Chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair with the ONSTEP versus the Lichtenstein technique, results of a double-blinded multicenter randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: The open new simplified totally extraperitoneal (ONSTEP) technique for the repair of inguinal hernia was presented some years ago with promising initial results regarding chronic pain. We conducted a randomized clinical trial investigating the ONSTEP technique versus the Lichtenstein technique with focus on postoperative pain. The aim of this paper was to report the results regarding chronic pain from follow-up at 6 and 12 months for the participants in the ONSTEP versus Lichtenstein trial. METHODS: This study was conducted as a randomized double-blinded clinical trial in male participants with primary unilateral hernias, having surgical repair of their hernia at one of five participating general surgical departments. At surgery, participants were allocated (1:1) to the ONSTEP or the Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair. Participants were followed up with questionnaires at 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with substantial pain-related impairment of daily functions at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. RESULTS: From April 2013 to May 2014, 290 male patients were included in the study. Regarding follow-up for pain, a total of 259 patients (89%) completed the 6-month follow-up and a total of 236 patients (81%) completed the 12-month follow-up. Regarding pain at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, no difference was found between groups. Two patients operated with Lichtenstein technique developed severe disabling chronic pain postoperatively, which was not seen in the ONSTEP group. CONCLUSION: The ONSTEP technique was not superior to the Lichtenstein technique regarding chronic pain following repair of primary inguinal hernias in males. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov NCT01753219.

Cholecystectomy During the Weekend Increases Patients' Length of Hospital Stay.

BACKGROUND: A higher risk of complications and mortality has previously been proven in selected settings. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether length of stay differentiates throughout the week and register if intra- and postoperative complications vary on weekends compared to weekdays. METHODS: The population originated from the Danish Cholecystectomy Database. It consists of adult patients, who had a cholecystectomy performed by standard four-port laparoscopic or open surgery. Adjusted analyses were used to study if day of the week had an influence on conversion, readmission within 30 days, post-operative supplemental procedures within 30 days, and variance in postoperative length of stay across the week. RESULTS: A total of 28,759 patients were included in the study. We found no difference in conversion rate, readmission within 30 days, or post-operative procedures within 30 days between week time and weekend time. A longer postoperative length of stay was observed for patients operated on Fridays and Saturdays even though surgical complication rates were alike between weekdays. Patients with acute cholecystitis had a longer length of stay on Saturdays. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence of a higher risk of conversions, post-operative procedures, or readmission during weekends compared with weekdays. Despite this, a prolonged length of stay was observed in patients operated with cholecystectomy on Fridays and Saturdays. The observed difference could be due to ward rounds on weekends mainly focus on the sickest patients leaving less time for discharge.

The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark has improved over 6-year period.

PURPOSE: The Danish Cholecystectomy Database (DCD) was a nationwide quality database that existed from 2006 to 2011. The main goal (indicators) for the database was to increase the quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark by (1) reducing the number of primary open cholecystectomies, (2) increasing the proportion of outpatient surgery, (3) reducing the number of postoperative readmissions, and (4) reducing the number of bile duct injuries and other postoperative complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the DCD met these goals. METHODS: Data from the DCD were used to identify all patients treated with cholecystectomy in the period from 2006 to 2011. The indicators were analyzed over time as a measure of quality of cholecystectomy and analyzed using chi-square statistics. RESULTS: A total of 37,317 patients were included in the study. The registration rate in the DCD was around 90 %, except in 2011 where it was 70.7 %. The proportion of open cholecystectomies decreased from 2.6 % in 2006 to 0.9 % in 2011 (p < 0.0005). Likewise, in 2011, 80 % of patients undergoing cholecystectomy were discharged within 24 h, an increase compared to 2006 (p < 0.0005). The proportion of readmissions remained steady in the area of 10 % (p = 0.6). Bile duct injuries were low (0.3 %) and unchanged during the study period. CONCLUSION: During the observed 6-year period, a significant increase of laparoscopic procedures was observed with more operations being performed as outpatient procedures. The proportion of readmissions and complications did not increase during this time period.

Recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during emergency calls - a systematic review of observational studies.

BACKGROUND: The medical dispatcher plays an essential role as part of the first link in the Chain of Survival, by recognising the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) during the emergency call, dispatching the appropriate first responder or emergency medical services response, performing dispatcher assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and referring to the nearest automated external defibrillator. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate and compare studies reporting recognition of OHCA patients during emergency calls. METHODS: This systematic review was reported in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library on 4 November 2015. Observational studies, reporting the proportion of clinically confirmed OHCAs that was recognised during the emergency call, were included. Two authors independently screened abstracts and full-text articles for inclusion. Data were extracted and the risk of bias within studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool for quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. RESULTS: A total of 3,180 abstracts were screened for eligibility and 53 publications were assessed in full-text. We identified 16 studies including 6,955 patients that fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in the systematic review. The studies reported recognition of OHCA with a median sensitivity of 73.9% (range: 14.1-96.9%). The selection of study population and the definition of "recognised OHCA" (threshold for positive test) varied greatly between the studies, resulting in high risk of bias. Heterogeneity in the studies precluded meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: Among the 16 included studies, we found a median sensitivity for OHCA recognition of 73.9% (range: 14.1-96.9%). However, great heterogeneity between study populations and in the definition of "recognised OHCA", lead to insufficient comparability of results. Uniform and transparent reporting is required to ensure comparability and development towards best practice.

Sexual dysfunction after inguinal hernia repair with the Onstep versus Lichtenstein technique: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Sequelae after inguinal hernia repair include pain-related impairment of sexual function. Pain during intercourse can originate from the scar, scrotum, penis, or during ejaculation. The aim of this study was to investigate if the Onstep technique resulted in better results than the Lichtenstein technique regarding pain-related impairment of sexual function. METHODS: This study was part of the randomized ONLI trial (NCT01753219, Onstep versus Lichtenstein for inguinal hernia repair). Separate reporting of pain-related impairment of sexual function was planned before the study start, with a separate sample size calculation. Participants were randomized to the Onstep or Lichtenstein technique for repair of their primary inguinal hernia and followed up at 6 months postoperative with the use of a questionnaire specific for pain-related impairment of sexual function. RESULTS: A total of 259 patients completed the 6-month follow-up, 129 in the Lichtenstein group and 130 in the Onstep group. Among the patients operated with the Onstep technique, 17 experienced pain during sexual activity 6 months after operation compared with 30 patients operated with the Lichtenstein technique (P = .034). Both subgroups that experienced pain during sexual activity had a median visual analog scale score of 0 with an interquartile range of 0 to 2 (P = .349). The Lichtenstein technique resulted in new pain in 14 patients, whereas the Onstep procedure gave new pain in 7 patients (P = .073). CONCLUSION: The Onstep technique was superior to the Lichtenstein technique in terms of pain during sexual activity 6 months after operation.

[Reporting guidelines can increase the quality of scientific research]. / Rapporteringsguidelines kan forbedre kvaliteten ograpporteringen af forskning

The purpose of reporting guidelines is to increase the quality of research by increasing transparency and consistency. Mandatory use of guidelines is increasingly a requirement when submitting an article to biomedical scientific journals. This article briefly explains the contents of generic scientific guidelines from the Equator network and furthermore describes the guidelines being appropriate for different study types (randomized controlled studies, systematic reviews, observational studies, case reports, interview studies, synthesis of qualitative studies etc.) and how to easily locate them.

Abdominal binders may reduce pain and improve physical function after major abdominal surgery - a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence for the effect of post-operative abdominal binders on post-operative pain, seroma formation, physical function, pulmonary function and increased intra-abdominal pressure among patients after surgery remains largely un-investigated. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. The PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for studies on the use of abdominal binders after abdominal surgery or abdominoplasty. All types of clinical studies were included. Two independent assessors evaluated the scientific quality of the studies. The primary outcomes were pain, seroma formation and physical function. RESULTS: A total of 50 publications were identified; 42 publications were excluded leaving eight publications counting a total of 578 patients for analysis. Generally, the scientific quality of the studies was poor. Use of abdominal binder revealed a non-significant tendency to reduce seroma formation after laparoscopic ventral herniotomy and a non-significant reduction in pain. Physical function was improved, whereas evidence supports a beneficial effect on psychological distress after open abdominal surgery. Evidence also supports that intra-abdominal pressure increases with the use of abdominal binders. Reduction of pulmonary function during use of abdominal binders has not been revealed. CONCLUSION: Abdominal binders reduce post-operative psychological distress, but their effect on post-operative pain after laparotomy and seroma formation after ventral hernia repair remains unclear. Due to the sparse evidence and poor quality of the literature, solid conclusions may be difficult to make, and procedure-specific, high-quality randomised clinical trials are warranted.