Prognostic implication of endometriosis in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate whether the presence of endometriosis is a prognostic factor in patients diagnosed with clear cell carcinoma (CCC) of the ovary. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed to all patients diagnosed with CCC and endometriosis between 1975 and 2002. All pathology reports were reviewed and slides were reviewed when available. Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier test were used to calculate survival prognostic factors. The level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients with CCC were identified with a 49% rate of coexisting endometriosis. Patients with tumors arising in endometriosis (n=15), with endometriosis found elsewhere in the specimen (n=26), and those without endometriosis (n=43) were analyzed comparatively. Patients with CCCs arising in endometriosis were 10 years younger (95% C.I. 0.6-18 years) than those with CCC not arising in endometriosis (P<0.05). Patients with endometriosis anywhere in the surgical specimen presented at early stage 66% of the times versus 42% for patients without endometriosis (P<0.05). Median overall survival (OS) for patients with endometriosis was 196 months (95% C.I. 28-363) versus 34 months (95% C.I. 13-55) for patients without endometriosis (P=0.01). Advanced tumor stage at diagnosis (HR 13, 95% C.I. 5-29, P=0.001) and absence of endometriosis (HR 2, 95% C.I. 1-3.9, P=0.03) were the only significant prognostic factors associated with poor survival. Disease recurrence or death among optimally and completely cytoreduced patients was 31% and 59% for those with and without endometriosis respectively (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the presence of endometriosis in patients with CCC of the ovary is associated with progression free and OS advantages with no difference in initial resectability.

Respiration-averaged CT for attenuation correction in canine cardiac PET/CT.

UNLABELLED: Heart disease is a leading cause of death in North America. With the increased availability of PET/CT scanners, CT is now commonly used as a transmission source for attenuation correction. Because of the differences in scan duration between PET and CT, respiration-induced motion can create inconsistencies between the PET and CT data and lead to incorrect attenuation correction and, thus, artifacts in the final reconstructed PET images. This study compared respiration-averaged CT and 4-dimensional (4D) CT for attenuation correction of cardiac PET in an in vivo canine model as a means of removing these inconsistencies. METHODS: Five dogs underwent respiration-gated cardiac (18)F-FDG PET and 4D CT. The PET data were reconstructed with 3 methods of attenuation correction that differed only in the CT data used: The first method was single-phase CT at either end-expiration, end-inspiration, or the middle of a breathing cycle; the second was respiration-averaged CT, which is CT temporally averaged over the entire respiratory cycle; and the third was phase-matched CT, in which each PET phase is corrected with the matched phase from 4D CT. After reconstruction, the gated PET images were summed to produce an ungated image. Polar plots of the PET heart images were generated, and percentage differences were calculated with respect to the phase-matched correction for each dog. The difference maps were then averaged over the 5 dogs. RESULTS: For single-phase CT correction at end-expiration, end-inspiration, and mid cycle, the maximum percentage differences were 11% +/- 4%, 7% +/- 3%, and 5% +/- 2%, respectively. Conversely, the maximum difference for attenuation correction with respiration-averaged CT data was only 1.6% +/- 0.7%. CONCLUSION: Respiration-averaged CT correction produced a maximum percentage difference 7 times smaller than that obtained with end-expiration single-phase correction. This finding indicates that using respiration-averaged CT may accurately correct for attenuation on respiration-ungated cardiac PET.

Comparison of prognostic factors and survival among black patients and white patients treated with irradiation for non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have reported differences in cancer incidence and survival between populations of Blacks and Whites. A 45% higher death rate from lung cancer for Black men and a survival duration for Black patients with lung cancer that is generally shorter than that for White patients have also been reported. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether race affects known prognostic factors for non-small-cell lung cancer in Black versus White patients. This analysis attempts to determine which prognostic factors may contribute to the reported differences in disease outcome. METHODS: We used data from 1565 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated in four randomized prospective trials conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). The data were pooled for a retrospective analysis of survival and prognostic factors by race. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed significant differences between Blacks and Whites with regard to sex, weight loss, histology, and RTOG T stage (P < .05), but the only clinically significant difference (P < or = .01) was weight loss. Despite these findings, overall survival for Blacks and Whites did not differ significantly (P = .67). Median survival for Blacks and Whites with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of 90 or more was 12.1 and 11.3 months, respectively (P = .45). Survival for Blacks and Whites with a KPS of less than 90 was 7.8 and 6.8 months, respectively. Cause of death did not differ between the two races. For both races, KPS, age, sex, weight loss, and RTOG T and N stages were significant prognostic factors for survival (P < .01), but race was not a significant prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: Further studies of the differential in cancer survival for Blacks and Whites may be indicated, but greater impact may be achieved by addressing socioeconomic factors, lifestyle and occupational risk factors, health education, and access to adequate health care.

Integration of diagnostic imaging in the clinical management of cervical cancer.

Diagnostic imaging plays multiple roles during the initial assessment, treatment, and surveillance follow-up of patients with cervical cancer. Clarification of pretreatment disease extent aids in understanding prognosis, may influence selection of treatment modalities, and permits outcome comparison between different therapeutic interventions employed in similar groups of patients. Recently, use of historically important imaging assessments has declined precipitously, coincident with the increased use of contemporary imaging modalities not yet acknowledged by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging. In the United States, approximately 50% of the patients with invasive cancer will receive all, or a portion, of their initial treatment with radiation therapy. Clarification of the target volumes for radiotherapy, including both teletherapy and brachytherapy components, enables delivery of radiation therapy, with maximal confidence that all identifiable cancer is within the treatment field and normal tissues are excluded to the greatest extent possible. Imaging assessments can help select patients most likely to benefit from aggressive salvage therapies. Identification of sites of recurrence provides guidance for refinements in existing therapies and is an important element in the prospective evaluation of new treatments. As postmortem examination of patients who have died of cancer becomes a rare event, antemortem imaging can serve as an alternative to the traditional autopsy in determining cause of death and ultimate patterns of failure. Future challenges for diagnostic imaging include addressing the need for disciplined, prospective evaluation of emerging imaging technologies and, when sensible, rational integration of widely available, standardized imaging modalities into algorithms for initial staging and subsequent monitoring of patients treated for invasive cervical cancer.

Radiation palliation of cervical cancer.

Radiation is a useful modality for palliation of local-regional disease in patients with cervical cancer who require palliation because of distant metastases, extensive local-regional disease, medical consideration, or patient concerns. Two radiation schedules have been reported on for the treatment of advanced pelvic disease including cervical cancer. The large single-dose schedule consisted of 10-Gy fractions repeated at monthly intervals to a maximum of 30 Gy. This schedule has produced good palliative results with symptomatic improvement in approximately 50% of patients and objective response in 35%-80%. However, severe late toxicity was shown to be as high as 42% (actuarial). The second schedule tested by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consisted of 3.7-Gy fractions given twice a day for 2 days (14.8 Gy) repeated after 2-4 weeks for a maximum of 44.4 Gy. There were 284 patients accrued, and the subgroup of 61 cervical cancer patients is analyzed in this article. The subjective response (50%-100% complete response) and objective response (53%) were similar to those observed with the large single-fraction schedule. The late toxicity was significantly lower (7%-actuarial). For patients who may survive 6 months or longer, this second schedule is preferable.

Intracavitary irradiation for carcinoma of the urinary bladder: rationale, technique, and preliminary results.

Twelve patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder have been treated employing a combination of external beam radiation (4000 to 5040 cGy/4 to 5.5 weeks) supplemented by intracavitary irradiation (1500 to 3000 cGy mucosal dose) using a triple lumen balloon catheter containing a central 137Cs source. The rationale, patient selection, and preliminary results are reported, and the technique of the intracavitary brachytherapy is described.

Sagittal magnetic resonance imaging in the design of lateral radiation treatment portals for patients with locally advanced squamous cancer of the cervix.

Twenty-five patients with FIGO clinical Stages IB-IVA squamous cancers of the uterine cervix underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging to assist in the design of radiation therapy portals. Magnetic resonance imaging was used primarily to define the treatment volume required to encompass the primary disease and its direct regional extensions, and only secondarily to assess the presence or absence of lymph node metastases. The sagittal scans revealed that use of "conventional" or "standard" lateral radiation portals would have resulted in a failure to encompass all gross cancer extensions (marginal miss) in 6 patients (24%). The beam edge of standard portals would have traversed tissue within 1 cm or less of gross cancer in an additional 8 patients (32%), increasing the risk of regional underdosage of subclinical disease extensions. Use of conventional lateral portals would have resulted in incomplete coverage of the uterine fundus in 15 of 24 patients (62.5%), of whom 3 had gross cancer extension to involve the uterine cavity or the myometrium of the lower uterine segment. Conventional lateral portal design, as described and illustrated in standard radiation oncology texts, may be suboptimal for a significant percentage of patients with locally advanced or bulky cervical cancer, and could be a contributing cause of failure to control pelvic disease. Design of lateral treatment portals should be based on imaging the morbid anatomy in the treatment position, rather than on an assumption of normal anatomic relationships.

Treatment planning for colorectal cancer: radiation and surgical techniques and value of small-bowel films.

For colorectal cancer, the adjuvant radiation dose levels required to achieve a high incidence of local control closely parallel the radiation tolerance of small bowel (4500-5000 rad), and for patients with partially resected or unresected disease, the dose levels exceed tolerance (6000-7000 rad). Therefore, both the surgeon and the radiation oncologist should use techniques that localize tumor volumes and decrease the amount of small intestine within the irradiation field. Surgical options include pelvic reconstruction (reperitonealization, omental flaps, retroversion of uterus, etc.) and clip placement. Radiation options include the use of radiographs to define small bowel location and mobility combined with treatment techniques using multiple fields, bladder distention, shrinking or boost fields, and/or patient position changes (prone, decubitus, etc.). When both specialties interact in optimum fashion, local control can be increased with minimal risks to achieve a suitable therapeutic ratio.

Subset analysis of RTOG 85-31 and 86-10 indicates an advantage for long-term vs. short-term adjuvant hormones for patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: The benefit of adjuvant hormones in prostate cancer patients receiving definitive radiation therapy (RT) in RTOG 85-31 and 86-10 has previously been reported. This analysis excludes those patients with positive lymph nodes or postprostatectomy to determine the benefit of adjuvant hormones in men with locally advanced nonmetastatic prostate cancer receiving definitive RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine hundred ninety-three eligible patients from RTOG 85-31 and 86-10 treated between 1987-1992 were included in this study. Five hundred seventy-five patients with T3N0M0 disease were included from RTOG 85-31 and 418 patients with T2b-T4N0M0 disease from RTOG 86-10. Patients randomized to receive long-term hormones (LTH) on 85-31 received goserelin starting the last week of RT and continued indefinitely. Patients treated with short-term hormones (STH) on 86-10 received goserelin and flutamide 2 months prior to and during RT. The median follow-up for all patients in this analysis was 71 months (range, 0.6-129 months). RESULTS: Combining both studies, statistically significant improvements in outcome were observed between the RT and hormones (I) and RT alone (II) groups for biochemical disease-free survival (bNED control) and distant metastases failure (DMF). Statistically significant improvements in bNED control, DMF and cause-specific failure (CSF) were observed for patients receiving LTH compared with STH. In those patients receiving LTH, the benefit in bNED control (p = 0.0002), DMF (p = 0.05), and CSF (p = 0.02) was limited to centrally reviewed Gleason score of 7 and 8-10 tumors. For all patients treated on 85-31, statistically significant improvements for bNED control, DMF, and CSF were observed between Group I and II. Multivariate analysis demonstrated Gleason score and the use of LTH to be independent predictors for bNED control (p < 0.0001), DMF (p < 0.0001), and CSF (p < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this analysis, adjuvant long-term hormones compared to short-term hormones resulted in statistically significant improvements in bNED control, DMF, and CSF rates for patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

Accelerated hyperfractionated hepatic irradiation in the management of patients with liver metastases: results of the RTOG dose escalating protocol.

PURPOSE: This study was prepared to address two objectives: (a) to determine whether progressively higher total doses of hepatic irradiation can prolong survival in a selected population of patients with liver metastases; (b) to refine existing concepts of liver tolerance for fractionated external radiation employing a fraction size which might be appropriate in clinical protocols evaluating elective or adjuvant radiation of the liver. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred seventy-three analyzable patients with computed tomography measurable liver metastases from primary cancers of the gastrointestinal tract were entered on a dose escalating protocol of twice daily hepatic irradiation employing fractions of 1.5 Gy separated by 4 hr or longer. Sequential groups of patients received 27 Gy, 30 Gy, and 33 Gy to the entire liver and were monitored for acute and late toxicities, survival, and cause of death. Dose escalation was implemented following survival of 10 patients at each dose level for a period of 6 months or longer without clinical or biochemical evidence of radiation hepatitis. RESULTS: The use of progressively larger total doses of radiation did not prolong median survival or decrease the frequency with which liver metastases were the cause of death. None of 122 patients entered at the 27 Gy and 30 Gy dose levels revealed clinical or biochemical evidence of radiation induced liver injury. Five of 51 patients entered at the 33 Gy level revealed clinical or biochemical evidence of late liver injury with an actuarial risk of severe (Grade 3) radiation hepatitis of 10.0% (+/- 7.3% S.E.) at 6 months, resulting in closure of the study to patient entry. CONCLUSION: The study design could not credibly establish a safe dose for hepatic irradiation, however, it did succeed in determining that 33 Gy in fractions of 1.5 Gy is unsafe, carrying a substantial risk of delayed radiation injury. The absence of apparent late liver injury at the 27 Gy and 30 Gy dose levels suggests that a prior clinical trial of adjuvant hepatic irradiation in patients with resected colon cancer may have employed an insufficient radiation dose (21 Gy) to fully test the question.

High dose para-aortic lymph node irradiation for gynecologic cancer: technique, toxicity, and results.

A technique for high dose (5600-6100 cGy) extended field irradiation to the para-aortic lymph nodes is described. Fourteen patients have been treated with this technique, of whom 10 have had histologic confirmation of para-aortic node metastases. With follow-up ranging from 11 to 78 months, 7 of 14 patients are alive and clinically cancer-free. Acute effects of extended field treatment on patient weight and circulating blood counts are analyzed, and late treatment morbidity assessed. The findings suggest that such treatment, executed with modern equipment and appropriate technique, is not significantly more hazardous than pelvic irradiation, and can result in a substantial probability of disease-free survival.

Anal sphincter conservation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal rectum: long-term results of radiation therapy oncology group protocol 89-02.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcome of a multi-institutional, national cooperative group study attempting functional preservation of the anorectum for patients with limited, distal rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between September 21, 1989 and November 1, 1992, a Phase II trial of sphincter-sparing therapy was conducted for patients with clinically mobile rectal cancers located below the pelvic peritoneal reflection. Protocol treatment was designed for patients who were, in the judgement of their attending surgeon, unsuitable for anal sphincter conservation in the context of anterior resection, and would have required abdominoperineal resection (APR) as conventional surgical therapy. Primary cancers were estimated to be 4 cm or less in largest clinical diameter, and occupied 40% or less of the rectal circumference. Chest radiography and computerized axial tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis excluded patients with overt lymphatic or hematogenous metastases. Protocol surgery was intended to remove the primary cancer by en-bloc, transmural excision of an ellipse of rectal wall by transanal, transcoccygeal, or trans-sacral technique, while conserving the anal sphincter. Based on tumor size, T classification, grade, and adequacy of surgical margins, patients were allocated to one of three treatment assignments: observation, or adjuvant treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and one of two different dose levels of local-regional radiation. After completion of protocol therapy, patients were observed with follow-up that included periodic general physical and rectal examination, determinations of CEA, abdominopelvic CT, chest radiography, and surveillance endoscopy. Sixty-five eligible and analyzable patients were registered. RESULTS: With minimum follow-up of 5 years and median follow-up of 6.1 years, 11 patients have failed: 3 patients recurred local-regionally only, 3 patients had distant failure alone, and 5 patients manifested local-regional and distant failure. Eight patients died of intercurrent illness. Local-regional failure correlated with T-category revealed: T1 1/27 (4%), T2 4/25 (16%), and T3 3/13 (23%). Local-regional failure escalated with percentage involvement of the rectal circumference: 2/31 (6%) among patients with cancers involving 20% or less of the rectal circumference, and 6/34 (18%) among patients with cancers involving 21-40% of the circumference. Distant dissemination rose with T-category with 1/27 (4%) T1, 3/25 (12%) T2, and 4/13 (31%) T3 patients manifesting hematogenous spread. Eight patients (12%) required temporary or permanent colostomy. Five of 8 patients with local-regional recurrence achieved local-regional control with management including surgery, although 4 of these patients subsequently developed distant dissemination. Three patients (5%) had persistent, uncontrolled, local disease. Actuarial freedom from pelvic relapse at 5 years is 88% based on the entire study population, and 86% for the less favorable patients treated with adjuvant radiation and 5-FU. CONCLUSION: Conservative, sphincter-sparing therapy is a feasible alternative treatment for selected patients with limited cancer involving the middle and lower rectum. Risk of both local and distant failure appears to escalate with increasing T-category (depth of invasion). Results achieved in the multi-institutional, cooperative group setting approximate results reported from single institutions.

Trends in the use of radiation and chemotherapy in the initial management of patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

PURPOSE: The Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons conducts Patient Care Evaluation studies to describe practice patterns and trends in disease management. This report surveys changing strategies in the initial treatment of patients with invasive cancer of the uterine cervix. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using a standard data collection form designed by a multidisciplinary committee of specialists, cancer registrars at 703 hospitals submitted anonymous data on 11,721 total cervical cancer patients diagnosed in 1984 and 1990. RESULTS: Between the two study years, the use of radiation as all, or a component, of the initial course of therapy declined from 70 to 60.3%, coincident with a 32.3% increase in the use of hysterectomy alone and a 33.7% reduction in the use of radiation alone. The percentage of all patients receiving combined hysterectomy and radiation (preoperative or postoperative) remained virtually unchanged--10.2% in 1984, and 9.3% in 1990. However, women who were treated by hysterectomy in 1990 were less likely to receive radiation as part of their treatment than patients treated by hysterectomy in 1984. Among patients treated by radiation without hysterectomy, the use of intracavitary brachytherapy techniques substantially exceeded interstitial brachytherapy techniques in both study years. Among patients treated by local radiation without hysterectomy, the frequency of adjunctive chemotherapy use increased from 6.9% in 1984 to 24.8% in 1990, with chemotherapy and radiation increasingly administered concurrently rather than sequentially. Although differences based on age, histology, race/ethnicity, and insurance status were observed, these general management trends were seen in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in the utilization of radiation and surgery may reflect the increasing surgical involvement of gynecologic oncologists in the management of early stage cervical cancer, rather than significant alterations in the demographics of the disease. Although brachytherapy is recognized as an important component of radiation treatment, some patients may not receive the potential benefit of this modality. Despite controversy concerning its efficacy, the use of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy to supplement local treatment modalities appears to be increasing rapidly.

Adjuvant postoperative pelvic radiation for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: pattern of cancer recurrence in patients undergoing elective radiation following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Thirty-seven patients with invasive cervical cancer have been referred to the Department of Radiation Oncology at the University of Washington following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Patients at high-risk for tumor recurrence were selected for adjuvant pelvic irradiation because of adverse risk factors identified on pathological study of the hysterectomy specimen. All patients were treated because of possible residual, microscopic carcinoma. Fourteen patients (38%) developed recurrent cancer, of whom 10 (27%) manifested initial failure within the irradiated volume. Possible explanations for this observation are discussed.

Combined 5-fluorouracil and irradiation for transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.

Thirty-four patients have completed treatment on a bladder-preservation protocol using primary irradiation combined with infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). 4,000 cGy pelvic irradiation was delivered in 5 weeks, with 1,000 mg/m2/day of 5-FU administered as a 96 hr infusion on days 1-4 of week 1 and 4. After a 3-week rest period, patients eligible for cystectomy underwent cystoscopy and biopsy. Those with residual tumor underwent cystectomy, and those without tumor received an additional cycle of chemotherapy and irradiation. Patients ineligible for cystectomy for reasons medical, surgical, or refusal received a third cycle without the 4-week delay or re-evaluation. With a median follow-up of 18 months (range 2-45 months), and with 25/34 patients having T3 (16) or T4 (9) tumors, 17 patients are NED, 4 have died of intercurrent deaths, 7 have died with bladder cancer, and 6 are alive with tumor (2 confined to the bladder). The actuarial cancer-specific survival for the entire group of patients is 64% (+/- 12%) at 45 months, with a freedom from relapse of invasive cancer of 54% (+/- 10%). Twenty-four of the 34 patients retained intact bladders, with 20/24 reporting entirely normal voiding. Of 18 potential surgical candidates, 13/16 (81%) who underwent pathologic re-staging after 2 cycles of chemoradiotherapy had no histologic evidence of residual cancer. Of these 13 patients, 8 remain NED and 2/13 have locally recurrent non-invasive tumors only. Treatment was well-tolerated, with 28/34 patients having received 100% of the planned 5-FU and 34/34 having received greater than 80%. This regimen appears more successful than radiotherapy alone in achieving complete tumor responses, and is an attractive alternative for patients who are unable to receive more aggressive chemotherapy/radiation combinations.

Interruptions of high-dose radiation therapy decrease long-term survival of favorable patients with unresectable non-small cell carcinoma of the lung: analysis of 1244 cases from 3 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials.

PURPOSE: To determine if prolonged treatment time adversely affects survival for patients with inoperable non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients enrolled on three randomized studies (RTOG 8311, 8321, 8403) between 1983-1989 formed the database. Previous analyses found that the addition of thymosin (8321) or prophylactic cranial irradiation (8403) failed to prolong survival: both studies used thoracic irradiation with standard fractionation to 55-60 Gy in 30 fractions. In 8311, patients were treated by hyperfractionated radiation therapy to randomly assigned total doses of 60.0 Gy, 64.8 Gy, 69.6 Gy, 74.4 Gy or 79.2 Gy, 1.2 Gy twice daily, 5 days per week. Patients analyzed received +/- 4% of the assigned total dose and lived > 90 days (to ensure that all patients would have completed treatment). Completion < 5 days beyond protocol specifications was classified as "per protocol." Elapsed treatment time exceeding specifications by 5-9 days was a minor deviation, 10-13 days was a major deviation-acceptable, and > or = 14 days was a major deviation-unacceptable. Absolute survival was the endpoint to evaluate the effect of delays. The log rank statistic was used to test for survival differences in the univariate setting, the Cox regression model was used in the multivariate setting. RESULTS: Of 293 patients treated with standard fractionation, eight (2.7%) had deviations from the specified treatment time (six minor, two major-acceptable). With hyperfractionation, 90 (15%) patients had deviations (40 minor, 21 major-acceptable, 29 major-unacceptable). As the assigned dose increased, the deviation rate increased (9.7% for 60.0 Gy vs. 20.8% for 79.2 Gy). Survivals for hyperfractionation patients with any deviations in treatment time were significantly shorter than those treated "per protocol" (p = 0.16): estimated 2- and 5-years rates were 24% and 10% versus 13% and 3%, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed the delay effect to be entirely in patients treated with 69.6 Gy or higher; there was also dependence upon the patients' prognosis. In patients with favorable prognosis (KPS 90-100, weight loss < or = 5%, no N3), the difference in survival was pronounced (33% and 15% vs. 14% and 0% at 2- and 5-years, respectively). Such differences were not found in patients with unfavorable prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Interruptions delaying completion of planned radiation therapy were more frequent with higher total doses (> or = 69.6 Gy). Favorable patients (high KPS, little weight loss, < N3 nodal metastasis) had markedly adverse effects on long-term survival associated with delays to completion of the planned total dose.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation for lung cancer patients at high risk for development of cerebral metastasis: results of a prospective randomized trial conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

Beginning in February 1984, 187 evaluable patients with adenocarcinoma or large cell carcinoma of the lung clinically confined to the chest were randomized to receive either conventionally fractionated thoracic irradiation alone or thoracic irradiation with concurrent, prophylactic cranial irradiation. The study population included 161 patients treated for medically or surgically inoperable primary cancers, and 26 patients undergoing adjuvant postoperative mediastinal irradiation following attempted curative resection of primary cancers found to have metastasized to hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes. Elective brain irradiation was not effective in preventing the clinical appearance of brain metastases, although the time to develop brain metastases appears to have been delayed. Eighteen of 94 patients (19%) randomized to chest irradiation alone have developed brain metastases as opposed to 8/93 patients (9%) randomized to receive prophylactic cranial irradiation (p = .10). No survival difference was observed between the treatment arms. Among the 26 patients undergoing prior resection of all gross intrathoracic disease, brain metastases were observed in 3/12 patients (25%) receiving adjuvant chest irradiation alone, compared to none of 14 receiving prophylactic cranial irradiation (p = .06). In the absence of fully reliable therapy for the primary disease, and without effective systemic therapy preventing dissemination to other, extrathoracic sites, prophylactic cranial irradiation for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer cannot be justified in routine clinical practice. Further investigation in the adjuvant, postoperative setting may be warranted.

Adenocarcinoma of the cecum: natural history and clinical patterns of recurrence following radical surgery.

One hundred and forty-three patients with previously untreated primary adenocarcinomas of the cecum were analyzed. Fifty-three patients manifesting disseminated disease at diagnosis were analyzed to define mechanisms of disease spread. Ninety patients were analyzed following attempted curative resection to determine anatomical distribution of initial clinical recurrences. Twenty-eight patients recurred (31%), of whom 9 underwent a second laparotomy. Nineteen of the 28 patients who recurred (68%) demonstrated an initial pattern of relapse clinically confined to the abdomen, liver, and retroperitoneum. Analysis was performed to determine the influence of stage and grade of the primary tumor on prognosis. Implications for adjuvant therapy are discussed.

Adenocarcinoma of the retroperitoneal ascending and descending colon: sites of initial dissemination and clinical patterns of recurrence following surgery alone.

One hundred twenty-seven patients with previously untreated primary carcinomas of proximal, retroperitoneal large bowel were retrospectively analyzed. Sites of involvement in 33 patients with surgically incurable (disseminated) disease were analyzed to define patterns of initial spread. Ninety-four patients were analyzed following attempted curative resection to determine anatomical distribution of initial clinical recurrences. Thirty-one patients recurred (33%). Twenty-four of these patients (77.5%) demonstrated an initial pattern of relapse clinically confined to the abdomen and retroperitoneum. Analysis was performed to identify factors of prognostic significance. Implications for adjuvant therapy are discussed.

Failure patterns by prognostic group determined by recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of 1547 patients on four radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) studies in inoperable nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PURPOSE: To identify groups of patients who might benefit from more aggressive systemic or local treatment, based on failure patterns when unresectable NSCLC was treated by radiation therapy (RT) alone. METHODS: From 4 RTOG trials, 1547 patients treated by RT alone were analyzed for patterns of first failure by RPA class defined by prognostic factors, including KPS, weight loss, nodal stage, pleural effusion, age and radiation therapy dose. All patients had NSCLC AJCC Stage II, IIIA, or IIIB, KPS > 50, with no previous RT or chemotherapy. Progressions in the primary (within irradiated fields), thorax (outside irradiated area, but within thorax), brain and distant metastasis other than brain were compared (2-sided) for each failure category by RPA. RESULTS: The RPA classes were 4 distinct subgroups that had significantly different median survivals of 12.6, 8.3, 6.3 and 3.3 months for Classes I, II, III and IV, respectively, (all groups, p = 0.0002). There were 583, 667, 249 and 48 patients in Classes I, II, III and IV, respectively. Primary failure was seen in 27%, 25%, 21% and 10% for Classes I, II, III, and IV, respectively (I vs. IV, p = 0.014; II vs. IV, p = 0.022). Distant metastasis, including brain metastasis, occurred at significantly higher rates among Classes I and II (58% and 54%) than in Classes III and IV (42% and 27%). A higher rate (58%) of death without an identifiable site of failure was found in Class IV than in Classes I, II and III (27%, 28% and 36%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that physiologic compromise from the intrathoracic disease in Class IV patients is sufficient to cause death before specific sites of failure became evident. Clinical investigations using treatments directed at specific sites of failure could lead to improved outcome for Class I, II and, possibly, Class III patients. Inclusion of Class IV patients in clinical trials may obscure outcomes.