RESUMEN
Medical waste poses high risks to healthcare workers, patients, the environment, and public health. Governments have adopted measures and enacted policies to ensure proper medical waste management. Through a retrospective policy analysis, we analyzed the waste management policy for primary healthcare centers in Saudi Arabia. By adopting Walt and Gilson's health policy analysis framework, we conducted a thematic analysis of documents to analyze the policy context, process, actors, and content. Contextual factors including accreditation, the Saudi Vision-2030 and the healthcare transformation plan contributed to the development of the policy. The policy was adapted from a regional policy that was enacted about 15 years ago. The policy content overlooked components relevant to the specific context of primary healthcare centers. Lack of training and cooperation among stakeholders challenged successful implementation and thus compliance with the policy. Respective stakeholders must take further actions to ensure implementation fidelity and sustainability of the policy.
Asunto(s)
Formulación de Políticas , Administración de Residuos , Humanos , Arabia Saudita , Estudios Retrospectivos , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
Osteosarcopenia is a common condition among elderly and postmenopausal female patients. Site-specific bone mineral density is more predictive of bone-related complications. Few studies have investigated muscle-bone associations. Our results demonstrated that in women, significant positive associations between paraspinal muscles FCSA and vBMD exist at different lumbosacral levels. These regional differences should be considered when interpreting bone-muscle associations in the lumbar spine. INTRODUCTION: There is increasing evidence between bone and muscle volume associations. Previous studies have demonstrated comorbidity between osteoporosis and sarcopenia. Recent studies showed that sarcopenic subjects had a fourfold higher risk of concomitant osteoporosis compared to non-sarcopenic individuals. Although site-specific bone mineral density (BMD) assessments were reported to be more predictive of bone-related complications after spinal fusions than BMD assessments in general, there are few studies that have investigated level-specific bone-muscle interactions. The aim of this study is to investigate the associations between muscle functional cross-sectional area (FCSA) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and site-specific quantitative computed tomography (QCT) volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) in the lumbosacral region among spine surgery patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a prospective institutional database of posterior lumbar fusion patients. Patients with available MRI undergoing posterior lumbar fusion were included. Muscle measurements and FCSA were conducted and calculated utilizing a manual segmentation and custom-written program at the superior endplate of the L3-L5 vertebrae level. vBMD measurements were performed and calculated utilizing a QCT pro software at L1-L2 levels and bilateral sacral ala. We stratified by sex for all analyses. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients (mean age 61.5 years and 52.4% females) were included. We found that female patients had statistically significant lower muscle FCSA than male patients. After adjusting for age and body mass index (BMI), there were statistically significant positive associations between L1-L2 and S1 vBMD with L3 psoas FCSA as well as sacral ala vBMD with L3 posterior paraspinal and L5 psoas FCSA. These associations were not found in males. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that in women, significant positive associations between the psoas and posterior paraspinal muscle FCSA and vBMD exist in different lumbosacral levels, which are independent of age and BMI. These regional differences should be considered when interpreting bone and muscle associations in the lumbar spine.
Asunto(s)
Región Lumbosacra , Osteoporosis , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Densidad Ósea , Músculos Paraespinales/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoporosis/etiologíaRESUMEN
We investigated the effect of posterior lumbar fusion surgery on the regional volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) measured by quantitative computed tomography. Surgery negatively affected the regional vBMD in adjacent levels. Interbody fusion was independently associated with vBMD decline and preoperative epidural steroid injections (ESIs) were associated with less postoperative vBMD decline. INTRODUCTION: Few studies investigate postoperative BMD changes after lumbar fusion surgery utilizing quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Additionally, it remains unclear what preoperative and operative factors contribute to postoperative BMD changes. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of lumbar fusion surgery on regional volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) in adjacent vertebrae and to identify potential modifiers for postoperative BMD change. METHODS: The data of patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion with available pre- and postoperative CTs were reviewed. The postoperative changes in vBMD in the vertebrae one or two levels above the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV+1, UIV+2) and one level below the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV+1) were analyzed. As potential contributing factors, history of ESI, and the presence of interbody fusion, as well as various demographic/surgical factors, were included. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were included in the study analysis. Mean age (±SD) was 62.1 ± 11.7. Volumetric BMD (±SD) in UIV+1 was 115.4 ± 36.9 mg/cm3 preoperatively. The percent vBMD change in UIV+1 was - 10.5 ± 12.9% (p < 0.001). UIV+2 and LIV+1 vBMD changes showed similar trends. After adjusting with the interval between surgery and the secondary CT, non-Caucasian race, ESI, and interbody fusion were independent contributors to postoperative BMD change in UIV+1. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior lumbar fusion surgery negatively affected the regional vBMDs in adjacent levels. Interbody fusion was independently associated with vBMD decline. Preoperative ESIs were associated with less postoperative vBMD decline, which was most likely a result of a preoperative decrease in vBMD due to ESIs.
Asunto(s)
Densidad Ósea , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Periodo Posoperatorio , Fusión Vertebral , Anciano , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Región Lumbosacra/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: There is currently conflicting level 1 evidence in the use of long-term antibiotics for chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps. The primary aim of this feasibility study was to optimise future randomised trial design by assessing recruitment and retention of patients alongside providing preliminary data on symptomatic control. DESIGN: Prospective, multicentre feasibility (cohort) study with all patients receiving macrolide therapy for 12 weeks and a further subsequent 12-week follow-up. Participants received a 12-week course of clarithromycin 250 mg alongside twice daily topical mometasone and nasal douching. Primary outcomes focused on recruitment, retention and compliance. Clinical and quality-of-life outcomes measures were also recorded. SETTING: Patients were prospectively recruited from six UK outpatient clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps and no prior endoscopic sinus surgery underwent baseline assessment and then follow-up at 3 and 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Six-month recruitment and retention data. RESULTS: Over 13 months, 55 adults were recruited from five centres. Four patients declined participation. 75% of patients were retained within the study. Dropouts included one medication contraindication, three unable to tolerate medication and 10 not attending full follow-up. Sino Nasal Outcome Test-22 and endoscopic scores showed statistically significant improvement. No other clinical or quality-of-life assessment improvements were seen. CONCLUSION: Retention and recruitment to a trial using long-term clarithromycin to treat chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps is achievable and this data will support a future randomised controlled trial. The study provides vital insight into trial design, thus informing UK research networks and rhinology researchers internationally.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Rinitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crónica , Esquema de Medicación , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Furoato de Mometasona/uso terapéutico , Selección de Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Irrigación Terapéutica , Reino Unido , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Frontal sinus mucocoeles require a structured approach to their surgical management. We share our experience of a novel method of positional classification for frontal mucocoele and corresponding surgical algorithm. METHODS: A retrospective case-note review examined all frontal sinus surgery for mucocoele, spanning three years (2008-2010). Patients had pre-operative nasendoscopy, multi-planar CT and MRI when indicated. Several important variables (position, drainage dimensions, fronto-ethmoidal cells and degree of neo-osteogenesis) were noted. A systematic algorithm was used for surgical drainage based on these characteristics. The three year outcomes using this approach are presented. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were identified with a total of 43 frontal mucocoeles. Using our classification, 30 mucocoeles were medial; seven were intermediate; six were lateral. Thirty-four patients underwent a primary endoscopic procedure; six required a combined primary osteoplastic-flap (OPF) and endoscopic approach. Six patients required revision surgery for polypoidal change or neo-ostium stenosis. All patients were eventually rendered asymptomatic. CONCLUSION: Implementation of our positional classification and surgical algorithm was successful with a revision rate of 19%. Presence of frontal sinus wall dehiscence and extra-sinus mucocoele extension are invalid indicators for external approach. We feel our classification and treatment algorithm, with its associated indicators for surgical escalation (i.e. limited dimensions of frontal ostium, presence of Type III / IV front-ethmoidal cells etc), are applicable for future management of frontal mucocoeles.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Seno Frontal/cirugía , Mucocele/clasificación , Mucocele/cirugía , Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/clasificación , Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Endoscopía/métodos , Femenino , Seno Frontal/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mucocele/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Background: Mounting research suggests that artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the innovations that aid in the patient's diagnosis and treatment, but unfortunately limited research has been conducted in this regard in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Hence, this study aimed to assess the level of knowledge and awareness of AI among faculty members and medicine students in one of the premier medical colleges in KSA. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at Batterjee Medical College (BMC), Jeddah (KSA), from November 2022 to April 2023. Result: A total of 131 participants contributed to our study, of which three were excluded due to incomplete responses, thereby giving a response rate of 98%. Conclusion: 85.4% of the respondents believe that AI has a positive impact on the healthcare system and physicians in general. Hence, there should be a mandatory course in medical schools that can prepare future doctors to diagnose patients more accurately, make predictions about patients' future health, and recommend better treatments.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patient misidentification errors continue to represent a significant risk to patients, health care staff, and hospitals. The study's purpose was to present a successful quality improvement project implemented in a public hospital in Saudi Arabia. The project focused on increasing staff's compliance with and awareness of the hospital's patient identification policy to thus reducing the number of patient misidentification-related incidents. METHODS: Through a quality improvement project, we employed FOCUS PDSA to address the issue of patient misidentification at outpatient departments. A total of 640 staff members participated in the educational program including physicians, nurses, receptionists, radiologists, physiotherapists, and laboratory staff. Collected data included measures of compliance and awareness levels as well as patient misidentification incidents, before and after the project. Statistical analysis was conducted to measure significant differences in the study indicators before and after the project. RESULTS: Results from the post-project assessment revealed that the project was successful in achieving its objectives. The overall compliance rate and awareness level increased from 59% to 78% and from 75% to 90%, respectively. Improvement in the levels of compliance and awareness was statistically significant. The average number of patient misidentification errors also reduced after the project's implementation with an average of 3 errors per month. The mean difference of patient misidentification errors before and after the project was significant ( P < .01). CONCLUSION: This project demonstrated how quality improvement projects can be used to address a critical issue such as patient misidentification. The project furthers efforts made by national and international agencies to improve patient safety. It also highlights the importance of continuous education and training to ensure compliance with patient identification policies that ultimately contributes to a safer hospital environment.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Seguridad del Paciente , Humanos , Arabia Saudita , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Hospitales PúblicosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The Saudi healthcare and medicolegal systems have seen several developments to improve quality of services and ensure patient safety. However, violation claims have seen an upward trend in the past few years. Several studies have analyzed medical litigation to better understand violations within healthcare sectors and address them accordingly. Such studies have focused extensively on medical litigations filed by patients against healthcare providers, overlooking other plaintiffs, such as governments. In this study, we examined violation claims filed by governmental entities against healthcare providers in the Eastern Province of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. METHODS: From 2016 to 2019, 718 healthcare providers were involved in violation claims that were referred to the Medical Offenses Committee. Two logistic regression analyses were performed to identify significant predictors of receiving a guilty verdict and the verdict type (for guilty verdicts), given defendant-related factors. RESULTS: Eighty-two percent of healthcare providers received a guilty verdict. Guilty verdicts were prevalent among non-Saudis and healthcare providers in the private sector. Healthcare providers working in the private sector were significantly more likely to receive a guilty verdict than healthcare providers working in the public sector. Nurses were significantly less likely to receive a guilty verdict than physicians. Being involved in violation claims with 5 or more codefendants decreased the likelihood of receiving a guilty verdict. In addition, non-Saudis being involved in violation claims with multiple defendants, working in the private sector, and working in pharmacies and medical complexes were significant predictors of the verdict type. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the study extend the extant literature by analyzing medical litigation including plaintiffs other than patients. In addition, the study introduces implications for the government and policymakers as well as areas for future research The study's findings emphasized the importance of employment sector and number of defendants as significant predictors of violation claims' verdicts. Policymakers should take into consideration significant predictors to ensure healthcare providers' compliance with respective rules and regulations. Tailored attention toward these predictors could minimize the prevalence of medical violation claims, ensure patient safety, and avoid associated negative consequences.
Asunto(s)
Mala Praxis , Médicos , Humanos , Arabia Saudita , Personal de Salud , GobiernoRESUMEN
Teleworking has been adopted as a response to COVID-19 to reduce the spread of the infection, while continuing business operations. Saudi Arabia was among the countries that adopted stringent teleworking policies accompanying the first documented COVID-19 case. A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted to explore experiences of employees towards teleworking as a mandated work setting during COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia. We collected data using a questionnaire that was disseminated via different social media platforms during the partial curfew in the Country. The study sample included 471 participants. Most participants (78%) were satisfied with teleworking and reported higher job efficiency (44%) and work concentration (48%), and better work-life balance (56%) and stress management (55%). The positive experience was dependent on factors, such as gender, age, marital status, educational level, working sector and teleworking mode. Men, bachelor's degree holders, nonmarried, and employees working in health and education sectors as well as working flexible hours had less positive experience than their respective counterparts. The research contributes to literature about teleworking as a legitimate alternative work arrangement, while approaching teleworking as a means to reduce risks. As the first study conducted within Saudi Arabia, the study's findings have implications for policy, practice and research.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Masculino , Humanos , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Teletrabajo , ComercioRESUMEN
Discarded polymeric or ceramic membranes are currently in need of appropriate and sustainable management. In the present study, the direct reuse of discarded ceramic membranes in membrane contactor (MC) systems for CO2 removal was investigated for the first time. The hydrophobic surface modification of the discarded ceramic membrane was done by using macromolecule additive coating. The influence of operational parameters (absorbent liquid flow rate (QL), feed gas flow rate (Qg), and different NaOH concentrations) of the MC on CO2 removal was investigated to prove the technical feasibility of reused ceramic membranes. The CO2 absorption flux was 7.9 × 10-4 mol/m2 s at optimal conditions of 2 M NaOH, QL (20 mL/min), and Qg (300 mL/min) with a removal efficiency of 98%, which lasted for 8 h. This study demonstrates a potential alternative for the reuse of discarded ceramic membranes and avoids their disposal in landfills. The proposed approach will also bring membrane technology into the circular economy and achieve sustainability goals by reducing the amount of waste from discarded ceramic membranes in the future and combating global warming by absorbing CO2.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Costs of hospitalization due to severe adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were previously estimated within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), but additional analyses are needed to infer potential interventions to mitigate these negative outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare specific adverse reaction-related hospitalization costs between medications with similar indications. METHODS: Mean hospitalization costs associated with the same ADR symptom were compared for different drugs with similar indications using adjusted generalized linear models with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons as well as a gamma distribution. RESULTS: Overall, hospitalization costs between medications with similar indications were not significantly different for specific adverse reactions. However, gastrointestinal hemorrhage-associated costs were higher for warfarin versus nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (model estimate of mean cost, $18,114 [range of lower and upper model estimates, $12,522-$26,202] vs $14,255 [estimate range, $9,710-$20,929]). Similarly, the estimated mean hospitalization cost associated with angioedema was higher for losartan versus lisinopril or lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide: $14,591 (range, $9467-$22,488) versus $8,935 (range, $6,301-$12,669) and $8,022 (range, $5,424-$11,865), respectively. CONCLUSION: Although we found few differences in the cost of hospitalization when comparing drugs with similar indications and the same adverse reaction, there were specific drug-ADR pairs that merit attention and consideration of interventions to improve safe and appropriate medication use. Evaluation of the effect of those interventions on the incidence of ADRs is an area for future study.
Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Lisinopril , Humanos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Hospitalización , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , IncidenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This research aims to assess the users' perceptions of usability and quality of mobile health applications used for promoting physical activity in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: This was a quantitative cross-sectional study. A survey was developed based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) and distributed among the Saudi population through social media to assess the users' perceptions of using mobile applications to enhance physical activity. The survey questionnaire consisted of 27 questions in six sections, including demographics (nine items), perceived usefulness (three items), perceived ease of use (three items), attitudes (three items), user experience (six items) and subjective quality (three items). All the participants were in Saudi Arabia and >15 y of age. RESULTS: A total of 195 m-Health users participated in the survey. Of the total participants, 25.1% were overweight and 21.0% were obese. The workout frequency of most users was rarely (32.3%) and three to four times a week (29.2%). In addition, 55.9% of the users agreed that the application they use served all fitness levels and >80% either agreed or strongly agreed that it was easy for them to learn how to use the application. More than 70% of users agreed or strongly agreed that the application enhanced their knowledge of workouts and physical activity and >90% would recommend the application to others. There were no differences identified between the male and female participants and younger (<40 y) and older (>40 y) participants with respect to perceived usefulness and ease of use, attitudes, experiences and subjective quality. However, significant differences were observed between participants <40 y and >40 y of age in terms of perceived ease of use of mHealth applications. CONCLUSION: mHealth users across Saudi Arabia believe that the mHealth applications have good usability and quality factors. As a result, they can motivate people and help them achieve their goals in relation to physical activities.
Asunto(s)
Aplicaciones Móviles , Telemedicina , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Arabia Saudita , Estudios Transversales , Ejercicio FísicoRESUMEN
As many industrial and third-world countries recover from the severe economic crisis of a global recession, they continue to struggle with its negative effect on their healthcare systems. Healthcare reform has become a leading policy agenda item for most countries. This is especially true for countries in the developing world who are struggling to allocate very limited resources to meet the growing health needs of their residents and the expectations of global health. In the late 1990s, the Egyptian government, in conjunction with the United States Agency for International Development, initiated a Health Sector Reform Program (HSRP) to completely reform the way healthcare was financed, organized and delivered with the intent to extend healthcare coverage to all of its citizens. Although some successes have resulted from the HSRP, Egypt's new government leaders will need to be informed on policies that may more effectively improve the health of the Egyptian population.
Asunto(s)
Reforma de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , EgiptoRESUMEN
Objectives: Health policy education is increasingly understood to be an important aspect in preparing future health professionals to become active policy leaders. However, current research on health policy education is limited and has been performed predominantly in Western contexts. The aim of this study was to explore and analyze the state of health policy education in KSA. Methods: A qualitative document analysis was performed on the course materials of health policy courses offered in Saudi universities. The inductive and interpretive analysis revealed four themes that were finalized after iterative engagement with data and interpretation. The study's credibility was enhanced through negative case analysis and rival explanations. Results: The results indicated that health policy education was delivered exclusively to specific programs. Whereas health policy courses had specific objectives, the programs' specialization or the Saudi context influenced the foci of these courses. The varying foci in health policy courses were accompanied by content reflecting the policy process and a discussion of various health policy domains. Conclusion: The results underscore the importance of building momentum in health policy education and the crucial roles of academic, health and policy leaders. The holistic approach of this study comprehensively indicates the national status of health policy education and situates the ongoing conversation regarding health policy education in a global context.
RESUMEN
Despite efforts to improve healthcare delivery and ensure patient safety, medicolegal claims in Saudi Arabia remain a concerning issue. This study investigated medical violation claims referred to the medical violation committee in the Eastern Province in Saudi Arabia. A retrospective study was conducted on medical violation claims from 2016 to 2019. Binary logistic regression was performed to examine the association between issued verdicts and a set of defendant, plaintiff and healthcare institution variables. During the study's period, the medical violation committee reached final verdicts against 1242 healthcare professionals in which 69% of them were found guilty. The majority of the defendants worked in private healthcare institutions (66%), were physicians (30%), male (53%), and non-Saudi (64%). Working at pharmacies, other healthcare settings, and the private sector were significantly associated with receiving a guilty verdict. Male healthcare professionals as well as pharmacists were found to have a higher likelihood to receive a guilty verdict than their respective counterparts. Medical violation claims filled by the Ministry of Health were more likely to receive guilty verdicts than those filled by patients or healthcare professionals. Findings of the study extend the literature on medicolegal claims and introduces implications for healthcare professionals and policymakers at institutional and national levels.
Asunto(s)
Médicos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Arabia Saudita/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
This article describes the clinical management of delayed eruption of the upper left permanent central incisor of an eight-year-old child with a history of overlooked intrusive trauma to the primary maxillary incisors. Initial conservative management involved simple extraction of the over-retained upper right primary left incisor. At the recall visit, the decision was made to expose permanent incisors surgically aiming to facilitate its eruption. Two years later, the upper right central and lateral incisors have been erupted into the oral cavity, improving patient aesthetics. This case report aims to demonstrate the clinical diagnosis and intervention for delayed eruption of maxillary permanent central incisor as a consequence of an overlooked intrusive trauma in the primary dentition. Additionally, to emphasize the importance of periodic radiographic examination in monitoring the sequence of eruption in mixed dentition.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to adapt the survey questionnaire designed by Moens et al. (2021) and determine the validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the survey in a sample of the Saudi population experiencing teleworking. METHODS: The questionnaire includes 2 sections. The first consists of 13 items measuring the impact of extended telework during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis. The second section includes 6 items measuring the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on self-view of telework and digital meetings. The survey instrument was translated based on the guidelines for the cultural adaptation of self-administrated measures. RESULTS: The reliability of the questionnaire responses was measured by Cronbach's alpha. The construct validity was checked through exploratory factor analysis followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to further assess the factor structure. CFA revealed that the model had excellent fit (root mean square error of approximation, 0.00; comparative fit index, 1.0; Tucker-Lewis index, 1; standardized root mean squared residual, 0.0). CONCLUSIONS: The Arabic version of the teleworking questionnaire had high reliability and good validity in assessing experiences and perceptions toward teleworking. While the validated survey examined perceptions and experiences during COVID-19, its use can be extended to capture experiences and perceptions during different crises.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , COVID-19/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the knowledge and attitudes of Saudi Arabian citizens towards telemedicine during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was designed to carry out this study. The electronic survey, prepared using Google Forms, was distributed to 1500 randomly selected citizens of Saudi Arabia. A total of 330 participants completed and returned the questionnaire. Basic statistics were used to describe the data. RESULTS: The majority of the respondents (73.9%) were female. More than half of them (54.8%) were >35 y of age and had graduate or postgraduate degrees (65.5%). A total of 96.7% of the respondents were Saudis. Most of the participants (70.0%) were familiar with the term 'telemedicine' and thought that telemedicine (92.1%) could reduce transportation costs. Of the respondents, 58.8% had not seen a telemedicine system before and 67.0% indicated that they had not previously used telemedicine services. A total of 87.3% of the participants agreed or strongly agreed that telemedicine was a useful tool during the COVID-19 pandemic. Also, more than half of the participants agreed or strongly agreed that telemedicine facilitates the diagnosis of people (58.8%), increases communication (58.2%), reduces clinic visits (85.9%) and performs tasks quickly (70.3%). Also, 51.5% of the respondents disagreed or strongly disagreed that telemedicine affects patient privacy. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes indicated that most of the participants had a positive attitude towards the use of telemedicine as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia. They believed that telemedicine saves time, labour and costs and is an effective tool to treat coronavirus patients at a safe distance. However, the government should develop programs to raise awareness in the population about the use of telemedicine for the treatment of various diseases that afflict the Saudi Arabian people. Likewise, a legal framework must be implemented to protect the privacy of patients and healthcare providers.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , SARS-CoV-2 , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to explore the perceptions of different stakeholders about the privatisation of the Saudi health care system. METHODS: Using a qualitative case study design, we interviewed 21 administrators and clinical staff of a public hospital in the Eastern Province of the KSA and analysed all official documents relevant to this study. The analysis followed a thematic approach to provide an in-depth interpretation of the data. RESULTS: Our analysis generated three main themes. The first was pertinent to the changes in the governance structure, with gradually increased autonomy from the government. The second reflected the necessity to introduce accountability within hospitals. The third described the cooperative relationship among the E1-Cluster hospitals as well as its competitive relationship with the private sector. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the interplay between newly introduced concepts of autonomy and accountability within the Saudi health care system. The findings of this study and their implications for research, practice, and policy are elaborated. Such an understanding is essential to improve the implementation process of privatisation and to recognise new dynamics that are shaping the health care system. The study contributes to the current scarce literature on health care reforms in KSA by reporting perceptions and experiences of key stakeholders.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: WhatsApp was the most popular messenger app used in Saudi Arabia with 71% of the total population using it in 2020. WhatsApp is increasingly being used as a tool for mobile health (m-health) interventions; however, concerning blood donation, there is a lack of research studies on the topic. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to measure the general awareness levels of the blood donation process and assess blood donation history, the motivators and inhibitors to donating blood, and to assess the impact of WhatsApp on the blood donation process in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: In this research study, a descriptive quantitative cross-sectional analysis was adopted. A questionnaire survey was designed using Google Forms and distributed online through social media applications to collect data. All citizens aged above 18 years of age were eligible to participate in the survey. There were a total of 150 participants in the study. RESULTS: More than 90% of participants were aware of their blood group, blood donation requirements, and causes to be deferred from the donation. Furthermore, 27% of participants donated blood because their relatives or friends needed blood, 26% donated due to human solidarity, 18% did not donate blood because of their health condition and 14% did not because of the fear of needles. About 33% of participants relied on WhatsApp to search for blood donors, and all the requests were fulfilled with blood donors. In addition, 94% of participants strongly believed that the WhatsApp application had a significant role in bridging the gap for blood banks' need for blood donors. CONCLUSION: Social media applications such as WhatsApp can bridge the gap between blood banks, blood donors and the patients in need of blood in Saudi Arabia, where there is a shortage of blood donors.