Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 161
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Gen Intern Med ; 39(6): 969-977, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38315409

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Menopausal quality of life (MenQoL) is a common concern that primary healthcare workers often encounter. Menopause has a significant impact on women's health, but studies examining its effect on the MenQoL of menopausal healthcare employees have produced conflicting results. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the quality of life related to menopausal status (pre-, peri-, or postmenopausal) in healthcare workers from various clinical settings in Kazakhstan. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 222 menopausal healthcare workers (physicians, nurses/midwives, administrative staff, and cleaners) were enrolled from hospitals affiliated with the University Medical Center (UMC) in Kazakhstan. MAIN MEASURES: The outcome variable was assessed using the Menopausal Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL), which evaluates MenQoL across four domains of menopausal symptoms: physical, psychological, vasomotor, and sexual. KEY RESULTS: The most frequently reported menopausal symptoms were physical ones, such as feeling tired or worn out (70.7%), followed by feeling a lack of energy (65.3%) and dry skin (64.1%). The postmenopause group had the highest mean MenQoL score in the vasomotor domain (mean 3.46 ± 1.84). There was a borderline statistical significance when comparing postmenopause and perimenopause groups in the physical domain. The pairwise comparison of mean sexual scores revealed that postmenopause women had the highest average score (3.3 ± 2.36) compared to both premenopause (mean 2.3 ± 1.82) and perimenopause (mean 2.22 ± 1.58) groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Menopausal status has influence on the MenQoL of healthcare workers. The study findings could have important implications for policymakers as they provide insight into the factors influencing the quality of life of menopausal healthcare employees. Creating a more menopause-friendly work environment may not only enhance the well-being of healthcare personnel but also improve their overall job satisfaction and performance.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Menopausia , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal de Salud/psicología , Menopausia/psicología , Menopausia/fisiología , Adulto , Kazajstán/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Qual Health Res ; : 10497323231216363, 2023 Dec 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38061388

RESUMEN

Little is known about the experiences of frontline professionals in Kazakhstan. Although studies of frontline workers have been conducted worldwide, it is imperative that caution should be exercised when extrapolating findings from disparate societies and generalizing them to Central Asian countries. As such, the purpose of this study was to explore and describe the firsthand experiences, perceptions, and knowledge gained from the experience of Kazakh frontline physicians and nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. An exploratory-descriptive qualitative (EDQ) study was conducted over the course of a year in COVID-19 hospitals in Kazakhstan, with physicians (n = 23) and nurses (n = 7). Each participant was interviewed three times between May 2021 and May 2022. Braun and Clarke's six-step method was used for the thematic analysis. Three overarching themes and subthemes were identified: (1) Longitudinal Journey ("Nobody knew, nobody understood, nobody was ready"; "It's just life"); (2) Facets of Professionalism ("In my lifetime this is something unique"; "Who else if not us"; "We survived the war and the enemy"); and (3) Facets of Resilience ("God's providence"; "A good word heals too"). In light of the lack of research that has previously been conducted in Kazakhstan, the results of this study offer important new insight into the experiences of medical professionals during the COVID-19 epidemic.

3.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(2)2023 Jan 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36837416

RESUMEN

Background and objectives: Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) have an increased risk of hospital-acquired infection (HAI). A diagnosis of cancer alone increases the risk of sepsis three-five-fold, which further increases the risk of nosocomial infection, subsequently deteriorates results, and leads to high mortality. In this study, we aimed to assess the mortality rate among hematologic oncologic patients with suspected infection who were subsequently admitted to the ICU and the predictive factors that are associated with high ICU mortality. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the hematological oncology critical care unit of a tertiary care hospital between November 2017 and February 2021. We analyzed anonymized medical records of hospitalized hematologic oncologic patients who were suspected or proven to have infection in the hematology-oncology department and were subsequently transferred to the ICU. Results: Both shorter hospitalization and shorter ICU stay length were observed in survivors [9.2 (7.7-10.4)] vs. non-survivors [10 (9.1-12.9), p = 0.004]. Sepsis had the highest hazard ratio (7.38) among all other factors, as patients with sepsis had higher mortality rates (98% among ICU non-survivors and 57% among ICU survivors) than those who had febrile neutropenia. Conclusions: The overall ICU mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies was 66%. Sepsis had the highest hazard ratio among all other predictive factors, as patients with sepsis had higher mortality rates than those who had febrile neutropenia. Chronic hepatitis (HBV and HCV) was significantly associated with higher ICU mortality.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Neutropenia Febril , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Sepsis , Humanos , Enfermedad Crítica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infección Hospitalaria/complicaciones , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Neutropenia Febril/complicaciones , Hospitales , Mortalidad Hospitalaria
4.
BMC Endocr Disord ; 22(1): 275, 2022 Nov 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36368961

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We aimed to explore descriptive epidemiology of T1 and T2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and to investigate demographic factors and comorbidities associated with all-cause mortality by aggregating and utilizing large-scale administrative healthcare data from the Unified National Electronic Health System (UNEHS) of Kazakhstan for 2014-2019 years period. METHODS: A total of 475,539 individuals were included in the analyses. The median years of follow-up for Type 1 DM patients accounted for 4.7 years and 4.5 years in Type 2 DM patients. We used Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test to calculate failure function and differences in survival by age, sex, ethnicity, and comorbidities with all-cause mortality for Type 1 and Type 2 DM. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to obtain crude and adjusted hazard ratios. RESULTS: Prevalence of Type 1 and Type 2 DM increased 1.7 times from 2014 to 2019. Mortality of Type 1 and Type 2 DM also increased 4 times and 6 times from 2014 to 2019, respectively. Male sex, older age and Kazakh ethnicity were associated with a higher risk of all-cause death compared to females, younger age and other nationalities than Kazakh in patients with Type 1 and Type 2 DM. Coronary artery disease, diabetic nephropathy, stroke, amputations and neoplasms were associated with a higher risk of all-cause death. CONCLUSION: The prevalence and mortality rate of Type 1 and Type 2 DM increased during the years 2014-2019 in Kazakhstan. Male sex, older age and Kazakh ethnicity were associated with a higher risk of all-cause death compared to females, younger age and other nationalities than Kazakh. Coronary artery disease, diabetic nephropathy, stroke, amputations and neoplasms were associated with a higher risk of all-cause death.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diabetes Mellitus , Nefropatías Diabéticas , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Kazajstán/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Electrónica , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología
5.
Radiat Environ Biophys ; 61(1): 17-28, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34821973

RESUMEN

The issue of radiation exposure as a potential cause of cerebrovascular disease raises many concerns. The aim of the present study was to investigate the epidemiology of stroke and transient ischemic attacks (TIA) along with the associated risk factors among the population of East Kazakhstan exposed to ionising radiation from the former Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site (SNTS) in comparison with the unexposed population of the same region. This 5-year retrospective cross-sectional study included the data on 10,970 patients, of whom the majority (62.3%) suffered from ischemic stroke, 11.7% had hemorrhagic stroke and the remaining 26.0% had TIA. At the moment when stroke/TIA happened, exposed patients were younger than the unexposed (mean age 63 years versus 64 years, p < 0.001) and showed higher rates of nearly all associated comorbidities, which commonly were more severe. Besides, exposed patients showed a higher risk of stroke lethality in contrast with the unexposed. The observed features might indicate that people residing in the vicinity of the SNTS are vulnerable to cerebrovascular disease and thus, this study contributes to timely recognition of this public health problem. In addition, a longitudinal study has to be envisaged to clarify whether there is any cause-effect relationship between exposure to radiation from the SNTS and the development of stroke or transient ischemic attacks.


Asunto(s)
Ataque Isquémico Transitorio , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/epidemiología , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/etiología , Kazajstán/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología
6.
Int J Health Plann Manage ; 37(2): 715-724, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34668585

RESUMEN

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a complex, chronic, multifactorial, and costly health problem representing 8% of total public health expenditures in Spain. The objective of this study was to analyse the prevalence and costs of Anxiety (AX) and Depression (DP) in the Spanish working population with DM. Data were obtained from the National Health Survey of Spain 2017. A multivariate analysis was conducted to predict the use of resources and absenteeism/presenteeism. Direct and indirect costs were calculated. The final population analysed contained 15,822 subjects (18-65 years old). DM prevalence was 4.8%, and AX-DP 10.6% (50.5% were men). Self-diagnosed health was rated as regular, poor or very poor in 89% of DM subjects with DP-AX. The average costs estimated were €24,643.41 for DM subjects with AX-DP and €20,059.53 for those with only DM. The total estimated 2017 economic impact of DM was 2.4% of Spanish gross domestic product (13% directly related to DP-AX). Indirect costs represented 72.7% of total DP-AX costs. Spanish society is paying a considerable price for the incidence of DP-AX levels with DM in the working population. This global challenge has important repercussions for individuals' quality of life, health systems, and countries' development and economic growth.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Calidad de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Estrés Financiero , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , España/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
7.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 58(2)2022 Feb 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35208577

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) has emerged as the most devastating syndemic of the 21st century, with worrisome and sustained consequences for the entire society. Despite the relative success of vaccination programs, the global threat of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is still present and further efforts are needed for its containment and control. Essential for its control and containment is getting closer to understanding the actual extent of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Material and Methods: We present a model based on the mortality data of Kazakhstan for the estimation of the underlying epidemic dynamic-with both the lag time from infection to death and the infection fatality rate. For the estimation of the actual number of infected individuals in Kazakhstan, we used both back-casting and capture-recapture methods. Results: Our results suggest that despite the increased testing capabilities in Kazakhstan, official case reporting undercounts the number of infections by at least 60%. Even though our count of deaths may be either over or underestimated, our methodology could be a more accurate approach for the following: the estimation of the actual magnitude of the pandemic; aiding the identification of different epidemiological values; and reducing data bias. Conclusions: For optimal epidemiological surveillance and control efforts, our study may lead to an increased awareness of the effect of COVID-19 in this region and globally, and aid in the implementation of more effective screening and diagnostic measures.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Kazajstán/epidemiología , Pandemias/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2
8.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 458, 2021 May 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34016043

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During the spike of COVID-19 pandemic in Kazakhstan (June-2020), multiple SARS-CoV-2 PCR-test negative pneumonia cases with higher mortality were reported by media. We aimed to study the epidemiologic characteristics of hospitalized PCR-test positive and negative patients with analysis of in-hospital and post-hospital mortality. We also compare the respiratory disease characteristics between 2019 and 2020. METHODS: The study population consist of 17,691 (March-July-2020) and 4600 (March-July-2019) hospitalized patients with respiratory diseases (including COVID-19). The incidence rate, case-fatality rate and survival analysis for overall mortality (in-hospital and post-hospital) were assessed. RESULTS: The incidence and mortality rates for respiratory diseases were 4-fold and 11-fold higher in 2020 compared to 2019 (877.5 vs 228.2 and 11.2 vs 1.2 per 100,000 respectively). The PCR-positive cases (compared to PCR-negative) had 2-fold higher risk of overall mortality. We observed 24% higher risk of death in males compared to females and in older patients compared to younger ones. Patients residing in rural areas had 66% higher risk of death compared to city residents and being treated in a provisional hospital was associated with 1.9-fold increased mortality compared to those who were treated in infectious disease hospitals. CONCLUSION: This is the first study from the Central Asia and Eurasia regions, evaluating the mortality of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive and PCR-negative respiratory system diseases during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic. We describe a higher mortality rate for PCR-test positive cases compared to PCR-test negative cases, for males compared to females, for elder patients compared to younger ones and for patients living in rural areas compared to city residents.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/mortalidad , Neumonía/diagnóstico , ARN Viral/metabolismo , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/virología , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Kazajstán/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Neumonía/mortalidad , Neumonía/virología , ARN Viral/análisis , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
9.
Bioethics ; 2019 Jan 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30681178

RESUMEN

Health-related data uses and data sharing have been in the spotlight for a while. Since the beginning of the big data era, massive data mining and its inherent possibilities have only increased the debate about what the limits are. Data governance is a relevant aspect addressed in ethics guidelines. In this context, the European project BRIDGE Health (BRidging Information and Data Generation for Evidence-based Health policy and research) strove to achieve a comprehensive, integrated and sustainable EU health-information system. One of the aims of the project was to evaluate the requirements to construct a data-linkage infrastructure for the secure management of health information. In a blueprint provided for this infrastructure, the topics ethics and the intimately related governance occupied a whole section, where the recent ethics guidelines by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) and the World Medical Association (WMA) were referenced. We explore what has changed in the latest versions of the ethics documents adopted by CIOMS and WMA regarding the management of health data and human tissues, the appropriateness of their application in new forms of research and infrastructures as the proposed in the BRIDGE Health project, and whether society should be so concerned about this topic, in the digital era of social exchange.

10.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 35(3): 176-180, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31006412

RESUMEN

Earlier activities on health technology assessment (HTA) started in Spain around 1984, with the creation of a National Advisory Board on HTA, and the development of national and regional HTA organizations in the early 1990s. In 2012, the Spanish Health Ministry established the Spanish Network for Health Technology Assessment of the National Health System (RedETS); funded at national level and including all public HTA organizations at national and regional levels. RedETSis focused on the assessment of nondrug health technologies to inform the revision (approval and funding or disinvestment) of the Benefit Portfolio of the Spanish NHS. In parallel with European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA), RedETS has been setting-up and sharing common procedures and methodological guidelines to ensure effective cooperation and mutual recognition of the scientific and technical production in HTA. The output of RedETS is fifty to sixty annual reports, including the production of full HTA reports, Clinical Practice Guidelines, methodological guidance reports, relative effectiveness assessments, tools to support shared decision making between patients and healthcare professionals, and monitoring studies. The HTA assessments requested by the Regional Health Authorities are the biggest component of the annual RedETS working plan. These assessment needs are identified according to a yearly process and prioritized by a Commission composed of representatives from all Spanish regions with the aid of the PRITEC tool. The objectives of this study are to report and update the normative and organizational state of HTA in Spain; describing noteworthy advances witnessed over the past 10 years, as well as discussing existing challenges.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Estatal/organización & administración , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica/organización & administración , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Objetivos Organizacionales , España , Medicina Estatal/normas , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica/normas
11.
Rheumatol Int ; 37(1): 75-84, 2017 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26497313

RESUMEN

Cardiac involvement (CI) is a known complication of SSc associated with increased mortality. Our objective was to describe a cohort of patients with SSc and CI and to assess the differences between cutaneous subsets regarding their presentation and survival. Three hundred and ninety-three Spanish patients from a single center, diagnosed with SSc, were retrospectively studied for evidence of CI using noninvasive and invasive tests from 1976 to 2011. Clinical, epidemiological, immunological and therapeutic features of patients with CI were compared to those without it and within the different cutaneous subsets of SSc. CI was present in 173 (44 %) patients. Mitral regurgitation (67 %), conduction alterations (45 %) and left ventricle diastolic dysfunction (40 %) were the most common findings. Pericardial involvement and heart failure were more frequent in diffuse SSc (dcSSc) than in limited or sine scleroderma SSc. CI accounted for 20 % of deaths, and it was an independent mortality risk factor (HR 2.1, P = 0.02), but once CI was established, classical dcSSc mortality risk factors determined mortality. Patients with dcSSc developed CI faster than limited (HR 1.9, P = 0.003) or sine SSc patients (HR 2.5, P = 0.002), specially during the first year after SSc onset. We found statistically significant differences between the 3 SSc subsets in the presentation of pericardial involvement and heart failure. CI increased the mortality and appeared at a higher rate, especially during the first year after SSc onset. Screening for heart involvement should be performed at diagnosis and during follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatías/etiología , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Adulto , Cardiomiopatías/mortalidad , Cardiomiopatías/fisiopatología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Angioscopía Microscópica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Esclerodermia Sistémica/mortalidad , Esclerodermia Sistémica/fisiopatología , España , Tasa de Supervivencia
12.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 33(4): 504-520, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29019295

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Tackling ethical dilemmas faced by reimbursement decision makers requires deeper understanding of values on which health technology assessment (HTA) agencies are founded and how trade-offs are made. This was explored in this study including the case of rare disease. METHODS: Representatives from eight HTA explored values on which institutions are founded using a narrative approach and reflective multicriteria (developed from EVIDEM, criteria derived from ethical imperatives of health care). Trade-offs between criteria and the impact of incorporating defined priorities (including for rare diseases) were explored through a quantitative values elicitation exercise. RESULTS: Participants reported a diversity of substantive and procedural values with a common emphasis on scientific excellence, stakeholder involvement, independence, and transparency. Examining the ethical imperatives behind EVIDEM criteria was found to be useful to further explore substantive values. Most criteria were deemed to reflect institutions' values, while 70 percent of the criteria were reported by at least half of participants to be considered formally by their institutions. The quantitative values elicitation highlighted the difficulty to balance imperatives of "alleviating or preventing patient suffering," "serving the whole population equitably," "upholding healthcare system sustainability," and "making decisions informed by evidence and context" but may help share the ethical reasoning behind decisions. Incorporating "Priorities" (including for rare diseases) helped reveal trade-offs from other criteria and their underlying ethical imperatives. CONCLUSIONS: Reflective multicriteria are useful to explore substantive values of HTAs, reflect how these values and their ethical underpinnings can be operationalized into criteria, and explore the ethical reasoning at the heart of the healthcare debate.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Enfermedades Raras/terapia , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica/ética , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica/organización & administración , Eficiencia Organizacional , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/ética , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/normas , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/ética , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/normas , Seguridad del Paciente , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Justicia Social/ética , Justicia Social/normas , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica/normas
14.
Eur J Public Health ; 26(5): 890-892, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27615735

RESUMEN

The objective was to evaluate the effect of influenza vaccine on all-cause mortality in a cohort of patients with heart failure followed up in primary care centres of the Community of Madrid, Spain, during the period 2006-10. Results of the Cox proportional-hazard model were adjusted for age and sex and, after 1:1 nearest neighbour matching, for propensity score. The analysis was further stratified by season. Having received annual influenza vaccine was associated with a decreased risk of death during the influenza season (hazard ratio = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.41-0.84), but no protective effect was observed before or after the influenza season.


Asunto(s)
Causas de Muerte , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Vacunas contra la Influenza/uso terapéutico , Gripe Humana/complicaciones , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Estaciones del Año , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , España
15.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 28(3): 275-80, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26993990

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The measurement of patient satisfaction is considered an essential outcome indicator to evaluate health care quality. Patient satisfaction is considered a multi-dimensional construct, which would include a variety of domains. Although a large number of studies have proposed scales to measure patient satisfaction, there is a lack of psychometric information on them. This study aims to describe the psychometric properties of the Primary Care Satisfaction Scale (PCSS) of the EUprimecare project. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey of patient satisfaction with primary care was carried out by telephone interview. SETTING: Primary care services of Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Lithuania, Italy and Spain. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3020 adult patients aged 18-65 years old attending primary care services. METHOD: Classic psychometric properties were analysed and Rasch analysis was used to assess the following measurement properties: fit to the Rasch model; uni-dimensionality; reliability; differential item functioning (DIF) by gender, age, civil status, area of residency and country; local independency; adequacy of response scale; and scale targeting. RESULTS: To achieve good fit to the Rasch model, the original response scales of three items (1, 2 and 6) were rescored and Item 3 (waiting time in the room) was removed. The scale was uni-dimensional and Person Separation Index was 0.79, indicating a good reliability. All items were free from bias. PCSS linear measure displayed satisfactory convergent validity with overall satisfaction with primary care. CONCLUSIONS: PCSS, as a reliable and valid scale, could be used to measure patient satisfaction in primary care in Europe.


Asunto(s)
Satisfacción del Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Citas y Horarios , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Estudios Transversales , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Psicometría , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Características de la Residencia , Factores Sexuales , Listas de Espera , Adulto Joven
16.
Cir Esp ; 94(3): 151-8, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26615736

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The results previously obtained in Spain in the study of the relationship between surgical caseload and in-hospital mortality are inconclusive. The aim of this study is to evaluate the volume-outcome association in Spain in the setting of digestive oncological surgery. METHODS: An analytical, cross-sectional study was conducted with data from patients who underwent surgical procedures with curative intent of esophageal, gastric, colorectal and pancreatic neoplasms between 2006-2009 with data from the Spanish MBDS. In-hospital mortality was used as outcome variable. Control variables were patient, health care and hospital characteristics. Exposure variable was the number of interventions for each disease, dividing the hospitals in 3 categories: high volume (HV), mid volume (MV) and low volume (LV) according to the number of procedures. RESULTS: An inverse, statistically significant relationship between procedure volume and in-hospital mortality was observed for both volume categories in both gastric (LV: OR=1,50 [IC 95%: 1,28-1,76]; MV: OR=1,49 (IC 95%: 1,28-1,74)) and colorectal (LV: OR=1,44 [IC 95%: 1,33-1,55]; MV: OR=1,24 [IC 95%: 1,15-1,33]) cancer surgery. In pancreatic procedures, this difference was only statistically significant between LV and HV categories (LV: OR=1,89 [IC 95%: 1,29-2,75]; MV: OR=1,21 [IC 95%: 0,82-1,79]). Esophageal surgery also showed an inverse relationship, which was not statistically significant (LV: OR=1,89 [IC 95%: 0,98-3,64]; MV: OR=1,05 [IC 95%: 0,50-2,21]). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest the existence in Spain of an inverse relationship between caseload and in-hospital mortality in digestive oncological surgery for the procedures analyzed.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Hospitales , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Neoplasias del Recto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Programa de VERF , España , Tasa de Supervivencia
17.
Fam Pract ; 32(1): 69-74, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25411423

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to measure clinical quality by doing an audit of clinical records and to compare the performance based on clinical quality indicators (CQI) for hypertension and type 2 diabetes across seven European countries: Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania and Spain. METHODS: Two common chronic conditions in primary care (PC), hypertension and type 2 diabetes, were selected for audit. The assessment of CQI started with a literature review of different databases: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, World Health Organization, European Commission European Community Health Indicators, US National Library of Medicine. Data were collected from clinical records. RESULTS: Although it was agreed to obtain the clinical indicators in a similar way from each country, the specific data collection process in every country varied greatly, due to different traditions in collecting and keeping the patients' data, as well as differences in regulation regarding access to clinical information. Also, there was a huge variability across countries in the level of compliance with the indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of clinical performance in PC by audit is methodologically challenging: different databases provide different information, indicators of quality of care have insufficient scientific proof and there are country-specific regulations. There are large differences not only in quality of health care across Europe but also in how it is measured.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Hipertensión/terapia , Auditoría Médica , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Enfermedad Crónica , Bases de Datos Factuales , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Aten Primaria ; 47(7): 438-45, 2015.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25487462

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe survival of patients with chronic heart failure (HF) followed up in primary care (PC) and analyse the effect of sex, age, clinical and health services factors, and income levels on survival. DESIGN: Longitudinal observational study of a retrospective cohort of patients with information extracted from electronic medical records. SETTING: PC Area 7 of the Community of Madrid. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 24 year and older with at least one visit to PC in 2006. PRINCIPAL MEASUREMENT: Incident cases of HF followed up from 2006 to 2010 or until death. Survival analysis with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard multivariate regression. RESULTS: A total of 3,061 cases were identified in a cohort of 227,984 patients. The survival rate was 65% at 5 years, with 519 patients dying with a median survival of 49 months. Factors associated with increased risk of mortality were, age (HR=1.04, 1.03-1.05), and having a diagnosis of ischemic heart disease (HR=1.45, 1.15- 1.78), or diabetes (HR=1.52, 1.17-1.95). Factors with a significant protective effect were: female sex (HR=0.72, 0.59-0.86), non-pensioner (HR=0.43, 0.23-0.84), having received the influenza vaccine annually (HR=0.01, 0.00-0.06), prescribed lipid-lowering drugs (HR=0.78, 0.61-0.99) or ACE inhibitors (HR=0.73, 0.60-0.88), and blood tests having been requested (HR=0.97, 0.95-1.00), X-rays (HR=0.81, 0.74-0.88), or electrocardiograms (HR=0.90, 0.81-0.99) in PC. CONCLUSIONS: Data from patients with HF followed up in PC indicate that their survival is better than that obtained in other countries, supporting the argument of a better evolution of HF in Mediterranean countries.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Atención Primaria de Salud , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Tasa de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA