Double immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for unresectable pleural mesothelioma rarely induces hyperprogressive disease: a case report.

Background: Use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is associated with new response types, such as hyperprogressive disease (HPD), whose definition is still being discussed. Some authors use dynamic indexes to define HPD. However, since the Checkmate-743 study, ICIs have been a first-line therapy for pleural mesothelioma (PM), thereby making use of dynamic indexes less appropriate. The aim of this study is to describe two cases of HPD and then discuss its definitions and implications. Case Description: Herein, we report two cases of PM HPD on first-line ICI therapy. A 67-year-old man with right unresectable epithelioid PM, without BAP1 or CDKN2A losses, high neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and rapid-onset pulmonary and mediastinal HPD after two ICI cycles, died of respiratory failure 1 month after starting treatment. A 40-year-old woman with left unresectable epithelioid PM had HPD at first assessment after 4 ICI infusions with jugular thrombosis, liver metastases and more dismal biological parameters. There are multiple different ways to describe HPD, some not applicable to PM. Suspected mechanisms include macrophage reprogramming to M2 cells. There are no known predictive factors of HPD, and future works should focus on identifying them. Conclusions: HPD is a mode of progression for ICI-treated PM patients. Further investigation is needed to better define and anticipate HPD in these patients.

Safety and Patient-Reported outcomes of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in stage IIIB/IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation, ALK rearrangement or ROS1 fusion progressing after targeted therapies (GFPC 06-2018 study).

BACKGROUND: In an open-label multicenter non-randomized non-comparative phase II study in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), oncogenic addiction (EGFR mutation or ALK/ROS1 fusion), with disease progression after tyrosine-kinase inhibitor and no prior chemotherapy (NCT04042558), atezolizumab, carboplatin, pemetrexed with or without bevacizumab showed some promising result. Beyond the clinical evaluation, we assessed safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to provide additional information on the relative impact of adding atezolizumab to chemotherapy with and without bevacizumab in this population. MATERIALS: Patients received platinum-pemetrexed-atezolizumab-bevacizumab (PPAB cohort) or, if not eligible, platinum-pemetrexed-atezolizumab (PPA cohort). The incidence, nature, and severity of adverse events (AEs) were assessed. PROs were evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-Core 30 and EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer 13). RESULT: Overall, 68 (PPAB) and 72 (PPA) patients were evaluable for safety. Grade 3-4 AEs occurred in 83.8% (PPAB) and 63.9% (PPA). Grade 3-4 atezolizumab-related AEs occurred in 29.4% and 19.4%, respectively. Grade 3-4 bevacizumab-related AEs occurred in 36.8% (PPAB). Most frequent grade 3-4 AEs were neutropenia (19.1% in PPAB; 23.6% in PPA) and asthenia (16.2% in PPAB; 9.7% in PPA). In PPAB, we observed a global stability in global health security (GHS) score, fatigue and dyspnea with a constant tendency of improvement, and a significant improvement in cough. In PPA, we observed a significant improvement in GHS score with a significant improvement in fatigue, dyspnea and cough. At week 54, we observed an improvement from baseline in GHS score for 49.2% of patients. In both cohorts, patients reported on average no clinically significant worsening in their overall health or physical functioning scores. CONCLUSION: PPAB and PPA combinations seem tolerable and manageable in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-squamous NSCLC with oncogenic addiction (EGFR mutation or ALK/ROS1 fusion) after targeted therapies.

ICU admission for solid cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the management of cancer. They can induce immune-related adverse events (irAE) leading to intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We aimed to describe irAEs for ICU admissions in solid cancer patients treated with ICIs. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study was conducted in France and Belgium. Adult patients with solid tumor and treated with systemic ICIs within the last 6 months, requiring non-programmed ICU admission were included. Patients admitted for microbiologically documented sepsis were excluded. Imputability of irAEs in ICU admissions was described according to the WHO-UMC classification system at ICU admission and at ICU discharge. The use of immunosuppressant treatment was reported. RESULTS: 115 patients were eligible. Solid tumor was mainly lung cancer (n = 76, 66%) and melanoma (n = 18, 16%). They were mainly treated with an anti-PD-(L)1 alone (n = 110, 96%). Main ICU admission reasons were acute respiratory failure (n = 66, 57%), colitis (n = 14, 13%), and cardiovascular disease (n = 13, 11%). ICU admission was considered "likely" associated with irAE for 48% (n = 55) of patients. Factors independently associated with irAE were a good ECOG performance status (PS) (ECOG-PS of 0 or 1 vs. ECOG-PS of 2-3, odds ratio [OR] = 6.34, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.13-18.90, and OR = 3.66, 95% CI 1.33-10.03, respectively), and a history of irAE (OR = 3.28, 95% CI 1.19-9.01). Steroids were prescribed for 41/55 (75%) patients with ICU admission "likely" related to irAE. Three patients were subsequently treated with immunosuppressants. CONCLUSION: IrAEs accounted for half of ICU admissions in cancer patients receiving ICIs. They could be treated with steroids. Identifying the imputability of irAEs in ICU admissions remains a challenge.

Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Advanced ALK-Translocated Non-small Cell Lung Cancers and Long-Term Responses to Crizotinib (CRIZOLONG GFPC 05-19 Study).

BACKGROUND: Although ALK-translocated (ALK+) advanced non-small cell lung cancers (aNSCLCs) are currently treated with second- or third-generation ALK inhibitors (ALK-TKIs), some patients respond durably to the first-generation ALK-TKI crizotinib. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of these long-term responders. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This national, multicenter, retrospective, non-interventional study included patients with ALK+ aNSCLCs and long-term responses to first (L1)- or subsequent (≥ L2)-line crizotinib, defined, respectively, as treatments lasting > 18 and > 10 months. Median treatment duration (mDOT) was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients (32 L1 and 53 ≥ L2 responders) from 23 centers were included (receiving crizotinib between 10/24/2011-10/02/2018): median age of 59 years, 83.6% non-smokers or ex-smokers, 85.9% performance status (PS) 0/1, 94.1% with adenocarcinomas, median of one metastatic site, and 22.4% with brain metastases (BMs). After median follow-up of 73.4 [95% confidence interval, 67.5-79.9] months, respective L1 and ≥ L2 mDOTs were 43.3 [26.7-56.8] and 29.6 [22.6-35.8] months, with overall survival (OS) not reached (NR) and 116.2 [83.4-NR] months. BM presence or absence did not affect mDOT (31.4 versus 32.9 months) but significantly impacted median OS (70.6 versus 158.6 months; p = 0.0008). Progression on crizotinib was paucisymptomatic (74.1%) and oligometastatic (34.8%), especially BMs (42.4%). After crizotinib discontinuation, 65 (76.5%) patients received subsequent systemic therapy: 57 (67.1%) with second-generation ALK-TKIs. Respective mDOTs of first- and second-line post-crizotinib ALK-TKIs lasted 19.4 [14.9-25.6] and 11.1 [4.8-17.9] months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Most ALK+ aNSCLC patients with prolonged crizotinib efficacy had paucisymptomatic and oligometastatic disease without BMs. They subsequently benefited from a sequential strategy with other ALK-TKIs.

Histomolecular Resistance Mechanisms to First-Line Osimertinib in EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicentric Retrospective French Study.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) used in first line for the treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). OBJECTIVE: The identification of related histomolecular resistance mechanisms to first-line osimertinib is a critical step to define the optimal treatment strategy beyond progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients treated in the first line with osimertinib for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC at 10 hospitals in the Greater Paris area between April 2015 and January 2021 were included. Histomolecular data from plasma and tissue samples taken at progression under osimertinib were collected, and all samples were analyzed using DNA next-generation sequencing. Data on objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) were also collected. RESULTS: Overall, 104 patients were included. Most patients had adenocarcinoma (n = 102, 98%) with an exon 19 EGFR deletion (n = 54, 52%). Forty-two patients (50%) had central nervous system (CNS) metastasis at the time of osimertinib initiation. ORR was 76%, median PFS and OS were 12.6 months and 52 months, respectively, and TTD was 33 months. At the time of analysis, 44 patients (42%) had tumor progression, and among these patients, 27 (61%) contributive samples were available. The most frequent molecular alterations at progression were mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET) amplification (15%; n = 4) and EGFR C797S mutation (11%; n = 3). Histological transformation was found in one patient (4%). RNA next-generation sequencing was performed in eight patients and showed a CCDC6-RET fusion in one patient (12%). CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed the efficacy of osimertinib in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. At progression, the most frequent histomolecular alterations were MET amplification and EGFR C797S mutation.

Management of patients with synchronous head-and-neck and lung cancers: SYNCHRON GFPC 15-01 study.

Purpose: Few data have been published on the management of patients with synchronous head-and-neck cancer (HNC) and lung cancer (LC). This observational study was undertaken to describe the management of these patients in multiple centers. Materials and Methods: All patients consecutively diagnosed with synchronous HNC and LC in 26 French centers were included. Information was collected on patients' clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes. Those characteristics and treatments were analyzed descriptively. Kaplan-Meier progression-free and overall survival probabilities were estimated. Results: The study included 132 patients: 83% male; median age: 63.7 (range: 62.1-65.4) years; all current or former smokers; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status: 0 or 1 for 21.9% or 65.9% of the patients, respectively; cardiovascular comorbidities: 63%; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: 33%; and previous cancer: 11%. HNC histology was 98% squamous: 23.5% oral cavity, 26.5% oropharyngeal, 22.0% hypopharyngeal, and 28.0% laryngeal. LCs were mainly localized (47.7% Stage I and 9.9% Stage II): 38% squamous, 49% adenocarcinomas, and 13% others. LC diagnosis impacted HNC management for 38% of the patients, with a median time from HNC diagnosis to first HNC treatment of 40 days. HNC impacted LC management for 48% of the patients, with a median time from LC diagnosis-to-LC treatment interval of 41 days. Conclusions: Synchronous LC at HNC diagnosis impacted management and outcomes of both cancers. Specific recommendations should be elaborated to improve the management of these patients.

When targeted therapy for cancer leads to ICU admission. RETRO-TARGETICU multicentric study.

PURPOSE: To study prevalence of targeted therapy (TT)-related adverse events requiring ICU admission in solid tumor patients. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study from the Nine-i research group. Adult patients who received TT for solid tumor within 3 months prior to ICU admission were included. Patients admitted for TT-related adverse event were compared to those admitted for other reasons. RESULTS: In total, 140 patients, median age of 63 (52-69) years were included. Primary cancer site was mostly digestive (n=27, 19%), kidney (n=27, 19%), breast (n=24, 17%), and lung (n=20, 14%). Targeted therapy was anti-VEGF/VEGFR for 27% (n=38) patients, anti-EGFR for 22% (n=31) patients, anti-HER2 for 14% (n=20) patients and anti-BRAF for 9% (n=5) patients. ICU admission was related to TT adverse events for 30 (21%) patients. The most frequent complications were interstitial pneumonia (n=7), cardiac failure (n=5), anaphylaxis (n=4) and bleeding (n=4). At ICU admission, no significant difference was found between patients admitted for a TT-related adverse event and the other patients. One-month survival rate was higher in patients admitted for TT adverse event (OR=5.733 [2.031-16.182] P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events related to targeted therapy accounted for 20% of ICU admission in our population and carried a 16% one-month mortality. Outcome was associated with admission for TT related to adverse event, breast cancer and good performance status.

Brigatinib for Pretreated, ALK-Positive, Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancers: Long-Term Follow-Up and Focus on Post-Brigatinib Lorlatinib Efficacy in the Multicenter, Real-World BrigALK2 Study.

Brigatinib is a next-generation ALK inhibitor (ALKi) that shows efficacy in ALK inhibitor naïve and post-crizotinib ALK+ advanced NSCLCs (aNSCLCs). The efficacy of brigatinib was retrospectively assessed in patients with aNSCLCs included in the brigatinib French Early-Access Program (1 August 2016−21 January 2019). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (invPFS) and the primary analysis was updated in 2021 with a longer follow-up, focused on post-brigatinib lorlatinib efficacy. Sixty-six centers included 183 patients: median age 60 ± 12.7 years; 78.3% never/former smokers; median of 3 ± 1 previous lines and 2 ± 0.5 ALKis; 37.1% ECOG PS 2 and 55.6% >3 metastatic sites. The median follow-up from brigatinib initiation was 40.4 months (95% CI 38.4−42.4). InvPFS was 7.4 months (95% CI 5.9−9.6), median duration of treatment (mDOT) was 7.3 months (95% CI 5.8−9.4) and median overall survival (mOS) was 20.3 months (95% CI 15.6−27.6). The median DOT and OS from brigatinib initiation tend to decrease with the number of ALK inhibitors used in previous lines of therapy. Based on the data collected, 92 (50.3%) patients received ≥1 agent(s) post-brigatinib and 68 (73.9%) of them received lorlatinib, with 51 (75%) immediately receiving it post-brigatinib, 12 (17.6%) receiving it after one and 5 (7.4%) after ≥2 subsequent treatments. The median follow-up was 29.9 (95% CI 25.7−33.1) months. Lorlatinib mDOT was 5.3 (95% CI 3.6−7.6) months with a median OS from lorlatinib initiation of 14.1 (95% CI 10.3−19.2) months. The results of the brigALK2 study confirm the efficacy of brigatinib in a population of heavily pretreated ALK+ aNSCLC patients and provide new data on the activity of lorlatinib after brigatinib.

Brigatinib in patients with ALK-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with sequential ALK inhibitors: A multicentric real-world study (BRIGALK study).

OBJECTIVES: Brigatinib is a next-generation ALK inhibitor initially developed in ALK-positive NSCLC pretreated with crizotinib. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective multicentric study analyzed ALK-positive advanced NSCLC patients pretreated with at least one tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, including crizotinib, and enrolled in the brigatinib French early access program. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: 104 patients were included (mean age, 56.6 years; never smokers, 61.5%; adenocarcinoma, 98.1%). Patients had received a median of 3 previous treatment lines, including at least 2 ALK inhibitors (mainly crizotinib then ceritinib). At brigatinib initiation, 59.1% had performance status 0-1, 51.9% had ≥ 3 metastatic sites, 74.5% had central nervous system metastases (CNS) and 8.8% had carcinomatous meningitis. Median duration of brigatinib treatment was 6.7 (95% CI, 0.06-20.7) months. Median PFS was 6.6 (4.8-9.9) months for the entire population. For patients who received 2, 3-4 and >4 lines of treatment before brigatinib, PFS was 4.3 (2.5-8.9), 10.4 (5.9-13.9) and 3.8 (0.8-7.4) months, respectively. In the 91 evaluable patients, disease control rate was 78.2%. From brigatinib start, median overall survival was 17.2 (11.0-not reached) months. Among the 68 patients with progressive disease after brigatinib, CNS was involved in 29.4% of cases. Median OS from the diagnosis of NSCLC was 75.3 (38.2-174.6) months. CONCLUSION: These real-world results confirm the efficacy of brigatinib in a cohort of patients heavily pretreated for ALK-positive advanced NSCLC.

Resistance mechanisms to osimertinib in EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A multicentric retrospective French study.

OBJECTIVES: The understanding of histo-molecular mechanisms associated with resistance to osimertinib is a critical step to define the optimal treatment strategy in advanced EGFR-mutated Non-Small-Cell-Lung-Cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a multicentric retrospective analysis on a cohort of consecutive patients treated with osimertinib for an advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC and collected histo-molecular data from plasma and tumor samples at the time of progression. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed for all samples. Best Overall Response Rate (ORR), Progression Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS) and data on treatment post-progression efficacy were also collected. RESULTS: Two-hundred and twenty-six patients were included from 9 Academic French Hospitals between April 2015-October 2018. Osimertinib was given in second-line or more in 219 patients (97%). Best ORR was 52% and best central nervous system ORR was 56%. Median PFS and OS were 9.5 months (IQR 4.0-17.2) and 24 months (IQR 12.4-NR) respectively. At the time of analysis, 150 patients (66%) had tumor progression. Among them, 73 contributive samples (56 tumor biopsies) were available. The most frequent molecular alterations were C797S mutation (n = 9 (13%)) and MET amplification (n = 8 (11%)). Histologic transformation occurred in 5 patients (9% of tumor biopsies). In T790M + NSCLC, loss of T790 M occurred in 68% of cases. Median PFS and OS with treatment beyond progression were 6.0 months (IQR 2.0-10.4) and 15.1 months (IQR 6.7-NR) respectively and longer in case of osimertinib continuation beyond progression. CONCLUSION: We confirmed the efficacy of osimertinib in patients with advanced EGFR mutation positive NSCLC. At progression, the most frequent molecular alterations were MET amplification and C797S mutation.

New PDL1 inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: focus on pembrolizumab.

The advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors during the past decade represents a major advancement in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with personalized treatment. Platinum-based chemotherapy has reached its efficacy threshold, with its use remaining limited by its toxicity. For NSCLC, inhibitors of the PD1 protein and its ligand PDL1 show promising clinical activity and induce durable responses in patients with advanced disease. The US Food and Drug Administration has approved pembrolizumab for treatment-naïve metastatic NSCLC with ≥50% of tumor cells expressing PDL1 and for metastatic NSCLC with ≥1% PDL1 expression after progression following first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. In 2017, it also authorized the first-line combination of pembrolizumab and carboplatin-pemetrexed chemotherapy without selection based on PDL1 expression, but European health authorities are still waiting for the results of a Phase III trial. In this review, the clinical results of published and ongoing studies evaluating pembrolizumab for advanced NSCLC are analyzed and the potential role of PDL1 as a factor predictive of overall responses addressed.

[Supportive cares on thoracic oncology]. / Soins de support en oncologie thoracique.

Palliative cares become an important element of the management of patients with lung cancer. The objective of this review is to review the literature data's of the impact of palliative cares in oncology, more particularly in thoracic oncology. The analysis concerns the impact of an early access to the palliative cares and the characteristics of these cares in thoracic oncology. The data of the literature are in favour of an early access and structured intervention. Nevertheless, numerous research questions remain, in particular the best moment to implant these palliative cares (at the diagnosis, at the beginning of the chemotherapy…), the assessment of each components of these programs and the economic impact of these initiatives.