Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Spine Deform ; 11(2): 415-422, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36260207

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Posterior spinal fusion (PSF) represents a large physiologic challenge for children with neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS). Perioperative complications are numerous with many occurring in the post-operative period due to pain and relative immobilization. This study assessed the impact of steroids on patients undergoing PSF for NMS. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients managed at a single center with PSF for NMS was reviewed. Clinical and radiographic analysis was used to evaluate baseline demographics, curve characteristics, and post-operative course. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients who underwent PSF for NMS were included. Fifty-seven of these patients did not receive post-operative steroids (NS) while 32 patients were treated with post-operative steroids (dexamethasone, WS) for a median of 3 doses (median 6.0 mg/dose every 8 h after surgery). The demographic variables of the cohorts were similar with no difference in curve magnitude, number of vertebrae fused, number of osteotomies, or EBL between groups. A 70% decrease in the median post-operative morphine equivalents was observed in the steroid cohort (0.50 mg/kg WS vs 1.65 mg/kg NS, p value < 0.001). There was an association between post-operative morphine equivalents and length of stay (Spearman's rho = 0.22, p value = 0.04). There was no difference in wound healing, infection, and pulmonary or gastrointestinal complications between groups. No difference was found in pain at discharge, 30-day ED returns, or 30-day OR returns between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative dexamethasone resulted in a 70% decrease in morphine equivalent use after PSF for NMS without any increase in perioperative wound infections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3: case-control series.


Asunto(s)
Parálisis Cerebral , Enfermedades Neuromusculares , Escoliosis , Fusión Vertebral , Niño , Humanos , Parálisis Cerebral/complicaciones , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Escoliosis/complicaciones , Enfermedades Neuromusculares/complicaciones , Dolor/etiología , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Derivados de la Morfina
2.
Spine Deform ; 11(3): 671-676, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36538190

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Children with neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) have historically been managed post-operatively in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) due to institutional tendencies. This study sought to define risk factors for PICU admission when using an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway. METHODS: A retrospective review of children with non-ambulatory (GMFCS 4 or 5) cerebral palsy undergoing PSF for NMS performed at two institutions by 5 surgeons. Both institutions have a pre-existing ERAS pathway for NMS patients consisting of post-surgical transfer to the hospital floor with early reinstitution of feeding and mobilization. PICU admission is used at the discretion of the surgeon and anesthesiologist rather than by institutional decree. Patient and surgical factors were assessed for risk factors of PICU admission. RESULTS: A total of 103 children were included (84% GMFCS 5, mean 14.52 years (± 3.4 years)). Forty children (38.8%) required postoperative PICU admission. PICU admission was associated with seizure disorder (P = 0.09), pre-existing feeding tube (P = 0.003), tracheostomy (P = 0.03), and modified GMFCS-5 subclassification (P = 0.003). Independent predictors of PICU admission include pre-existing feeding (Odd's ratio = 2.9, P = 0.02) and length of surgery (Odd's ratio = 2.6, P < 0.001), with surgery lasting ≥ 5.0 h having an 82.5% sensitivity and 63.5% specificity (AUC 0.8, P < 0.001) for post-operative PICU admission. CONCLUSION: The majority of children with non-ambulatory cerebral palsy can be successfully managed on the hospital floor following PSF. The extent of central neuromotor impairment is significantly associated with PICU admission along with surgery lasting longer than 5 h.


Asunto(s)
Parálisis Cerebral , Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Enfermedades Neuromusculares , Escoliosis , Fusión Vertebral , Niño , Humanos , Escoliosis/complicaciones , Escoliosis/cirugía , Parálisis Cerebral/complicaciones , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Enfermedades Neuromusculares/complicaciones , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico
3.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 102(20): 1807-1813, 2020 Oct 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33086348

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgeons have hesitated to use steroids in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion because of the risk of wound complications. The literature has supported the use of postoperative steroids in other areas of orthopaedics on the basis of more rapid recovery and improved postoperative pain control. We hypothesized that a short course of postoperative dexamethasone following posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) would decrease opioid usage without increasing wound-healing problems. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of AIS from 2015 to 2018 at a single hospital were included. A review of demographic characteristics, curve characteristics, surgical data, and postoperative clinic notes was performed. Opioid usage was determined by converting all postoperative opioids given into morphine milligram equivalents (MME). RESULTS: Sixty-five patients underwent posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of AIS without postoperative steroids (the NS group), and 48 patients were managed with 3 doses of postoperative steroids (the WS group) (median, 8.0 mg/dose). There was no difference between the groups in terms of curve magnitude, number of vertebrae fused, or estimated blood loss. There was a 39.6% decrease in total MME used and a 29.5% decrease in weight-based MME used in the group receiving postoperative steroids (82.0 mg [1.29 mg/kg] in the NS group versus 49.5 mg [0.91 mg/kg] in the WS group]; p < 0.001). This difference persisted after accounting for gabapentin, ketorolac, and diazepam usage; surgical time; curve size; levels fused; and number of osteotomies (median decrease, 0.756 mg/kg [95% CI, 0.307 to 1.205 mg/kg]; p = 0.001). Three patients in the NS group (4.6%) and 4 patients in the WS group (8.3%) developed wound dehiscence requiring wound care (p = 0.53). One patient in the NS group required surgical debridement for the treatment of an infection. Patients in the WS group were more likely to walk at the time of the initial physical therapy evaluation (60.4% versus 35.4%; p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: A short course of postoperative steroids after posterior spinal fusion was associated with a 40% decrease in the use of opioids, with no increase in wound complications. Surgeons may consider the use of perioperative steroids in an effort to decrease the use of postoperative opioids following posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of AIS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Escoliosis/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Adolescente , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Masculino , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA