Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
AIDS ; 20(2): 241-6, 2006 Jan 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16511417

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The risk of hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission in medically assisted procreation (MAP) is debated and some researchers have proposed to exclude MAP for HCV-positive infertile patients. The objectives of this study were to assess the presence of viral RNA in the final preparation of density gradient semen fractions collected from men with chronic HCV and HIV co-infection participating in a MAP program, and to assess whether HIV co-infection influences the rate of the presence of HCV RNA in the semen. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was based on a cohort of 170 HCV-infected male patients (93 HIV co-infected) participating in a MAP program in a French center. Semen samples were subjected to standard MAP sperm preparation, using density-gradient centrifugation with 40 and 90% layers. All aliquots were tested with a commercially available HCV RNA assay (Roche Monitor), adapted for use with semen after a nucleic HCV RNA extraction modification (Organon Technika). RESULTS: Seminal plasma samples from 19 (11%) patients were HCV RNA positive. The positive HCV viral load in semen was less than 600 IU/ml. None of the 90% fractions from HCV-infected patients were HCV RNA positive. Among the 93 co-infected patients, 10 were positive for HCV RNA in semen and three were HIV/HCV RNA positive in semen. CONCLUSIONS: Although HCV RNA was found in the semen of 11% of patients, no purified sperm fraction, or spermatozoa used in MAP were HCV RNA positive. The 90% purified sperm fraction discards the virus and must be used with care in MAP.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Hepacivirus/aislamiento & purificación , Hepatitis C Crónica/transmisión , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Espermatozoides/virología , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones por VIH/virología , VIH-1/aislamiento & purificación , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Hepatitis C Crónica/virología , Humanos , Infertilidad Masculina/complicaciones , Infertilidad Masculina/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , ARN Viral/análisis , ARN Viral/sangre , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa/métodos , Semen/virología , Motilidad Espermática , Carga Viral
2.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 7(2): 185-9, 2003 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14567887

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to compare, in a centre with previous experience of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist use, single administration of a GnRH antagonist [cetrorelix (Cetrotide) 3 mg] with a single administration of a GnRH agonist [Decapeptyl Retard 3.75 mg] in patients undergoing assisted reproduction treatment (n = 307 and 364 respectively). GnRH agonist was administered on the first day of menses, while cetrorelix was administered when the largest follicle reached 14 mm. Ovarian stimulation was performed with recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH; 150-225 IU/day). Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG, 10,000 IU) was administered when at least two follicles reached a mean diameter > or =18 mm. Over 90% of patients in both groups reached the criteria for HCG administration and underwent oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer. Duration of FSH therapy (9.95 versus 11.25 days) and cumulative dose of r-hFSH (1604 versus 1980 IU) were significantly reduced (P < 0.01) in the cetrorelix 3 mg group. The number of oocytes retrieved was lower (8.5 versus 11.2; P < 0.01) with cetrorelix, but the number of embryos replaced was similar (2.2 versus 2.3; NS). The pregnancy rates per oocyte retrieval were the same, 24.5%, in the antagonist and agonist groups. This study indicates that although fewer oocytes are recovered, similar pregnancy rates can be achieved with a GnRH antagonist compared with a GnRH agonist. Additionally, a single dose of 3 mg cetrorelix was administered in 84% of patients, thus being simpler and more convenient for patients. Cetrorelix 3 mg may thus be proposed as a first choice for preventing both a premature LH surge and detrimental rises in LH during ovarian stimulation prior to assisted reproduction treatment.


Asunto(s)
Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/análogos & derivados , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/administración & dosificación , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Antagonistas de Hormonas/administración & dosificación , Infertilidad Femenina/tratamiento farmacológico , Luteolíticos/administración & dosificación , Pamoato de Triptorelina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Femenino , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Hormonas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Luteolíticos/efectos adversos , Síndrome de Hiperestimulación Ovárica/tratamiento farmacológico , Inducción de la Ovulación , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA