RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Overcrowded emergency departments (EDs) may increase the risk of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) transmission. METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental study divided into 2 phases (baseline and intervention) to investigate the impact of an intervention on the acquisition rate and identify risk factors for CRE colonization in an ED of a tertiary academic hospital in Brazil. In both phases, we did universal screening with rapid molecular test (blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA48, blaOXA23, and blaIMP) and culture. At baseline, both screening test results were not reported, and patients were put under contact precautions (CP) based on previous colonization or infection by multidrug-resistant organisms. During the intervention, all patients hospitalized in the ED were placed in empiric CP and the result of CRE screening was reported; if negative, patients were released from CP. Patients were rescreened if they stayed >7 days in the ED or were transferred to an intensive care unit. RESULTS: A total of 845 patients were included: 342 in baseline and 503 in intervention. Colonization at admission was 3.4% by culture and molecular test. Acquisition rates during ED stay dropped from 4.6% (11/241) to 1% (5/416) during intervention (P = .06). The aggregated antimicrobial use in the ED decreased from phase 1 to phase 2 (804 defined daily doses [DDD]/1000 patients to 394 DDD/1000 patients, respectively). Length of stay >2 days in the ED was a risk factor for CRE acquisition (adjusted odds ratio, 4.58 [95% confidence interval, 1.44-14.58]; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Early empiric CP and rapid identification of CRE-colonized patients reduce cross-transmission in ED. Nevertheless, staying >2 days in ED compromised efforts.
Asunto(s)
Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae , Humanos , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Control de Infecciones , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Our aim in this retrospective cohort study was to assess the impact on mortality of the empirical use of polymyxin as therapy for carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) in septic patients. The study was performed at a tertiary academic hospital in Brazil, from January 2018 to January 2020, the pre-coronavirus disease 2019 period. METHODS: We included 203 patients with suspected sepsis. The first doses of antibiotics were prescribed from a "sepsis antibiotic kit", which contained a selection of drugs, including polymyxin, with no preapproval policy. We developed a logistic regression model to assess risk factors associated with 14-day crude mortality. Propensity score for polymyxin was used to control biases. RESULTS: Seventy (34%) of 203 patients had infections with at least 1 multidrug-resistant organism isolated from any clinical culture. Polymyxins in monotherapy or in combination therapy were prescribed to 140 of the 203 (69%) patients. The overall 14-day mortality rate was 30%. The 14-day crude mortality was associated with age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.05; P = .01), SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score value (aOR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.09-1.32; P < .001), CR-GNB infection (aOR, 3.94; 95% CI, 1.53-10.14; P = .005), and time between suspected sepsis and antibiotic administration (aOR, 0.73; 95% CI, .65-.83; P < .001). The empirical use of polymyxins was not associated with decreased crude mortality (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, .29-1.71; P = .44). CONCLUSIONS: Empirical use of polymyxin for septic patients in a setting with high CR-GNB prevalence was not associated with decreased crude mortality.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Sepsis , Humanos , Polimixinas/uso terapéutico , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: High rates of antibiotic use (AU) among inpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) despite low rates of bacterial coinfection and secondary infection have been reported. We evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on AU in healthcare facilities (HCFs) in South America. METHODS: We conducted an ecologic evaluation of AU in inpatient adult acute care wards in 2 HCFs each in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile. The AU rates for intravenous antibiotics were calculated as the defined daily dose per 1000 patient-days, using pharmacy dispensing records and hospitalization data from March 2018-February 2020 (prepandemic) and March 2020-February 2021 (pandemic). Differences in median AU were compared between the prepandemic and pandemic periods, using the Wilcoxon rank sum test to determine significance. Interrupted time series analysis was used to analyze changes in AU during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Compared with the prepandemic period, the median difference in AU rates for all antibiotics combined increased in 4 of 6 HCFs (percentage change, 6.7%-35.1%; P < .05). In the interrupted time series models, 5 of 6 HCFs had significant increases in use of all antibiotics combined immediately at the onset of the pandemic (immediate effect estimate range, 15.4-268), but only 1 of these 5 HCFs experienced a sustained increase over time (change in slope, +8.13; P < .01). The effect of the pandemic onset varied by antibiotic group and HCF. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial increases in AU were observed at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting the need to maintain or strengthen antibiotic stewardship activities as part of pandemic or emergency HCF responses.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , COVID-19 , Humanos , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pacientes Internos , Pandemias , Chile/epidemiología , Argentina/epidemiología , BrasilRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Only two naturally occurring human Sabiá virus (SABV) infections have been reported, and those occurred over 20 years ago. METHODS: We diagnosed two new cases of SABV infection using metagenomics in patients thought to have severe yellow fever and described new features of histopathological findings. RESULTS: We characterized clinical manifestations, histopathology and analyzed possible nosocomial transmission. Patients presented with hepatitis, bleeding, neurological alterations and died. We traced twenty-nine hospital contacts and evaluated them clinically and by RT-PCR and neutralizing antibodies. Autopsies uncovered unique features on electron microscopy, such as hepatocyte "pinewood knot" lesions. Although previous reports with similar New-World arenavirus had nosocomial transmission, our data did not find any case in contact tracing. CONCLUSIONS: Although an apparent by rare, Brazilian mammarenavirus infection is an etiology for acute hemorrhagic fever syndrome. The two fatal cases had peculiar histopathological findings not previously described. The virological diagnosis was possible only by contemporary techniques such as metagenomic assays. We found no subsequent infections when we used serological and molecular tests to evaluate close contacts.
Asunto(s)
Arenavirus del Nuevo Mundo , Infección Hospitalaria , Fiebre Amarilla , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Brasil/epidemiología , HumanosRESUMEN
Ventilator associated pneumonia(VAP) is a severe complication that can lead to high mortality when not early identified or when therapy is delayed. The aim of this study was to evaluate procalcitonin(PCT) as a biomarker for VAP development. In total, 73 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were analyzed. PCT levels greater than 0.975ng/mL were more related to VAP. No association was found for C-reactive protein (CRP). The results show that procalcitonin may be a pertinent biomarker for VAP diagnosis and can be a helpful tool for antibiotic withdrawal.
Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/diagnóstico , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores/sangre , COVID-19/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/complicaciones , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Curva ROC , SARS-CoV-2 , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The global spread of carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO) has been considered by international health authorities as a critical public health concern. Brazil has a high CPO prevalence according to distinct publications but many routine microbiology laboratories have only phenotypic resources to evaluate this epidemiological situation, which is time-consuming and detects only carbapenem-resistant isolates missing CPO susceptible expressing a slightly decreased susceptibility. New molecular platforms can detect CPO faster but a local evaluation is essential. AIM: To evaluate the performance of CPO detection direct from rectal swabs with the Xpert Carba-R™ assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) in the largest Brazilian University Hospital. METHODS: A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of CPO was performed with the collection of rectal swabs from patients admitted into the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and into the Emergency Department (ED) between April and July 2016. The Xpert Carba-R™ assay results were compared with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) surveillance cultures plus in-house PCR carbapenemase detection (reference method). In case of discordant results between methods, additional tests were performed. The limit of detection (LoD) for the CRE culture and the Xpert Carba-R™ assay were performed with contrived isolates of known carbapenemases genes. RESULTS: A total of 921 clinical rectal swabs were analyzed being 21% (196/921) from the ICU and 79% (725/921) from the ED. Overall, the Xpert Carba-R™ assay detected 9.9% (91/921) of CPOs being 9.5% (87/921) positive only for blaKPC and 0.4% (4/921) positive only for blaNDM. The reference method detected 9.1% (84/921) CPO being 77 (8.4%) blaKPC, 5 blaVIM (0.5%) and 2 blaNDM (0.2%). No IMP or OXA-48 like gene was detected. Overall, twelve samples, 1.3% (10 blaKPC, 2 blaNDM) were Xpert Carba-R™ positive but negative by the reference method. Five isolates (0.5%) were positive for blaVIM only by in-house PCR and confirmed to be blaVIM-2 by DNA sequencing. The Kappa value, sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values and accuracy of the Xpert Carba-R™ assay were; 0.893 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.842-0.944), 94% (86.7-98.0), 98.6% (97.5-99.3), 86.8% (78.1-93.0), 99.4% (98.6-99.8) and 98.2% (97.3-99.1), respectively. The LoD for blaKPC of the Xpert Carba-R™ assay and the CRE cultures were 101 CFU/swab. CONCLUSION: The Xpert Carba-R™ assay is an accurate test to detect CPO directly from the rectal swabs with significant lower turnaround time (TAT) when compared to the reference method (CRE culture plus in-house PCR). Xpert Carba-R™ may, therefore, be regarded as a good and fast epidemiological tool.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/genética , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/diagnóstico , beta-Lactamasas/genética , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Brasil , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/métodos , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadAsunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/prevención & control , Pacientes , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/enzimología , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/patogenicidad , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/transmisión , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the last decade, non-multiresistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (NM-MRSA) has been described as an important agent in bloodstream infections in our hospital. METHODS: This prospective cohort study, conducted from February 2009 through January 2010 in the neonatal unit, evaluated 403 newborns (NB), their 382 mothers and 148 health care workers (HCW). RESULTS: Approximately 217 NB (54%), 187 mothers (48%) and 87 HCW (59%) were colonized by S. aureus (SA). MRSA colonization was greater among NB (15%) than mothers (4.7%) and HCW (3.4%). Although mother-to-NB transmission occurred, in most cases mothers were not responsible for NB colonization. There were 2 predominant PFGE patterns among the NB and some mothers and HCW became colonized by them. Factors significantly associated with MRSA carriage by NB were lower level of maternal schooling (risk factor: odds ratio: 2.99; 95% confidence interval: 1.10-8.07) and maternal rhinosinusitis (protective factor: odds ratio: 0.33; 95% confidence interval:0.12-0.88). Among NB who remained hospitalized for more than 72 hours, breast feeding was protective (odds ratio: 0.22; 95% confidence interval: 0.05-0.98). All the isolates were NM-MRSA, carried few virulence factors and SCCmec types IVa and type IVd predominated. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no cases of infection, nosocomial transmission of MRSA clearly occurred in the neonatal unit, and this highlights the need for infection control practices such as hand hygiene to prevent cross-dissemination. Other healthcare practices, which are very basic but also ample in scope, may play a role, such as general education of women and breast feeding.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Portador Sano/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Femenino , Genotipo , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/clasificación , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Epidemiología Molecular , Tipificación Molecular , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/transmisiónRESUMEN
The objective was to evaluate the performance of surveillance cultures at various body sites for Staphylococcus aureus colonization in pregnant women and newborns (NB) and the factors associated with nasal colonization. For NB, 4 sites were evaluated: nares, oropharynx, perineum, and umbilical stump (birth, third day, and weekly). For pregnant women, 4 sites during labor: anterior nares, anus, perineum, and oropharynx. Nasally colonized patients were compared with colonized only extranasally. Colonization was 53% of 392 pregnant women (methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]: 4%) and 47% of 382 NB (MRSA: 9%). For newborn patients, the best body site was the umbilical stump (methicillin-susceptible S. aureus [MSSA]: 64%; MRSA: 68%) and the combination of nares + umbilical (MSSA: 86%; MRSA: 91%). Among pregnant women, the best body site was the anterior nares (MSSA: 59%; MRSA: 67%) and the combination of nares + oropharynx (MSSA: 83%; MRSA: 80%). A smaller number of household members were associated with MRSA carriage in pregnant women (2.2 ± 0.6 versus 3.6 ± 1.8; P = 0.04). In conclusion, multiple culture sites are needed. Control programs based on surveillance cultures may be compromised.