Cardiac hydatid disease; a systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Human cystic echinococcosis (CE), is a common health problem in low- and middle-income countries. Cardiac involvement is a relatively rare manifestation of Echinococcus infection. This study aims to summarize the evidence regarding the features of cardiac CE. METHODS: Case series of the patients with cardiac CE, were included in this study. Non-English papers, case reports, reviews, letters, , commentaries, and conference abstracts were not included. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE databases and the risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist. RESULTS: Out of 3985 results of the searches, finally 37 studies were included in this systematic review. Based on available evidence, cardiac involvement is an uncommon but serious presentation of CE which presents with some non-specific signs and symptoms. Dyspnea, chest pain, and palpitation are the most common symptoms of the disease and normal sinus rhythm is the most common Electrocardiogram (ECG) feature. The disease is not associated with high mortality in case of timely diagnosis and appropriate management. DISCUSSION: Consecutive and complete inclusion of participants, statistical analysis, and appropriate reporting of the demographics were the sources of bias in the included studies. The exclusion of non-English papers was a limitation during the review process. FUNDING: The research protocol was approved and supported by the Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (grant number: 69380). REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022381204).

Comparison of the Efficacy of Atorvastatin and Rosuvastatin in Preventing Atrial Fibrillation after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Double-Blind Randomized Comparative Trial.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a supraventricular tachyarrhythmia characterized by disorganized atrial activity and subsequent mechanical atrial failure. Postoperative AF is a frequent complication of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Although there is evidence of decreased AF after CABG with statin usage, information is scarce regarding a direct comparison between atorvastatin and rosuvastatin. The present study was conducted to compare the efficacy of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin in preventing post-CABG AF. Methods: The present double-blind randomized comparative clinical trial selected CABG candidates with stable ischemic heart disease or acute coronary syndromes. Atorvastatin (40 mg per day) or rosuvastatin (20 mg per day) was prescribed 1 week before surgery, and the outcomes were compared. Results: Two-hundred patients, 100 cases in each group, completed the study. Twenty-five patients in each group were female, and the mean age was 59.30±8.42 years in the rosuvastatin group and 60.13±9.40 years in the atorvastatin group (P=0.513). The frequency of AF was 31% in the atorvastatin group and 27% in the rosuvastatin group (P=0.534). No significant differences existed between the groups concerning the length of hospital and ICU stay (P=0.333 and P=0.161) and in-hospital and 3-month mortality (P=0.315 and P=0.648). A subgroup analysis of only patients with stable ischemic heart disease could not detect a significant difference between the study groups in any of the investigated outcomes. Our logistic regression analysis showed an association only between age and the incidence of AF after CABG (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.20; P<0.01). Conclusion: Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin are similar concerning the prevention of post-CABG AF, but there is a need for future well-designed multicenter studies on this topic.

Effects of underlying heart failure on outcomes of COVID-19; a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The risk for worse outcomes of COVID-19 (Coronavirus 2019 disease) is higher in patients with cardiac conditions. In this study, we aim to investigate the risks of COVID-19-induced conditions in cases with underlying heart failure. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, ProQuest, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library, to collect the English language articles that investigated patients with underlying heart failure who get infected by COVID-19. The second version of comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA.2) software was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Results: From 5997 publications, our eligibility criteria were met by 27 studies. Overall, outcomes investigated in all studies include but are not limited to mortality rate, length of hospitalization, need for Intensive care unit (ICU) admission, need for mechanical ventilation, and major cardiovascular conditions. Regarding mortality heart failure patients were more susceptible to death (OR:2.570, 95%CI: 2.085 to 3.169; p-value:<0.001). Also in heart failure patients, the risk of mechanical ventilation was higher (OR:1.707, 95%CI: 1.113 to 2.617; p-value: 0.014). Conclusion: Pre-existing heart failure is associated with the increased risk of mortality and the need for mechanical ventilation while getting infected with COVID-19. Finding an answer to determine the risk of hospitalization, length of stay, readmission rate, and multiorgan failure is necessary for further development of preventive care and making a plan for providing optimal healthcare facilities for these patients.