Frontline Treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Despite many recent therapeutic advances, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) remains a largely incurable disease. Treatments for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease are limited in number and in response durability. Therefore, improving the efficacy of frontline (1L) treatment, and specifically maximizing the duration of first remission, remains of critical importance to obtain favorable long-term outcomes. As 1L treatments become more effective, improving tolerability is also becoming an increasingly realistic goal. Targeted agents, which are now mainstays of treatment in R/R MCL, are establishing new, paradigm-changing roles in frontline treatment. Here, we review data supporting current standard-of-care (SOC) approaches and explore six main areas of possible focus for advancement of 1L management: optimizing the chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) backbone, adding targeted agents to CIT, redefining the role of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), improving maintenance therapy, using targeted agent combinations with omission of CIT, and employing MRD-guided therapy. We highlight several ongoing phase 3 trials that may soon impact frontline MCL management and outline some areas of necessary investigation as the field continues to strive towards a cure for this disease.

Dismantling relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma.

Despite recent therapeutic advancements in the general field of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, effective treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) remains a challenge. The development of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors has revolutionized the field and these agents are now the mainstay of R/R MCL management. However, BTK inhibitors are not curative, and as they are increasingly being incorporated into frontline regimens, the shifting treatment landscape for R/R disease presents new challenges. Here we review data for commonly employed treatment strategies including BTK inhibitors, the BCL2-inhibitor venetoclax, lenalidomide-based regimens, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. We additionally review data for promising novel agents including antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies before highlighting some emerging targeted agents that continue to bring promise for improved outcomes in R/R MCL.

Effective sequencing of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in the treatment of LBCL in 2023.

Over the last decade, CD19-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has profoundly changed the management of relapsed/refractory large-B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). At present, there are three FDA-approved anti-CD19 CAR T-cell products for LBCL: axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel). Two of these (axi-cel & liso-cel) are approved for use in the second-line setting under certain conditions. As CAR T-cell therapy continues to define a new role in the treatment armamentarium for LBCL, questions remain regarding which product to use and how to sequence CAR T-cell therapy with other therapeutic options. Here we will briefly review the key features of each FDA-approved anti-CD19 CAR T-cell product and the data that led to regulatory approval for each. Next, we will focus on the recent landmark studies that have established the use of CAR T-cell therapy as second-line treatment. While no direct prospective head-to-head comparisons exist of the 3 constructs, we will review some retrospective studies that suggest some emerging differences between the products. Lastly, we will turn our attention to the horizon as we explore some of the ongoing questions of how to best leverage the curative potential of CAR T-cell therapy for the most effective management of LBCL. These areas include the consideration of CAR T-cell therapy in the frontline setting, the optimal timing for CAR T-cell referral, the optimal bridging approach, and how to continue advancing novel CAR T-cell approaches in the context of the current treatment landscape.