RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Disconnected branch pulmonary arteries with a systemic arterial origin of the disconnected vessel is a rare, but well-described entity. Most will have ductal tissue connecting the pulmonary artery to the aorta. CASE SUMMARY: We describe in this paper the haemodynamic result in three neonates presenting with ductal origin of a single branch pulmonary artery in the context of trans-catheter stenting procedures to maintain or re-recruit vessel patency. All were faced with potential or actual ductal closure and proceeded to trans-catheter stenting to re-cannalate the duct-dependent pulmonary artery. Two patients with otherwise normal anatomy struggled post-procedure with pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dilatation. Both required surgical re-anastomosis of the disconnected pulmonary artery during the same admission-one 26 days post-stenting following failure to wean from high-flow respiratory support and the second 8 days post-stenting following failed extubation. In contrast, a patient with tetralogy of Fallot born at 2.5 kg underwent sequential stenting of the right ventricular outflow tract and then the left-sided ductus. He had a good post-procedural course and thrived for several months before complete repair. DISCUSSION: We describe the clinical courses and discuss the resultant haemodynamics, highlighting the importance of flow to each lung, the resulting haemodynamic implications and the compounding effects of additional lesions.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To review our experience with valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) in adult patients after the previous surgery for congenital heart disease. METHODS: From August 2008 to February 2014, 11 patients (mean age: 30.5 ± 7.7 years), previously operated for various congenital cardiac defects, mostly conotruncal lesions, underwent VSARR for progressive aortic root dilatation. Five patients had also developed moderate, and 1 patient severe aortic valve (AoV) insufficiency. All aortic root procedures were performed by the same operating surgeon in two institutions. The mean interval between the initial procedure and aortic root surgery was 25.7 ± 7.7 years. At the time of reoperation, the mean aortic root diameter was 53.4 ± 6.2 mm. The reimplantation technique (David procedure) was used in all patients. Seven patients underwent concomitant procedures. The median follow-up was 32 months (range 12-78 months). RESULTS: No mortality occurred in hospital or during the follow-up period. Ten patients remain in NYHA functional class I; 1 patient with a single-ventricle circulation is in NYHA functional class II. During the immediate postoperative period, 2 patients underwent drainage of a pericardial collection and 1 patient required renal replacement therapy with eventual full recovery of renal function. No other reoperations or reinterventions were needed during the follow-up period. The most recent echocardiogram in 10 patients have demonstrated no or trivial AoV insufficiency. One patient, however, with severe aortic insufficiency preoperatively, developed mild AoV regurgitation shortly after the operation, which has progressed to moderate regurgitation 1 year following the operation. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of our experience in a small group of patients confirms that valve-sparing aortic root surgery can be safely performed in adult congenital patients presenting with progressive aortic root dilatation following their previous surgery. Although we have analysed patients with different original congenital cardiac lesions and the follow-up period is not long, we can conclude that the use of the reimplantation technique (David procedure) have resulted in overall satisfactory AoV function at follow-up. Longer follow-up with larger series will be needed, however, before firm conclusions can be drawn.