Antibiotic utilization in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a multi-institutional study and review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Utilization of antibiotics for endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (endo-DCR) is largely dependent on individual surgeon preference. This study aimed to investigate prescribing practices of pre-, peri-, and postoperative antibiotics and effects on postoperative infection rates in patients who underwent endo-DCR. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of institutional data at two academic centers of endo-DCR cases from 2015-2020 was performed. Postoperative infection rates for patients who received pre-, peri-, and postoperative antibiotics, individually or in combination, and those who did not, were compared via odds ratio and ANOVA linear regression. RESULTS: 331 endo-DCR cases were included; 22 cases (6.6%) had a postoperative infection. There was no significant difference in the infection rates between patients without an active preoperative dacryocystitis who received different permutations of peri- and postoperative antibiotics. Patients who received preoperative antibiotics within two weeks of surgery for preexisting acute dacryocystitis, but did not receive peri- or postoperative antibiotics, had a higher rate of postoperative infections (p = 008). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest antibiotics may be beneficial only when patients have a recent or active dacryocystitis prior to surgery. Otherwise, our data do not support the routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis in endo-DCR.

Macular Oxygen Saturation in Glaucoma Using Retinal Oximetry of Visible Light Optical Coherence Tomography.

Purpose: Oxygen saturation (sO2) plays a critical role in retinal pathophysiology, especially at the macula, which undergoes significant energy consumption. While macular damage has been suggested to be involved in early-stage glaucoma, there has been no report to date on non-invasive macular sO2 in glaucoma. Therefore, we conducted this study to compare macular sO2 associated with other clinical measurements between normal and glaucoma subjects and evaluate whether there are significant differences. Method: This is a cross-sectional study. We used visible light optical coherence tomography (VIS-OCT) for retinal oximetry in perifoveal vessels. The subjects from groups of normal, suspect/pre-perimetric glaucoma (GS/PPG) and perimetric glaucoma (PG) were scanned using VIS-OCT in the macular region with a sampling density of 512×256 in an area of 5×5 mm2. 48 eyes (16 normal, 17 GS/PPG and 15 PG) were included for the analysis. For each eye, we measured the sO2 of arterioles (AsO2), venules (VsO2), and calculated the difference between arterioles and venules (A-V sO2=AsO2-VsO2), oxygen extraction (OE=(AsO2-VsO2)/AsO2 ×100%). Additionally, we included Zeiss Cirrus OCT scans and 24-2 visual field test (VFT) for clinical benchmark. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the differences among the three groups. Spearman correlation tests were used for correlation sO2 markers to standard metrics including the thickness of ganglion cell layer and inner plexiform layer (GCL+IPL), circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) and mean deviation (MD) in VFT. Result: Significant differences were found among three groups for all VIS-OCT, Zeiss OCT, and VFT variables. Macular AsO2, A-V sO2, OE decreased, and VsO2 increased along with severity. Macular AsO2 and A-V sO2 were statistically correlated with GCL+IPL and cpRNFL in all eyes, as well as only PG eyes. Within PG eyes, the correlation between AsO2 and GCL+IPL is dominant in more damaged lower hemifield. Conclusion: The GS/PPG and PG subjects had significantly higher macular VsO2, lower A-V sO2 and OE indicating less oxygen consumption. The sO2 measured by retinal oximetry of VIS-OCT can be a potential metric for the early diagnosis of glaucoma.

A Baseline Study of Oxygen Saturation in Parafoveal Vessels Using Visible Light Optical Coherence Tomography.

The retinal macula is at the center of our visual field, and thus pathological damage in the macula significantly impacts an individual's quality of life. The parafoveal vessels form the inner retina provide oxygen perfusion, and the measurement of parafoveal oxygen saturation (sO2) can evaluate macular metabolism and provide pathophysiological insight. In this paper, for the first time, we present a baseline study of microvascular oxygen saturation (sO2) in perifoveal macular region using visible light optical coherence tomography (VIS-OCT) on normal eyes. The arterial and venous sO2 from all eyes was 92.1 ± 7.1 (vol %) and 48.4 ± 5.0 (vol %) (mean ± SD), respectively. Arteriovenous sO2 difference was 43.8 ± 9.5 (vol %). Marginal correlation was found between venous sO2 and intraocular pressure (IOP) among eyes. No significant correlation was found between sO2 and vessel topological features, including length, diameter, and distance to fovea. This baseline study could serve as a benchmark for the future sO2 investigation of retinal macular pathologies.

Visible Light Optical Coherence Tomography of Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Reflectivity in Glaucoma.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical utility of visible light optical coherence tomography (VIS-OCT) and to test whether VIS-OCT reflectivity and spectroscopy of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) are correlated with severity of glaucoma, compared with standard-of-care OCT thickness measurements. Methods: In total 54 eyes (20 normal, 17 suspect/preperimetric glaucoma [GS/PPG], 17 perimetric glaucoma [PG]) were successfully imaged with complete datasets. All the eyes were scanned by a custom-designed dual-channel device that simultaneously acquired VIS-OCT and near-infrared OCT (NIR-OCT) images. A 5 × 5 mm2 scan was taken of the pRNFL. The pRNFL reflectivity was calculated for both channels and the spectroscopic marker was quantified by pVN, defined as the ratio of VIS-OCT to NIR-OCT pRNFL reflectivity. The results were compared with ophthalmic examinations and Zeiss Cirrus OCT. Results: VIS-OCT pRNFL reflectivity significantly, sequentially decreased from normal to GS/PPG to PG, as did NIR-OCT pRNFL reflectivity. The pVN had the same decreasing trend among three groups. Normal and GS/PPG eyes were significantly different in VIS-OCT pRNFL reflectivity (P = 0.002) and pVN (P < 0.001), but were not in NIR-OCT pRNFL reflectivity (P = 0.14), circumpapillary RNFL thickness (P = 0.17), or macular ganglion cell layer and inner plexiform layer thickness (P = 0.07) in a mixed linear regression model. Conclusions: VIS-OCT pRNFL reflectivity and pVN better distinguished GS/PPG from normal eyes than Cirrus OCT thickness measurements. Translational Relevance: VIS-OCT pRNFL reflectivity and pVN could be useful metrics in the early detection of glaucoma upon further longitudinal validation.

Oral Sedation is Non-Inferior to Intravenous Sedation for Cornea and Glaucoma Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Purpose: To determine whether oral sedation is as safe and effective as IV sedation for ophthalmic surgeries other than cataract surgery, we tested whether patient satisfaction with oral triazolam was non-inferior to IV midazolam for cornea and glaucoma surgeries. Patients and Methods: Seventy-five cornea and 49 glaucoma surgery patients 18 years and older at Boston Medical Center (Boston, MA) were randomized within each study group (cornea or glaucoma) to receive oral triazolam + IV placebo, or oral placebo + IV midazolam before surgery in a double-masked fashion. Supplemental IV anesthesia was administered as needed during surgery. The primary outcome measure was patient satisfaction with anesthesia, compared between oral and IV sedation groups via t-test for non-inferiority, based on 70 cornea and 43 glaucoma subjects completing the study. Secondary outcome measures included surgeon and anesthesia provider satisfaction with anesthesia, rate of supplemental IV anesthesia, and incidence of adverse events and surgical complications. Results: Using an a priori non-inferiority margin of 0.5, initial oral sedation was non-inferior to initial IV sedation in cornea (n=70, p<0.001) and glaucoma (n=43, p=0.017) groups, even after excluding subjects administered supplemental IV anesthesia. There were no significant differences in anesthesia provider or surgeon satisfaction, intra-operative complications, adverse events, or supplemental anesthesia between groups, except for higher anesthesia provider satisfaction with oral sedation in an Ahmed or Baerveldt implant ± cataract surgery sub-group (p=0.04). Subjects receiving supplemental anesthesia included 6 oral (18.2%) and 5 IV (13.5%) in the cornea group (p=0.59), and 7 oral (29.2%) and 6 IV (31.6%) in the glaucoma group (p=0.50). Conclusion: Our results suggest that an initial dose of oral triazolam is equivalent to IV midazolam for non-cataract anterior segment surgeries. However, there was a relatively high need for supplemental IV anesthesia during some surgery types, particularly with glaucoma tube shunt implantation.

Poor Correlation of Provider and Patient Satisfaction with Anesthesia in Ophthalmic Surgeries: A Secondary Analysis of a Clinical Trial.

Purpose: This secondary analysis of a clinical trial that measured surgeon, anesthesiologist, and patient satisfaction following ophthalmic surgery under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with a benzodiazepine investigates the degree of association between patient satisfaction with anesthesia compared to surgeon and anesthesiologist satisfaction with anesthesia. Patients and Methods: Data from analogous 6-point surgeon satisfaction surveys and anesthesiologist satisfaction surveys were compared to data from a 6-point validated patient satisfaction survey collected from a clinical trial investigating satisfaction with different forms of benzodiazepine for patients undergoing cataract, retina, cornea, or glaucoma surgery. Relationships between measures were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient, with further subgroup analysis based on language groups and single-question measures of satisfaction. Results: A total of 283 ophthalmic surgical cases were analyzed. Mean surgeon satisfaction was 5.27 (range, 1.33-6.00), mean anesthesiologist satisfaction was 5.12 (range, 1.17-6.00), and mean patient satisfaction was 5.28 (range, 2.58-6.00). The correlation between surgeon and patient satisfaction was 0.333 (p = 9.06e-9), while the correlation between anesthesiologist and patient satisfaction was 0.319 (p = 4.28e-8). There was no difference between English and non-English speaking patients in correlation between surgeon and patient satisfaction (p = 0.08) and anesthesiologist and patient satisfaction (p = 0.47). Conclusion: The data demonstrate a low level of association between patient satisfaction with anesthesia and provider satisfaction, even when patient language is taken into consideration. This suggests that providers are poor predictors of patient satisfaction with anesthesia and are unreliable judges of patient comfort perioperatively.

Real-World Clinical Impact of Netarsudil 0.02% at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital.

Purpose: To analyze the efficacy, safety, and accessibility of netarsudil 0.02% in patients with glaucoma (suspect, open or closed) at a safety-net academic medical center, Boston Medical Center (BMC). Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients prescribed netarsudil 0.02% for uncontrolled glaucoma at BMC between December 2017 and September 2019. Outcome measures included change in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline and evaluation of adverse events (AEs). Results: One hundred thirty patients (60% severe stage) were analyzed. The IOP reduction from baseline was about 3 mmHg. Fifty-four patients (42%) experienced an AE (eg, conjunctival hyperemia). Thirty-eight patients (29%) started netarsudil 0.02% in lieu of laser or surgery. Ninety-nine patients (71%) required prior authorization for insurance coverage of netarsudil 0.02%. Ten patients (7%) were unable to obtain netarsudil 0.02% due to issues with insurance coverage. Conclusion: Netarsudil 0.02% yielded significant IOP reduction in our cohort, however, to a smaller degree compared with prior studies that bore equivocal IOP reduction regardless of baseline IOP. Conjunctival hyperemia was the most common AE. In a limited number of patients, netarsudil 0.02% was not covered by insurance.

A Comparison of Patient Acceptance of 3 Eye Drop Instillation Aids.

PRECIS: Patients can be quite amenable to using eye drop instillation aids. We should consider recommending these devices to patients who otherwise struggle with drop instillation and medication adherence. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare patient acceptance of 3 commercially available eye drop instillation aids in a diverse tertiary care population. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized controlled study, 39 patients being treated with topical antihypertensives were assigned to Arm A (no intervention) or Arm B (AutoDrop, AutoSqueeze, or SimplyTouch). Subjects in Arm B were instructed to administer their eye drop with the assigned drop aid at every use for ~6 weeks. Satisfaction surveys were administered at 3 and 6 weeks, where patients also reported the number of drops missed. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 39 subjects completed study participation and full data analysis. Within this total group, 24 subjects were randomized to drop aids (AutoDrop N=10, AutoSqueeze N=8, SimplyTouch N=6), and 8 were randomized to no drop aid. At the 3 and 6-week timepoints, patients found instillation easier with AutoDrop (70.0%, 60.0%) followed by the AutoSqueeze (62.5%, 75.0%), and lastly SimplyTouch (33.3%, 33.3%). For the AutoSqueeze, the mean number of drops missed with and without the drop aid were significantly different (P=0.015 at 3 wk, P=0.008 at 6 wk). There was no difference in the mean number of drops missed with the AutoDrop and SimplyTouch at either timepoint. CONCLUSIONS: For the AutoDrop and AutoSqueeze groups, over 60% of the patients found the devices helpful and would consider using them long-term. Our results suggest that patients would be amenable to using eye drop instillation aids, although more objective data is needed to determine whether these devices would improve medication compliance and clinical outcomes.

A Pilot Study of Automated Pupillometry in the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: A rough, visual estimate of pupil size is used in grading the severity of opioid withdrawal. Few studies have examined the clinical utility of more precise automated pupillometry measurements. METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled 27 patients receiving opioid agonist therapy (OAT) to treat cravings or withdrawal during an acute hospitalization. Six sets of automated pupillometry measurements were obtained at regular intervals before and after administration of OAT. Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale measurements were performed pre and post OAT. Primary outcomes included pupil size in dark and bright illumination (mm). Latency of the pupillary light response (s), constriction and dilation velocity (mm/s), and percent constriction (%) were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The mean predosing pupil size in dark and bright illumination was 4.33 ±â€Š1.40 mm and 2.96 ±â€Š0.79 mm, respectively. A significantly decreased mean pupil size was first detected at 15 minutes postdosing (4.01 ±â€Š1.34 mm, P = 0.0115 for dark illumination; 2.71 ±â€Š0.72 mm, P = 0.0003 for bright illumination) and this reduction in pupil size persisted at later postdosing timepoints. Those with Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale <5 after dosing had a greater decrease in dark pupil size (10.6% ±â€Š13.2 vs 3.2% ±â€Š3.2, P = 0.043). There was no significant change in the remaining pupil reactivity parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Automated pupillometry demonstrated a small but significant change in mean pupil size that occurred within 15 minutes of OAT dosing and was associated with low withdrawal scores. This pilot may inform future work to incorporate pupillometry measurement into OAT dosing assessments.