Effectiveness of educational intervention and cognitive rehearsal on perceived incivility among emergency nurses: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Witnessing or experiencing of incivility affected the nurses' perception of the ethical climate and quality of their work life. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of educational intervention and cognitive rehearsal on perceived incivility among emergency nurses. METHOD: This study was conducted as a randomized controlled parallel group clinical trial. Eighty emergency nurses participated in this study and were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups during December 2019-March 2020. Cognitive rehearsal program (include of definitions of incivility, ten common incivilities and appropriate practice methods for responding to each and role-plays) was delivered in five two-hour sessions over three weeks on different working days and shifts. The control group received only written information about what incivility is and how to deal with it before the implementation of intervention and one month after the completion of the training sessions, the demographic information form and the incivility scale were completed by the nurses. RESULTS: The results showed that there was a significant effect on overall incivility, general incivility, and supervisor incivility between the intervention and control groups. However, these significant reductions were seen in control group who received only written education. There were no significant differences in nurse's incivility towards other nurses, physician incivility, and patient/visitor incivility between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The cognitive rehearsal program did not decrease perceived incivility among emergency department nurses in the short term. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Our research was registered on clinicaltrials.gov. REGISTRATION NUMBER: IRCT20200714048104N1 , first registration 16/07/2020.

The epidemiology and treatment outcomes of COVID-19 patients admitted to an intensive care unit in an Iranian hospital in Neyshabur city.

Background and Aims: The COVID-19 pandemic and the infection of numerous individuals from diverse societies have emerged as major global challenges. Given the limited resources in intensive care units, effective bed management and resource allocation require a deep understanding of the disease. This study aimed to assess the epidemiology and treatment outcomes of COVID-19 patients admitted to an intensive care unit in an Iranian hospital in Neyshabur city. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on COVID-19 patients hospitalized in intensive care units in Razavi Khorasan, Iran in 2021. Census sampling was used to include all intensive care units. Of the initial 480 cases, 54 cases were excluded based on the exclusion criteria, leaving 426 cases for the study. Data were collected with the help of a data collection form that was designed by the researcher and its content validity and reliability were measured with Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α = 89%.). Data were analyzed with SPSS version 20 software. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. Mean, standard deviation, and interquartile range indicators were used for descriptive statistics, and absolute frequency and relative frequency (percentage) were used to show numbers and ratios. Results: The mean (SD) age of the patients was 66.33 (15.05) years, and 49.3% were female. The results showed that arterial blood oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and Alzheimer's disease were significant variables for predicting mortality. Furthermore, arterial blood oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and the need for transfusion of blood products were significant variables in predicting hospitalization and the risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that arterial blood oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and Alzheimer's disease are crucial variables for predicting death. Furthermore, arterial blood oxygen saturation and respiratory rate are significant factors in predicting the risk of ARDS.

Patient Commitment to Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Commitment to Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) is one of the essential strategies to reduce the long-term complications of cardiovascular disease. The attributes of patients' commitment have not been defined distinctly. Thus, the present study aimed to describe the attributes of commitment to CR from the participants' perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This qualitative study was carried out in Tehran from 2018 to 2019. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews with 30 participants, including 13 CR specialists, 13 patients, and four caregivers, through purposeful sampling. The analysis was performed through the conventional content analysis using the Elo and Kyngäs approach. RESULTS: Commitment to CR has one theme titled the attitudinal-motivational aspect that consists of four categories including attitudinal-cognitive, attitudinal-behavioral, attitudinal-emotional, and motivational as the core features. The commitment to CR is devotion, internal desire, and voluntary obligation to initiate and continue CR cooperatively, all of which are accompanied by the purposeful initiation of the treatment plan. CONCLUSIONS: The patient's commitment to CR is an intrinsic interest in achieving health that stems from the acceptance of the disease and the need for treatment. Besides, the rehabilitation team facilitates purposeful interpersonal relationships between the patient and the treatment group. It provides the basis for the patient's active efforts to meet the challenges of the treatment process.

Exploring the consequences of patient commitment to cardiac rehabilitation program: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Commitment to implementing cardiac rehabilitation (CR) plays an important role in managing the problems caused by heart diseases. Commitment to the treatment plan implementation is accompanied by numerous positive consequences. This study was carried out to explain the consequences of commitment to CR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected through semi-structured individual interviews with 26 participants (13 CR specialists and 13 patients), using purposeful sampling. Interview questions focused on the factors influencing the formation of commitment to the CR and its consequences. Conventional content analysis with Graneheim and Lundman's approach was used to analyze the data. To obtain data trustworthiness, Lincoln and Guba's criteria were used. RESULTS: The findings were classified in three categories: purposeful of a purposeful behavior structure (sense of controlling and managing the condition, sense of responsibility, sense of security), formation of active performance structure (interaction between the patient-family-treatment team, stabilization of behavior and prevention of intermittent behavior, no cessation of the treatment plan and adherence to it, directing behaviors and adaptation to conditions) and achieving dynamic and effective care (active follow-up of the treatment plan, sense of satisfaction, reduced readmission, reduced costs, improved quality of life, reduced anxiety and concerns about treatment failure, increased self-care ability). CONCLUSION: The results show that the patient's commitment to CR is accompanied by optimal consequences. The results of this study can help design the training plan for the CR staff and develop the clinical practice guidelines to provide educational-care approaches to patients to reinforce their commitment.

The of effect of partnership-based education on adherence to the treatment plans in open heart surgery.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to the treatment plans is one of the most effective conducts to prevent and reduce postoperative side effects. Partnership-based education is one of the most efficient ways to shape health behaviors. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of partnership-based education on adherence to the treatment plans in open heart surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This quasi-experimental study was conducted in 2019-2020 on the patients undergoing open heart surgery in Tehran (Capital of Iran). Sampling was done in one educational hospital. A total of 86 patients and their caregivers participated in the study. Sampling was done nonrandomly by tossing a coin, and patients were allocated into the odd week in the intervention group and the even week in the control group (n = 43 in each group), and data were collected before and after intervention using the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire concerning dietary, physical activity, and medication aspects. The educational intervention was carried out after the pretest analysis in five 20-45 min sessions (two individual and three group educations). Data were analyzed with Chi-square, independent t-test, and paired t-test using SPSS 19 at a significance level of P < 0.05. RESULTS: Patients and caregivers in both groups did not have a significant difference in terms of demographic variables (P > 0. 05). In addition, there was no significant difference in the mean of dietary, physical activity, and medication plans before the intervention in both groups; however, after the intervention, the mean of the three aspects in the intervention group was significantly higher than that of control (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Implementing partnership-based education with participation of patients and caregivers is influential in improving patients' adherence to the treatment plans and it is recommended as a clinical dynamic educational strategy.

Unwanted isolation: An obstacle to constructive interaction between oncology nurses and their patients.

AIM: The current study was carried out to investigate the obstacles faced by oncology nurses in their interactions with their patients. DESIGN: This research is a descriptive qualitative study. METHODS: In this study, conventional content analysis was used for analysing the data collected from 26 oncology nurses. The participants were selected through purposive sampling. Semi-structured interviews were used for collecting data. Data analysis was conducted with Elo and Kyngäs's approach. RESULTS: The results included three categories: "role conflict," "role overload" and "inefficient interaction," and 10 subcategories.

Comparing the effect of lecture and Jigsaw teaching strategies on the nursing students' self-regulated learning and academic motivation: A quasi-experimental study.

BACKGROUND: In cooperative learning approach, the active and direct involvement of the learner in the learning process leads to a comprehensive development. Self-regulated learning and academic motivation focus on the role of the individual in the teaching-learning process. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the comparing of lecture and Jigsaw teaching strategies on the nursing students' self-regulated learning and academic motivation. METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental conducted from January to November 2018 on 94 nursing students in the fourth education semester in two classrooms. A classroom was randomly assigned to the lecture group and the other as a Jigsaw group. The data collection tools were demographic data questionnaire, self-regulated learning questionnaire, and academic motivation scale. The interventions were lecture and Jigsaw teaching strategy for seven sessions lasting for 2 h in the lecture and Jigsaw groups respectively. Data was collected before and after the interventions. Finally, data was analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test, paired t-test, independent t-test via the PASW-22 software. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of self-regulated learning and academic motivation before the interventions (P = 0.59, P = 0.38), but after the interventions, the mean scores of self-regulated learning and academic motivation were significantly different in Jigsaw group from that of the lecture group (P = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: The Jigsaw teaching strategy can be used for nursing student's theoretical education to improve the self-regulated learning and academic motivation.

The effect of education based on health belief model on health beliefs of women with urinary tract infection.

BACKGROUND: Urinary Tract Infection is one of the commonest infections which affect humans. Half of all women have a UTI in their lifetime and one fourth have recurrent infections. Health behaviours can help patients to prevent Urinary Tract Infection recurrence and changing beliefs is necessary for health behaviour change. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of education based on Health Belief Model on health beliefs of women with Urinary Tract Infection. METHODS: This is a quasi-experimental study with pre-test and post-test design, conducted on 170 married women with Urinary Tract Infection, referred to selected hospital laboratories in Tehran. The laboratories were divided to experience and control groups. The data collection tool was a "self-administrated" questionnaire which was answered by samples of both groups, prior to the intervention and 12 weeks thereafter. The intervention (education based on Health Belief Model) was performed on the experiment group. RESULTS: Based on the study results, after the intervention the average score of the perceived susceptibility (P<0.001), perceived severity (P<0.001), perceived benefits (P<0.001), cues to action (P<0.001) and health behaviours (P<0.001) of the experiment group showed a significant increase, compared to the control group, however, the average score of the perceived barriers (P=0.235) of the experiment group was not significantly different compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: The findings showed that education based on Health Belief Model was effective in promoting the health beliefs (except perceived barriers) and health behaviours of women with Urinary Tract Infection. Therefore, it can be suggested that the mentioned model can be used as one of the strategies for prevention of Urinary Tract Infection in women.