A staged use of tourniquet does not influence the fast-track recovery after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.

INTRODUCTION: Upper-tight tourniquet is widely used in Total Knee Arthroplasty in different modalities. However, it has been associated with a negative impact on post-operative muscle strength end pain. This study aimed to investigate the effect of tourniquet on post-operative pain and recovery in enhanced recovery joint surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective randomized study, we included 116 patients undergoing to TKA. Surgery was performed with a staged use of tourniquet in Group A (58 patients) and without tourniquet in Group B. In the former group a low-pressure tourniquet was deflated after bone cuts to allow hemostasis of posterior recess and re-inflated for cementation. For all patients a multimodal fast-track recovery protocol was used. Time to reach rehabilitation milestones was recorded as primary endpoint. Range of motion, pain, hemarthrosis, total blood loss, surgical field visualization, Knee Score (KS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were considered as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: . No statistically significant differences were found (group B: average 1.3 ± 0.6 day; group A: average 1.2 ± 0.5 day). Group A had a shorter mean surgical time and a clearer surgical field visualization. Group B had a larger estimated blood loss and hemoglobin drop without a statistically significant difference in the transfusion rate. No differences between the groups were seen in the KS, OKS and range of motion (ROM) and post-operative joint swelling. Pain score was similar between cohorts and recorded thigh pain was surprisingly greater in group B. DISCUSSION: The use of tourniquet in TKA surgery helps to minimize intraoperative blood loss and improves surgical field visualization. Its application with a modern and staged protocol does not affect the functional outcomes (OKS, KSS, ROM) of the early post operative period without compromising the fast-track recovery.

"Systematic review and meta-analysis of ceramic coated implants in total knee arthroplasty. Comparable mid-term results to uncoated implants."

BACKGROUND: Nitride-based ceramic coatings, such as titanium nitride (TiN) and titanium niobium nitride (TiNbN), have been introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to enhance the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of knee components, harden the metal surface and reduce CoCrMo exposure and metal ion release. However, the theoretical advantages of these ceramic coatings in TKA have yet to be fully elucidated. This systematic review aimed to provide clinical evidence on mid-term outcomes of ceramic-coated knee prostheses in comparison with uncoated standard CoCrMo knee prostheses in primary TKA. The hypothesis was that ceramic-coated implants can be used in primary TKA with no inferior outcomes compared to uncoated CoCrMo implants. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to find all clinical studies regarding primary TKA with ceramic-coated knee prostheses. MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Library were searched from 1990 to October 2020 to identify relevant studies for the first qualitative analysis. Using PICOS eligibility criteria, a subgroup of the selected studies was used to perform a meta-analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included in this systematic review, of which six were included in the meta-analysis: 3 randomized controlled trials, 2 retrospective comparative studies and 1 prospective cross-sectional study. Pooled data overall included 321 coated TKAs vs. 359 uncoated TKAs and a mean follow-up of 4.6 years (range, 2-10 years). No significant difference in the implant survival risk ratio with revision or reoperation due to any reason was found between coated and uncoated TKAs, even considering the RCT study subgroup with a risk ratio of 1.02 (P = 0.34). No significant differences were found for postoperative complications, clinical scores, or metal blood concentrations at 1 year. CONCLUSION: The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis support the statement that ceramic-coated TKAs are not inferior to uncoated TKAs, showing comparable survival rates, complication rates and clinical outcomes. There is strong evidence that ceramic-coated TKA does not improve the clinical results or survival rate in comparison with uncoated TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II,  Therapeutic.

Synovial Biomarkers to Detect Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Pilot Study to Compare Calprotectin Rapid Test, Calprotectin ELISA Immunoassay and Leukocyte Esterase Test.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication after joint replacement surgery, and making diagnosis is often far from obvious. Calprotectin was recently proposed as a promising synovial biomarker to detect PJI. To our knowledge, no comparative study exists between enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and rapid calprotectin test (CalFAST). Our purpose was to compare these methods with leukocyte esterase (LE) test from synovial fluid of painful knee arthroplasty subjected to infectious workup. METHODS: Ninety-three patients were included in this prospective observational study. They underwent synovial fluid aspiration that was analyzed for cell count, microbiological culture, LE test, calprotectin rapid test, and calprotectin immunoassay dosage. The 2018 Consensus Statements criteria for PJI were used to diagnose PJI. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, and receiver operating characteristic were calculated for detection methods and compared. RESULTS: We categorized 39 patients as infected and 50 patients as not infected. The sensitivity comparing the ELISA test and CalFAST test was similar, 92.3% and 97.4%, respectively. LE rapid test showed 46% of sensitivity and 94% of specificity. The highest specificity was found with ELISA test (100%). Comparing the receiver operating characteristic curves by z-test, there were statistically significant differences between LE strip test and the other two methods. Otherwise, no statistically significant differences were present between ELISA and CalFAST test. CONCLUSION: Synovial calprotectin detection has high accuracy in knee PJI diagnosis, both ELISA and rapid test. LE strip test remains a good test to confirm the diagnosis of PJI in case of positivity. In clinical practice, the calprotectin rapid test can be considered an excellent point-of-care test.

Synovial Fluid Calprotectin for the Preoperative Diagnosis of Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents a challenge in clinical practice and the analysis of synovial fluid is a useful diagnostic tool. Calprotectin is an inflammatory biomarker widely used in the evaluation of chronic inflammatory diseases; however, little is known about its role in PJI. The purpose of this study is to determine the reliability of synovial calprotectin in the diagnosis of PJI. METHODS: Seventy-six patients with painful knee arthroplasty were included in this prospective observational study. Synovial fluid was analyzed for cell count, percentage of polymorphonuclear neutrophils, microbiological culture, leukocyte esterase strip test, alpha-defensin rapid test, and calprotectin immunoassay dosage. The 2018 Consensus Statements criteria for PJI were used as standard reference to define the presence of infection. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, and receiver-operation characteristic curve were calculated for calprotectin immunoassay test. RESULTS: By 2018 Consensus Statements criteria for PJI, 28 patients were considered infected, 44 patients were considered not infected, and 4 patients were classified as inconclusive. The calprotectin synovial fluid test resulted in 2 false-positive results and no false-negative results. The calprotectin synovial fluid test demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 99.96-100) and specificity of 95% (95% CI 89.4-100) for the diagnosis of PJI. The positive likelihood ratio was 22 (95% CI 5.680-85.209) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0 (95% CI 0-0.292). The area under the receiver-operation characteristic curve was 0.996 (95% CI 94.3-100). CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that synovial calprotectin immunoassay test has a high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of knee PJI. Moreover, it is easily applied, quick and valuable in clinical practice.

Treatment of avascular osteonecrosis of femoral head by core decompression and platelet-rich plasma: a prospective not controlled study.

PURPOSE: Core decompression is a surgical option since the 1960s for hip osteonecrosis treatment. This technique promotes bone repair by reducing intramedullary pressure, but this is not often enough to stop the progression of necrosis. The aim of this study was to associate core decompression with the regenerative stimulus provided by platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and compare our results with other regenerative techniques. METHODS: Femoral head osteonecrosis was prospectively evaluated in 30 hips (22 patients, 15-60 years) treated by core decompression and PRP graft. Patients presented monolateral or bilateral osteonecrosis in stage I-IIA-IIB according to Arlet and Ficat classification. The outcome was assessed by changes in Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the need for total hip replacement (THA). RESULTS: The mean preoperative HHS was 64 points, at two years from surgery was roughly 84 points. Sixteen of 30 hips showed osteonecrosis progression of the femoral head and were converted to THA. At the five year follow-up, the survival rate was 100% for patients at stage I, 67% for stage IIA, and 0% for stage IIB and was 68% and 32% for idiopathic and secondary osteonecrosis, respectively. CONCLUSION: Core decompression combined with PRP could be indicated as a treatment for the I and IIA stages of osteonecrosis, as it significantly reduces joint pain and delays THA. This procedure should be avoided in AVNFH related to cortisone therapy because only a few benefits have been proven. It also has the advantage of being technically simple, minimally invasive, and free from complications.

A novel quantitative grading system for implant fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Aims: Obtaining solid implant fixation is crucial in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) to avoid aseptic loosening, a major reason for re-revision. This study aims to validate a novel grading system that quantifies implant fixation across three anatomical zones (epiphysis, metaphysis, diaphysis). Methods: Based on pre-, intra-, and postoperative assessments, the novel grading system allocates a quantitative score (0, 0.5, or 1 point) for the quality of fixation achieved in each anatomical zone. The criteria used by the algorithm to assign the score include the bone quality, the size of the bone defect, and the type of fixation used. A consecutive cohort of 245 patients undergoing rTKA from 2012 to 2018 were evaluated using the current novel scoring system and followed prospectively. In addition, 100 first-time revision cases were assessed radiologically from the original cohort and graded by three observers to evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the novel radiological grading system. Results: At a mean follow-up of 90 months (64 to 130), only two out of 245 cases failed due to aseptic loosening. Intraoperative grading yielded mean scores of 1.87 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.82 to 1.92) for the femur and 1.96 (95% CI 1.92 to 2.0) for the tibia. Only 3.7% of femoral and 1.7% of tibial reconstructions fell below the 1.5-point threshold, which included the two cases of aseptic loosening. Interobserver reliability for postoperative radiological grading was 0.97 for the femur and 0.85 for the tibia. Conclusion: A minimum score of 1.5 points for each skeletal segment appears to be a reasonable cut-off to define sufficient fixation in rTKA. There were no revisions for aseptic loosening at mid-term follow-up when this fixation threshold was achieved or exceeded. When assessing first-time revisions, this novel grading system has shown excellent intra- and interobserver reliability.

Revision knee surgery: the practical approach.

Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is a challenging procedure with often unreproducible results. A step-by-step approach is fundamental to achieving good outcomes.Successful surgery requires a correct diagnosis of the original cause of failure. Only with an accurate and detailed plan can surgeons overcome difficulties presented in this scenario.Any bone loss should be prevented during prosthetic component removal. Efficient tools must be chosen to avoid time-consuming manoeuvres.Joint reconstruction based on a 'dual-zone' fixation is essential to provide a long-term survivorship of the implant. The use of relatively short fully cemented stems combined with a biological metaphyseal fixation is highly recommended by authors.Flexion and extension gaps are accurately balanced after the establishment of the tibial platform.Varus-valgus laxity is commonly managed with a condylar constrained prosthesis. If hinged implants are required, a stronger implant fixation is needed to counteract constraints forces. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:495-500. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210018.