A Comparison of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scores among Individuals with Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implants.

OBJECTIVES: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a cognitive screening tool that has 4 of 10 test items heavily dependent on auditory input, potentially leaving hearing-impaired (HI) individuals at a disadvantage. Previous work found that HI individuals scored lower than normal-hearing (NH) individuals on the MoCA, potentially attributed to the degraded auditory signals negatively impacting the ability to commit auditory information to memory. However, there is no research comparing how cochlear implant (CI) recipients perform on the MoCA relative to NH and HI individuals. This study aimed to (1) examine the effect of implementing three different hearing-adjusted scoring methods for a group of age-matched CI recipients and NH individuals, (2) determine if there is a difference between the two groups in overall scores and hearing-adjusted scores, and (3) compare scores across our CI and NH data to the published HI data for all scoring methods. We hypothesized that (1) scores for CI recipients would improve with implementation of the hearing-adjusted scoring methods over the original method, (2) CI recipients would score lower than NH participants for both original and adjusted scoring methods, and (3) the difference in scores between NH and CI listeners for both adjusted and unadjusted scores would be greater than that reported in the literature between NH and HI individuals due to the greater severity of hearing loss and relatively poor spectral resolution of CIs. DESIGN: A total of 94 adults with CIs and 105 adults with NH were initially enrolled. After age-matching the two groups and excluding those who self-identified as NH but failed a hearing screening, a total of 75 CI participants (mean age 61.2 y) and 74 NH participants (mean age 58.8 y) were administered the MoCA. Scores were compared between the NH and CI groups, as well as to published HI data, using the original MoCA scoring method and three alternative scoring methods that excluded various auditory-dependent test items. RESULTS: MoCA scores improved for all groups when two of the three alternative scoring methods were used, with no significant interaction between scoring method and group. Scores for CI recipients were significantly poorer than those for age-matched NH participants for all scoring methods. CI recipients scored better than the published data for HI individuals; however, the HI group was not age matched to the CI and NH groups. CONCLUSIONS: MoCA scores are only partly affected by the potentially greater cognitive processing required to interpret degraded auditory signals. Even with the removal of the auditory-dependent items, CI recipients still did not perform as well as the age-matched NH group. Importantly, removing auditory-dependent items significantly and fundamentally alters the test, thereby reducing its sensitivity. This has important limitations for administration and interpretation of the MoCA for people with hearing loss.

Timing of First Set of Pressure Equalization Tubes in Pediatric Patients With Cleft Deformities.

OBJECTIVES: Children with cleft palates often have comorbid eustachian tube dysfunction requiring pressure equalization tubes (PETs). PETs can relieve middle ear effusions that impede hearing. Ideal PET placement timing in this population is controversial. In this study, the audiologic exam passing rates of patients with cleft palate prior to and following PET insertion were assessed. Rates for patients receiving PETs at different ages were compared. It was hypothesized that earlier PET placement may benefit patients with additional months of improved hearing. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients with cleft palate between November 22, 2016 and November 22, 2021 at a tertiary center. Statistical analysis compared passing/normal audiologic exams in patients receiving PETs at different ages. RESULTS: A total of 348 patients had cleft palate diagnoses, received PETs, and had adequate hearing data for inclusion. Those with PETs inserted at 3 months of age or less had an increase in percent of patients passing audiologic exams following versus prior to PET insertion of 13% (1.3 times improvement). Those receiving PETs between 7- and 12-months had the largest rate of improvement (42%) (2.4 times improvement); other groups had changes in passing rates between 31% and 40%. The rate of passing audiologic exams following PET insertion was high across all groups, ranging from 66% to 81%. CONCLUSION: This is one of the first studies exploring the timing of PET placement in this population and showed that patients receiving PETs at 3 months of age or younger passed subsequent audiologic exams at similar rates relative to those receiving PETs later in life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:3391-3394, 2024.

Pediatric Otolaryngology fellowship virtual interview sentiments.

BACKGROUND: Interviews for Pediatric Otolaryngology fellowship rapidly transitioned to virtual interviews mid-cycle in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe perspectives on virtual versus in-person interviews for both applicants and program directors. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. Surveys were conducted of all Pediatric Otolaryngology fellowship applicants participating in the San Francisco Match and program directors in 2020 and 2021. RESULTS: Out of 32 U.S. trained fellowship applicants, 24 completed the survey in 2020 and 18 in 2021. While 70% of applicants felt they did not get the same experience with virtual interviews, 75% did not feel it changed how they ranked programs. Applicant perception of virtual interviews improved in 2021, with the majority (56%) preferring virtual interviews if provided an option. Twenty out of 36 fellowship directors completed the survey in 2020, and eighteen in 2021. While fellowship directors continued to prefer in-person in 2021, an increased number (10% in 2020, 30% in 2021) felt continuing with virtual interviews may increase the number of applicants in the future. CONCLUSION: Based on the survey, both applicants and fellowship directors had a less favorable perception of virtual interviews compared to in-person interviews initially; however, applicant perception favored virtual interviews in 2021, while Program Directors continued to prefer in-person.

Skull base osteomyelitis with extensive bony erosion complicated by venous sinus thrombosis.

Skull base osteomyelitis (SBO) mimics the presentation of various conditions, including solid tumors. Computed tomography-guided core biopsy for culture informs antibiotic selection, and with intravenous corticosteroids, may minimize chronic neurologic dysfunction. Although SBO predominantly affects individuals who are diabetic or immunocompromised, it is important to be able to recognize SBO presenting in an otherwise healthy individual.

Disparities in Index of Care for Otolaryngologic Procedures Performed in Ambulatory and Inpatient Settings.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the same surgical procedure performed in ambulatory and inpatient settings to determine the demographics associated with this selection, the differences in 30-day revisit rates, and the total 30-day cost of care. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Ambulatory and inpatient centers in Florida, New York, and Maryland. METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, the State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database, and the State Inpatient Database were used to identify patients undergoing commonly performed otolaryngologic procedures in 2016. The State Emergency Department Database and State Inpatient Database were used to identify 30-day revisits. RESULTS: A total of 55,311 patients underwent an otolaryngologic procedure: 51,136 (92.4%) ambulatory and 4175 (7.6%) inpatient. Adjusted odds of receiving care in the ambulatory setting was significantly lower for Black patients (odds ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.55-0.85]; P = .001) and nonspecified other races (odds ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.52-0.95]; P = .001) as compared with White patients. Women had 1.16-higher adjusted odds of undergoing a procedure in the ambulatory setting (95% CI, 1.05-1.29; P = .005). Insurance status and income were associated with location of care in the subcategorization of head and neck surgery. Adjusted inpatient procedure costs were significantly more than ambulatory (median, $59,112 vs $14,899); 30-day adjusted costs were $71,333.07 (95% CI, $56,223.99-$86,42.15; P < .001) more expensive for inpatient procedures vs ambulatory; and the adjusted 30-day odds of revisit were 2.23 times greater (95% CI, 1.44-3.44; P < .001) for ambulatory surgery across all procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities exist in the use of ambulatory settings to provide otolaryngologic surgery. Additional research is required to ensure equitable triaging of surgical care setting.

Canalplasty for Exostosis Removal Comparing Microscopic Versus Endoscopic Ear Surgery Techniques.

OBJECTIVE: To compare an endoscopic versus microscopic approach to removal of exostoses and osteomas in canalplasty procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Private and tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS: Adult patients requiring canalplasty procedures performed either microscopically or endoscopically for removal of exostosis or osteoma and/or canal stenosis. INTERVENTION: Microscopic or endoscopic canalplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Major outcome measures included assessment of hearing improvement as well as rates of major and minor complications. Standard audiological data were collected before and after the operative procedure. Major complications queried included stenosis, perforation of the tympanic membrane, hearing loss, facial palsy, and osteomyelitis. Minor complications queried included signs of poor wound healing, graft failure, and bleeding or discharge. RESULTS: Forty three canalplasties were performed on 36 patients. Audiometric tests did not significantly differ between endoscopic and microscopic surgeries. There was a moderate linear relationship between date of surgery and duration of surgery for the endoscopic technique, with more recent surgeries taking less time. No major complications were noted. However, significantly fewer endoscopic cases had evidence of minor postoperative complications relative to microscopic cases. CONCLUSIONS: An endoscopic approach to canalplasty is a safe and minimally invasive technique. Significantly fewer postoperative complications occurred after endoscopic canalplasty procedures as compared with microscopic procedures. Endoscopic repair may be preferred to microscopic repairs due to the improved view of the end of the instruments while maintaining a minimally invasive approach with what is likely a decreased operative time as well.

The changing landscape of vestibular schwannoma diagnosis and management: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the current state of the diagnosis and management of vestibular schwannoma (VS) as well as treatment trends, and to evaluate the role of treatment setting and various specialists in treatment plan. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with VS completed a voluntary and anonymous survey. The questionnaires were distributed through Acoustic Neuroma Association website, Facebook page, and e-mail newsletters from January to March 2017. RESULTS: In total, 789 VS patients completed the survey. Of those, 414 (52%) underwent surgery; 224 (28%) underwent radiotherapy; and 121 (15%) were observed. General otolaryngologists diagnosed 62% of responders, followed by primary care (11%) and neurotologists (10%). Patients who underwent surgery were significantly younger and had larger tumors compared to those treated with radiation or observation. The ratio of patients having nonsurgical versus surgical resection changed from 1:2 to 1:1 for the periods of 1979 through 2006 versus 2007 through 2017, respectively. Neurosurgeons (40%) and neurotologists (38%) were the most influential in treatment discussion. Neurotologists (P < 0.001) and general otolaryngologists (P = 0.04) were more influential than neurosurgeons for the decision process in patients with smaller tumors. Patients treated at academic versus nonacademic private institutions reported similar tumor sizes (P = 0.27), treatment decisions (P = 0.09), and decision satisfaction (P = 0.78). CONCLUSION: There is a continuing trend toward nonsurgical management, with approximately half of the patients opting for nonsurgical management. In this cohort, the patients commonly presented with otologic symptoms and otolaryngologists made the most diagnoses. Neurotologists and neurosurgeons were the most influential in treatment discussion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 130:482-486, 2020.

Towards the Prevention of Aminoglycoside-Related Hearing Loss.

Aminoglycosides are potent antibiotics deployed worldwide despite their known side-effect of sensorineural hearing loss. The main etiology of this sensory deficit is death of inner ear sensory hair cells selectively triggered by aminoglycosides. For decades, research has sought to unravel the molecular events mediating sensory cell demise, emphasizing the roles of reactive oxygen species and their potentials as therapeutic targets. Studies in recent years have revealed candidate transport pathways including the mechanotransducer channel for drug entry into sensory cells. Once inside sensory cells, intracellular targets of aminoglycosides, such as the mitochondrial ribosomes, are beginning to be elucidated. Based on these results, less ototoxic aminoglycoside analogs are being generated and may serve as alternate antimicrobial agents. In this article, we review the latest findings on mechanisms of aminoglycoside entry into hair cells, their intracellular actions and potential therapeutic targets for preventing aminoglycoside ototoxicity.