RESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a heterogeneous disease presenting with either myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic features. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only potentially curative option, but the inherent toxicity of this procedure makes the decision to proceed to allo-HCT challenging, particularly because patients with CMML are mostly older and comorbid. Therefore, the decision between a nonintensive treatment approach and allo-HCT represents a delicate balance, especially because prospective randomized studies are lacking and retrospective data in the literature are conflicting. International consensus on the selection of patients and the ideal timing of allo-HCT, specifically in CMML, could not be reached in international recommendations published 6 years ago. Since then, new, CMML-specific data have been published. The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Practice Harmonization and Guidelines (PH&G) Committee assembled a panel of experts in the field to provide the first best practice recommendations on the role of allo-HCT specifically in CMML. Recommendations were based on the results of an international survey, a comprehensive review of the literature, and expert opinions on the subject, after structured discussion and circulation of recommendations. Algorithms for patient selection, timing of allo-HCT during the course of the disease, pretransplant strategies, allo-HCT modality, as well as posttransplant management for patients with CMML were outlined. The keynote message is, that once a patient has been identified as a transplant candidate, upfront transplantation without prior disease-modifying treatment is preferred to maximize chances of reaching allo-HCT whenever possible, irrespective of bone marrow blast counts.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica , Trasplante Homólogo , Adulto , Humanos , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/terapia , Sociedades Médicas/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A single-group, phase 1-2 study indicated that eltrombopag improved the efficacy of standard immunosuppressive therapy that entailed horse antithymocyte globulin (ATG) plus cyclosporine in patients with severe aplastic anemia. METHODS: In this prospective, investigator-led, open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of horse ATG plus cyclosporine with or without eltrombopag as front-line therapy in previously untreated patients with severe aplastic anemia. The primary end point was a hematologic complete response at 3 months. RESULTS: Patients were assigned to receive immunosuppressive therapy (Group A, 101 patients) or immunosuppressive therapy plus eltrombopag (Group B, 96 patients). The percentage of patients who had a complete response at 3 months was 10% in Group A and 22% in Group B (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 7.8; P = 0.01). At 6 months, the overall response rate (the percentage of patients who had a complete or partial response) was 41% in Group A and 68% in Group B. The median times to the first response were 8.8 months (Group A) and 3.0 months (Group B). The incidence of severe adverse events was similar in the two groups. With a median follow-up of 24 months, a karyotypic abnormality that was classified as myelodysplastic syndrome developed in 1 patient (Group A) and 2 patients (Group B); event-free survival was 34% and 46%, respectively. Somatic mutations were detected in 29% (Group A) and 31% (Group Β) of the patients at baseline; these percentages increased to 66% and 55%, respectively, at 6 months, without affecting the hematologic response and 2-year outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of eltrombopag to standard immunosuppressive therapy improved the rate, rapidity, and strength of hematologic response among previously untreated patients with severe aplastic anemia, without additional toxic effects. (Funded by Novartis and others; RACE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02099747; EudraCT number, 2014-000363-40.).
Asunto(s)
Anemia Aplásica/terapia , Suero Antilinfocítico/uso terapéutico , Benzoatos/uso terapéutico , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Hidrazinas/uso terapéutico , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia Aplásica/tratamiento farmacológico , Anemia Aplásica/genética , Suero Antilinfocítico/efectos adversos , Benzoatos/efectos adversos , Ciclosporina/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Hidrazinas/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Prospectivos , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Receptores de Trombopoyetina/agonistas , Inducción de Remisión , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Hematological toxicity is the most common adverse event after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Cytopenias can be profound and long-lasting and can predispose for severe infectious complications. In a recent worldwide survey, we demonstrated that there remains considerable heterogeneity in regard to current practice patterns. Here, we sought to build consensus on the grading and management of immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT) after CAR T-cell therapy. For this purpose, a joint effort between the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the European Hematology Association (EHA) involved an international panel of 36 CAR T-cell experts who met in a series of virtual conferences, culminating in a 2-day meeting in Lille, France. On the basis of these deliberations, best practice recommendations were developed. For the grading of ICAHT, a classification system based on depth and duration of neutropenia was developed for early (day 0-30) and late (after day +30) cytopenia. Detailed recommendations on risk factors, available preinfusion scoring systems (eg, CAR-HEMATOTOX score), and diagnostic workup are provided. A further section focuses on identifying hemophagocytosis in the context of severe hematotoxicity. Finally, we review current evidence and provide consensus recommendations for the management of ICAHT, including growth factor support, anti-infectious prophylaxis, transfusions, autologous hematopoietic stem cell boost, and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. In conclusion, we propose ICAHT as a novel toxicity category after immune effector cell therapy, provide a framework for its grading, review literature on risk factors, and outline expert recommendations for the diagnostic workup and short- and long-term management.
Asunto(s)
Hematología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Consenso , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Factores InmunológicosRESUMEN
Cell and gene therapy poses evolving challenges. The current article summarizes the discussions held by European Regional Committee of the International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) on the current challenges in this field, focusing on the European setting. This article emphasizes the imperative assessment of real-world cell and gene therapy activity, advocating for expanded registries beyond hematopoietic transplantation and chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell therapy. Accreditation's role in ensuring standardized procedures, as exemplified by JACIE (The Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT-Europe and EBMT), is crucial for safety. Access to commercial products and reimbursement variations among countries underscore the need for uniform access to advanced therapy medical products (ATMPs). Academic product development and point-of-care manufacturing face barriers to patient access. Hospital Exemption's potential, demonstrated by some initial experiences, may increase patient accessibility in individual situations. Regulatory challenges, including the ongoing European ATMPs legislation review, necessitate standardized criteria for Hospital Exemption and mandatory reporting within registries. Efforts to combat unproven therapies and fraud involve collaboration between scientific societies, regulatory bodies and patient groups. Finally, is important to highlight the vital role of education and workforce development in meeting the escalating demand for specialized professionals in the ATMP field. Collaboration among scientific societies, academic institutions, industry, regulatory bodies and patient groups is crucial for overcoming all these challenges to increase gene and cell therapy activity in Europe.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y Tejidos , Terapia Genética , Humanos , Terapia Genética/métodos , Europa (Continente) , Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y Tejidos/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Sociedades Médicas , Acreditación/métodosRESUMEN
Acute diarrhea is a common and debilitating complication in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). In this prospective, observational, and multicenter study we examined all episodes occurring in the first 6 months of 142 consecutive adult patients who underwent a reduced-intensity conditioning HCT in 10 Spanish tertiary university hospitals. Fifty-four patients (38%) developed a total of 75 acute diarrhea episodes. The median time from HCT to the first episode was 38 days (4-157). The main cause of enterocolitis was lower GI-aGVHD (38%), followed by infections (21%) and drug-related toxicity (8%). Causative infectious causes were identified in only 16/75 episodes (21%). C. difficile-related infection was the most common infectious agent with an incidence and recurrence of 13% and 2%, respectively. With a median follow-up for survivors of 32 months, the non-relapse mortality (NRM) and the overall survival (OS) at 1 year, were 20% (95% C.I.: 14-28%) and 69% (95% C.I.: 61-77%), respectively. Development of enterocolitis was not associated with higher NRM (p = 0.37) or worse OS (p = 0.9). This real-life study confirms that the diagnosis and management of acute diarrhea in the early stages after HCT is challenging. Nosocomial infections seem to be relatively uncommon, probably due to more rational use of antibiotics.
Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Diarrea , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Adulto , Humanos , Enfermedad Crónica , Diarrea/etiología , Diarrea/mortalidad , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/mortalidad , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/mortalidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/efectos adversos , Trasplante Homólogo/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Aguda , Enterocolitis/inducido químicamente , Enterocolitis/etiología , Enterocolitis/mortalidadRESUMEN
Plerixafor (Mozobil, Sanofi) is approved for using in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma when steady-state mobilization strategies fail. Although off-label use of plerixafor in healthy related donors (HRD) is known, limited data are available and no recommendations exist to guide its use in this setting. With the aim of collecting data from HRDs who received plerixafor in our country, we designed an observational case series study within the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Transplant and Cell Therapy (GETH). Plerixafor was administered subcutaneously to 30 HRDs at a median dose of 0.24 mg/Kg (interquartile range (IQR): 0.23-0.25) because mobilization failure after using mobilization with G-CSF (mobilization failure was defined as collection of <4.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/Kg recipient). All HRDs received G-CSF at a median dose of 11 µg/Kg/day (IQR: 10-12) for 4-5 days. Leukocytapheresis after G-CSF mobilization was performed in 23 (77 %) HRDs collecting a median of 1.6 × 106 CD34+ cells/Kg recipient weight (IQR: 0.9-2.5). Addition of plerixafor allowed the collection of a higher median number of CD34 cells (4.98 × 106 CD34+ cells/Kg recipient weight (IQR: 3.5-5.8)) when compared with the collection of CD34+ cells with G-CSF alone (p < 0.01). The final median total number of CD34+ cells collected was 6.1 × 106/Kg recipient weight (IQR: 4.8-7.3). Mild adverse events related with plerixafor administration were reported in 8 (27 %) donors. In conclusion, addition of plerixafor after G-CSF mobilization failure in HRDs allowed collecting higher number of CD34+ cells in comparison with steady-state mobilization.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Bencilaminas/uso terapéutico , Ciclamas/uso terapéutico , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética/métodos , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-VIH/farmacología , Bencilaminas/farmacología , Ciclamas/farmacología , Femenino , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/farmacología , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Donantes de TejidosRESUMEN
Infection of long-term central venous catheters (CVCs) remains a challenge in the clinical management of cancer patients. We aimed to determine whether a lock solution with taurolidine-citrate-heparin would be more effective than placebo for preventing nontunneled CVC infection in high-risk neutropenic hematologic patients. We performed a prospective, multicenter, randomized (1:1), double-blind, parallel, superiority, placebo-controlled trial involving 150 hematological patients with neutropenia carrying nontunneled CVCs who were assigned to receive CVC lock solution with taurolidine-citrate-heparin or heparin alone. The primary endpoint was bacterial colonization of the CVC hubs. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), CVC removal, adverse events related to the lock solution, and the 30-day case fatality rate. CVC lock solution with taurolidine-citrate-heparin was associated with less colonization of the CVC hubs than that with placebo, with no statistically significant differences: 4.1%, versus 10.1% (relative risk [RR] = 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11 to 1.52), with a cumulative incidence of 4.17 (95% CI = 0.87 to 11.70) and 10.14 (95% CI = 4.18 to 19.79), respectively. There were no significant differences regarding the secondary endpoints. Only three episodes of CRBSI occurred during the study period. No adverse events related to the administration of the lock solution occurred. In this trial involving high-risk patients carrying nontunneled CVCs, the use of taurolidine-citrate-heparin did not show a benefit over the use of placebo. Nevertheless, the safety of this prevention strategy and the trend toward less hub colonization in the taurolidine-citrate-heparin group raise the interest in assessing its efficacy in centers with higher rates of CRBSI. (This study has been registered in ISRCTN under identifier ISRCTN47102251.).
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/microbiología , Citratos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Neutropenia/complicaciones , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Soluciones Farmacéuticas , Estudios Prospectivos , Taurina/análogos & derivados , TiadiazinasRESUMEN
Deoxyribonucleic acid microarrays allow researchers to measure mRNA levels of thousands of genes in a single experiment and could be useful for diagnostic purposes in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). We assessed the feasibility of the AML profiler (Skyline™ Array) in genetic stratification of patients with de novo AML and compared the results with those obtained using the standard cytogenetic and molecular approach. Diagnostic bone marrow from 31 consecutive de novo AML cases was used to test MLL-PTD, FLT3-ITD and TKD, NPM1 and CEBPAdm mutations. Purified RNA was used to assess RUNX1-RUNX1T1, PML-RARα and CBFß-MYH11 rearrangements. RNA remnants underwent gene expression profiling analysis using the AML profiler, which detects chromosomal aberrations: t(8;21), t(15;17), inv(16), mutations (CEBPAdm, ABD-NPM1) and BAALC and EVI1 expression. Thirty cases were successfully analysed with both methods. Five cases had FLT3-ITD. In one case, a t(8;21) was correctly detected by both methods. Four cases had inv(16); in one, the RNA quality was unsatisfactory and it was not hybridized, and in the other three, the AML profiler detected the genetic lesion - this being a rare type I translocation in one case. Two cases with acute promyelocytic leukaemia were diagnosed by both methods. Results for NPM1 mutations were concordant in all but two cases (2/11, non-ABD mutations). Analysis of costs and turnaround times showed that the AML profiler was no more expensive than the conventional molecular approach. These results suggest that the AML profiler could be useful in multicentre trials to rapidly identify patients with AML with a good prognosis. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Asunto(s)
Perfilación de la Expresión Génica/métodos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/patología , Masculino , Nucleofosmina , Pronóstico , RiesgoRESUMEN
The aim of this study is to analyse the risk of invasive fungal infection (IFI) and the need for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndromes (AML/MDS) treated with azacitidine. We retrospectively analysed the incidence of IFI according to EORTC-MSG criteria in 121 consecutive AML/MDS patients receiving 948 azacitidine courses (median 5, range 1-43) between June 2007 and June 2015. Four cases of IFI (two possible, one probable aspergillosis and one proven candidemia) occurred in this series. The incidence rate of proven/probable IFI was 0.21% per treatment cycle and 1.6% per patient treated for the whole series, and 0.73% per treatment cycle and 4.1% per patient treated in those with severe neutropenia. Two patients died from IFI, leading to an IFI-attributable mortality rate of 1.65% per patient and 0.21% per treatment cycle. The numbers needed to treat with prophylaxis to prevent one case of IFI are 238 azacitidine cycles or 30 patients throughout their whole treatment course, and 137 azacitidine cycles or 24 patients among those with severe neutropenia. AML/MDS patients treated with azacitidine, including those with severe prolonged neutropenia, have a very low risk of IFI which does not justify the use of antifungal prophylaxis.
Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Azacitidina/efectos adversos , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/prevención & control , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/complicaciones , Enfermedades Mielodisplásicas-Mieloproliferativas/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Azacitidina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/epidemiología , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/mortalidad , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Mielodisplásicas-Mieloproliferativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/complicaciones , Números Necesarios a Tratar , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Triazoles/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
AIM: To assess the toxicity, tolerance, steroid-sparing capacity, effectiveness, and response rate to imatinib and dasatinib for the treatment of severe sclerotic chronic graft-vs-host disease (scGVHD). METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 8 consecutive patients with severe refractory scGVHD who received salvage therapy with imatinib. Patients intolerant and/or refractory to imatinib received dasatinib treatment. RESULTS: 7 patients discontinued imatinib treatment (1 achieved complete response, 5 were resistant and/or intolerant, and 1 developed grade IV neutropenia) and 1 patient achieved prolonged partial response, but died due to an infectious complication while on treatment. 5 patients started dasatinib treatment (3 achieved partial responses and discontinued dasatinib, 1 achieved a durable partial response, but died due to a consecutive rapid pulmonary cGVHD progression and 1 with stable disease discontinued treatment due to gastroenteric intolerance). The response rate (partial and/or complete responses) for severe scGVHD was 25% for imatinib and 60% for dasatinib. CONCLUSION: In our series, dasatinib was better tolerated, safer, steroid-sparing, and had a low incidence of infectious complications, which suggests that it may be a more effective therapeutic alternative for patients with refractory scGVHD than imatinib. Treatment of scGVHD with effective antifibrotic drugs such as TKI, which block the kinase fibrotic pathway, may be a safe and effective therapeutic option, but further studies are needed to confirm our findings.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Dasatinib/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapéutico , Esclerosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Dasatinib/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib/administración & dosificación , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia Recuperativa , Esclerosis/complicaciones , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is a practical need to investigate the performance of the serum galactomannan (GM) assay in hematology patients with a potentially low pretest risk of invasive aspergillosis following effective antimold prophylaxis. METHODS: We present a 4-year study with 262 unselected consecutive high-risk episodes, prospectively managed with posaconazole primary prophylaxis and a uniform diagnostic algorithm, including biweekly serum GM quantification for early detection of invasive aspergillosis. RESULTS: A total of 2972 serum GM tests were performed (median, 11 per episode [range, 3-30]); the vast majority were negative (96.7% of tests and 83.6% of episodes). The incidence of breakthrough invasive aspergillosis was 1.9% (5/262), all with true-positive GM test results. Our study identified 30 false-positive GM evaluable episodes (85.7%; 13.8% of all evaluable episodes), validating with real-life data the low positive predictive value of the assay in this setting (12%). In 26 of these 30 episodes (86.7%), the false-positive result(s) occurred in tests performed as preemptive surveillance only. Conversely, in evaluable cases with positive GM tests and a clinical suspicion of invasive fungal disease, the performance of diagnostic-driven GM tests improved, with a positive predictive value of 89.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The low pretest risk of invasive aspergillosis in the context of effective antimold prophylaxis renders serum GM surveillance of asymptomatic patients unreliable, as all results would be either negative or false positive. The test remains useful to diagnose patients with a clinical suspicion of invasive fungal disease, calling for a more efficient copositioning of effective prophylaxis and GM testing in this clinical setting.
Asunto(s)
Aspergilosis/sangre , Aspergilosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Mananos/sangre , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Antígenos Fúngicos/sangre , Galactosa/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Triazoles/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Among the strategies to optimize engraftment of cord blood (CB) stem cell transplantation (SCT), single CB with the coinfusion of CD34(+) stem cells from an HLA-mismatched auxiliary donor (haplo-cord) provides a valid alternative for adult patients without a suitable donor. A total of 132 high-risk adult patients with hematological malignancies from 3 Spanish institutions underwent myeloablative haplo-cord SCT. The median age was 37 years and median weight was 70 kg; 37% had active disease. The median number of postprocessing CB total nucleated and CD34(+) cells was 2.4 × 10(7)/kg (interquartile range [IQR], 1.8 to 2.9) and 1.4 × 10(5)/kg (IQR, .9 to 2), respectively. Neutrophil engraftment occurred in a median of 11.5 days (IQR, 10.5 to 16.5) and platelet engraftment at 36 days (IQR, 25.5 to 77). Graft failure was 2% overall and only 9% for CB. Cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GHVD) grades II to IV was 21% and cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 21%. Median follow-up was 60 months (range, 3.5 to 163). Overall survival was 43.5%, event-free survival was 38.3%, nonrelapse mortality was 35%, and relapse was 20% at 5 years. Myeloablative haplo-cord SCT results in fast engraftment of neutrophils and platelets, low incidences of acute and chronic GVHD, and favorable long-term outcomes using single CB units with relatively low cell content. Moreover, CB cell dose had no impact on CB engraftment and survival in this study. Therefore, haplo-cord SCT expands donor availability while reducing CB cell dose requirements.
Asunto(s)
Antígenos CD34 , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre del Cordón Umbilical , Supervivencia de Injerto , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Células Madre , Adulto , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hematológicas/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
In 2023, the EBMT Practice harmonization and Guidelines Committee partnered with the EBMT Infection Diseases Working Party (IDWP) to undertake the task of delivering best practice recommendations, aiming to harmonize by expert consensus, the already existing definitions and future epidemiological and clinical studies among centers of the EBMT network. To attain this objective, a group of experts in the field was convened. The workgroup identified and discussed some critical aspects in definitions of community-acquired respiratory viruses (CARV) and adenovirus (ADV) infections in recipient of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). The methodology involved literature review and expert consensus. For CARV, expert consensus focused on defining infection severity, infection duration, and establishing criteria for lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD). For ADV, the expert consensus focused on surveillance methods and the definitions of ADV infection, certainty levels of disease, response to treatment, and attributable mortality. This consensus workshop provided indications to EBMT community aimed at facilitating data collection and consistency in the EBMT registry for respiratory viral infectious complications.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Humanos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/terapia , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/diagnóstico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/virología , Infecciones por Adenoviridae/terapia , Infecciones por Adenoviridae/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Adenoviridae/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/terapia , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Consenso , Infecciones por Adenovirus Humanos/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Adenovirus Humanos/terapia , Infecciones por Adenovirus Humanos/epidemiología , Adenoviridae/aislamiento & purificaciónRESUMEN
Since the early description of three patients with relapsed leukaemia after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) who obtained complete remission after donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs), the added value of this procedure to induce or maintain graft-versus-leukaemia immunity has been undisputed. For more than 30 years, DLIs have become common practice as prophylactic, pre-emptive, or therapeutic immunotherapy. However, as with many aspects of allogeneic HCT, centres have developed their own routines and practices, and many questions related to the optimal applications and toxicity, or to the immunobiology of DLI induced tumour-immunity, remain. As a part of the Practice Harmonization and Guidelines Committee and the Cellular Therapy and Immunobiology Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation effort, a panel of experts with clinical and translational knowledge in transplantation immunology and cellular therapy met during a 2-day workshop in September, 2023, in Lille, France, and developed a set of consensus-based recommendations for the application of unmanipulated DLI after allogeneic HCT for haematological malignancies. Given the absence of prospective data in the majority of publications, these recommendations are mostly based on retrospective studies and expert consensus.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Transfusión de Linfocitos , Trasplante Homólogo , Humanos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Transfusión de Linfocitos/métodos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Donantes de TejidosRESUMEN
The European society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) has a long-standing interest in the evaluation of hematopoietic cell transplantation. More than three decades ago, its members established a continental registry. Today, more than 700,000 patients have been registered, and information has been gathered on more than 800,000 transplants. This huge amount of information has allowed conducting multiple retrospective studies, evaluating changes in practices over time and for different categories of diseases, benchmarking outcome across EBMT affiliated centers, and increasingly serves to build synthetic comparators to evaluate the introduction of therapeutic innovations in the field of hematology. CAR-T cells therapies draw on human and technical resources that are also used to deliver HCT; they elicit side effects that require the implementation of risk mitigation plans; they are living drugs that persist in the body of the recipient and thus deserve prolonged follow-up; the introduction of CAR-T cells in the pharmacopeia is likely to significantly impact on the practice of BMT; for all these reasons and even before the first approvals of CAR-T Cells in Europe, EBMT engaged in a project aiming at complementing the EBMT Registry with a Cellular Therapy Form, with the objective to register CAR-T cells treated patients and collect information on their short-, middle- and long-term outcome. The goal is to provide EBMT investigators with a tool for primary analyses of the collected information and to support secondary use of data transferred at the individual level to Marketing Authorization Holders and other interested parties, to fulfill their obligations to health authorities and further evaluate the actual medical values of CAR-T Cells in different contexts and indications. The EBMT Registry received a positive opinion from the European Medicines agency in 2019, and five years later contains information on more than 9.000 treated patients. This article describes the journey to start this new activity, lessons to be drawn in view of improving the collection of real-world data, and what existing information tells us in terms of patient access.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Europa (Continente) , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Systemic Mastocytosis (SM) is a multifaceted clinically heterogeneous disease. Advanced SM (AdvSM) comprises three entities: aggressive SM (ASM), mast cell leukaemia (MCL) and SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm (SM-AHN), the latter accounting for 60-70% of all AdvSM cases. Detection of a disease-triggering mutation in the KIT gene (esp. KIT D816V) in >90% of the patients with ASM or SM-AHN has led to a significant improvement in therapeutic options by the implementation of two KIT-targeting kinase inhibitors: midostaurin and avapritinib. Although complete remissions have been reported, neither of these targeted agents is 'curative' in all patients and the duration of responses varies. The median overall survival, depending on the WHO subtype and scoring result, is approximately 1 to 4 years. Although the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) and American Initiative in Mast Cell Diseases (AIM) consensus groups recommend allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in drug-resistant and other high-risk patients, there is a relative lack of information to guide clinicians on which patients with AdvSM should be considered for transplant, and how KIT inhibitors may fit into the transplant algorithm, including their use pre- and post-transplant to optimise outcomes. Following the generation of an expert panel with a specialist interest in allo-HCT and mastocytosis, these best practice recommendations were generated according to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Practice Harmonisation and guidelines and ECNM methodology. We aim to provide a practical, clinically relevant and up-to-date framework to guide allo-HCT in AdvsM in 2024 and beyond.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Leucemia de Mastocitos , Mastocitosis Sistémica , Mastocitosis , Humanos , Mastocitosis Sistémica/terapia , Mastocitosis Sistémica/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Mastocitosis/terapia , Leucemia de Mastocitos/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-kit/genética , MastocitosRESUMEN
Despite emergence of novel therapies to treat hematologic malignancies, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains an essential treatment modality capable of curing these diseases. Allo-HCT has been also shown to be curative in benign hematologic disorders such as aplastic anemia, sickle cell disease, and thalassemia, among others. Recently, the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) published standardized definitions for hematopoietic recovery, graft rejection, graft failure, poor graft function, and donor chimerism. To attempt broader international consensus, a panel of adult and pediatric physician transplant experts was assembled from European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), ASTCT, the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), and Asia-Pacific Blood and Marrow Transplantation (APBMT). Consensus was defined as ≥70% of voting members strongly agreeing or somewhat agreeing with a definition. With few exceptions, there was a consensus to endorse the prior ASTCT definitions. Importantly, we revised existing EBMT and CIBMTR data collection forms to align with these harmonized definitions that will facilitate research and international collaboration among transplant researchers and across transplant registries.
Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Humanos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Aloinjertos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Quimera por Trasplante , Trasplante Homólogo/métodosRESUMEN
Autoimmune diseases (ADs) are characterized by loss of immune tolerance, high chronicity, with substantial morbidity and mortality, despite conventional immunosuppression (IS) or targeted disease modifying therapies (DMTs), which usually require repeated administration. Recently, novel cellular therapies (CT), including mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC), Chimeric Antigen Receptors T cells (CART) and regulatory T cells (Tregs), have been successfully adopted in ADs. An international expert panel of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and the International Society for the Cell and Gene Therapy, reviewed all available evidence, based on the current literature and expert practices, on use of MSC, CART and Tregs, in AD patients with rheumatological, neurological, and gastroenterological indications. Expert-based consensus and recommendations for best practice and quality of patient care were developed to support clinicians, scientists, and their multidisciplinary teams, as well as patients and care providers and will be regularly updated.
RESUMEN
Hematological toxicity represents the most common grade ≥3 toxicity after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. However, its underlying pathophysiology is incompletely understood and its grading and management remains ill-defined. To inform the forthcoming European Hematology Association/European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EHA/EBMT) guidelines on the management of "immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity" (ICAHT), we undertook a survey of experienced clinicians using an online survey focusing on (1) grading, (2) risk-stratification and diagnostic work-up, (3) short-term, and (4) long-term management of ICAHT. There were 81 survey respondents across 18 countries. A high degree of variability was noted for cytopenia grading in regards to depth, duration, and time from CAR-T infusion. The majority of experts favored pre-CAR-T bone marrow studies, especially in case of a high-risk profile. Most respondents felt that the work-up for patients with severe hematotoxicity should rule-out viral infections (96%), substrate deficiency (80%), or coincident sHLH/MAS (serum ferritin, 92%), and should include bone marrow aspiration (86%) and/or biopsy (61%). Clinicians were divided as to whether the occurrence of coincident immunotoxicity should influence the decision to apply G-CSF, and when to initiate G-CSF support. In case of prolonged thrombocytopenia, most survey participants favored thrombopoietin agonists (86%). Conversely, autologous hematopoietic cell boosts represented the preferred choice for neutropenia (63%), although they were frequently not available and no consensus was reached regarding the optimal trigger point. These findings underline the current heterogeneity of practice patterns regarding ICAHT and invite the development of consensus guidelines, which may harmonize grading, establish standard operating procedures for diagnosis, and set management guidelines.