RESUMEN
AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of once-daily ipragliflozin 50 mg versus placebo in Japanese people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) inadequately controlled with insulin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Participants (N = 175) were randomized (2:1) to receive once-daily ipragliflozin 50 mg (n = 115) or placebo (n = 60), combined with insulin, for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c); key secondary endpoints included change in insulin dose and body weight. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated. RESULTS: The ipragliflozin group demonstrated a significant decrease in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment versus the placebo group: adjusted mean difference (AMD) -3.8 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval [CI] -6.2, -1.5) or - 0.36% (95% CI -0.57, -0.14; P = 0.001). Significant reductions in total daily insulin dose (AMD -7.35 IU [95% CI -9.09, -5.61]; P < 0.001) and body weight (AMD -2.87 kg [95% CI -3.58, -2.16]; P < 0.001) were observed for the ipragliflozin group versus placebo. Two serious TEAEs occurred (major hypoglycaemia and abdominal abscess); both were in the placebo group. All other TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. Four cases of study discontinuation occurred; three in the placebo group and one in the ipragliflozin group. No diabetic ketoacidosis was reported for any participant in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Daily ipragliflozin 50 mg in combination with insulin significantly reduced HbA1c, daily insulin dose and body weight versus placebo in people with T1DM. No safety concerns were identified after 24 weeks of treatment. Overall, once-daily ipragliflozin 50 mg was both efficacious and well tolerated.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucósidos , Hipoglucemiantes , Insulina , Tiofenos , Adulto , Peso Corporal , Femenino , Glucósidos/efectos adversos , Glucósidos/uso terapéutico , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/efectos adversos , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tiofenos/efectos adversos , Tiofenos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
AIM: To evaluate the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of the novel oral sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, ipragliflozin, in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Patients were randomized to receive 25, 50, or 100 mg/day ipragliflozin or placebo for 2 weeks. Key pharmacokinetic endpoints included area under the concentration-time curve 24 hours postdose (AUC24h ), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ), and renal clearance. Key pharmacodynamic endpoints included 24-hour urinary glucose excretion, mean plasma glucose AUC0-24h , and mean renal glucose clearance. Changes in total, basal, and bolus insulin dosages were recorded. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored for safety. RESULTS: Dose-dependent increases were observed in AUC24h and Cmax on days 1 and 14 for 25-, 50-, and 100-mg ipragliflozin. The mean plasma glucose AUC0-24h was lower than that of placebo and the mean renal glucose clearance increased in a dose-dependent manner from baseline, but remained unchanged in the placebo group. The mean (standard deviation) change from baseline in total daily insulin dose was greater in the ipragliflozin 25-, 50-, and 100-mg groups (-14.77 ± 14.04%, -18.40 ± 12.49% and -19.25 ± 16.77%, respectively), than placebo (-4.51 ± 16.28%). Most AEs were mild in severity; no patients discontinued the study because of treatment-emergent AEs. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of ipragliflozin in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus were confirmed. Increases in urinary glucose excretion lead to dose-dependent decreases in plasma glucose. Concomitant insulin dose decreased with ipragliflozin treatment. No clinically relevant safety concerns were identified.
Asunto(s)
Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucósidos , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2 , Tiofenos , Adulto , Anciano , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Glucósidos/administración & dosificación , Glucósidos/efectos adversos , Glucósidos/farmacología , Glucósidos/uso terapéutico , Glucosuria , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/farmacología , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico , Tiofenos/administración & dosificación , Tiofenos/efectos adversos , Tiofenos/farmacología , Tiofenos/uso terapéutico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ipragliflozin vs placebo as add-on therapy to metformin and sitagliptin in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre, phase III study was conducted in Korea in 2015 to 2017. Patients were randomized to receive either ipragliflozin 50 mg/day or placebo once daily for 24 weeks in addition to metformin and sitagliptin. The primary endpoint was the change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to end of treatment (EOT). RESULTS: In total, 143 patients were randomized and 139 were included in efficacy analyses (ipragliflozin: 73, placebo: 66). Baseline mean (SD) HbA1c levels were 7.90 (0.69)% for ipragliflozin add-on and 7.92 (0.79)% for placebo. The corresponding mean (SD) changes from baseline to EOT were -0.79 (0.59)% and 0.03 (0.84)%, respectively, in favour of ipragliflozin (adjusted mean difference -0.83% [95% CI -1.07 to -0.59]; P < .0001). More ipragliflozin-treated patients than placebo-treated patients achieved HbA1c target levels of <7.0% (44.4% vs 12.1%) and < 6.5% (12.5% vs 1.5%) at EOT (P < .05 for both). Fasting plasma glucose, fasting serum insulin, body weight and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance decreased significantly at EOT, in favour of ipragliflozin (adjusted mean difference -1.64 mmol/L, -1.50 µU/mL, -1.72 kg, and -0.99, respectively; P < .05 for all). Adverse event rates were similar between groups (ipragliflozin: 51.4%; placebo: 50.0%). No previously unreported safety concerns were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Ipragliflozin as add-on to metformin and sitagliptin significantly improved glycaemic variables and demonstrated a good safety profile in Korean patients with inadequately controlled T2DM.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucósidos/administración & dosificación , Metformina/administración & dosificación , Fosfato de Sitagliptina/administración & dosificación , Tiofenos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Glucemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Glucósidos/efectos adversos , Hemoglobina Glucada/efectos de los fármacos , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Metformina/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , República de Corea , Fosfato de Sitagliptina/efectos adversos , Tiofenos/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
To examine differential improvements among cardiovascular risk factors in response to treatment with ipragliflozin in Japanese type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, we conducted a pooled analysis of six randomized, double-blind trials of Japanese T2DM patients who received ipragliflozin 50 mg/day or placebo and had patient-level data for cardiometabolic risk parameters. Risk factors included glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance and beta-cell function (HOMA-R and HOMA-beta, respectively), systolic blood pressure, fasting serum insulin concentrations, and the concentration of uric acid, lipids, and liver enzymes from baseline to end of treatment (EOT; 12-24 weeks). The primary endpoint of each trial was the change in HbA1c from baseline to EOT. Changes in risk factors from baseline to EOT were compared between ipragliflozin-treated and placebo groups, and between two subgroups (high- and low-risk groups for each parameter). All parameters, except low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non HDL-C), improved significantly in the ipragliflozin group. Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly greater improvement in the high-risk group versus low-risk group in HbA1c, HOMA-R, HOMA-beta, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, and gamma-glutamyltransferase, but not in any of the lipid parameters or blood pressure. Liver function improvement in the ipragliflozin group was significantly correlated with changes in body weight, HbA1c, HOMA-beta, and HOMA-R. This analysis demonstrated that, in Japanese T2DM patients, ipragliflozin 50 mg/day was associated with improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors, except for LDL-C and non HDL-C.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucósidos/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Tiofenos/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Glucemia/análisis , Índice de Masa Corporal , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Resistencia a la Insulina , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The phase 3 COMMODORE trial evaluated gilteritinib versus salvage chemotherapy (SC) in a predominantly Asian relapsed/refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated (FLT3mut+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patient population. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included event-free survival (EFS) and complete remission (CR) rate. As of June 30, 2020 (interim analysis: 32.2 months after study initiation), 234 patients were randomized (gilteritinib, n = 116; SC, n = 118). Median OS was significantly longer with gilteritinib versus SC (9.6 vs. 5.0 months; HR 0.566 [95% CI: 0.392, 0.818]; p = 0.00211) with a median follow-up of 10.3 months. Median EFS was also significantly longer with gilteritinib (2.8 vs. 0.6 months; HR 0.551 [95% CI: 0.395, 0.769]; p = 0.00004). CR rates with gilteritinib and SC were 16.4% and 10.2%, respectively; composite CR rates were 50.0% and 20.3%, respectively. Exposure-adjusted grade ≥3 adverse event (AE) rates were lower with gilteritinib (58.38 events/patient-year [E/PY]) versus SC (168.30 E/PY). Common AEs with gilteritinib were anemia (77.9%) and thrombocytopenia (45.1%). Gilteritinib plasma concentration peaked ~4 h postdose; ~3-fold accumulation occurred with multiple dosing. The COMMODORE trial demonstrated that gilteritinib significantly improved OS and EFS in predominantly Asian patients, validating the outcomes of gilteritinib from the ADMIRAL trial in R/R FLT3mut+ AML.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ (PPARδ) plays a central role in modulating mitochondrial function in ischemia-reperfusion injury. The novel PPARδ modulator, ASP1128, was evaluated. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, biomarker assignment-driven, multicenter study was performed in adult patients at risk for acute kidney injury (AKI) following cardiac surgery, examining efficacy and safety of a 3-day, once-daily intravenous dose of 100 mg ASP1128 versus placebo (1:1). AKI risk was based on clinical characteristics and postoperative urinary biomarker (TIMP2)â¢(IGFBP7). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with AKI based on serum creatinine within 72 hours postsurgery (AKI-SCr72h). Secondary endpoints included the composite end point of major adverse kidney events (MAKE: death, renal replacement therapy, and/or ≥25% reduction of estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) at days 30 and 90). Results: A total of 150 patients were randomized and received study medication (81 placebo, 69 ASP1128). Rates of AKI-SCr72h were 21.0% and 24.6% in the placebo and ASP1128 arms, respectively (P = 0.595). Rates of moderate/severe AKI (stage 2/3 AKI-SCr and/or stage 3 AKI-urinary output criteria) within 72 hours postsurgery were 19.8% and 23.2%, respectively (P = 0.609). MAKE occurred within 30 days in 11.1% and 13.0% in the placebo and ASP1128 arms (P = 0.717), respectively; and within 90 days in 9.9% and 15.9% in the placebo and ASP1128 arms (P = 0.266), respectively. No safety issues were identified with ASP1128 treatment, but rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation were lower (11.6%) than in the placebo group (29.6%). Conclusion: ASP1128 was safe and well-tolerated in patients at risk for AKI following cardiac surgery, but it did not show efficacy in renal endpoints.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to assess the long-term (52-week) efficacy and safety of ipragliflozin in insulin-treated Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and inadequate glycemic control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 28-week, open-label extension of a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, 24-week phase III study, ipragliflozin recipients continued treatment (50 mg, once daily), and placebo recipients were switched to once-daily 50 mg ipragliflozin at the start of the extension period. The ipragliflozin dose could be increased to 100 mg if warranted. The primary end-point was change in glycated hemoglobin; secondary end-points were change in insulin dose and bodyweight. Safety outcomes were monitored as treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 53 (placebo switched to ipragliflozin) and 108 (ipragliflozin) patients completed the open-label extension (treatment period 2), with 24 and 44 patients, respectively, receiving dose increases. From baseline to end of treatment, the overall mean change (standard deviation [SD]) in glycated hemoglobin was -0.33% (0.72; -3.7 mmol/mol [7.9]), with changes in basal, bolus and total insulin doses of -3.76 IU (SD 3.85 IU), -2.51 IU (SD 7.08 IU) and -6.27 IU (SD 8.16 IU), respectively. No serious drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events or deaths were reported. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to study discontinuation occurred in zero and three (2.6%) patients in the placebo switched to ipragliflozin and ipragliflozin groups, respectively; all were considered drug-related. There were no cases of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis, and no safety concerns related to dose increase. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of 50 mg, once-daily ipragliflozin in insulin-treated type 1 diabetes mellitus patients were confirmed in this long-term, open-label extension study. No safety concerns were attributed to a dose increase to 100 mg.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucósidos/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico , Tiofenos/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Pueblo Asiatico , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Transactivadores , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To characterize the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship of ipragliflozin in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and to determine the appropriate dose regimen for a Phase III study of ipragliflozin in Japanese patients with T1DM. METHODS: The PK (AUC24h of plasma ipragliflozin) and PD (renal glucose clearance) properties in patients with T1DM and T2DM were assessed in 2 independent clinical pharmacologic studies of ipragliflozin. The same maximum efficacy (Emax) model described the PK/PD relationship in patients with T1DM and T2DM. Changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in T1DM patients were simulated by applying a previously established FPG model for ipragliflozin in patients with T2DM. FINDINGS: Data from 42 patients with T1DM and 28 patients with T2DM were used. Comparable AUC24h of plasma ipragliflozin and similar dose dependency were observed on day 14 between patients with T1DM and those with T2DM. Decreases in renal glucose clearance were comparable regardless of the ipragliflozin dose in both groups of patients. The estimated mean Emax and AUC24h producing 50% of Emax (EX50) were 45.1 mL/min (95% CI, 37.0-53.2 mL/min) and 2160 ng·h/mL (95% CI, 929-3390 ng·h/mL), respectively, in all patients with T1DM and T2DM. Observed FPG in patients with T1DM was reproduced well by the simulation from the previously established FPG model. IMPLICATIONS: The PK/PD properties for ipragliflozin were comparable between patients with T1DM and T2DM, suggesting no substantial difference in PK/PD relationships in both patient populations. The dose regimen used for patients with T2DM was also recommended for a Phase III study in Japanese patients with T1DM. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01023945 and NCT02529449.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucósidos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/administración & dosificación , Tiofenos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Área Bajo la Curva , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Glucósidos/farmacocinética , Glucósidos/farmacología , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/farmacocinética , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/farmacología , Tiofenos/farmacocinética , Tiofenos/farmacologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine long-term efficacy/safety of ipragliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, added to ongoing insulin therapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We conducted a 36-week, open-label extension of ipragliflozin therapy following a 16-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind period (treatment periods II and I, respectively). Prior to the open-label period, patients taking insulin with/without a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor were randomized to receive placebo or 50 mg once-daily ipragliflozin. Oral antidiabetic drugs other than DPP-4 inhibitors were discontinued 4 weeks before screening. Following treatment period I, all patients received open-label ipragliflozin 50 mg, with the possibility of a dose increase to 100 mg at week 24 if HbA1c was ≥ 7.0% at week 20. Efficacy endpoints were changes in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), self-monitored blood glucose, bodyweight, and metabolic hormones. Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored for safety. RESULTS: Of 175 patients randomized to ipragliflozin, 168 entered treatment period II, 121 (69%) of whom completed this period. The mean ± standard deviation changes in HbA1c, FPG, and bodyweight from baseline (start of treatment period I) to the end of treatment were - 0.83 ± 0.72%, - 31.5 ± 41.2 mg/dL, and - 1.34 ± 1.80 kg, respectively. Between weeks 8 and 32, HbA1c was lower in patients taking a DPP-4 inhibitor than in those without. The most common drug-related TEAE was hypoglycemia; no drug-related TEAEs not already reported for ipragliflozin were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Ipragliflozin was well tolerated, effective, and reduced bodyweight over a period of 52 weeks in patients treated with insulin with/without a DPP-4 inhibitor. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02175784.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Few data are available regarding ipragliflozin treatment in combination with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ipragliflozin in combination with GLP-1 receptor agonists in Japanese patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: This multicenter study (consisting of three periods: a 4-week washout period, a 6-week observation period, and a 52-week open-label treatment period) included patients aged ≥ 20 years who received a stable dose/regimen of a GLP-1 receptor agonist either solely or in combination therapy with a sulfonylurea for ≥ 6 weeks, with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of ≥ 7.5% and a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) of ≥ 126 mg/dL. Ipragliflozin treatment was given at a fixed dose of 50 mg/day for 20 weeks, followed by 50 or 100 mg/day for 32 weeks. Changes from baseline in glycemic control and other parameters were examined; safety was also assessed. RESULTS: The mean changes in HbA1c and body weight from baseline to end of treatment were - 0.92% and - 2.69 kg, respectively, in all ipragliflozin-treated patients (n = 103). Overall, sustained reductions from baseline were observed for HbA1c, FPG, self-monitored blood glucose, and body weight during the 52-week treatment. The dose increase of ipragliflozin to 100 mg/day resulted in better glycemic control and weight reduction for patients in whom the 50-mg dose was insufficient. Overall, 46.6% (48/103) of patients experienced drug-related adverse events. The most common drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were pollakiuria (9.7%), hypoglycemia (8.7%), constipation (6.8%), and thirst (5.8%). CONCLUSION: Combined therapy with ipragliflozin and GLP-1 receptor agonists/sulfonylureas was significantly efficacious in reducing glycemic parameters in patients with T2DM with inadequate glycemic control, and no major safety concerns were identified. The results from this study suggest that ipragliflozin can be recommended as a well-tolerated and effective add-on therapy to a GLP-1 receptor agonist for the treatment of T2DM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02291874). FUNDING: Astellas Pharma Inc., Tokyo, Japan.