Efficacy and safety of biological therapy compared to synthetic immunomodulatory drugs or placebo in the treatment of Behçet's disease associated uveitis: a systematic review.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of biological therapy with cyclosporin A (CsA), azathioprine (AZA), or placebo in uveitis flares and other ocular outcomes in patients with Behçet disease. A comprehensive and sensitive search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed. We selected articles including: (1) adult patients with Behçet's and uveitis; (2) on biological therapies; (3) placebo or active control with CsA or AZA; (4) analyzing efficacy (number of uveitis flares, macular edema, etc.) and/or safety outcomes. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, clinical trials, and observational studies with > 10 patients were included. The selection, data collection and quality assessment (Oxford scale) was carried out by 2 reviewers independently. Nine articles of moderate quality were included (6 randomized clinical trials and 3 retrospective studies) involving 378 patients. Most of them, apart from the study drugs received systemic corticosteroids and other immunosuppressant drugs. Infliximab was more effective than CsA in reducing short-term uveitis flares and severe complications of retinal vasculitis in the long term. Rituximab was similar to a combination of cytotoxic drugs in improving inflammatory activity. In patients with active uveitis adalimumab was associated with a lower risk of uveitic flare or visual impairment, and in patients with inactive uveitis to a significantly lowered the risk of flare upon corticosteroid withdrawal. Secukinumab and daclizumab were not superior to placebo in reducing uveitis flares, like interferonα compared to other drugs. Our results highlight the need for better designed comparative studies on Behçet's uveitis.

Tocilizumab in patients with Takayasu arteritis: a retrospective study and literature review.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TA). METHODS: Multicentre open-label retrospective study. RESULTS: Eight patients (all women) with a mean age of 34±16 years, median 36 years (range: 7-57) were assessed. The main clinical features at TCZ therapy onset were: constitutional symptoms (n=4), fever (n=3), headache (n=2), chest pain (n=1), abdominal pain (n=1), mesenteric ischaemia (n=1), myalgia involving the lower limbs (n=1), cerebral vascular insufficiency (n=1), malaise (n=1), upper limb claudication (n=1) and nodular scleritis (n=1). Besides corticosteroids and before TCZ treatment onset, 7 of 8 patients had also received several conventional immunosuppressive and/or biologic agents. Seven patients experienced marked clinical improvement in the first 3 months after the onset of TCZ therapy. After a median follow-up of 15.5 [interquartile range-IQR: 12-24] months, 7 patients were asymptomatic. The median C-reactive protein decreased from 3.09 [IQR: 0.5-12] to 0.15 [IQR: 0.1-0.5] mg/dL (p=0.018), and median erythrocyte sedimentation rate from 40 [IQ range: 28-72] to 3 [IQR: 2-5] mm/1st hour (p=0.012). The median dose of prednisone was also tapered from 42.5 [IQR: 25-50] to 2.5 [IQR: 0-7.5] mg/day (p=0.011). However, TCZ had to be discontinued in 1 patient because she developed a systemic lupus erythematosus, and in another patient due to inefficiency. TCZ dose was reduced in a patient because of mild thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: TCZ appears to be effective in the management of patients with TA, in particular in patients refractory to corticosteroids and/or conventional immunosuppressive drugs.

The effect of biologic therapy different from infliximab or adalimumab in patients with refractory uveitis due to Behçet's disease: results of a multicentre open-label study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of other biologic therapies, different from infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA), in patients with Behçet's disease uveitis (BU). METHODS: Multicenter study of 124 patients with BU refractory to at least one standard immunosuppressive agent that required IFX or ADA therapy. Patients who had to be switched to another biologic agent due to inefficacy or intolerance to IFX or ADA or patient's decision were assessed. The main outcome measures were the degree of anterior and posterior chamber inflammation and macular thickness. RESULTS: Seven (5.6%) of 124 cases (4 women/3 men; mean age, 43 (range 28- 67) years; 12 affected eyes) were studied. Five of them had been initially treated with ADA and 2 with IFX. The other biologic agents used were golimumab (n=4), tocilizumab (n=2) and rituximab (n=1). The ocular pattern was panuveitis (n=4) or posterior uveitis (n=3). Uveitis was bilateral in 5 patients (71.4%). At baseline, anterior chamber and vitreous inflammation were present in 6 (50%) and 7 (58.3%) of the eyes. All the patients (12 eyes) had macular thickening (OCT>250µm) and 4 of them (7 eyes), cystoid macular edema (OCT>300 µm). Besides reduction anterior chamber and vitreous inflammation, we observed a reduction of OCT values, from 330.4±58.5 µm at the onset of the biological agent to 273±50 µm at month 12 (p=0.06). Six patients achieved a complete remission of uveitis. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of patients with BU refractory to standard immunosuppressive drugs are successfully controlled with ADA and/or IFX. Other biologic agents appear to be also useful.

Efficacy of Anti-IL6-Receptor Tocilizumab in Refractory Cystoid Macular Edema of Birdshot Retinochoroidopathy Report of Two Cases and Literature Review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate tocilizumab (TCZ) efficacy in severe and refractory birdshot chorioretinopathy (BSCR). METHODS: Assessment of BSCR patients refractory to conventional immunosuppressive and anti-TNF-α drugs who underwent TCZ therapy. RESULTS: Two HLA-A29 positive patients (man/37 years and woman/38 years; four affected eyes) with BSCR were studied. They had a chronic bilateral posterior uveitis. Patient 1 had been treated with intraocular and oral corticosteroids, cyclosporine A, and infliximab whereas Patient 2 received intravenous methylprednisolone pulses, cyclosporine A, azathioprine, and adalimumab. At TCZ onset they had macular edema (four eyes); visual acuity (VA) impairment (four eyes); vitritis (one eye); and diffuse angiographic signs of vasculitis (periphlebitis) (two eyes). Improvement of VA and OCT was observed following TCZ therapy in both patients. After a follow-up of 18 months (Patient 1) and 10 months (Patient 2), respectively, a corticosteroid sparing effect without any adverse effects was achieved in both cases. CONCLUSIONS: TCZ was effective in two patients with BSCR refractory to anti-TNF-α agents.

Anti-Interleukin-6 Receptor Tocilizumab for Severe Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Uveitis Refractory to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy: A Multicenter Study of Twenty-Five Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated uveitis. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter study of patients with JIA-associated uveitis that was refractory to conventional immunosuppressive drugs and anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents. RESULTS: We assessed 25 patients (21 female; 47 affected eyes) with a mean ± SD age of 18.5 ± 8.3 years. Uveitis was bilateral in 22 patients. Cystoid macular edema was present in 9 patients. Ocular sequelae found at initiation of TCZ included cataracts (n = 13), glaucoma (n = 7), synechiae (n = 10), band keratopathy (n = 12), maculopathy (n = 9), and amblyopia (n = 5). Before TCZ, patients had received corticosteroids, conventional immunosuppressive drugs, and biologic agents (median 2 [range 1-5]), including adalimumab (n = 24), etanercept (n = 8), infliximab (n = 7), abatacept (n = 6), rituximab (n = 2), anakinra (n = 1), and golimumab (n = 1). Patients received 8 mg/kg TCZ intravenously every 4 weeks in most cases. TCZ yielded rapid and maintained improvement in all ocular parameters. After 6 months of therapy, 79.2% of patients showed improvement in anterior chamber cell numbers, and 88.2% showed improvement after 1 year. Central macular thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in patients with cystoid macular edema decreased from a mean ± SD of 401.7 ± 86.8 µm to 259.1 ± 39.5 µm after 6 months of TCZ (P = 0.012). The best-corrected visual acuity increased from 0.56 ± 0.35 to 0.64 ± 0.32 (P < 0.01). After a median follow-up of 12 months, visual improvement persisted, and complete remission of uveitis was observed in 19 of 25 patients. Significant reduction in the prednisone dosage was also achieved. The main adverse effects were severe autoimmune thrombocytopenia in 1 patient, pneumonia and then autoimmune anemia and thrombocytopenia in 1 patient, and viral conjunctivitis and bullous impetigo in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: TCZ appears to be a useful therapy for severe refractory JIA-associated uveitis.

Golimumab in refractory uveitis related to spondyloarthritis. Multicenter study of 15 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of golimumab (GLM) in refractory uveitis associated to spondyloarthritis (SpA). METHODS: Multicenter study of SpA-related uveitis refractory to at least 1 immunosuppressive drug. The main outcome variables were degree of anterior and posterior chamber inflammation, visual acuity, and macular thickness. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients (13 men/2 women; 18 affected eyes; mean age 39 ± 6 years) were evaluated. The underlying SpA subtypes were ankylosing spondylitis (n = 8), psoriatic arthritis (n = 6) and non-radiographic axial SpA (n = 1). The ocular involvement patterns were recurrent anterior uveitis in 8 patients and chronic anterior uveitis in 7. Before GLM they have received methotrexate (n = 13), sulfasalazine (n = 6), pulses of methylprednisolone (n = 4), azathioprine (n = 3), leflunomide (n = 2), and cyclosporine (n = 1). Overall, 10 of them had also been treated with TNF-α blockers; etanercept (n = 7), adalimumab (n = 7), infliximab (n = 6), and certolizumab (n = 1). GLM was given at the standard dose (50mg/sc/monthly) as monotherapy (n = 7) or in combination with conventional immunosuppressive drugs (n = 8), mainly methotrexate. Most patients had rapid and progressive improvement of intraocular inflammation parameters. The median number of cells in the anterior chamber at 2 years [0 (0-0)] was significantly reduced compared to baseline findings [1 (0-3); p = 0.04]. The mean best corrected visual acuity value also improved (0.84 ± 0.3 at 2 years versus 0.62 ± 0.3 at baseline; p = 0.03). Only minor side effects were observed after a mean follow-up of 23 ± 7 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that GLM may be a useful therapeutic option in refractory SpA-related uveitis.

Belimumab en lupus eritematoso sistémico: experiencia en práctica clínica en un hospital comarcal / Belimumab in systemic lupus erythematosus: experience in clinical practice settings in a regional hospital

No disponible

Anti-TNF-α therapy in refractory uveitis associated with sarcoidosis: Multicenter study of 17 patients.

OBJECTIVES: To assess anti-TNF-α therapy response in uveitis associated with sarcoidosis refractory to conventional immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: Open-label, multicenter, retrospective study on patients with sarcoid uveitis who underwent anti-TNF-α therapy because of inadequate response to conventional therapy including corticosteroids and at least 1 systemic synthetic immunosuppressive drug. The main outcome measurements were degree of anterior and posterior chamber inflammation, visual acuity, macular thickness, and immunosuppression load. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients (8 men; 29 affected eyes; mean ± standard deviation age 38.4 ± 16.8; range: 13-76 years) were studied. The patients had bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy (58.8%), lung parenchyma involvement (47.1%), peripheral lymph nodes (41.2%), and involvement of other organs (52.9%). Angiotensin-converting enzyme was elevated in 58.8%. The most frequent ocular pattern was bilateral chronic relapsing panuveitis. The first biologic agent used was adalimumab in 10 (58.8%) and infliximab in 7 (41.2%) cases. Infliximab 5mg/kg intravenously every 4-8 weeks and adalimumab 40mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks were the most common administration patterns. In most cases anti-TNF-α therapy was given in combination with immunosuppressive drugs. The mean duration of follow-up was 33.9 ± 17.1 months. Significant improvement was observed following anti-TNF-α therapy. Baseline results versus results at 2 years from the onset of biologic therapy were the following: the median of cells in the ocular anterior chamber (interquartile range-IQR) 0.5 (0-2) versus 0 (0-0) (p = 0.003), vitritis 0 (0-1.25) versus 0 (0-0) (p = 0.008), macular thickness (391.1 ± 58.8 versus 247 ± 40.5µm) (p = 0.028), and visual acuity 0.60 ± 0.33 versus 0.74 ± 0.27; p = 0.009. The median daily (interquartile range) dose of prednisone was also reduced from 10 (0-30)mg at the onset of the anti-TNF-α therapy to 0 (0-0)mg at 2 years (p = 0.02). Significant reduction was also achieved in the immunosuppressive load. CONCLUSION: Anti-TNF-α therapy is effective in sarcoid uveitis patients refractory to conventional immunosuppressive therapy. Infliximab and adalimumab allowed a substantial reduction in prednisone dose despite having failed standard therapy.

Utilidad de las técnicas de imagen para el control de la actividad de la espondiloartritis / Utility of imaging techniques for monitoring disease activity in spondyloarthritis

Si bien la radiografía es la técnica de imagen de primera línea en las espondiloartritis (EspA), tanto esta como la tomografía computarizada permiten apreciar la evolución del daño estructural a medio y largo plazo, pero son insensibles para demostrar entesitis, sacroilitis, sinovitis o tenosinovitis (salvo con contraste), y su rápida modificación con el tratamiento. El uso de técnicas como la ecografía o la resonancia magnética facilitan el diagnóstico precoz, lo que permite modificar el curso de la enfermedad con tratamientos más tempranos y controlar de forma más precisa la respuesta al tratamiento, así como controlar los cambios inflamatorios a corto plazo, apoyados por los hallazgos clínicos y de laboratorio, principalmente aquellos que puedan ofrecer dudas. El uso generalizado de estas técnicas de imagen para el control de las EspA no está aceptado, por costes y falta de evidencia, pero en casos seleccionados y con la colaboración entre radiólogos y reumatólogos pueden ser sumamente importantes en la evaluación de pacientes con sospecha de actividad, y de ella depende tanto la buena evolución del paciente como el uso adecuado de los recursos. El gasto en las pruebas de diagnóstico por la imagen es importante, pero puede ayudar a aprovechar mejor los recursos en las EspA

Although radiography is the first-line imaging technique in spondyloarthritis (SpA), both radiography and computed tomography allow assessment of the progression of structural damage in the medium- and long-term. However, both have poor sensitivity in demonstrating enthesitis, sacroiliitis, synovitis and tenosynovitis (except with contrast medium) and its rapid modification with treatment. The use of techniques such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance aid early diagnosis, which allows modification of the course of the disease with earlier treatment and more precise control of treatment response by monitoring shortterm inflammatory changes and supporting clinical and laboratory findings, mainly those that may raise doubts. The generalised use of these imaging techniques to monitor SpA is not accepted, due to their costs and lack of evidence. However, in selected patients, and with collaboration between radiologists and rheumatologists, they can be extremely important in the assessment of patients with suspected activity, which is essential for both good patient outcomes and adequate resource use. Imaging tests are expensive but may help to make better use of resources in SpA

Utilidad de las técnicas de imagen en la valoración de la respuesta al tratamiento en las espondiloartritis / Utility of imaging techniques in the assessment of treatment response in spondyloarthritis

La ausencia de consenso sobre la evaluación óptima de la actividad de la espondiloartritis obstaculiza el desarrollo de un tratamiento por objetivos. Es cierto que existen medidas de respuesta, tanto para la afectación axial como para la periférica, como ASAS, BASDAI o ASDAS, DAS28 o DAPSA, basadas esencialmente en las manifestaciones clínicas. Esta medidas valoran función e inflamación aunque excluyen progresión radiográfica, por lo que parece importante el apoyo de determinadas pruebas de imagen para una valoración más objetiva del resultado. Entre ellas, las pruebas que han demostrado más utilidad son la ecografía y la resonancia magnética. La ecografía se utiliza fundamentalmente en la afectación periférica (articular, entesis y dactilitis) para evaluar inflamación y progresión radiográfica, y la resonancia fundamentalmente en la afectación axial. Por todo ello se requiere más formación para la autosuficiencia del reumatólogo en la utilización de la ecografía, así como protocolos bien establecidos con el servicio de radiología para una mejor disposición de pruebas, como la resonancia magnética

The lack of consensus on optimal assessment of disease activity in spondyloarthritis has hampered the development of targeted therapy. Although there are response measures, both for axial and peripheral involvement, such as ASAS, BASDAI or ASDAS, DAS28 or DAPSA, which are principally symptom-based and assess functional status and inflammation but exclude radiographic progression, imaging studies are an important support for more objective assessment of the results. Among them, the techniques that have been shown to be most useful are ultrasound and magnetic resonance. Ultrasound is mainly useful in peripheral involvement (joints, enthesis, dactilitis) to assess inflammation and radiological progression and magnetic resonance to assess mainly axial involvement. Consequently, more training is required for rheumatologists to be self-sufficient in the use of ultrasound, as well as well-established protocols with the radiology service for better provision of tests such as magnetic resonance