Pre-procedural abnormal function of von Willebrand Factor is predictive of bleeding after surgical but not transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Both transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) have been proven to effectively correct von Willebrand Factor (vWF) pathologies, however there is limited data simultaneously comparing outcomes of both approaches. We prospectively enrolled patients with severe aortic stenosis referred for TAVI (n = 52) or SAVR (n = 48). In each case, vWF antigen (vWF:Ag), vWF activity (vWF:Ac) and activity-to-antigen (vWF:Ac/Ag) ratio were assessed at baseline, 24 h and 72 h after procedure. VWF abnormalities were defined as reduced vWF:Ac/Ag ratio (< 0.8). Bleeding events in both arms were classified according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) definitions. Overall, there was no difference between patients referred for TAVI and SAVR in vWF:Ac (1.62 ± 0.52 vs 1.71 ± 0.64; p = 0.593), vWF:Ag (1.99 ± 0.81 vs 2.04 ± 0.81; p = 0.942) or vWF:Ac/Ag ratio (0.84 ± 0.16 vs 0.85 ± 0.12; p = 0.950). Pathological vWF:Ac/Ag ratio was found in 20 (38%) TAVI and 15 (31%) SAVR patients (p = 0.407). Normalization of vWF:Ac/Ag ratio at day 3 after procedure was achieved in 19 (95%) TAVI and 13 (87%) SAVR patients (p = 0.439). Similar prevalence of major or life-threatening bleedings (MLTB) after TAVI and SAVR in entire groups was observed (19% vs. 23%, p = 0.652). VWF abnormalities were associated with higher incidence of MLTB in SAVR (53% vs 9%, p < 0.001), but not TAVI (15% vs. 22%, p = 0.132). Accordingly, in receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis vWF:Ac/Ag ratio < 0.8 showed significant sensitivity and specificity for predicting MLTB in SAVR group (AUC 0.735, 95% CI 0.538-0.931, p = 0.019). We proved that abnormal function of vWF is corrected successfully after both TAVI and SAVR, but vWF abnormalities are predictive of MLTB only in surgical patients.

Guided de-escalation of DAPT in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with BVS implantation: a post-hoc analysis from the randomized TROPICAL-ACS trial.

To investigate the safety and efficacy of an early platelet function testing (PFT)-guided de-escalation of dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS). Early DAPT de-escalation is a new non-inferior alternative to 12-months DAPT in patients with biomarker positive ACS treated with stent implantation. In this post-hoc analysis of the TROPICAL-ACS trial, which randomized 2610 ACS patients to a PFT-guided DAPT de-escalation (switch from prasugrel to clopidogrel) or to control group (uniform prasugrel), we compared clinical outcomes of patients (n = 151) who received a BVS during the index PCI. The frequency of the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or BARC ≥ 2 bleeding) was 8.8% (n = 6) in the de-escalation group vs. 12.0% (n = 10) in the control group (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.26-1.98, p = 0.52) at 12 months. One early definite stent thrombosis (ST) occurred in the control group (day 19) and 1 possible ST (sudden cardiovascular death) in the de-escalation group (day 86), both despite prasugrel treatment and in a background of high on-treatment platelet reactivity assessed at day 14 after randomization (ADP-induced platelet aggregation values of 108 U and 59 U, respectively). A PFT-guided DAPT de-escalation strategy could potentially be a safe and effective strategy in ACS patients with BVS implantation but the level of platelet inhibition may be of particular importance. This hypothesis-generating post-hoc analysis requires verification in larger studies with upcoming BVS platforms.

Different types of endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Infective endocarditis (IE) may take different faces in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to describe echocardiographic and clinical characteristics of TAVI's patients suffered from IE. METHODS: In a single-center, retrospective study we analyzed 311 consecutive patients treated with TAVI for severe aortic stenosis between 2010 and 2018. RESULTS: According to modified Duke criteria, we confirmed IE in 2.2% of the cohort, however PVE of TAVI's valve in 1.2% only; rest of the group suffered from CDRiE and IE of the mitral valve. In PVE's group vegetations were localized inside the frame with or without bioprosthesis moderate stenosis or regurgitation. Only 1 pts developed significant TAVI's bioprosthesis' paravalvular leak. We observed no native aortic anulus involvement. Mortality rate in the PVE-TAVI's group was 75% regardless of the type of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The above findings show that IE following TAVI is a serious complication and various scenarios (also CDRiE and native valve IE) should be considered.

Concomitant coronary artery disease and its management in patients referred to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights from the POL-TAVI Registry.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) and degenerative aortic stenosis often coexist. However, the impact of CAD and its management on the prognosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains uncertain. We sought to evaluate the impact of obstructive CAD, SYNTAX score (Ss), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) prior to TAVI on short-term outcome. METHODS: Overall, 896 patients who underwent TAVI after heart team decision was included. Pre-procedural angiograms were analysed to calculate baseline Ss (bSs) and residual Ss (rSs). Baseline, procedural and follow-up data up to 30 days was acquired from the national POL-TAVI registry. RESULTS: Patients with obstructive CAD at baseline (n = 462, 52%) had higher mortality as compared with the remaining (8.7 vs. 5.1%, log-rank P = 0.039). Also, after correction for confounding factors obstructive CAD was identified as independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.74, 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 1.03-2.94, P = 0.037). In obstructive CAD, neither bSs (AUC 0.47, CI 0.38-0.56, P = 0.47) nor rSs (AUC 0.47, CI 0.30-0.64, P = 0.72 for those undergoing PCI and AUC 0.48, CI 0.37-0.59, P = 0.75 for the remaining) was predictive of mortality. When revascularization status was considered, patients with PCI prior to TAVI had similar outcome as those without obstructive CAD at baseline (7.7 vs. 5.1%, log-rank P = 0.23) with no negative impact on mortality (HR 1.13, CI 0.62-2.09, P = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, obstructive CAD at baseline evaluation for TAVI has independent negative impact on short-term prognosis. However, neither baseline nor residual Ss values have prognostic ability in patients undergoing TAVI. Revascularization prior to TAVI seems to improve survival to levels comparable with patients without obstructive CAD at baseline.

Percutaneous Closure of Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Defects-An Over Decade-long Experience.

OBJECTIVES: To report an over decade-long experience with percutaneous post-infarction ventricular septal defect (PIVSD) closure. BACKGROUND: PIVSDs remains a major clinical challenge with extremely high mortality. Data concerning interventional closure of PIVSD is scarce. METHODS: All percutaneous PIVSD closures performed between 2003 and 2016 in 8 participating centres were identified. Data concerning patients and procedures was acquired. Patients were divided into two groups, based on the time interval between VSD diagnosis and closure (≤14 days-acute phase, >14 days-non-acute phase). RESULTS: Twenty-one percutaneous PIVSD closures were performed on 20 patients (9 females, mean age: 70 years). Mean interval between the diagnosis and the procedure was 182.6 ± 500 days (range: 7-2228). Defects were mostly located in apical (55%) segments of the septum. In 7 cases (33%) the procedure was performed in the acute phase. The closure was technically successful in 17 cases (81%). Four patients died within 48 hours after the procedure. 30-days survival rate of the entire cohort was 70%. Univariate analysis revealed impact of technical success of the procedure (HR 0.13, CI 0.03-0.68 P = 0.016) and white blood cell count (HR 1.36 per unit increase, CI 1.1-1.69, P = 0.005) on 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In a selected population of patients percutaneous PIVSD closure is feasible and provides satisfactory survival rate. Procedural success has a protective impact on survival. Timing of the closure remains controversial. Procedure in the non-acute phase carries lower mortality, but at the same time introduces a selection bias. Larger registry-based studies are required.

Incidence, Predictors and Impact of Severe Periprocedural Bleeding According to VARC-2 Criteria on 1-Year Clinical Outcomes in Patients After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

There are differences in reporting bleeding complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), which is a consequence of the lack of consensus for their definition. Furthermore, the amount of data on the impact of peri-procedural bleeding on the mid-term prognosis is still limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, predictors, and impact of life-threatening and major bleedings as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 (VARC-2) in patients after TAVI over the mid-term prognosis.Consecutive patients who underwent TAVI from March 2010 to December 2013 were included. All data were classified according to the VARC-2 criteria. We assessed the incidence and the predictors of serious bleeding events (SBE), defined as life-threatening/disabling (LT/D) or major bleeding, and analyzed their impact on 30-day and 1-year clinical outcome.A total of 129 patients were included (79.1 ± 8.3 years; mean EuroSCORE = 17.8 ± 12.7). The SBE occurred in 25 patients (19.4%), of which 9 (7.0%) had LT/D and 16 (12.4%) had major bleeding. Trans-subclavian (TS) access (OR 4.38, 95% CI 2.13-14.29, P = 0.01) and diabetes (OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.08-7.93, P = 0.03) were identified as independent predictors of SBE. Patients with SBE had higher 30-day mortality (20.0% versus 4.0% P = 0.02) and 1-year mortality (40.0% versus 11.1%, P < 0.002). SBE independently predicted 1-year, all-cause mortality (HR 5.88, 95% CI 1.7319,94, P = 0.005).SBE are frequent after TAVI and are associated with decreased short and mid-term survival. Diabetes and TS access are independent risk factors for SBE.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Bicuspid aortic valve stenosis is regarded as a relative contraindication for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) according to current guidelines, as patients with bicuspid anatomy (BiAV) were excluded from landmark clinical trials.In this review, we will discuss the feasibilty, safety and outcomes of TAVR in BiAV, based upon the current literature and our own experience. RECENT FINDINGS: The currently available data come from observational registries with low sample size, and only in a few were the results of TAVR in BiAV compared with those achieved in the cohort with tricuspid anatomy. TAVR proved to be technically feasible in selected BiAV patients, and the mid-term clinical outcomes are acceptable. Nevertheless, there are still some unresolved issues, such as long-term valve durability and the relatively high rate of paravalvular leakage. SUMMARY: The existing literature supports the use of TAVR in selected high-risk BiAV patients, although the final role of this technique in this cohort of patients can only be established once a larger, preferably randomized, study comparing TAVR with surgery is performed.

Extracellular Vesicles to Predict Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation - a Prospective, Multicenter Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment for aortic stenosis (AS) in patients at intermediate and high surgical risk. Circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanoparticles involved in cardiovascular diseases. We aimed to (i) determine the effect of TAVI on plasma concentrations of five EV subtypes and (ii) evaluate the predictive value of EVs for post-TAVI outcomes. METHODS: Blood samples were collected 1 day before TAVI and at hospital discharge. Concentrations of EVs were evaluated using flow cytometry. RESULTS: Concentration of leukocytes EVs decreased after TAVI, compared to the measurement before (p = 0.008). Among 123 patients discharged from the hospital, 19.5% experienced MACCE during the median of 10.3 months. Increased pre-TAVI concentration of phosphatidylserine-exposing EVs was an independent predictor of MACCE in multivariable analysis (OR 5.313, 95% CI 1.164-24.258, p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with increased pre-TAVI concentration of procoagulant, PS-exposing EVs have over fivefold higher odds of adverse outcomes.

Impact of previous coronary artery revascularization on outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Introduction: Coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) raises questions regarding the safety and efficacy of TAVI in this subset of patients. Aim: To evaluate the impact of previous coronary revascularization in terms of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on clinical outcomes after TAVI. Material and methods: A total of 507 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI were divided into: non-revascularization (NR), post-PCI and post-CABG groups. The endpoints were established according to VARC-2 definitions. Results: Patients with previous coronary revascularization (36.7% of the population) were younger, more often male and their EuroSCORE II risk evaluation was significantly higher (NR 7.9% vs. post-PCI 8.0% vs. post-CABG 20.5%, p < 0.0001). Patients after PCI or CABG prior to TAVI had similar 30-day all-cause mortality rates as those without coronary revascularization at baseline (NR vs. post-PCI vs. post-CABG: 8.1% vs. 5.5% vs. 6.8%, respectively; p = 0.6). There were no differences in 12-month all-cause mortality rates between groups (NR vs. post-PCI vs. post-CABG: 15.3% vs. 14.2% vs. 16.9%, respectively; log-rank p = 0.67). In the Cox proportional-hazards regression model, acute kidney injury stage 2-3 (HR = 3.7, 95% CI: 2.14-6.33; p < 0.001) and post-TAVI stroke (HR = 3.5, 95% CI: 1.57-7.8; p = 0.002) were independently correlated with 1-year mortality. Conclusions: TAVI seems to be a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of severe AS in patients with previous coronary revascularization.

Nationwide experience with transcarotid transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights from the POL-CAROTID registry.

BACKGROUND: The carotid artery is an alternative access route for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), especially useful in patients unsuitable for traditional access routes including transfemoral (TF), subclavian, transapical, and aortic. AIMS: To investigate the feasibility and safety of transcarotid (TC) access for TAVI in comparison to the TF approach in a multicenter setting. METHODS: A total of 41 patients, treated between December 2014 and December 2018, were retrospectively reported to the Polish Registry of Common Carotid Artery Access for TAVI (POL-CAROTID). The median follow-up time was 619 (365-944) days, and Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) definitions were applied. Clinical outcomes were compared with 41 propensity-matched TF-TAVI patients. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation [SD]) patients' age was 78.0 (7.2) years, and 29 patients (70.7%) were men. Prohibitive iliofemoral anatomy and/or obesity (46.3%) and/or the presence of a stent graft in the abdominal aorta (31.7%) were the most common indications for TC-TAVI. Device success for TC-TAVI was comparable with the matched TF-TAVI group (90.2% vs. 95.3%, respectively, P = 0.396), and no periprocedural mortality was observed. Moreover, early safety was similar between the two groups (92.7% vs. 95.3%, respectively, log-rank P = 0.658) with only 1 case of non-disabling stroke during the first month after TC-TAVI. Consequently, no cerebrovascular events were observed in the mid-term, and the clinical efficacy of TC-TAVI corresponded well with TF-TAVI (90.2% vs. 92.7%, respectively, log-rank P = 0.716). A total of 4 (9.8%) deaths were noted in the TC-TAVI cohort in comparison to 3 (7.3%) in the TF-TAVI group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study indicated that the first cohort of Polish patients with implantations of second-generation transcarotid transcatheter heart valves had a similar prognosis to TF-TAVI with regard to safety and feasibility. TC access may be considered an optimal alternative for patients in whom the TF approach is precluded.

Long-term mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis in immunosuppression-treated patients: a propensity-matched multicentre retrospective registry-based analysis.

Introduction: Data regarding patients with a previous medical record of immunosuppression treatment who have undergone transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are limited and extremely inconclusive. Available studies are mostly short term observations; thus there is a lack of evidence on efficacy and safety of TAVI in this specific group of patients. Aim: To compare the in-hospital and long-term outcomes between patients with or without a medical history of immunosuppressive treatment undergoing TAVI for aortic valve stenosis (AS). Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective registry-based analysis including patients undergoing TAVI for AS at 5 centres between January 2009 and August 2017. The primary endpoint was long-term all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints comprised major vascular complications, life-threatening or disabling bleeding, stroke and new pacemaker implantation. Results: Of 1451 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI, two propensity-matched groups including 25 patients with a history of immunosuppression and 75 patients without it were analysed. No differences between groups in all-cause mortality were found in a median follow-up time of 2.7 years following TAVI (p = 0.465; HR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.30-1.77). The rate of major vascular complications (4.0% vs. 5.3%) was similar in the two groups (p = 1.000). There were no statistically significant differences in the composite endpoint combining life-threatening or disabling bleeding, major vascular complications, stroke and new pacemaker implantation (40.0% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.218). Conclusions: Patients who had undergone TAVI for AS had similar long-term mortality regardless of whether they had a previous medical record of immunosuppression. Procedural complication rates were comparable between the groups.

Machine learning for prediction of all-cause mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

AIMS: Prediction of adverse events in mid-term follow-up after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is challenging. We sought to develop and validate a machine learning model for prediction of 1-year all-cause mortality in patients who underwent TAVI and were discharged following the index procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: The model was developed on data of patients who underwent TAVI at a high-volume centre between January 2013 and March 2019. Machine learning by extreme gradient boosting was trained and tested with repeated 10-fold hold-out testing using 34 pre- and 25 peri-procedural clinical variables. External validation was performed on unseen data from two other independent high-volume TAVI centres. Six hundred four patients (43% men, 81 ± 5 years old, EuroSCORE II 4.8 [3.0-6.3]%) in the derivation and 823 patients (46% men, 82 ± 5 years old, EuroSCORE II 4.7 [2.9-6.0]%) in the validation cohort underwent TAVI and were discharged home following the index procedure. Over the 12 months of follow-up, 68 (11%) and 95 (12%) subjects died in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. In external validation, the machine learning model had an area under the receiver-operator curve of 0.82 (0.78-0.87) for prediction of 1-year all-cause mortality following hospital discharge after TAVI, which was superior to pre- and peri-procedural clinical variables including age 0.52 (0.46-0.59) and the EuroSCORE II 0.57 (0.51-0.64), P < 0.001 for a difference. CONCLUSION: Machine learning based on readily available clinical data allows accurate prediction of 1-year all-cause mortality following a successful TAVI.

Valve-in-valve transcatheter transfemoral mitral valve implantation (ViV-TMVI): Characteristics and early results from nationwide registry.

BACKGROUND: Valve-in-valve transcatheter transfemoral mitral valve implantation (ViV-TMVI) is an emerging treatment alternative to reoperation in high surgical risk patients with a failed mitral bioprostheses. AIM: To describe characteristics and evaluate 30-day outcomes of ViV-TMVI in the Polish population. METHODS: Nationwide registry was initiated to collect data of all patients with failed mitral bioprosthesis undergoing ViV-TMVI in Poland. This study presents 30-days clinical and echocardiographic follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 27 ViV-TMVI were performed in 8 centers until May 2022 (85% since 2020). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 73 (11.6) years with the median (interquartile range [IQR]) STS score of 5.3% (4.3%-14.3%). Mean (SD) time between surgical implantation and ViV-TMVI was 8.2 (3.2) years. Failed Hancock II (29%) and Perimount Magna (22%) were most frequently treated. Mechanisms of failure were equally often pure mitral regurgitation or stenosis (both 37%) with mixed etiology in 26%. Balloon-expandable Sapien 3/Ultra were used in all but 1 patient. Technical success was 96.3% (1 patient required additional prosthesis). Mean (SD) transvalvular mitral gradient reached 6.7 (2.2) mm Hg and mitral valve area was 1.8 (0.4) cm². None of the patients had moderate or severe mitral regurgitation with only 14.8% graded as mild. In 92.6% device success (2 patients had mean gradient ≥10 mm Hg) and in 85.6% procedural success was present. There were no deaths, cerebrovascular events or need for mitral valve surgery during 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In short-term observation ViV-TMVI is safe and effective alternative for patients with failed mitral bioprosthesis at high surgical risk of re-operation. Longer observations on larger sample are warranted.

Expression of miR-223 to predict outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment for aortic stenosis (AS) in patients at increased surgical risk. Up to 29% of patients annually experience major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) after TAVI. MicroRNAs (miRNA) are currently widely investigated as novel cardiovascular biomarkers. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of TAVI on the expressions of selected miRNAs associated with platelet function (miR-125a-5p, miR-125b and miR-223), and evaluate the predictive value of these miRNAs for MACCE in 65 patients undergoing TAVI. METHODS: Venous blood samples for miRNA expression analysis were collected 1 day before TAVI and at hospital discharge. The expression of miR-223, miR-125a-5p, miR-125b was evaluated in platelet-depleted plasma. RESULTS: The expression of miR-223 and miR-125b increased after TAVI, compared to the measurement before (p = 0.020, p = 0.003, respectively). Among 63 patients discharged from the hospital, 18 patients experienced MACCE (29%) during the median 15 months of observation. Baseline low miR-223 expression was a predictor of MACCE in univariate Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-7.01; p = 0.041). After inclusion of covariates, age, gender (male), New York Heart Association class and diabetes into the multivariate Cox regression model, miR-223 did not reach statistical significance (HR: 2.56, 95% CI: 0.79-8.33; p = 0.118). CONCLUSIONS: To conclude, miR-223 might improve risk stratification after TAVI. Further studies are required to confirm the clinical applicability of this promising biomarker.

Long-Term Mortality After TAVI for Bicuspid vs. Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis: A Propensity-Matched Multicentre Cohort Study.

Objectives: Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis were excluded from the pivotal trials of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We compared the in-hospital and long-term outcomes between patients undergoing TAVI for bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) stenosis. Methods: We performed a retrospective registry-based analysis on patients who underwent TAVI for BAV and TAV at five different centers between January 2009 and August 2017. The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, procedural complications, and valve performance. Results: Of 1,451 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI, two propensity-matched cohorts consisting of 130 patients with BAV and 390 patients with TAV were analyzed. All-cause mortality was comparable in both groups up to 10 years following TAVI (HR 1.09, 95% CI: 0.77-1.51). Device success and in-hospital mortality were comparable between the groups (96 vs. 95%, p = 0.554 and 2.3 vs. 2.1%, p = 0.863, respectively). Incidence of procedural complications was similar in both groups, with a trend toward a higher rate of stroke in patients with BAV (5 vs. 2%, p = 0.078). Incidence of moderate or severe paravalvular leak (PVL) at discharge was comparable in both groups (2 vs. 2%, p = 0.846). Among patients with BAV, all-cause mortality was similar in self-expanding and balloon-expandable prostheses (HR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.52-1.99) and lower in new-generation devices compared to old-generation valves (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.12-0.62). Conclusion: Patients who had undergone TAVI for BAV had comparable mortality to patients with TAV up to 10 years after the procedure. The device success, in-hospital mortality, procedural complications, and PVL rate were comparable between the groups. The high rate of neurological complications (5%) in patients with BAV warrants further investigation.

Transcatheter aortic valve­in­valve implantation for failed surgical bioprostheses: results from the Polish Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Implantation (ViV­TAVI) Registry

INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter aortic valve­in ­valve implantation (ViV­TAVI) has emerged as an alternative to redo surgery in patients with failed surgical aortic bioprosthesis. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ViV­TAVI in Polish patients after surgical aortic valve replacement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a nationwide multicenter registry of ViV­TAVI procedures. Data were collected using an online form, and the clinical follow ­up lasted 1 year. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2020, 130 ViV­TAVI procedures were performed (1.9% of all transcatheter aortic valve implantation [TAVI] cases). A considerable increase in ViV­TAVI procedures since 2018 has been observed (n = 59, 45% of ViV­TAVI cases). Hancock II, Freestyle, and homograft were the most frequently treated bioprostheses. The self ­expanding supra ­annular Corevalve / Evolut valve was used in 76% of cases. In 21% of cases, the mean postprocedural pressure gradient (PG) exceeded 20 mm Hg. All­cause mortal­ity at 1 year was 10.8%. Aortic valve stenosis was associated with a higher mean PG than aortic valve regurgitation or mixed disease (P = 0.004). Supra ­annular transcatheter aortic valves were associated with lower mean PGs than intra ­annular valves (P = 0.004). Second ­generation devices were associated with shorter procedure time (120 min vs 135 min, P = 0.04), less frequent need for additional TAVI (2% vs 10%, P = 0.04), and lower 1­year cardiovascular mortality (95% vs 82.8%, P = 0.03) than first­generation valves. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter treatment of failed bioprostheses is increasingly common, with the best hemodynamic effect shown for supra ­annular valves. The introduction of second­generation valves has improved procedural and clinical outcomes.

Ten-year experience with transcatheter aortic valve implantation in bicuspid aortic valve: lessons learned and future perspectives.

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis has traditionally been perceived as a contraindication to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to its specific anatomical characteristics including extensive calcifications, high leaflet coaptation and frequently encountered aortic root dilation, which may result in worse procedural outcomes and higher risk of complications. Hence, BAV patients were not included in previous clinical trials. In the recent years, improved pre-procedural imaging and technological advances have gradually enabled expansion of TAVI to patients with complex anatomy, including those with BAV. Moreover, indications for TAVI are expanding to a younger group of patients with fewer comorbidities, and BAV is more prevalent in this population. Contemporary multicenter registry-based studies indicate that patients undergoing TAVI for BAV have similar outcomes as those with tricuspid aortic valve stenosis. In this article, we provide a thorough overview of the available clinical data regarding the outcomes of TAVI in BAV, from the perspective of an experienced TAVI center with over 150 TAVIs in this group of patients, performed in our institution since the year 2009. We present anatomical and clinical classifications of BAV, differences in outcomes in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid valves, as well as important topics regarding choice of an adequate valve and valve size.

Impact of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on coexistent mitral regurgitation parameters.

BACKGROUND: Data on the impact of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) on coexisting mitral regurgitation (MR) are still inconsistent. AIMS: The study aimed to evaluate the impact of TAVI on coexistent MR depending on its etiology. METHODS: Out of 311 patients treated with TAVI, we selected 48 with coexistent MR: functional (FMR; n = 26) or nonfunctional (nFMR; n = 22). The impact of the procedure on MR was quantitatively assessed during a 1­year follow­up using MR effective regurgitant orifice area (MR­EROA) and volume (MRV). RESULTS: Compared with baseline, no change of MR­EROA was observed at 1­year follow­up in all patients with MR (median [interquartile range (IQR)], 0.2 [0.17-0.23]cm2 vs 0.17 [0.14-0.2]cm2 ; P = 0.054). No change in MR­EROA was also noted either in FMR (median [IQR], 0.21 [0.17-0.27]cm2 vs 0.19 [0.14-0.25]cm2 ; P = 0.142) or nFMR (median [IQR], 0.17 [0.12-0.23] cm2 vs 0.17 [0.1-0.2] cm2 ; P = 0.238) cohorts. Decreased MRV was seen in theoverall MR population after TAVI (median [IQR], 32 [28-36]ml/beat vs 26 [22-28]ml/beat; P = 0.002). Similarly, decreased MRV was noted in both FMR (median [IQR], 33 [26-42] ml/beat vs 26 [20-40] ml/beat; P = 0.042) and nFMR (median [IQR], 30 [20-46] ml/beat vs 24 [15-33] ml/beat; P = 0.015) cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation had no impact on MR­EROA regardless of the etiology of regurgitation. However, the procedure reduced MRV in both FMR and nFMR.

Protamine sulfate during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (PS TAVI) - a single-center, single-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) negatively affect the post-procedural prognosis. Routine use of protamine sulfate (PS) to reverse unfractionated heparin after TAVI was never assessed in a randomized controlled trial. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of PS on bleeding complications after TAVI. METHODS: Between December 2016 and July 2020 311 patients qualified to TAVI in one academic center were screened. Patients that met the inclusion criteria were randomized to either PS or normal saline administration at the moment of optimal valve deployment. Baseline, procedural, and follow-up data for up to 30 days were collected and analyzed. The primary endpoint (PE) was a composite of life-threatening and major bleeding according to Valve Academic Research Consortium within 48 hours after the procedure. RESULTS: Overall, 100 patients (48 males, median age 82 years) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Forty-seven subjects (47%) were randomized to PS. The primary endpoint occurred in 29% of the study population. Despite numerically lower rates of PE in patients randomized to PS, a statistical significance was not reached (21% in the PS group and 36% in the placebo group; odds ratio [OR], 0.48; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.2-1.2; P = 0.11). There were no significant differences in secondary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Routine protamine sulfate administration did not significantly decrease the rate of major and life-threatening bleeding complications after TAVI. Larger studies are required to assess the impact of routine PS use.

Temporal trends of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a high-volume academic center over 10 years.

BACKGROUND: Indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have gradually expanded since its introduction. AIMS: The aim was to analyze temporal trends in TAVI characteristics based on the experience of a high-volume academic center over the period of 10 years. METHODS: Five hundred and six consecutive (n = 506) patients with 1-year follow-up were divided into early (G1, years 2010-2013, n = 130), intermediate (G2, 2014-2016, n = 164) and recent (G3, 2017-2019, n = 212) experience groups. RESULTS: Patient's age remained constant over time (mean [SD]; G1 = 79.1 [7.1] years vs G2 = 79.1 [7.1] years vs G3 = 79.7 [6.6] years, P = 0.73) but surgical risk in G3 was lower (log Euroscore, median [IQR]: G1 = 14.0 [8.4-20.2] vs G2 = 12.0 [7.0-22.2] vs G3 = 5.1 [3.5-8.5]; P <0.001). Major/life-threatening bleeding (G1 = 26.9% vs G2 = 12.8% vs G3 = 9.4%; P <0.001), major vascular complications (G1 = 15.4% vs G2 = 8.5% vs G3 = 5.7%; P = 0.02) and moderate/severe paravalvular leak (G1 = 16.2% vs G2 = 11% vs G3 = 7.5%; P = 0.046) were decreasing with time. There was a significant drop in all-cause 1-year mortality in G3 (G1 = 20% vs G2 = 17.7% vs G3 = 9.1%; log rank = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The age of TAVI recipients remained unchanged over the last decade. Decreasing surgical risk coupled with improvements in procedural technique and care resulted in fewer periprocedural complications and better 1-year survival.