RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Deregulated signal transduction pathways play a key role in development, progression and therapeutic resistance of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). The purpose of this study is to assess the downstream markers of two well-characterized pathways and to correlate them with clinical outcome. DESIGN: 670 patients with metastatic NSCLC were prospectively enrolled in a comprehensive biomarker profiling program at a single center from 2012 to 2016. Phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (p-ERK), and protein kinase B (p-AKT) was assessed by standardized immunohistochemistry. Product of scores for quantity and quality of staining were calculated (immunoreactive score, 0-9). Somatic mutations of Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog [KRAS], epithelial growth factor receptor [EGFR], v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B [BRAF] and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase [PIK3CA]) were detected by Sanger (2012-03/2015) and amplicon NGS (04/2015-02/2016). Patients enrolled during the first year (2012) were used as discovery cohort. Patients enrolled from 2013 to 02/2016 were used as validation cohort. Clinical data were retrieved from the electronic medical records and were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Using a discovery cohort, we identified an immunoreactive score of p-ERK ≥3 to be prognostically relevant. The validation cohort confirmed that higher levels of p-ERK correlated with worse overall survival (OS) and higher proportion of RAS mutations. Multivariate analysis including established risk factors such EGFR, ALK or ROS mutations and metastatic disease showed a trend of a detrimental effect of high p-ERK on OS (HR 1.23, CI 0.94-1.59, pâ¯=â¯0.131 for p-ERK immunoreactive score ≥3) and time to treatment failure after first-line therapy in the validation cohort. Phosphorylated AKT did not correlate with clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: While serving as a prognosticator in univariate analysis, highly phosphorylated ERK does not convey a significant prognostic effect for OS in the presence of other prognostic factors. Phosphorylated ERK indicates a higher activity of RAS in advanced NSCLC.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Animales , Biomarcadores , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Ratones , Mutación , Fosforilación , Pronóstico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/genética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Proteínas ras/genéticaRESUMEN
Mutated RAS onco-proteins are key drivers across many cancers. The distribution of somatic RAS mutations varies between cancer entities. Retrospective analyses have associated some RAS mutations with distinct clinical outcomes. However, the clinical impact of the full spectrum of RAS mutations in their disease contextuality remains to be defined. To improve upon this situation, we studied genomically and clinically annotated, prospectively recruited cohorts of patients with RAS-mutated metastatic lung cancer and colorectal cancer. Mutational spectra were compared with predictions derived from analyzing the mutagenic impact at the genome level for each entity. Interestingly, we found concordance of predicted signatures with those actually observed in our patients. Thus, composition of the functionally active RAS mutational subtypes is primarily determined by the mutagenic context. Most RAS mutations seemed dominant oncogenic drivers with entity-dependent clinical outcomes. RAS comutations were enriched in tumors harboring class 2/3 BRAF mutations, highlighting the functional dependency of some mutated BRAF isoforms on RAS. With our dataset, we established a probabilistic model for cross-entity comparison of the prognostic impact of specific RAS mutational subtypes. The resulting prognostic clusters showed largely consistent clinical categorizations in both entities. This suggests mutant subtype-specific functional properties leading to similar clinical effects. A notable exception is KRAS G12C, which imparted an adverse prognosis only in colorectal cancer. Our findings provide a framework for risk stratification of specific RAS mutations across several cancer entities, which is required to guide the analysis of clinical findings in patients treated with direct RAS inhibitors or agents targeting downstream pathways.