MDR cases or birth in MDR-TB-high-incidence countries are risk factors for MDR-pTB. Early identification of potential MDR index cases by contact investigation, and susceptibility testing in children from high-burden MDR-TB countries are essential for timely diagnosis and treatment, reducing the severity of disease and treatment side effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien ( https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00023817 ), DRKS00023817, 2020-09-08. WHAT IS KNOWN: •Management of children with MDR-TB remains challenging due to difficulties in diagnosing MDR-TB (lack of information on MDR index case, lack of microbiological confirmation in paucibacillary disease). •Choice of treatment regimen and monitoring of side effects. WHAT IS NEW: •Children with an MDR-TB index or born in a MDR-TB-high-incidence country are at higher risk of developing MDR-TB in a low incidence country. •The time lag to initiate treatment in MDR-TB is longer than in DS-TB and MDR-TB treatment involves a higher risk of adverse effects in longer treatment regimens especially with injectables.

Successful containment of Covid-19 outbreak in a large maternity and perinatal center while continuing clinical service.

With increasing number of SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 patients to be taken care of by the health system, more and more health workers become affected by the disease. It has been reported that right from the beginning of the outbreak in Lombardy up to 20% of the doctors and nurses became infected. Under these circumstances, the regular operation of health institutions already suffering from a shortage of staff becomes difficult. This has led to complete or partial shutdowns of hospitals, either due to a lack of uninfected personnel or because of uncontrollable chains of infection endangering patients. In one of the largest university perinatal center in Bavaria with more than 3000 births per year, an outbreak of COVID-19 occurred in March 2020, affecting 36 staff members, including doctors, nurses, and midwives. Here, we describe the outbreak and present the measures contributing to the successful containment of the outbreak within three weeks. At the same time, clinical services could be maintained, however, not without deployment of personnel exposed to employees infected with SARS-CoV-2. Apart from massive testing of personnel in pre-defined phases and increased hygiene measures, including a general obligation to wear surgical face masks, we identified the need to monitor cases of illness across all groups of employees, to ensure social distancing within personnel and to evaluate contacts of clinical personnel outside of the hospital environment, in order to be able to interpret chains of infections and to disrupt them. Overall, only a bundle of measures is needed to contain such an outbreak.

Symptoms and immunoglobulin development in hospital staff exposed to a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections is increasing. Serological immunoglobulin tests may help to better understand the development of immune mechanisms against SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 cases and exposed but asymptomatic individuals. The aim of this study was to investigate exposure to SARS-CoV-2, symptoms, and antibody responses in a large sample of healthcare workers following a COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS: A COVID-19 outbreak among staff members of a major German children's and women's hospital was followed by massive RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 tests and provided the opportunity to study symptoms, chains of infection, and SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responses (IgG and IgA) by ELISA. Study participants were classified as COVID-19 cases, and persons with close, moderate, or no exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in the clinical setting, respectively. RESULTS: Out of 201 study participants, 31 were COVID-19 cases. While most study participants experienced many symptoms indicative for SARS-CoV-2 infection, anosmia and coughing were remarkably more frequent in COVID-19 cases. Approximately 80% of COVID-19 cases developed some specific antibody response (IgA and IgG) approximately 3 weeks after onset of symptoms. Subjects in the non-COVID-19 groups had also elevated IgG (1.8%) and IgA values (7.6%) irrespective of contact history with cases. CONCLUSION: We found that a significant number of diseased did not develop relevant antibody responses three weeks after symptom onset. Our data also suggest that exposure to COVID-19 positive co-workers in a hospital setting is not leading to the development of measurable immune responses in a significant proportion of asymptomatic contact persons.

Immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in health care workers following a COVID-19 outbreak: A prospective longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVE: Currently, little is known about the progression of an immune response against SARSCoV- 2 upon infection or sub-infection-exposure over time. We examined the serologic response in healthcare workers up to 12 weeks after a well-documented and contained outbreak and compared results with findings from earlier serologic testing in the same population. METHODS: This study followed 166 health care workers of the University Perinatal Care Center, Regensburg, Germany, for up to 12 weeks. 27 of the subjects had previously tested positive for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 by PCR testing and developed COVID-19. Serologic responses were tested with two independent commercially available test kits. RESULTS: 77.8 % of COVID-19 study subjects developed a specific IgG-response over the course of the 12-week study, while none of the COVID-19 contact groups had a detectable IgG response. Amongst most COVID-19 patients the values of detectable IgG-responses significantly increased over time as confirmed with both tests, while that of positive IgA responses decreased. Between the number of reported symptoms and antibody responses in COVID-19 patients no correlation was found and no new cases of seroconversion were identified in asymptomatic coworkers with negative PCR during the outbreak. CONCLUSIONS: Immune response after COVID-19 increases significantly over time but still approximately 22 % of COVID-19 patients did not mount a measurable serologic immune response within 60 days. Exposed co-workers did not develop any relevant antibody levels at all. We conclude that immunity after infection increases over time, but the antibody response does not develop reliably in all infected people.