Phytoremediation of chloride from marine dredged sediments: A new model based on a natural vegetation recolonization.

Phytoremediation is a type of bioremediation process that involves the use of plants to remove or degrade contaminants from soil, water, or air. In most of the observed phytoremediation models, plants are introduced and planted on a polluted site to take up, absorb, or transform contaminants. This study aims to explore a new mixed phytoremediation approach that involves natural recolonization of a contaminated substrate, by identifying the species growing naturally, their bioaccumulation capacity, and by modeling annual mowing cycles of their aerial parts. This approach aims to evaluate the phytoremediation potential of such a model. Both natural and human interventions are involved in this approach, which is referred to as a mixed phytoremediation process. The study focuses on chloride phytoremediation from a chloride-rich and regulated substrate that is marine dredged sediments abandoned for 12 years and recolonized for 4 years. The sediments are colonized by a Suaeda vera dominated vegetation and possess heterogeneity in lixiviate chloride and conductivity. The study found that despite Suaeda vera is the well adapted species for this environment, it is not an effective species for phytoremediation as it has low bioaccumulation and translocation rates (9.3 and 2.6 respectively), and disturbs chloride leaching below in the substrate. Other identified species, such as Salicornia sp., Suaeda maritima, and Halimione portulacoides, have better phytoaccumulation (respectively 39.8, 40.1, 34.8) and translocation rates (respectively 7.0, 4.5, 5.6) and can successfully remediate the sediment in 2-9 years. The following species have been found to bioaccumulate chloride in aboveground biomass at the following rates: Salicornia sp. (181 g/kg DW), Suaeda maritima (160 g/kg DW), Sarcocornia perennis (150 g/kg DW), Halimione portulacoides (111 g/kg DW) and Suaeda vera (40 g/kg DW).

Genetic-environment interactions and climatic variables effect on bean physical characteristics and chemical composition of Coffea arabica.

BACKGROUND: The effects of the environment and genotype in the coffee bean chemical composition were studied using nine trials covering an altitudinal gradient [600-1100 m above sea level (a.s.l.)] with three genotypes of Coffea arabica in the northwest mountainous region of Vietnam. The impacts of the climatic conditions on bean physical characteristics and chemical composition were assessed. RESULTS: We showed that the environment had a significant effect on the bean density and on all bean chemical compounds. The environment effect was stronger than the genotype and genotype-environment interaction effects for cafestol, kahweol, arachidic (C20:0), behenic acid (C22:0), 2,3-butanediol, 2-methyl-2-buten-1-ol, benzaldehyde, benzene ethanol, butyrolactone, decane, dodecane, ethanol, pentanoic acid, and phenylacetaldehyde bean content. A 2 °C increase in temperature had more influence on bean chemical compounds than a 100 mm increase in soil water content. Temperature was positively correlated with lipids and volatile compounds. With an innovative method using iterative moving averages, we showed that correlation of temperature, vapour pressure deficit (VPD) and rainfall with lipids and volatiles was higher between the 10th and 20th weeks after flowering highlighting this period as crucial for the synthesis of these chemicals. Genotype specific responses were evidenced and could be considered in future breeding programmes to maintain coffee beverage quality in the midst of climate change. CONCLUSION: This first study of the effect of the genotype-environment interactions on chemical compounds enhances our understanding of the sensitivity of coffee quality to genotype environment interactions during bean development. This work addresses the growing concern of the effect of climate change on speciality crops and more specifically coffee. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Navigating the science policy interface: a co-created mind-map to support early career research contributions to policy-relevant evidence.

The interface between science and policy is a complex space, in theory and practice, that sees the interaction of various actors and perspectives coming together to enable policy-relevant evidence to support decision-making. Early Career Researchers (ECRs) are increasingly interested in working at the science-policy interface to support evidence-informed policy, with the number of opportunities to do so increasing at national and international levels. However, there are still many challenges limiting ECRs participation, not least how such a complex space can be accessed and navigated. While recommendations for engaging at the science-policy interface already exist, a practical 'map' of the science-policy interface landscape which would allow for ECR participation in evidence co-production and synthesis in science-policy is missing. With the purpose of facilitating the engagement of ECRs producing biodiversity and ecosystem services policy-relevant evidence at the interface between science and policy, the authors have co-created a 'mind-map'-a tool to review the landscape of and leverage access to the science-policy interface. This tool was developed through reviewing published literature, collating personal experiences of the ECR authors, and validating against wider peer perspectives in an ECR workshop during the 7th Plenary of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). This co-created tool sees ECR engagement in (co-)producing evidence at the science-policy interface as an interaction of three main factors: the environment of the ECR, which mediates their acts of engagement at the science-policy interface leading to outcomes that will ultimately have a reciprocal impact on the ECR's environment.