[Indications, diagnoses and quality markers in upper and lower endoscopies in 2010 and 2011 at the 1st Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest]. / A felso és alsó endoszkópiák indikációja, a diagnózisok megoszlása és minoségi mutatók 2010­2011-ben a Semmelweis Egyetem I. Belgyógyászati Klinikáján.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: The aim was to assess the incidence of endoscopic findings based on the indication of the procedures in upper/lower endoscopies, and measuring quality indicators of colonoscopies at the 1st Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest. METHOD: Data of 2987 patients (male/female:1361/1626, mean age: 60.7 years(y), SD: 16.7y) between 01.01.2010 and 31.12.2011 were analyzed. Both inpatient and outpatient records were collected. RESULTS: Incidence of peptic ulcer disease, esophageal varices, gastric polyps and gastric cancer were 10.8%, 4.5%, 6.1%, 2.9% in upper endoscopies, respectively. In colonoscopies colorectal polyps, diverticulosis, colorectal cancer and IBD were found in 29.9%, 22.4%, 6.9%, 9.7%, respectively. In patients having upper endoscopy with GI bleeding indication, older age (p<0.001), male gender (p<0.001, OR: 1.64), acenocoumarol/heparin use (p<0,001, peptic ulcers and esophageal varices were more frequent (p<0.001, OR: 2.83 and p<0.001, OR: 2.79), while in colonoscopies colorectal cancer had higher incidence (p<0.001, OR:3.27). 81% of colonoscopies were complete. Causes of incomplete procedures were ineffective bowel preparation (38.2%), technical difficulties (25.1%) and strictures (20.5%). CONCLUSION: The endoscopic findings and quality indicators (adenoma detection rate, coecal intubation rate) were in line with that reported in published series. Orv. Hetil., 2016, 157(52), 2074-2081.

Optimizing Patient Management in Crohn's Disease in a Tertiary Referral Center: the Impact of Fast-Track MRI on Patient Management and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Rapid optimization of treatment algorithms and disease outcomes requires an objective measurement of disease activity in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Our aim was to evaluate the impact of rapid-access to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on treatment optimization, clinical decision-making and outcomes for CD patients in a specialized tertiary care for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. METHODS: A cohort of 75 referral CD patients (median age: 34, IQR: 25-43 years) who had underwent 90 fast-track MR enterography (MRE) scans between January 2014 and June 2016 were retrospectively enrolled. The MRI results were compared to clinical activity scores and biomarkers (C-reactive protein). The immediate impact of fast-track MRI on clinical decision-making, including changes in medical therapy, the need of hospitalization and surgery were evaluated. RESULTS: The location of CD was ileo-colonic in 61% of the patients with perianal fistulas in 56% and previous surgeries in 55%. The indication for fast-track MRI scans was active disease (clinical or biomarker activity) in 55.6%. The radiological activity (including mild radiological signs to severe lesions) was detected in 94% of cases. Significant/severe MRI activity was depicted in 68% of these patients. Correlation between MRI radiological activity and clinical disease activity or colonoscopy was moderate (kappa: 0.609 and 0.652). A change in therapeutic strategy was made in 94.1% of cases with severe MRI radiological activity vs. 50% of patients without severe MRI radiological activity (p=0.001). Significant/severe MRI activity was followed by higher surgery rates among patients with clinical disease activity (50% vs. 12.5%; p=0.013). MRI performed on patients with clinical and biomarker remission identified disease activity in a significantly smaller proportion. CONCLUSIONS: Fast-track MRI had a great impact on patient management in CD patients with clinical or biomarker activity, leading to better patient stratification and faster optimization of the therapy (medical or surgical), while MRI revealed previously undiagnosed disease activity only in a small proportion of patients in clinical remission.

Quality of care indicators in inflammatory bowel disease in a tertiary referral center with open access and objective assessment policies.

BACKGROUND: In the management of inflammatory bowel diseases, there is considerable variation in quality of care. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate structural, access/process components and outcome quality indicators in our tertiary referral IBD center. METHODS: In the first phase, structural/process components were assessed, followed by the second phase of formal evaluation of access and management on a set of consecutive IBD patients with and without active disease (248CD/125UC patients, median age 35/39 years). RESULTS: Structural/process components of our IBD center met the international recommendations. At or around the time of diagnosis usual procedures were full colonoscopy in all patients, with ileocolonoscopy/gastroscopy/CT/MRI in 81.8/45.5/66.1/49.6% of CD patients. A total of 86.7% of CD patients had any follow-up imaging evaluation or endoscopy. The median waiting time for non-emergency endoscopy/CT/MRI was 16/14/22 days. During the observational period patients with flares (CD/UC:50.6/54.6%) were seen by specialist at the IBD clinic within a median of 1day with same day laboratory assessment, abdominal US, CT scan/surgical consult and change in therapy if needed. Surgery and hospitalization rates were 20.1/1.4% and 17.3/3.2% of CD/UC patients. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight that structural components and processes applied in our center are in line with international recommendations, including an open clinic concept and fast track access to specialist consultation, endoscopy and imaging.