Diagnostic reference levels in spinal CT: Jordanian assessments and global benchmarks.

BACKGROUND: To reduce radiation dose and subsequent risks, several legislative documents in different countries describe the need for Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs). Spinal radiography is a common and high-dose examination. Therefore, the aim of this work was to establish the DRL for Computed Tomography (CT) examinations of the spine in healthcare institutions across Jordan. METHODS: Data was retrieved from the picture archiving and communications system (PACS), which included the CT Dose Index (CTDI (vol) ) and Dose Length Product (DLP). The median radiation dose values of the dosimetric indices were calculated for each site. DRL values were defined as the 75th percentile distribution of the median CTDI (vol)  and DLP values. RESULTS: Data was collected from 659 CT examinations (316 cervical spine and 343 lumbar-sacral spine). Of the participants, 68% were males, and the patients' mean weight was 69.7 kg (minimum = 60; maximum = 80, SD = 8.9). The 75th percentile for the DLP of cervical and LS-spine CT scans in Jordan were 565.2 and 967.7 mGy.cm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This research demonstrates a wide range of variability in CTDI (vol)  and DLP values for spinal CT examinations; these variations were associated with the acquisition protocol and highlight the need to optimize radiation dose in spinal CT examinations.

The Diverse Utility of Contrast Media Delivery and Dosing During Computed Tomography: An International Assessment of Knowledge and Practices.

BACKGROUND: Despite the escalated production rate, the Iodinated Contrast Media (ICM) shortage continues, and demand outweighs supply. AIM: The aim of this study is to investigate the knowledge and practice of ICM delivery in computed tomography (CT) among radiographers and radiologic technologists worldwide. METHODS: An IRB-approved cross-sectional survey used Google Forms for data collection. It involved 94 CT radiographers from 27 countries and was divided into five sections. The first section gathered demographic information, followed by sections on experience, self-assessment of ICM reactions, and delivery technique. The third section explored ICM knowledge and its relation to CT parameters. The fourth and fifth sections focus on practices during pulmonary angiography CT and renal CT scans. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, the Chi- Square test, and ANOVA. RESULTS: Knowledge was assessed with seven questions, and a score of at least 3.5 was needed for categorization. The median score was two, indicating low knowledge. Specifically, 64.9% of the participants scored lower than the two scores. Years of experience are strongly correlated with the level of knowledge, with 51.6% of radiographers having more than 10 years of experience demonstrating adequate knowledge. 41.7% of respondents demonstrated adequate knowledge when their duty was focused on CT. Furthermore, wide practice variability exists in all CT pulmonary angiography protocols among radiographers with adequate and inadequate knowledge. CONCLUSION: Inexperienced individuals showed knowledge gaps, leading to varied practices and highlighting the need for educational programs. The study underscores establishing standardized Protocols and Practice Guidelines (PPGs) for contrast media administration in Radiology Departments. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of regular training programs, and international knowledge sharing. The potential for self-selection bias in the online survey sample is highlighted.

Empowering Radiographers: A Call for Integrated AI Training in University Curricula.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) applications are rapidly advancing in the field of medical imaging. This study is aimed at investigating the perception and knowledge of radiographers towards artificial intelligence. Methods: An online survey employing Google Forms consisting of 20 questions regarding the radiographers' perception of AI. The questionnaire was divided into two parts. The first part consisted of demographic information as well as whether the participants think AI should be part of medical training, their previous knowledge of the technologies used in AI, and whether they prefer to receive training on AI. The second part of the questionnaire consisted of two fields. The first one consisted of 16 questions regarding radiographers' perception of AI applications in radiology. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the effect of gender on the items of the questionnaire. Results: Familiarity with AI was low, with only 52 out of 100 respondents (52%) reporting good familiarity with AI. Many participants considered AI useful in the medical field (74%). The findings of the study demonstrate that nearly most of the participants (98%) believed that AI should be integrated into university education, with 87% of the respondents preferring to receive training on AI, with some already having prior knowledge of AI used in technologies. The logistic regression analysis indicated a significant association between male gender and experience within the range of 23-27 years with the degree of familiarity with AI technology, exhibiting respective odds ratios of 1.89 (COR = 1.89) and 1.87 (COR = 1.87). Conclusions: This study suggests that medical practices have a favorable attitude towards AI in the radiology field. Most participants surveyed believed that AI should be part of radiography education. AI training programs for undergraduate and postgraduate radiographers may be necessary to prepare them for AI tools in radiology development.

The effect of macrocyclic ionic and non-ionic gadolinium agents on neuronal injury and myelin loss in the spinal cords of rats with and without diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: The effect of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) on the spinal cord is not established, especially in patients with diabetes mellitus. PURPOSE: To investigate neuronal and myelin loss in the spinal cord when employing macrocyclic ionic Gadoterate Meglumine (Gd-DOTA) and non-ionic Gadobuterol (Gd-BT-DO3A) GBCA in rats with and without diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed between November 2018 and February 2020. Sixty young Sprague Dawley white rats (n = 6/group) were given injections of two macrocyclic GBCA: 0.5 mmol/ml Gd-DOTA and 1 mmol/ml Gd-BT-DO3A, using volumes based of the recommended doses (0.1 ml and 0.2 ml) for 42 days in both healthy and diabetic rats. Control groups received saline injections. Morphological assessment of spinal cord tissues was performed on three spinal segments. Neuronal counts in the ventral horns and myelin sparing percentage in the white matter were determined and compared in each group employing one-way ANOVA and Dunnett test for each category followed by three-way factorial analysis. RESULTS: Low neuronal count and myelin percentage-area were obtained in groups receiving 0.2 ml Gd-DOTA (p = .001;p = .002;p < .001 neurons; and p < .001;p = .007;p = .001 myelin %) and Gd-BT-DO3A (p = .01;p = .048;p = .006 neurons; p < .001;p = .01;p = .001 myelin %). Similarly, neuronal loss was seen in diabetics receiving low volume-injection (0.1 ml) of Gd-DOTA (p = .04;p = .03;p = .42), Gd-BT-DO3A (p = .002;p = .007;p = .01); or high volume-injection (0.2 ml) of Gd-DOTA (p = .001;p = .003;p = .01) or Gd-BT-DO3A (p < .001,p = .002;p = .002), with associated decrease in myelin sparing for each category with low dose Gd-DOTA (p < .001, p = .001; p. = 09),Gd-BT-DO3A (p = .003;p = .003;p = .007); or the higher dose counterparts of Gd-DOTA (p < .001; p < .00; p = .001) and Gd-BT-DO3A (p < .001, p < .001, p < .001). Damage was observed using the standard dose (equivalent of 0.1 mmol/kg for rats) of Gd-DOTA (0.2 ml) but not that of Gd-BT-DO3A (0.1 ml) in healthy rats. CONCLUSION: Multiple high-volume injections of gadoterate meglumine and gadobuterol are associated with neuronal and myelin injury in the spinal cord, more so in rats with diabetes mellitus.

An augmented patient-specific approach to administration of contrast agent for CT renal angiography

ABSTRACT Purpose This hybrid retrospective and prospective study performed on 200 consecutive patients undergoing renal CTA, investigates the opacification of renal vasculature, radiation dose, and reader confidence. Materials and Methods 100 patients were assigned retrospectively to protocol A and the other 100 were allocated prospectively to protocol B. Both protocols implemented a contrast material and saline flow rate of 4.5 mL/sec. Protocol A utilized a 100 mL of low-osmolar nonionic IV contrast material (Ioversol 350 mg I/mL) while protocol B employed a patient-tailored contrast media formula using iso-osmolar non-ionic (Iodixanol 320 mg I/mL). Results Arterial opacification in the abdominal aorta and in the bilateral main proximal renal arteries demonstrated no statistical significance (p>0.05). Only the main distal renal artery of the left kidney in protocol B was statistically significant (p<0.046). In the venous circulation, the IVC demonstrated a significant reduction in opacification in protocol B (59.39 HU ± 19.39) compared to A (87.74 HU ± 34.06) (p<0.001). Mean CNR for protocol A (22.68 HU ± 13.72) was significantly higher than that of protocol B (14.75 HU ± 5.76 p< 0.0001). Effective dose was significantly reduced in protocol B (2.46 ± 0.74 mSv) compared to A (3.07 ± 0.68 mSv) (p<0.001). Mean contrast media volume was reduced in protocol B (44.56 ± 14.32 mL) with lower iodine concentration. ROC analysis demonstrated significantly higher area under the ROC curve for protocol B (p< 0.0001), with inter-reader agreement increasing from moderate to excellent in renal arterial visualization. Conclusion Employing a patient-tailored contrast media injection protocol shows a significant refinement in the visualization of renal vasculature and reader confidence during renal CTA.