Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 56(2)2020 Jan 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31972958

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: Maxillary bone defects related to post-extraction alveolar ridge resorption are usual. These defects may lead to failure in further surgical implant phases given the lack of bone volume to perform the dental implant. The objective of this clinical assay was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an experimental synthetic bone substitute in the preservation of post-extraction maxillary alveoli. Materials and Methods: 33 voluntary patients who had at least one maxillary premolar tooth that was a candidate for exodontia (n = 39) and subsequent implant rehabilitation participated. The regenerated alveoli were monitored by means of periodic clinical examinations (days 9 ± 1, 21 ± 4, 42 ± 6, and 84 ± 6), measuring the height and width of the alveolar crest (days 0 and 180 ± 5), measurement of radiodensity using tomographic techniques (days 0-5 and 175 ± 5), and histological examination of biopsies collected at 180 ± 5 days. Results: No significant differences were observed during the entire follow-up period between the two groups with respect to the safety variables studied. A variation in width of -0.9 ± 1.3 mm and -0.6 ± 1.5 mm, and a variation in height of -0.1 ± 0.9 mm and -0.3 ± 0.7 mm was observed for experimental material Sil-Oss® and Bio-Oss®, respectively. The radiodensity of the alveoli regenerated with the experimental material was significantly lower than that corresponding to Bio-Oss®. However, the histological study showed greater osteoid matrix and replacement of the material with newformed bone in the implanted beds with the experimental material. Conclusions: Both materials can be used safely and proved equally effective in maintaining alveolar flange dimensions, they are also histologically biocompatible, bioactive and osteoconductive. The experimental material showed the advantage of being resorbable and replaced with newformed bone, in addition to promoting bone regeneration.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Fosfatos de Calcio/farmacología , Durapatita/antagonistas & inhibidores , Gel de Sílice/farmacología , Adulto , Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar/prevención & control , Sustitutos de Huesos/normas , Sustitutos de Huesos/uso terapéutico , Fosfatos de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Durapatita/farmacología , Durapatita/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Maxilar/efectos de los fármacos , Maxilar/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Gel de Sílice/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA