Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 18(8): e0289148, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37531387

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medication errors represent a significant challenge in healthcare, as they can lead to enduring harm for patients and impose substantial financial burdens on the healthcare system. To effectively mitigate medication errors, it is imperative to gain a comprehensive understanding of their frequency and the contributing variables. Thus, the primary objective of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of medication errors among patients with kidney diseases in Quetta, Pakistan. METHODS: The objective of this study was to assess medication errors in patients diagnosed with kidney diseases in Quetta, Pakistan. The research was conducted at the Balochistan Institute of Nephro-Urology Quetta (BINUQ) Hospital, which serves as a tertiary care center specializing in the treatment of kidney diseases. A cross-sectional descriptive study design was employed over a period of six months. The study population consisted of patients admitted to the Nephro-urology wards at BINUQ Hospital during the specified duration. Data collection encompassed various methodologies, including checklist-guided observation, review of prescription order forms, documentation of drug administration, and comprehensive analysis of patient medical records. Descriptive and analytical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 23. Univariate analysis was employed to identify independent variables associated with medication errors, employing a significance level of p<0.01. The multivariate logistic regression analysis incorporated variables that exhibited a significant association with medication errors during the univariate analysis. Only those variables demonstrating a p-value of less than 0.05 at a 95% confidence level were considered significant predictors of medication administration errors within the final multivariate model. RESULTS: Among the 274 medication errors identified in the study, documentation errors accounted for 118 cases (12.06%), administration errors for 97 cases (9.91%), prescribing errors for 34 cases (3.47%), and dispensing errors for 25 cases (2.55%). Statistical analysis revealed significant associations (p<0.05) between forgetfulness and duty shift, and medication errors in the documentation process. Similarly, inattention was significantly associated (p<0.05) with both prescribing and dispensing errors. Furthermore, the number of medications received emerged as the most influential factor associated with medication errors. Patients receiving 4-6 medications exhibited an odds ratio of 9.08 (p<0.001) compared to patients receiving 1-3 medications, while patients receiving more than 6 medications had an odds ratio of 4.23 (p<0.001) in relation to patients receiving 1-3 medications. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study determined that documentation errors were the most prevalent medication errors observed in patients with kidney disease in Quetta, Pakistan. Forgetfulness and duty shift were associated with documentation errors, whereas inattention was linked to prescribing and dispensing errors. The significant risk factor for medication errors was found to be a high number of prescribed medications. Therefore, strategies aimed at reducing medication errors should prioritize enhancements in documentation practices, alleviating medication burden, and increasing awareness among healthcare providers.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales , Errores de Medicación , Humanos , Pakistán , Estudios Transversales , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Lista de Verificación
2.
Front Public Health ; 10: 819088, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36062098

RESUMEN

Background and Objective: The standards of living, improvement in public health, and medical care in Pakistan are increasing day by day, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has been increasingly acknowledged in various patient's reported outcomes in Pakistan. However, a large-scale general population-based study on assessing HQRoL in Pakistan was not conducted. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate HRQoL for the general Pakistani population. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study with a population sample (n = 16,672) was selected from all Pakistan provinces using a stratified sampling approach. The EQ-5D-3L tool was used to measure the HRQoL of the general population of Pakistan. The descriptive and inferential statistics have been done by using SPSS version 20. Results: Overall, 121 health states were reported in this study. EQ-5D index and EQ-VAS scores were 0.74 ± 0.32 and 0.75 ± 0.25, respectively. The percentage of people responding to any problems increased with age. Males have better health as compared to females in all age groups. All demographics were significantly associated (P < 0.01) with the mean EQ5D index and VAS scores except residence (p > 0.05). The regression model reported that age was the best predictor of the EQ-5D index scores after adjusting for the covariates (beta = 0.19; p < 0.001). This study provides Pakistani population HRQoL data measured by the EQ-5D tool, based on a national representative sample. Conclusion: The current study concluded that Age, City, Gender, Education, Occupation, Residence, and House occupancy are significantly affecting HRQOL. The socioeconomically deprived groups and females have inferior health status than more advantaged. The trends detected in high-income nations were usually similar to Pakistan.


Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Pueblo Asiatico , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pakistán/epidemiología
3.
East Mediterr Health J ; 27(11): 1078-1083, 2021 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34927711

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Typhoid fever is spread by ingestion of contaminated food or water, which is linked to infrastructure; specifically, sewage and sanitation. In developing countries, infrastructure varies according to socioeconomic status (SES). Balochistan is the least developed province of Pakistan. AIMS: To analyse the association between the clinical features of typhoid fever and socioeconomic status. METHODS: A quantitative, cross-sectional study was conducted in Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan. Between May and October 2017, 143 patients presented to tertiary care hospitals and private clinics with a complaint of fever lasting ~3 days, along with a clinical history of headache, malaise, diarrhoea or constipation, abdominal pain, dry cough, and anorexia. All patients had a positive blood culture for Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi. Eighteen patients dropped out of the study, leaving 125. RESULTS: Seventy (56%) participants had low socioeconomic status (SES), 40 (32%) middle SES and 15 (12%) high SES. The strongest predictors of presenting with typhoid fever were patients' clinical condition when presenting to health facilities, followed by SES. Most respondents had a treatment duration of 1-2 weeks. SES had a high impact on source of drinking water supply. CONCLUSION: The strongest predictor of reporting typhoid fever was the current clinical condition of the patients, followed closely by SES. The incidence of typhoid fever in the low SES patients was almost the same as in the middle and high SES patients. Patients with low SES were more susceptible to contracting typhoid fever due to poor health status and facilities.


Asunto(s)
Fiebre Tifoidea , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Pakistán/epidemiología , Saneamiento , Clase Social , Fiebre Tifoidea/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA